Combobox.SelectedItem binding to nested property - wpf

I am doing a simple WPF application using MVVM and I am having trouble binding to the SelectedItem property of the combobox.
The setter of the bound property does not get called, and there is no output in the debug windows telling me it is not able to bind (I assume it is able to).
This is .NET 3.5, I made a small example that has the same problem.
In XAML:
<Window x:Class="Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="Window1" Height="300" Width="300">
<StackPanel>
<ComboBox IsDropDownOpen="False" IsReadOnly="False" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Printers}" SelectedIndex="0" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=Printer.SelectedPrinter, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, Mode=TwoWay}" Name="cmbPrinters" />
</StackPanel>
</Window>
View code behind:
using System.Windows;
public partial class Window1 : Window
{
ViewModel viewmodel;
public Window1()
{
viewmodel = new ViewModel();
this.DataContext = viewmodel;
InitializeComponent();
}
}
View model:
using System;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
public class ViewModel
{
public ViewModel()
{
Printers = new ObservableCollection<string>() { "test", "test2" };
Printer = new PrinterViewModel();
}
public PrinterViewModel Printer { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<string> Printers { get; set; }
}
PrinterViewModel:
using System.Windows;
using System.Diagnostics;
public class PrinterViewModel : DependencyObject
{
public string SelectedPrinter
{
get { return (string)GetValue(SelectedPrinterProperty); }
set
{
SetValue(SelectedPrinterProperty, value);
Debug.WriteLine("!!!!!! SelectedPrinter setter called");
}
}
public readonly DependencyProperty SelectedPrinterProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("SelectedPrinter", typeof(string), typeof(PrinterViewModel), new UIPropertyMetadata());
}
Can anyone see what I am doing wrong here?

The problem here is that you have a misunderstanding about how the Silverlight dependency property system works.
When the value of a dependency property changes, Silverlight doesn't go through the properties you've defined (such as SelectedPrinter) to set the value of the dependency property. The Silverlight dependency property mechanism keeps track of all of the values of dependency properties, and when the value of one of these properties changes, Silverlight changes its value directly without calling your code to do so. In particular, it will not call your property setter. This should explain why your debugging message wasn't appearing.
The getter in a property that uses a dependency property, such as your SelectedPrinter property, should contain only a call to GetValue, and the setter should contain only a call to SetValue. You shouldn't add any code to the getter or setter, as doing this will not achieve what you want.
Furthermore, you are using dependency properties in the view-model layer. This is not where they are intended to be used. Dependency properties are only intended to be used in the view-layer. Your view-model classes should instead be implementing INotifyPropertyChanged rather than extending DependencyObject.
It is possible to bind two dependency properties together. This is permitted, and occasionally it comes in useful to wire together two dependency properties in the view-layer. In fact, the bindings in your example were working, which explains why you weren't getting any messages about problems with bindings.

why inherit from DependencyObject when doing mvvm?`
public class PrinterViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _selected;
public string SelectedPrinter
{
get { return this._selected; }
set
{
_selected= value;
OnPropertyChanged("SelectedPrinter");
}
}
}
now your code should work

Related

How to bind to the dependency property of the dependency object?

The following is only a summary of the core of the problem.
I defined the class that has one dependency property is as below.
public class TestMap : DependencyObject
{
public bool TestProperty
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(TestPropertyProperty); }
set { SetValue(TestPropertyProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TestPropertyProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("TestProperty", typeof(bool), typeof(TestMap), new PropertyMetadata(false));
}
Now I'm going to use the above class in the UserControl.
The following code is an example.
public class UserControl1 : Control
{
public TestMap TestMap { get; set; }
}
And I used the UserControl1 in the MainWindow like below.
<Window>
<Grid>
<local:UserControl1 />
</Grid>
</Window>
The above code works well but If I try to binding to the TestMap.TestProperty what I should do?
I tried the following code but it doesn't work. (Assume ViewModel is bound)
<Window>
<Grid>
<local:UserControl1 TestMap.TestProperty="{Binding ViewModelProperty}"/>
</Grid>
</Window>
The error message for the above code is as below image.
The error message is
"It can't found connectable 'TestProperty' property in the 'TestMap' format."
Thanks for reading.
You can't bind to a nested property, i.e. a property TestProperty of the object returned by the property TestMap, like this in XAML. It's not supported.
You should either move the TestProperty to the UserControl, set it programatically, or consider using an attached dependency property that is settable on any object of a specific type.

How to bind a DataTemplate datatype to a View which receives ViewModels a dependency injected by DI

I have a WPF application which implements navigation using MVVM, filling a different DataTemplate for each View within the same Window e.g. :
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type foo:FooViewModel}">
<foo:FooView/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type bar:BarViewModel}">
<bar:BarView/>
</DataTemplate>
<Window.Resources>
(Switching between Views/UserControls using MVVM is Rachel Lim's article which has inspired the aforementioned approach)
What happens now is that FooView gets FooViewModel automatically injected as a dependency by DI (which in my case is Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection on .Net Core3 Preview) e.g. :
public partial class FooView : UserControl
{
public FooView(FooViewModel fooViewModel)
{
this.InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = fooViewModel;
}
}
At this point obviously the DataTemplate complains because the FooView does not define a parameter-less ctor (as per reference Type '{0}' is not usable as an object element)
Is there any way to bypass this issue and let FooView to use FooViewModel as DataContext?
DataTemplate
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type foo:FooViewModel}">
<foo:FooView/>
</DataTemplate>
will assign an instance of FooViewModel to FooView.DataContext.
this.DataContext = fooViewModel; line in FooView control is useless, because DataContext will be overwritten in such scenario. I would say, it is perfectly fine not to pass view model via contrustor. It can be accessed from DataContext:
public partial class FooView : UserControl
{
public FooView()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
}
private FooViewModel Vm { get { return this.DataContext as FooViewModel; } }
}
In the navigation pattern you are using, View is a receiver of ViewModel. Current ViewModel is set by AppViewModel:
public class AppViewModel
{
// simplified properties
public ViewModelBase CurrentViewModel {get; set;}
public ICommand ViewFooCommand {get;}
public ICommand ViewBarCommand {get;}
}
You are trying to make View an originator/producer of ViewModel, which conflicts with pattern.

WPF: ×™how to populate my ViewModel in XAML instead of code behind

So i have this ViewModel class:
public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private ObservableCollection<Person> _persons;
public ObservableCollection<Person> Porsons
{
get { return _persons; }
set
{
_persons = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] String propertyName = "")
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
And then create this ViewModel class and populate its Person list:
ViewModel viewModel;
ObservableCollection<Person> persons
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
viewModel = new ViewModel();
viewModel.Porsons= persons;
}
And then my ListView:
<ListView ItemSource={Binding Persons}/>
So instead of binding this Persons list into my ViewModel class and then do this ItemSource can i do it in pure XAML or this is the right way ?
Instead of creating a ViewModel property on your view it is recommended to use it's DataContext (this link also shows how to set it using XAML). Also don't populate the view model in the view since most of the time the data resides in the model and the view should not know anything about any models (when following MVVM).
Please read the link above and visit the links you meet. Also read this article about MVVM. This gives you some basic knowledge to make it easier to understand how to use the WPF framework.
There are many variations of view model creation in XAML.
For example alternatively you can create it in the App.Xaml to make it globally accessible via the StaticResource markup extension and assign it to the individual controls's DataContext via a Style or use an ObjectDataProvider.
This example uses XAML Property Element declaration to create a ViewModel instance directly in the target view. This instance is locally accessible only.
ViewModel.cs:
namespace Example
{
public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ViewModel()
{
this.Persons = new ObservableCollection<Person>();
}
private ObservableCollection<Person> _persons;
public ObservableCollection<Person> Persons
{
get => _persons;
set
{
_persons = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] String propertyName = "")
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
}
View.xaml:
<Window x:Class="Example.MainWindow"
...
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:Example">
<Window.DataContext>
<local:ViewModel />
</Window.DataContext>
<Grid>
<ListView ItemSource={Binding Persons}/>
</Grid>
</Window>
Yes, you can. But no, you most certainly do not want to.
To answer your question, let's say your Person class looks like this:
public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
You can easily declare a list in XAML and bind it to a ListView (say) like this:
<ListView DisplayMemberPath="Name">
<ListView.ItemsSource>
<x:Array Type="{x:Type vm:Person}">
<vm:Person Name="Tom" />
<vm:Person Name="Dick" />
<vm:Person Name="Harry" />
</x:Array>
</ListView.ItemsSource>
</ListView>
The result of which is this:
Just because you can do this, though, doesn't mean you should. The whole point of MVVM is to separate your view layer from your view model layer. You should be able to run your entire application from a test build without creating a single view object at all. In asking this question what you are apparently trying to do is declare a data structure in your view layer, which is totally the wrong place to put it. Your view layer should be as "dumb" as possible, with only the weakest possible bindings to your view model layer where the actual logic is going on.

Simple WPF data binding

I want to separate my user interface from my code, so I (obviously) landed at bindings. As a test, I've written the following XAML:
<Window x:Class="BindingTest.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="Auto" Width="200">
<StackPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Item}"/>
<Button Content="Add" Click="AddNew"/>
<ListBox Height="100" ItemsSource="{Binding Items}"/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
The C# looks like this:
namespace BindingTest
{
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public string Item { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<string> Items { get; set; }
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
Items = new ObservableCollection<string>();
}
private void AddNew(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Items.Add(Item);
}
}
}
What I want to happen is that the text entered into the textbox is added to the listbox's itemssource. However, this doesn't happen...
Two things you need two do -
Set - DataContext = this; in your constructor.
You'd be better off if you would change your properties to dependency properties instead. You could do that easily with the "propdp" snippet in visual studio.
Data binding is performed against the current data context. However, you have not set the data context for your window. Often you will set the data context to a view model but in your case you simply want to use the window class for that.
You should add the following line to the constructor:
DataContext = this;
Change your code to this:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public string Item { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<string> Items { get; set; }
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
Items = new ObservableCollection<string>();
DataContext = this;
}
private void AddNew(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Items.Add(Item);
}
}
}
You do need to set your DataContext - works for me.
Two things:
You should set the correct data context for your window. Otherwise the binding will not find your properties.
You should initialize your Items collection before the InitializeComponent() call as inside it the ListBox tries to evaluate the expression and get NULL as the binding souce. And since you are not implementing INotifyPropertyChanged and the property is not a DependencyProperty the ListBox will never reevaluate the binding thus it will never get the instance of your Items collection.
So, the code should be as follows:
public MainWindow()
{
Items = new ObservableCollection<string>();
DataContext = this;
InitializeComponent();
}
Try this
hope this will work. But this is not hte right approach. You need to set the DataContext to the Object whose properties u guna use for binding. you must follow MVVM Architecture.

WPF: How to bind to a nested property?

I can bind to a property, but not a property within another property. Why not? e.g.
<Window DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"...>
...
<!--Doesn't work-->
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=ParentProperty.ChildProperty,Mode=TwoWay}"
Width="30"/>
(Note: I'm not trying to do master-details or anything. Both properties are standard CLR properties.)
Update: the problem was that my ParentProperty depended on an object in XAML being initialized. Unfortunately that object was defined later in the XAML file than the Binding, so the object was null at the time when my ParentProperty was read by the Binding. Since rearranging the XAML file would screw up the layout, the only solution I could think of was to define the Binding in code-behind:
<TextBox x:Name="txt" Width="30"/>
// after calling InitializeComponent()
txt.SetBinding(TextBox.TextProperty, "ParentProperty.ChildProperty");
You can also set DataContext for TextBox in XAML (I don't know if it's optimal solution, but at least you don't have to do anything manually in codeBehind except of implementing INotifyPropertyChanged). When your TextBox has already DataContext (inherited DataContext) you write code like this:
<TextBox
DataContext="{Binding Path=ParentProperty}"
Text="{Binding Path=ChildProperty, Mode=TwoWay}"
Width="30"/>
Be aware that until your DataContext for TextBox isn't ready binding for Text property will not be 'established' - you can add FallbackValue='error' as Binding parameter - it will be something like indicator which will show you if binding is OK or not.
All I can think of is that the ParentProperty is being changed after the Binding is created, and it does not support change notification. Every property in the chain must support change notification, whether it be by virtue of being a DependencyProperty, or by implementing INotifyPropertyChanged.
Do both the ParentProperty and your class implement INotifyPropertyChanged?
public class ParentProperty : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string m_ChildProperty;
public string ChildProperty
{
get
{
return this.m_ChildProperty;
}
set
{
if (value != this.m_ChildProperty)
{
this.m_ChildProperty = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("ChildProperty");
}
}
}
#region INotifyPropertyChanged Members
#endregion
}
public partial class TestClass : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private ParentProperty m_ParentProperty;
public ParentProperty ParentProperty
{
get
{
return this.m_ParentProperty;
}
set
{
if (value != this.m_ParentProperty)
{
this.m_ParentProperty = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("ParentProperty");
}
}
}
}
public TestClass()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
ParentProperty = new ParentProperty();
ParentProperty.ChildProperty = new ChildProperty();
#region INotifyPropertyChanged Members
#endregion
}

Resources