I am trying to append a character to a string... that works fine unfortunately I can't free the mem of the string afterwards which causes that the string gets longer and longer.... as it reads a file every linie will be added to the string which obviously shouldn't happen
char* append_char(char* string, char character)
{
int length = strlen(string);
string[length] = character;
string[length+1] = '\0';
return string;
}
I allocated mem for string like
char *read_string = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*500);
call the function append_char(read_string,buffer[0]); and free it after the whole string is build free(read_string);
I presume that once I call the append_char() , the mem allocation is going to be changed, which cause that I can't get hold of it.
Edited:
here is the function which uses the append_char()
char *read_log_file_row(char *result,int t)
{
filepath ="//home/,,,,,/mmm.txt";
int max = sizeof(char)*2;
char buffer[max];
char *return_fgets;
char *read_string = malloc(sizeof(char)*500);
file_pointer = fopen(filepath,"r");
if(file_pointer == NULL)
{
printf("Didn't work....");
return NULL;
}
int i = 0;
while(i<=t)
{
while(return_fgets = (fgets(buffer, max, file_pointer)))
{
if(buffer[0] == '\n')
{
++i;
break;
}
if(i==t)
{
append_char(read_string,buffer[0]);
}
}
if(return_fgets == NULL)
{
free(read_string);
return NULL;
/* return "\0";*/
}
if(buffer[0] != '\n')
append_char(read_string,buffer[0]);
}
fclose(file_pointer);
strcpy(result,read_string);
free(read_string);
return result;
}
Dont cast the return value of malloc() in C.
Make sure you initialize read_string to an empty string before you try to append to it, by setting read_string[0] = '\0';.
Make sure you track the current length, so you don't try to build a string that won't fit in the buffer. 500 chars allocated means max string length is 499 characters.
Not sure what you expect should happen when you do free(read_string). It sounds (from your comment to #Steve Jessop's answer) that you do something like this:
char *read_string = malloc(500);
read_string[0] = '\0'; /* Let's assume you do this. */
append_char(read_string, 'a'); /* Or whatever, many of these. */
free(read_string);
print("%c\n", *read_string); /* This invokes UNDEFINED BEHAVIOR. */
This might print an a, but that proves nothing since by doing this (accessing memory that has been free():d) your program is invoking undefined behavior, which means that anything could happen. You cannot draw conclusions from this, since the "test" is not valid. You can't free memory and then access it. If you do it, and get some "reasonable"/"correct" result, you still cannot say that the free():ing "didn't work".
No, the memory allocation is not changed in any way by append_char. All it does is change the contents of the allocation -- by moving the nul terminator one byte along, you now care about the contents of one more of your 500 bytes than you did before.
If the string gets longer than 500 bytes (including terminator), then you have undefined behavior. If you call strlen on something that isn't a nul-terminated string, for example if you pass it a pointer to uninitialized memory straight from malloc, then you have undefined behavior.
Undefined behavior is bad[*]: feel free to read up on it, but "X has undefined behavior" is in effect a way of saying "you must not do X".
[*] To be precise: it's not guaranteed not to be bad...
Have you ever initialized the string? Try *read_string=0 after allocating it. Or use calloc. Also, have your string grown beyond the allocated memory?
Related
I'm trying to implement a function that concatenate two strings, but I keep getting the same error.
"pointer being realloc'd was not allocated"
When I compiled the same code on a windows machine it worked, is it something that I'm missing?
The code below is basically what I'm trying to do.
main:
int main() {
int length = 4096;
char *string = malloc(length * sizeof(char));
createString(string, length);
realloc(string, 30);
return 0;
}
createString:
void createString(char * string, int length) {
char *copyAdress = string;
char *temp ="";
int counter2 = 0;
fflush(stdin);
fgets(string, length,stdin);
while(*string != EOF && *string != *temp ) {
string++;
counter++;
}
string = copyAdress;
realloc(string, (counter)*sizeof(char));
}
Thanks!
Edit:
I want createString to change the size of string to the length of the string that I get with fgets, while having the same address as the string that I sent in, so I can allocate more memory to it later when I want to add another string to it.
There are several issues:
realloc(string, (counter)*sizeof(char)); is wrong, you need string = realloc(string, (counter)*sizeof(char)); because realloc may return a different address.
Calling createString(string, length); won't modify string
If you want a more accurate answer you need to tell us what exactly createString is supposed to do. In your code there is no attempt to concatenate two strings.
Let's work through this in order of execution.
fflush(stdin); is undefined behaviour. If you really need to clear everything in the stdin you have to find another way (a loop for example). There are compilers/systems with a defined implementation but I would not count on it.
string++; is superflous as you overwrite string after the loop.
realloc(string, (counter)*sizeof(char));
should be
char *temp = realloc(string, (counter)*sizeof(char));
if (temp != NULL)
string = temp;
This way you get the pointer where your new string is located, but I suggest you read the refecerence for realloc. In essence you do not know if it has been moved and the old address might be invalid from that point on. So dereferencing it is also undefined behaviour.
After this you would have to return the new address of string or pass the address of the pointer to your function.
The same problem repeats with the second realloc. You only got to know your first call was wrong, because the second call noticed that you do not have valid data in what you thought would be your string.
In regards to your comment: It is not possible to use realloc and to be sure that the reallocated memory is in the same place as before.
If you realloc some memory, the pointer pointing to the original memory becomes invalid (unless realloc failed and returned NULL). So calling realloc twice on the same pointer should indeed not work (if it didn't return NULL the first time).
See the answers from others about what you do wrong. However, the eror message means that on MacOS, the realloc in createString deallocated the orignal string and allocated a new one, and now your realloc in main tries to realloc a pointer that is no longer valid (allocated). On Windows, the memory was not deallocated in createString and so the second call of realloc (in main) is given a valid pointer.
In the code below, I hope you can see that I have a char* variable and that I want to read in a string from a file. I then want to pass this string back from the function. I'm rather confused by pointers so I'm not too sure what I'm supposed to do really.
The purpose of this is to then pass the array to another function to be searched for a name.
Unfortunately the program crashes as a result and I've no idea why.
char* ObtainName(FILE *fp)
{
char* temp;
int i = 0;
temp = fgetc(fp);
while(temp != '\n')
{
temp = fgetc(fp);
i++;
}
printf("%s", temp);
return temp;
}
Any help would be vastly appreciated.
fgetc returns an int, not a char*. This int is a character from the stream, or EOF if you reach the end of the file.
You're implicitly casting the int to a char*, i.e., interpreting it as an address (turn your warnings on.) When you call printf it reads that address and continues to read a character at a time looking for the null terminator which ends the string, but that address is almost certainly invalid. This is undefined behavior.
I've taken some liberties with what you wanted to accomplish. Rather that deal with pointers, you can just use a fixed sized array as long as you can set a maximum length. I've also included several checks so that you don't run off the end of the buffer or the end of the file. Also important is to make sure that you have a null termination '\0' at the end of the string.
#define MAX_LEN 100
char* ObtainName(FILE *fp)
{
static char temp[MAX_LEN];
int i = 0;
while(i < MAX_LEN-1)
{
if (feof(fp))
{
break;
}
temp[i] = fgetc(fp);
if (temp[i] == '\n')
{
break;
}
i++;
}
temp[i] = '\0';
printf("%s", temp);
return temp;
}
So, there are several problems here:
You're not setting aside any storage for the string contents;
You're not storing the string contents correctly;
You're attempting to read memory that doesn't belong to you;
The way you're attempting to return the string is going to give you heartburn.
1. You're not setting aside storage for the string contents
The line
char *temp;
declares temp as a pointer to char; its value will be the address of a single character value. Since it's declared at local scope without the static keyword, its initial value will be indeterminate, and that value may not correspond to a valid memory address.
It does not set aside any storage for the string contents read from fp; that would have to be done as a separate step, which I'll get to below.
2. You're not storing the string contents correctly
The line
temp = fgetc(fp);
reads the next character from fp and assigns it to temp. First of all, this means you're only storing the last character read from the stream, not the whole string. Secondly, and more importantly, you're assigning the result of fgetc() (which returns a value of type int) to an object of type char * (which is treated as an address). You're basically saying "I want to treat the letter 'a' as an address into memory." This brings us to...
3. You're attempting to read memory that doesn't belong to you
In the line
printf("%s", temp);
you're attempting to print out the string beginning at the address stored in temp. Since the last thing you wrote to temp was most likely a character whose value is < 127, you're telling printf to start at a very low and most likely not accessible address, hence the crash.
4. The way you're attempting to return the string is guaranteed to give you heartburn
Since you've defined the function to return a char *, you're going to need to do one of the following:
Allocate memory dynamically to store the string contents, and then pass the responsibility of freeing that memory on to the function calling this one;
Declare an array with the static keyword so that the array doesn't "go away" after the function exits; however, this approach has serious drawbacks;
Change the function definition;
Allocate memory dynamically
You could use dynamic memory allocation routines to set aside a region of storage for the string contents, like so:
char *temp = malloc( MAX_STRING_LENGTH * sizeof *temp );
or
char *temp = calloc( MAX_STRING_LENGTH, sizeof *temp );
and then return temp as you've written.
Both malloc and calloc set aside the number of bytes you specify; calloc will initialize all those bytes to 0, which takes a little more time, but can save your bacon, especially when dealing with text.
The problem is that somebody has to deallocate this memory when its no longer needed; since you return the pointer, whoever calls this function now has the responsibility to call free() when it's done with that string, something like:
void Caller( FILE *fp )
{
...
char *name = ObtainName( fo );
...
free( name );
...
}
This spreads the responsibility for memory management around the program, increasing the chances that somebody will forget to release that memory, leading to memory leaks. Ideally, you'd like to have the same function that allocates the memory free it.
Use a static array
You could declare temp as an array of char and use the static keyword:
static char temp[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
This will set aside MAX_STRING_SIZE characters in the array when the program starts up, and it will be preserved between calls to ObtainName. No need to call free when you're done.
The problem with this approach is that by creating a static buffer, the code is not re-entrant; if ObtainName called another function which in turn called ObtainName again, that new call will clobber whatever was in the buffer before.
Why not just declare temp as
char temp[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
without the static keyword? The problem is that when ObtainName exits, the temp array ceases to exist (or rather, the memory it was using is available for someone else to use). That pointer you return is no longer valid, and the contents of the array may be overwritten before you can access it again.
Change the function definition
Ideally, you'd like for ObtainName to not have to worry about the memory it has to write to. The best way to achieve that is for the caller to pass target buffer as a parameter, along with the buffer's size:
int ObtainName( FILE *fp, char *buffer, size_t bufferSize )
{
...
}
This way, ObtainName writes data into the location that the caller specifies (useful if you want to obtain multiple names for different purposes). The function will return an integer value, which can be a simple success or failure, or an error code indicating why the function failed, etc.
Note that if you're reading text, you don't have to read character by character; you can use functions like fgets() or fscanf() to read an entire string at a time.
Use fscanf if you want to read whitespace-delimited strings (i.e., if the input file contains "This is a test", fscanf( fp, "%s", temp); will only read "This"). If you want to read an entire line (delimited by a newline character), use fgets().
Assuming you want to read an individual string at a time, you'd use something like the following (assumes C99):
#define FMT_SIZE 20
...
int ObtainName( FILE *fp, char *buffer, size_t bufsize )
{
int result = 1; // assume success
int scanfResult = 0;
char fmt[FMT_SIZE];
sprintf( fmt, "%%%zus", bufsize - 1 );
scanfResult = fscanf( fp, fmt, buffer );
if ( scanfResult == EOF )
{
// hit end-of-file before reading any text
result = 0;
}
else if ( scanfResult == 0 )
{
// did not read anything from input stream
result = 0;
}
else
{
result = 1;
}
return result;
}
So what's this noise
char fmt[FMT_SIZE];
sprintf( fmt, "%%%zus", bufsize - 1 );
about? There is a very nasty security hole in fscanf() when you use the %s or %[ conversion specifiers without a maximum length specifier. The %s conversion specifier tells fscanf to read characters until it sees a whitespace character; if there are more non-whitespace characters in the stream than the buffer is sized to hold, fscanf will store those extra characters past the end of the buffer, clobbering whatever memory is following it. This is a common malware exploit. So we want to specify a maximum length for the input; for example, %20s says to read no more than 20 characters from the stream and store them to the buffer.
Unfortunately, since the buffer length is passed in as an argument, we can't write something like %20s, and fscanf doesn't give us a way to specify the length as an argument the way fprintf does. So we have to create a separate format string, which we store in fmt. If the input buffer length is 10, then the format string will be %10s. If the input buffer length is 1000, then the format string will be %1000s.
The following code expands on that in your question, and returns the string in allocated storage:
char* ObtainName(FILE *fp)
{
int temp;
int i = 1;
char *string = malloc(i);
if(NULL == string)
{
fprintf(stderr, "malloc() failed\n");
goto CLEANUP;
}
*string = '\0';
temp = fgetc(fp);
while(temp != '\n')
{
char *newMem;
++i;
newMem=realloc(string, i);
if(NULL==newMem)
{
fprintf(stderr, "realloc() failed.\n");
goto CLEANUP;
}
string=newMem;
string[i-1] = temp;
string[i] = '\0';
temp = fgetc(fp);
}
CLEANUP:
printf("%s", string);
return(string);
}
Take care to 'free()' the string returned by this function, or a memory leak will occur.
I have been stuck here for an hour. Dont know why i get segmentation fault when file pointer is not null.
anyone plz help me.
int load(char* dictionary){
char* word = "";
FILE* fp=fopen(dictionary,"r");
if ( fp!= NULL )
{
while (fscanf(fp,"%s",word) != EOF) // **getting segmentation fault**
{
hash_put(word);
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
fclose(fp);
return true;}
What else do you expect? Writing to the read only memory of the string literal is not allowed.
You should allocate some read/write memory... e.g malloc (don't forget to free at the end), or on the stack char data[1024];
The problem is not with your file pointer; the problem is your word variable.
You've set word to point to a string literal (""), which only has room for the 0 terminator. Attempting to modify the contents of a string literal invokes undefined behavior. This, plus the fact that you're going to be storing stuff past the end of the literal, is why your code is crashing.
Arrays do not grow to accomodate additional data. You have to allocate sufficient memory to store your data before you attempt to read it.
#define WORD_SIZE ... // large enough to hold the largest word in your file
char word[WORD_SIZE];
...
while ( fgets( word, sizeof word, fp ) )
{
// do stuff with word
}
Why not try giving word some memory to store that data?
i.e. an array - try
char data[100];
This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Pointer to local variable
Can a local variable's memory be accessed outside its scope?
gcc 4.4.4 c89
In main I call a function to pass a line of text to a function. I want to perform some operation on it. However, that would mean that line is of no use. So in my get_string function I copy the contents and return the result. The only problem, is that the memory to that result would be lost and pointing to something unexpected.
I am just wondering how can I pass the result back, without and still keep the ordinal line of data?
Many thanks for any advice,
code snippet from main:
if(fgets(line_data, (size_t)STRING_SIZE, fp) == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Text error reading file line number [ %d ]\n", i);
}
if(get_string(line_data) != NULL) {
if(strcmp(get_string(line_data), "END") == 0)
break;
}
else {
fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Cannot get name of student at line [ %d ]\n", i);
}
/* Fill student info */
strncpy(stud[i].name, line_data, (size_t)STRING_SIZE);
Call this function
char* get_string(char *line_data)
{
char *quote = NULL;
char result[STRING_SIZE] = {0};
strncpy(result, line_data, (size_t)STRING_SIZE);
/* Find last occurance */
if((quote = strrchr(result, '"')) == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr, "Text file incorrectly formatted for this student\n");
return NULL;
}
/* Insert nul in place of the quote */
*quote = '\0';
/* Overwite the first quote by shifting 1 place */
memmove(result - 1, result, strlen(result) + 1);
return result;
}
Just return strdup(result).
It will allocate and copy your string.
However, you have to free the result after using it in the outer function.
You also could take a buffer in input (with its size), and fill it with what you want.
For your direct question - either use malloc(3) and tell the user of the function to de-allocate the return pointer (this is sort of prone to memory leaks since it's so easy to ignore return value in C), or provide the second parameter as a receive buffer:
char* get_string( const char* line_data, char* receive_buf, size_t buf_size );
The third parameter is for the function to know how large the receive buffer is.
Now to your code - the line memmove(result - 1, result, strlen(result) + 1); corrupts your stack.
You want to malloc the memory for result:
char *result; result = malloc(STRING_SIZE);
As you have it, the memory for result exists on the stack and thus only during the time that execution is inside get_string()
You'll also need to free result before returning NULL to prevent a memory leak.
As a rule of thumb, you should never return a pointer to a function's local variable. You know why: once a function returns, the memory allocated for its variables can be reused for something else. The idea to return a pointer to the result buffer is inherently bad.
You should think whether you really need to keep a copy of the quoted string. What if you tested the "END" string before calling get_string? If you need to quote and output data later, it is done easily. Say:
printf("\"%s\"", student_record);
So get_string could actually work in the buffer in place and return the error code (0 for success). Since you know the final result is a smaller nul terminated string, you wouldn't even need a length parameter.
int get_string(char* student_record);
If you really need to keep a copy of the quoted string, then you need to pass another buffer. I'd still return an int to indicate success (0) or failure (say -1).
int get_string( const char* line_data, char* student_record, size_t buf_size );
I personally prefer letting the caller allocate its own buffer. It leaves it a chance to use a fixed length buffer (simpler memory management). Ex:
char student_record[512];
...
if (!get_string(student_record)) {
// error
}
I am getting "Bus Error" trying to read stdin into a char* variable.
I just want to read whole stuff coming over stdin and put it first into a variable, then continue working on the variable.
My Code is as follows:
char* content;
char* c;
while( scanf( "%c", c)) {
strcat( content, c);
}
fprintf( stdout, "Size: %d", strlen( content));
But somehow I always get "Bus error" returned by calling cat test.txt | myapp, where myapp is the compiled code above.
My question is how do i read stdin until EOF into a variable? As you see in the code, I just want to print the size of input coming over stdin, in this case it should be equal to the size of the file test.txt.
I thought just using scanf would be enough, maybe buffered way to read stdin?
First, you're passing uninitialized pointers, which means scanf and strcat will write memory you don't own. Second, strcat expects two null-terminated strings, while c is just a character. This will again cause it to read memory you don't own. You don't need scanf, because you're not doing any real processing. Finally, reading one character at a time is needlessly slow. Here's the beginning of a solution, using a resizable buffer for the final string, and a fixed buffer for the fgets call
#define BUF_SIZE 1024
char buffer[BUF_SIZE];
size_t contentSize = 1; // includes NULL
/* Preallocate space. We could just allocate one char here,
but that wouldn't be efficient. */
char *content = malloc(sizeof(char) * BUF_SIZE);
if(content == NULL)
{
perror("Failed to allocate content");
exit(1);
}
content[0] = '\0'; // make null-terminated
while(fgets(buffer, BUF_SIZE, stdin))
{
char *old = content;
contentSize += strlen(buffer);
content = realloc(content, contentSize);
if(content == NULL)
{
perror("Failed to reallocate content");
free(old);
exit(2);
}
strcat(content, buffer);
}
if(ferror(stdin))
{
free(content);
perror("Error reading from stdin.");
exit(3);
}
EDIT: As Wolfer alluded to, a NULL in your input will cause the string to be terminated prematurely when using fgets. getline is a better choice if available, since it handles memory allocation and does not have issues with NUL input.
Since you don't care about the actual content, why bother building a string? I'd also use getchar():
int c;
size_t s = 0;
while ((c = getchar()) != EOF)
{
s++;
}
printf("Size: %z\n", s);
This code will correctly handle cases where your file has '\0' characters in it.
Your problem is that you've never allocated c and content, so they're not pointing anywhere defined -- they're likely pointing to some unallocated memory, or something that doesn't exist at all. And then you're putting data into them. You need to allocate them first. (That's what a bus error typically means; you've tried to do a memory access that's not valid.)
(Alternately, since c is always holding just a single character, you can declare it as char c and pass &c to scanf. No need to declare a string of characters when one will do.)
Once you do that, you'll run into the issue of making sure that content is long enough to hold all the input. Either you need to have a guess of how much input you expect and allocate it at least that long (and then error out if you exceed that), or you need a strategy to reallocate it in a larger size if it's not long enough.
Oh, and you'll also run into the problem that strcat expects a string, not a single character. Even if you leave c as a char*, the scanf call doesn't make it a string. A single-character string is (in memory) a character followed by a null character to indicate the end of the string. scanf, when scanning for a single character, isn't going to put in the null character after it. As a result, strcpy isn't going to know where the end of the string is, and will go wandering off through memory looking for the null character.
The problem here is that you are referencing a pointer variable that no memory allocated via malloc, hence the results would be undefined, and not alone that, by using strcat on a undefined pointer that could be pointing to anything, you ended up with a bus error!
This would be the fixed code required....
char* content = malloc (100 * sizeof(char));
char c;
if (content != NULL){
content[0] = '\0'; // Thanks David!
while ((c = getchar()) != EOF)
{
if (strlen(content) < 100){
strcat(content, c);
content[strlen(content)-1] = '\0';
}
}
}
/* When done with the variable */
free(content);
The code highlights the programmer's responsibility to manage the memory - for every malloc there's a free if not, you have a memory leak!
Edit: Thanks to David Gelhar for his point-out at my glitch! I have fixed up the code above to reflect the fixes...of course in a real-life situation, perhaps the fixed value of 100 could be changed to perhaps a #define to make it easy to expand the buffer by doubling over the amount of memory via realloc and trim it to size...
Assuming that you want to get (shorter than MAXL-1 chars) strings and not to process your file char by char, I did as follows:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define MAXL 256
main(){
char s[MAXL];
s[0]=0;
scanf("%s",s);
while(strlen(s)>0){
printf("Size of %s : %d\n",s,strlen(s));
s[0]=0;
scanf("%s",s);
};
}