While working on one application I am getting this error:
can't convert Enumerator into Array
Here is my code, mr_collection is MongoID query.
mr_collection = self.where(query).map_reduce(map, reduce).finalize(finalize).out({:replace => 'mr_results'})
paginator = WillPaginate::Collection.new(page, limit, collection_count)
collection = mr_collection.find(
:sort => sort,
:limit => limit,
:skip => skip
)
paginator.replace(collection)
While getting mr_collection, if I inspect the result mr_collection gives me:
[
{"_id"=>1.0, "value"=>{"s"=>4.2, "p"=>14.95, "pml"=>0.01993}},
{"_id"=>2.0, "value"=>{"s"=>3.7, "p"=>12.9, "pml"=>0.0172}},
{"_id"=>3.0, "value"=>{"s"=>4.2, "p"=>12.9, "pml"=>0.0172}},
{"_id"=>4.0, "value"=>{"s"=>4.0, "p"=>11.95, "pml"=>0.01593}},
{"_id"=>300.0, "value"=>{"s"=>0.0, "p"=>8.95, "pml"=>0.01193}},
]
While getting collection, if I inspect the result collection gives me:
#<Enumerator: []:find({:sort=>[["value.s", :desc], ["value.pml", :asc]], :limit=>10, :skip=>0})>
I am getting error on the line paginator.replace(collection). I'm using Ruby 1.9.3 & Rails 3.2.6.
collection is an Enumerator which obviously can't convert into an Array, which is what replace expects.
Here are the comments from the rubydocs:
Enumerable#find(ifnone = nil) { |e| ... }
Passes each entry in enum to block. Returns the first for which block
is not false. If no object matches, calls ifnone and returns its
result when it is specified, or returns nil otherwise.
If no block is given, an enumerator is returned instead.
Therefore you have two options:
If you want all elements, yield from the Enumerator to an Array.
If you only want the first match, supply a block that determines what the match is.
Hope this helps.
(Moral of the story: always read the docs!)
I have no idea about mongoid having never used it.
But a search has brought to fore an awfully similar question -
Mongoid 3 - access map_reduce results
Unfortunately my environent is not set to test the magic of
collection = mr_collection.send(:documents).sort(sort).limit(limit).skip(skip).to_a
Have you had a look at this link? Hopefully it'll help solve your issue!
Related
I am fetching an array of objects from an RX/JS call from an http backend. It returns an object which I am then trying to work with. I am making changes to this object using a for loop (in this example I am trying the .forEach because I have tried a number of different things and none of them seem to work.
When I run the code, I get a very weird problem. If I return the values of the properties, I get the new values (i.e. correctionQueued returns as true, etc.) but in the very next line, when I return the object, those same values are the same as the original (correctionQueued === false, etc.) HOWEVER, correctionStatus (which does not exist on the original object from http) sets just fine.
I don't understand how
array[index].correctionQueued can return true, but
array[index] returns an object with correctionQueued as false.
After the loop, the original array (checklistCopy) is identical to the object before the forEach loop, except the new property (correctionStatus) is now set, but all properties that I changed that were part of the original object remain as they were.
I have tried using a for of, for in, and .forEach. I have used the index to alter the original array, always the same result. Preexisting properties do not change, new properties are added. I have even tried working on a copy of the object in case there is something special about the object returned from rxjs, but to no avail.
checklistCopy.forEach((checklistItem, index, array) => {
if (checklistItem.crCode.isirName === correctionSetItem) {
array[index].correctionQueued = true;
array[index].correctionValue = mostRecentCorrection.correctionValue;
array[index].correctionStatus = mostRecentCorrection.status;
console.log(array[index].correctionQueued, array[index].correctionValue, array[index].correctionStatus);
console.log(array[index]);
}
}
);
I don't get an error, but I get..
Original object is:
correctionQueued: false;
correctionValue: JAAMES;
--
console.log(array[index].correctionQueued, array[index].correctionValue, array[index].correctionStatus);
true JAMES SENT
but when I print the whole object:
console.log(array[index]);
correctionQueued: false;
correctionValue: JAAMES;
correctionStatus: "SENT'; <-- This is set correctly but does not exist on original object.
console.log(array[index]) (at least in Chrome) just adds the object reference to the console. The values do not resolve until you expand it, so your console log statement is not actually capturing the values at that moment in time.
Change your console statement to: console.log(JSON.stringify(array[index])) and you should discover that the values are correct at the time the log statement runs.
The behavior you are seeing suggests that something is coming along later and changing the object properties back to the original value. Unless you show a more complete example, we can't help you find the culprit. But hopefully this answers the question about why your logs show what they show.
Your output doesn't make sense to me either but cleaning up your code may help you. Try this:
checklistCopy.forEach(checklistItem => {
checklistItem.correctionQueued = checklistItem.crCode.isirName === correctionSetItem;
if (checklistItem.correctionQueued) {
checklistItem.correctionValue = mostRecentCorrection.correctionValue;
checklistItem.correctionStatus = mostRecentCorrection.status;
console.log('checklistItem', checklistItem)
}
}
);
In the Hash documentation, the section on Object keys seems to imply that you can use any type as a Hash key as long as you indicate but I am having trouble when trying to use an array as the key:
> my %h{Array};
{}
> %h{[1,2]} = [3,4];
Type check failed in binding to parameter 'key'; expected Array but got Int (1)
in block <unit> at <unknown file> line 1
Is it possible to do this?
The [1,2] inside the %h{[1,2]} = [3,4] is interpreted as a slice. So it tries to assign %h{1} and %{2}. And since the key must be an Array, that does not typecheck well. Which is what the error message is telling you.
If you itemize the array, it "does" work:
my %h{Array};
%h{ $[1,2] } = [3,4];
say %h.perl; # (my Any %{Array} = ([1, 2]) => $[3, 4])
However, that probably does not get what you want, because:
say %h{ $[1,2] }; # (Any)
That's because object hashes use the value of the .WHICH method as the key in the underlying array.
say [1,2].WHICH; say [1,2].WHICH;
# Array|140324137953800
# Array|140324137962312
Note that the .WHICH values for those seemingly identical arrays are different.
That's because Arrays are mutable. As Lists can be, so that's not really going to work.
So what are you trying to achieve? If the order of the values in the array is not important, you can probably use Sets as keys:
say [1,2].Set.WHICH; say [1,2].Set.WHICH
# Set|AEA2F4CA275C3FE01D5709F416F895F283302FA2
# Set|AEA2F4CA275C3FE01D5709F416F895F283302FA2
Note that these two .WHICHes are the same. So you could maybe write this as:
my %h{Set};
dd %h{ (1,2).Set } = (3,4); # $(3, 4)
dd %h; # (my Any %{Set} = ((2,1).Set) => $(3, 4))
Hope this clarifies things. More info at: https://docs.raku.org/routine/WHICH
If you are really only interested in use of an Object Hash for some reason, refer to Liz's answer here and especially the answers to, and comments on, a similar earlier question.
The (final1) focus of this answer is a simple way to use an Array like [1,'abc',[3/4,Mu,["more",5e6],9.9],"It's {<sunny rainy>.pick} today"] as a regular string hash key.
The basic principle is use of .perl to approximate an immutable "value type" array until such time as there is a canonical immutable Positional type with a more robust value type .WHICH.
A simple way to use an array as a hash key
my %hash;
%hash{ [1,2,3].perl } = 'foo';
say %hash{ [1,2,3].perl }; # displays 'foo'
.perl converts its argument to a string of Perl 6 code that's a literal version of that argument.
say [1,2,3].perl; # displays '[1, 2, 3]'
Note how spaces have been added but that doesn't matter.
This isn't a perfect solution. You'll obviously get broken results if you mutate the array between key accesses. Less obviously you'll get broken results corresponding to any limitations or bugs in .perl:
say [my %foo{Array},42].perl; # displays '[(my Any %{Array}), 42]'
1 This is, hopefully, the end of my final final answer to your question. See my earlier 10th (!!) version of this answer for discussion of the alternative of using prefix ~ to achieve a more limited but similar effect and/or to try make some sense of my exchange with Liz in the comments below.
Scala beginner who is trying to store values obtains in a Scala foreach loop but failing miserably.
The basic foreach loop looks like this currently:
order.orderList.foreach((x: OrderRef) => {
val references = x.ref}))
When run this foreach loop will execute twice and return a reference each time. I'm trying to capture the reference value it returns on each run (so two references in either a list or array form so I can access these values later)
I'm really confused about how to go about doing this...
I attempted to retrieve and store the values as an array but when ran, the array list doesn't seem to hold any values.
This was my attempt:
val newArray = Array(order.orderList.foreach((x: OrderRef) => {
val references = x.ref
}))
println(newArray)
Any advice would be much appreciated. If there is a better way to achieve this, please share. Thanks
Use map instead of foreach
order.orderList.map((x: OrderRef) => {x.ref}))
Also val references = x.ref doesn't return anything. It create new local variable and assign value to it.
Agree with answer 1, and I believe the reason is below:
Return of 'foreach' or 'for' should be 'Unit', and 'map' is an with an changed type result like example below:
def map[B](f: (A) ⇒ B): Array[B]
Compare To for and foreach, the prototype should be like this
def foreach(f: (A) ⇒ Unit): Unit
So If you wanna to get an changed data which is maped from your source data, considering more about functions like map, flatMap, and these functions will traverse all datas like for and foreach(except with yield), but with return values.
I'm not a programmer, but I find myself writing some simple ruby and aren't sure about a few things.
I have the following function
def resolve_name(ns_name)
ip = Resolv.getaddress(ns_name)
return ip
end
and the array
array = ['ns-1.me.com', 'ns-2.me.com']
What I want to do is to pass every element in the array to the function to be evaluated, and spit out to... something. Probably a variable. Once I have the resolved IPs I'll be passing them to an erb template. Not quite sure yet how to handle when there may be 1 to 4 possible results either.
What I want think I need to do is do an each.do and typecast to string into my function, but I haven't been able to figure out how to actually do that or phrase my problem properly for google to tell me.
http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.0.0/doc/syntax/calling_methods_rdoc.html#label-Array+to+Arguments+Conversion Doesn't quite have what I'm looking for.
irb(main):010:0> resolved = resolve_name(array)
TypeError: no implicit conversion of Array into String
Any suggestions?
Take a look at the documentation for ruby's Enumerable, which arrays implement. What you're looking for is the map method, which takes each element of an enumerable (i.e. an array) and passes it to a block, returning a new array with the results of the blocks. Like this:
array.map{|element| resolve_name(element) }
As an aside, in your method, you do not need to use a local variable if all you're doing with it is returning its value; and the return statement is optional - ruby methods always return the result of the last executed statement. So your method could be shortened to this:
def resolve_name(ns_name)
Resolv.getaddress(ns_name)
end
and then you really all it's doing is wrapping a method call in another. So ultimately, you can just do this (with array renamed to ns_names to make it self-explanatory):
ns_names = ['ns-1.me.com', 'ns-2.me.com']
ip_addresses = ns_names.map{|name| Resolv.getaddress(name) }
Now ip_addresses is an array of IP addresses that you can use in your template.
If you pass an array you could do:
def resolve_name(ns_name)
res = []
ns_name.each do |n|
res << {name: n, ip: Resolv.getaddress(name) }
end
res
end
And get an array of hashes so you know which address has which ip
I am very new to perl (but from a c# background) and I am trying to move some scripts to a windows box.
Due to some modules not working easily with windows I have changed the way it connects to the DB.
I have an sqlserver DB and I had a loop reading each row in a table, and then within this loop another query was sent to select different info.
I was the error where two statements can't be executed at once within the same connection.
As my connection object is global I couldn't see an easy way round this, so decided to store the first set of data in an array using:
my $query = shift;
my $aryref = $dbh->selectall_arrayref($query) || die "Could not select to array\n";
return($aryref);
(this is in a module file that is called)
I then do a foreach loop (where #$s_study is the $aryref returned above)
foreach my $r_study ( #$s_study ) {
~~~
my $surveyId=$r_study->{surveyid}; <-------error this line
~~~~
};
When I run this I get an error "Not a hash reference". I don't understand?!
Can anyone help!
Bex
You need to provide the { Slice => {} } parameter to selectall_arrayref if you want each row to be stored as a hash:
my $aryref = $dbh->selectall_arrayref($query, { Slice => {} });
By default, it returns a reference to an array containing a reference to an array for each row of data fetched.
$r_study->{surveyid} is a hashref
$r_study->[0] is an arrayref
this is your error.
You should use the second one
If you have a problem with a method, then a good first step is to read the documentation for that method. Here's a link to the documentation for selectall_arrayref. It says:
This utility method combines
"prepare", "execute" and
"fetchall_arrayref" into a single
call. It returns a reference to an
array containing a reference to an
array (or hash, see below) for each
row of data fetched.
So the default behaviour is to return a reference to an array which contains an array reference for each row. That explains your error. You're getting an array reference and you're trying to treat it as a hash reference. I'm not sure that the error could be much clearer.
There is, however, that interesting bit where it says "or hash, see below". Reading on, we find:
You may often want to fetch an array
of rows where each row is stored as a
hash. That can be done simple using:
my $emps = $dbh->selectall_arrayref(
"SELECT ename FROM emp ORDER BY ename",
{ Slice => {} }
);
foreach my $emp ( #$emps ) {
print "Employee: $emp->{ename}\n";
}
So you have two options. Either switch your code to use an array ref rather than a hash ref. Or add the "{ Slice => {} }" option to the call, which will return a hash ref.
The documentation is clear. It's well worth reading it.
When you encounter something like "Not a hash reference" or "Not an array reference" or similar you can always take Data::Dumper to just dump out your variable and you will quickly see what data you are dealing with: arrays of arrayrefs, hashes of something etc.
And concerning reading the data, this { Slice => {} } is most valuable addition.