I was working on my project when I needed to use "curl" to obtain some data from www. Now firstly I tried direct system() function but it didn't worked, strangely everytime it corrupted the whole source code file while compiling with gcc. Luckily I was testing it separately.
Then I tested execl() function, this code compiles OK and gcc gives me a .exe file to run, but nothing happens when I run it,blank windows appears. CODE:
int main(){
execl("curl","curl","http://livechat.rediff.com/sports/score/score.txt",">blahblah.txt",NULL);
getch();
return 0;
}
Includes are not shown properly but I have included stdio,conio,stdlib and unistd.h.
How can I get output of program to store in text file? Also running the above command creates and stores text file in My Documents, I want it to be in local directory from where I run the program. How can I do that?
You need to provide the path of curl, and you cannot use redirection because the application will not be executed through bash. Instead use the -o flag and specify the filename. Also, execl does not return when successful:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){
execl("/usr/bin/curl",
"curl","http://livechat.rediff.com/sports/score/score.txt",
"-oblahblah.txt",NULL
);
printf("error\n");
return 0;
}
If you want your code to return, you should fork a child process to run the command. This way you can check the return code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define CURL "/usr/bin/curl"
int main()
{
pid_t pid;
int status;
pid = fork();
if (pid == 0)
{
execl(CURL, CURL, arg1, NULL);
}
else if (pid < 0)
{
printf("Fork failed\n");
exit (1);
}
else
{
if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid)
status = -1;
}
return status;
}
arg1 is whatever argument you want to use with curl or if you aren't using any than you obviously can omit it.
Related
I have two files in the same directory.
directory/
| a.c
| b.c
a.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t pid;
int status;
int wret;
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
printf("error");
else if(pid == 0)
{
printf("%s", argv[1]);
execv(argv[1], &argv[1]);
}
else
{
/* respawn */
if ((wret = wait(&status)) != -1)
execv(argv[1], &argv[1]);
}
return 0;
}
b.c is just a simple program that print "hello".
I want to run ./a b from the command line to make the a program call exexXX to execute the b program.
I don't understand why if I use execv I can write just ./a b in the command line, instead if I use execvp I have to write ./a ./b.
The man exec page is not clear because it reports
"The initial argument for these functions is the name of a file that
is to be executed."
Thanks
If the program name argument contains no slashes, the execvp() function looks for the program to execute in the directories listed on your PATH environment variable. If you don't have . (the current directory) on your PATH and you aren't in one of the directories listed on your path, a plain name like b will not be executed, even if b is in the current directory. If the name contains a slash, it can be relative (./b) or absolute (/home/someone/src/programs/b) and it will be interpreted as a file name to be executed without consulting the PATH environment variable.
By contrast, execv() treats a plain b in the program name argument as ./b — the name of the file in the current directory and executes it if it is present, and fails if it is located somewhere else.
At one time, there was a comment that asked:
Are you saying if you have an executable b in . and you do execv("b", b_args), it will get executed?
On a normal Unix box, yes.
Code b.c:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
puts("Hello");
return 0;
}
Code a.c:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(void)
{
char *argv[] = { "b", 0 };
execv(argv[0], argv);
fprintf(stderr, "failed to execute '%s'\n", argv[0]);
return 1;
}
Running these:
$ (PATH=$(clnpath "$PATH" ".:$PWD"); echopath PATH; ./a)
/Users/jleffler/bin
/opt/informix/12.10.FC6/bin
/Users/jleffler/oss/bin
/Users/jleffler/oss/rcs/bin
/usr/local/mysql/bin
/opt/gcc/v7.3.0/bin
/Users/jleffler/perl/v5.24.0/bin
/usr/local/bin
/usr/bin
/bin
/opt/gnu/bin
/usr/sbin
/sbin
Hello
$
The clnpath script modifies the string provided as its first argument ("$PATH") by removing any occurrences of any of the directory names listed in its second path-like argument (".:$PWD") — it's how I edit my PATH on the fly when I need to. The echopath script echoes the directories on PATH (or any other path-like variable, or it will process the result of expanding a pathlike variable, such as "$PATH"), one per line — the output shows that neither . nor /Users/jleffler/soq (which is where I run the program) is on $PATH in the sub-shell. The ./a runs the code from a.c (it would not be executed without that ./ in front), which in turn runs the code from b.c, which produces the Hello. (If there is some system where this does not work, please identify it.)
I could also arrange for b.c to be:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void)
{
puts("Hello");
const char *env = "PATH";
char *val = getenv(env);
if (val == 0)
val = "<nothing>";
printf("%s=%s\n", env, val);
return 0;
}
which would print the value of $PATH directly from the executable (to verify that neither . nor the value of the current working directory is listed).
I'm a beginner programmer to C and I'm trying to write a basic shell. I'm trying to use the fork() function, but it simply doesn't seem to work. I get caught in an endless loop of just my shell's prompt taking input and then seemingly doing nothing with it.
I ran the debugger and set the breakpoint to where the program forks, and at that point, I got an error message of
Can't find a source file at "/build/glibc-Cl5G7W/glibc-2.23/posix/../sysdeps/nptl/fork.c"
Locate the file or edit the source lookup path to include its location.
What I think is happening is that I either messed up with my #include headers or that when I tried to compile, I left some library out. I've just been compiling with the standard
gcc -o shell custom_shell.c
and I recall my teacher saying something about compiling with libraries, but I thought my #include headers would cover that and I can't find anything else on the topic online.
The parts of my code I'm wary over are
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
...
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid < 0){ //error
perror("fork");
exit(1);
}
else if (pid == 0){ //child
execvp(args[0], args);
}
else{ //parent
wait(0);
}
Is it possible to generate a mini core dump for debugging purpose without crashing the process. Let's say if a function receives an unexpected value, just printing logs and returning gracefully might not be sufficient to debug the issue. On the other hand, if i can get a screenshot of memory and look at the stack, i could find more useful information to debug.
Yes,
According to gdb's documentation, once attached with gdb you may issue the following command:
(gdb) gcore
(gdb) q
This will dump the core to "core.pid" without crashing the process.
or this one-liner:
sudo sh -c 'echo gcore <output_core> | gdb -p <pid>'
There is not building function to do that, you could use ptrace() to debug your own process but it would not be easy. Call gcore is the easiest method.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
int main(void) {
pid_t parent = getpid();
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) {
// oh dear we are on trouble
} else if (pid == 0) {
char tmp[42];
snprintf(tmp, sizeof tmp, "%" PRIdMAX, (intmax_t)parent);
execvp("gcore", (char *[]){"gcore", tmp, NULL});
} else {
int wstatus;
waitpid(pid, &wstatus, 0);
}
}
I've been using a combination of fork() and exec() to execute some external command on linux, however, the code seems to fail whenever I try to execute /usr/bin/firefox which is a symbolic link to a real binary.
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? I've tested with other programs (which really are executable binaries and not symlinks to them) and it works.
Here's the code from the program:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
pid_t pid;
// this was the old line:
// char *parmList[] = {"", "index.html", NULL};
// and this is the one that solves the problem:
char *parmList[] = {"firefox", "index.html", NULL};
int a;
if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
perror("fork failed");
if (pid == 0) {
a = execvp("/usr/bin/firefox", parmList);
fprintf(stdout, "execvp() returned %d\n", a);
fprintf(stdout, "errno: %s (%d).\n", strerror(errno), errno);
}
else {
waitpid(pid, 0, 0);
}
return 0;
}
Edit: I updated the code to include the answer and changed the topic's title because the problem really didn't seem to be due to symbolic links at all. Thanks everyone.
You might want to add some code right after the execvp to output some diagnostic (i.e. check errno, print something meaningful ;)).
You could also try to analyze it w/o source modification using strace or gdb for that matter.
See also: execve.
Update as follow-up from the comments
Firefox is not happy with argv[0] being empty, which is what argList looked like, unfortunately.
Lessons learned: Be thoroughly aware of what you pass as argv to the program you execute. :)
Does Firefox insist on having a non-empty argv[0]? You should normally pass the name of the command (either just "firefox" or "/usr/bin/firefox") to the command, but you are not doing so.
[...going to check the deeper comments above - and it seems this is the correct diagnosis, but 21 minutes or so late...]
I'm supposed to create a linux shell using C. Below is my code:
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define SHELL "/bin/sh"
#include "extern.h"
int mysystem (char *command)
{
int status;
pid_t pid;
pid = fork ();
if (pid == 0)
{
execl (SHELL, SHELL, "-c", command, NULL);
_exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
else if (pid < 0)
status = -1;
else
if (waitpid (pid, &status, 0) != pid)
status = -1;
return status;
}
Everything is right when I test the code using different commands like "ls", "man", etc. but when I use notepad to create a testfile containing the following:
echo "hello"
exit 2
the return code come out to be 512 when it's supposed to be just 2.
Can anyone help me fix my code?
status is not the exit code; it contains other information as well. Normally the return value is in bits 8-15 of status, but you should be using the macros in wait.h to extract the return value from status in a portable way.
Note that 512 is 2<<8.
Make sure you're using the macros like WIFEXITED and WEXITSTATUS on your status value. See your operating system's man page for waitpid. Here is a description of the POSIX requirements on waitpid.
By notepad do you mean you're using a Windows program to create a Unix shell script? That doesn't work because you end up with CRLF at the end of each line instead of LF. Try the "dos2unix" command on the script to convert it to Unix format and then run it.
I assume you're aware that code is already available in the system() library call? Judging by your function name, I'd guess you're just trying to learn how to do it with system calls.
Try enclosing your command string you supply to /bin/sh with quotes, because otherwise the space character makes /bin/sh think you are supplying another option to the shell itself, not to the command you are calling. For example, try this in a terminal:
/bin/sh -c exit 2
echo $?
and
/bin/sh -c "exit 2"
echo $?
The first one gives 0, and the second one gives the desired 2.