How to trace a process for system calls? - c

I am trying to code a program that traces itself for system calls. I am having a difficult time making this work. I tried calling a fork() to create an instance of itself (the code), then monitor the resulting child process.
The goal is for the parent process to return the index of every system call made by the child process and output it to the screen. Somehow it is not working as planned.
Here is the code:
#include <unistd.h> /* for read(), write(), close(), fork() */
#include <fcntl.h> /* for open() */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/reg.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
pid_t child;
long orig_eax;
child = fork();
if (0 == child)
{
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL);
if (argc != 3) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: copy <filefrom> <fileto>\n");
return 1;
}
int c;
size_t file1_fd, file2_fd;
if ((file1_fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "copy: can't open %s\n", argv[1]);
return 1;
}
if ((file2_fd = open(argv[2], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT)) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "copy: can't open %s\n", argv[2]);
return 1;
}
while (read(file1_fd, &c, 1) > 0)
write(file2_fd, &c, 1);
}
else
{
wait(NULL);
orig_eax = ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child, 4 * ORIG_EAX, NULL);
printf("copy made a system call %ld\n", orig_eax);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, NULL, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
This code was based on this code:
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <linux/user.h> /* For constants
ORIG_EAX etc */
int main()
{
pid_t child;
long orig_eax;
child = fork();
if(child == 0) {
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL);
execl("/bin/ls", "ls", NULL);
}
else {
wait(NULL);
orig_eax = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER,
child, 4 * ORIG_EAX,
NULL);
printf("The child made a "
"system call %ld\n", orig_eax);
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, NULL, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
The output of this one is:
The child made a system call 11
which is the index for the exec system call.
According to the man pages for wait():
All of these system calls are used to wait for state changes in a child
of the calling process, and obtain information about the child whose
state has changed. A state change is considered to be: the child terminated;
the child was stopped by a signal; or the child was resumed by
a signal.
The way I understand it is that every time a system call is invoked by a user program, the kernel will first inspect if the process is being traced prior to executing the system call routine and pauses that process with a signal and returns control to the parent. Wouldn't that be a state change already?

The problem is that when the child calls ptrace(TRACEME) it sets itself up for tracing but doesn't actually stop -- it keeps going until it calls exec (in which case it stops with a SIGTRAP), or it gets some other signal. So in order for you to have the parent see what it does WITHOUT an exec call, you need to arrange for the child to receive a signal. The easiest way to do that is probably to have the child call raise(SIGCONT); (or any other signal) immediately after calling ptrace(TRACEME)
Now in the parent you just wait (once) and assume that the child is now stopped at a system call. This won't be the case if it stopped at a signal, so you instead need to call wait(&status) to get the child status and call WIFSTOPPED(status) and WSTOPSIG(status) to see WHY it has stopped. If it has stopped due to a syscall, the signal will be SIGTRAP.
If you want to see multiple system calls in the client, you'll need to do all of this in a loop; something like:
while(1) {
wait(&status);
if (WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP) {
// stopped before or after a system call -- query the child and print out info
}
if (WIFEXITED(status) || WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
// child has exited or terminated
break;
}
ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, childpid, 0, 0); // ignore any signal and continue the child
}
Note that it will stop TWICE for each system call -- once before the system call and a second time just after the system call completes.

you are basically trying to write strace binary in linux, which traces the system calls of the process. Linux provides ptrace(2) system call for this. ptrace system call takes 4 arguement and the first arguement tells what you need to do. OS communicates with the parent process with signals and child process is stopped by sending SIGSTOP. broadly you need to follow below steps.
if(fork() == 0 )
{
//child process
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0, 0);
exec(...);
}
else
{
start:
wait4(...);
if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
//done
}
if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
//done
}
if(flag == startup)
{
flag = startupdone;
ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, pid,0, 0) ;
goto start;
}
if (if (WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP) {) {
//extract the register
ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGS,pid,(char *)&regs,0)
}
Note the register reading and interpretation will depend on your architecture. The above code is just an example to get it right you need to dig deeper. have a look at strace code for further understanding.

In your parent how many calls do you want to monitor? If you want more than one you're going to need some kind of loop.
Note the line in the example, it's important:
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL);
Looking at the man page the child needs to either do a PTRACE_TRACEME and an exec, or the parent needs to trace using PTRACE_ATTACH. I don't see either in your code:
The parent can initiate a trace by calling fork(2) and having the resulting child do a PTRACE_TRACEME, followed (typically) by an exec(3). Alternatively, the parent may commence trace of an existing process using PTRACE_ATTACH.

Just putting together what Chris Dodd said:
#include <unistd.h> /* for read(), write(), close(), fork() */
#include <fcntl.h> /* for open() */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/reg.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
pid_t child;
int status;
long orig_eax;
child = fork();
if (0 == child)
{
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL);
raise(SIGCONT);
if (argc != 3) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: copy <filefrom> <fileto>\n");
return 1;
}
int c;
size_t file1_fd, file2_fd;
if ((file1_fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "copy: can't open %s\n", argv[1]);
return 1;
}
if ((file2_fd = open(argv[2], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT)) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "copy: can't open %s\n", argv[2]);
return 1;
}
while (read(file1_fd, &c, 1) > 0)
write(file2_fd, &c, 1);
}
else
{
while(1){
wait(&status);
if(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP){
orig_eax = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child, sizeof(long) * ORIG_EAX, NULL);
printf("copy made a system call %ld\n", orig_eax);
}
if(WIFEXITED(status) || WIFSIGNALED(status)){
break;
}
ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, child, 0, 0);
}
}
return 0;
}

Related

How to detach from process, so that it can be traced by another process?

Program steps:
Create child process by fork and call execv inside it
Ptrace attach to child process
Do something with ptrace
Detach from child
execute gdb -p child_pid
But when gdb starts, it writes that child process is already tracked.
How to detach from traced process, so that it can be traced by another process?
Code that do things above
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/signal.h>
#include <sys/user.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#define Error(msg) do { perror(msg); exit(0); } while(0)
#define PTRACE_E(req, pid, addr, data) \
do { \
if(ptrace(req, pid, addr, data) < 0) { \
perror(#req); \
exit(0); \
} \
} while(0)
#define BUF_SIZE 16
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
pid_t pid;
struct user_regs_struct regs;
int status;
char buf[BUF_SIZE];
if (argc < 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <executable> [ARGS]\n", argv[0]);
exit(0);
}
pid = fork();
if(pid < 0) {
Error("fork");
} else if(pid == 0) {
if(execv(argv[1], &argv[1]) < 0)
Error("execv");
}
PTRACE_E(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
while(wait(&status) && !WIFEXITED(status)) {
PTRACE_E(PTRACE_GETREGS, pid, NULL, &regs);
if(regs.orig_eax == 26 && regs.ebx == PTRACE_TRACEME) {
regs.eax = 0;
PTRACE_E(PTRACE_SETREGS, pid, NULL, &regs);
break;
}
PTRACE_E(PTRACE_SYSCALL, pid, NULL, NULL);
}
ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
snprintf(buf, BUF_SIZE, "%d", pid);
execl("/usr/bin/gdb", "/usr/bin/gdb", "-p", buf, NULL);
}
The important thing to note here is that the PTRACE_SYSCALL request will make the target process stop at entry to or exit from a system call. The manual page says
Syscall-enter-stop and syscall-exit-stop are indistinguishable from
each other by the tracer. The tracer needs to keep track of the
sequence of ptrace-stops in order to not misinterpret syscall-enter-stop
as syscall-exit-stop or vice versa.
If you use ptrace to change the target's register values, you'll change the system call arguments that the kernel will see, or the return value that the user process will see, depending on whether you do it at syscall-enter-stop or syscall-exit-stop.
Your code here is run at syscall-enter-stop:
if (regs.orig_eax == 26 && regs.ebx == PTRACE_TRACEME) {
regs.eax = 0;
PTRACE_E(PTRACE_SETREGS, pid, NULL, &regs);
break;
}
It changes eax (which is -38 on entry to a system call) to 0. Since your intent was to change the return code from the target's PTRACE_TRACEME request from -1 to 0, you'll need to do PTRACE_SYSCALL one more time, so that the target will stop at syscall-exit-stop, before running the above code.
Currently, your code breaks out of the loop after the PTRACE_SETREGS request, and then does
ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, pid, NULL, NULL);
which will detach from the target and continue it. The (now ex-)target completes its PTRACE_TRACEME request, which succeeds, making its parent the tracer once again.
execl("/usr/bin/gdb", "/usr/bin/gdb", "-p", buf, NULL);
Gdb will give a warning message, because it is, unexpectedly, already the tracer for the target.

prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG) race condition

As I understand, the best way to achieve terminating a child process when its parent dies is via prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG) (at least on Linux): How to make child process die after parent exits?
There is one caveat to this mentioned in man prctl:
This value is cleared for the child of a fork(2) and (since Linux 2.4.36 / 2.6.23) when executing a set-user-ID or set-group-ID binary, or a binary that has associated capabilities (see capabilities(7)). This value is preserved across execve(2).
So, the following code has a race condition:
parent.c:
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int f = fork();
if (fork() == 0) {
execl("./child", "child", NULL, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
child.c:
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <signal.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL); // ignore error checking for now
// ...
return 0;
}
Namely, the parent count die before prctl() is executed in the child (and thus the child will not receive the SIGKILL). The proper way to address this is to prctl() in the parent before the exec():
parent.c:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <signal.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int f = fork();
if (fork() == 0) {
prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL); // ignore error checking for now
execl("./child", "child", NULL, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
child.c:
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
// ...
return 0;
}
However, if ./child is a setuid/setgid binary, then this trick to avoid the race condition doesn't work (exec()ing the setuid/setgid binary causes the PDEATHSIG to be lost as per the man page quoted above), and it seems like you are forced to employ the first (racy) solution.
Is there any way if child is a setuid/setgid binary to prctl(PR_SET_PDEATH_SIG) in a non-racy way?
It is much more common to have the parent process set up a pipe. Parent process keeps the write end open (pipefd[1]), closing the read end (pipefd[0]). Child process closes the write end (pipefd[1]), and sets the read end (pipefd[1]) nonblocking.
This way, the child process can use read(pipefd[0], buffer, 1) to check if the parent process is still alive. If the parent is still running, it will return -1 with errno == EAGAIN (or errno == EINTR).
Now, in Linux, the child process can also set the read end async, in which case it will be sent a signal (SIGIO by default) when the parent process exits:
fcntl(pipefd[0], F_SETSIG, desired_signal);
fcntl(pipefd[0], F_SETOWN, getpid());
fcntl(pipefd[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC);
Use a siginfo handler for desired_signal. If info->si_code == POLL_IN && info->si_fd == pipefd[0], the parent process either exited or wrote something to the pipe. Because read() is async-signal safe, and the pipe is nonblocking, you can use read(pipefd[0], &buffer, sizeof buffer) in the signal handler whether the parent wrote something, or if parent exited (closed the pipe). In the latter case, the read() will return 0.
As far as I can see, this approach has no race conditions (if you use a realtime signal, so that the signal is not lost because an user-sent one is already pending), although it is very Linux-specific. After setting the signal handler, and at any point during the lifetime of the child process, the child can always explicitly check if the parent is still alive, without affecting the signal generation.
So, to recap, in pseudocode:
Construct pipe
Fork child process
Child process:
Close write end of pipe
Install pipe signal handler (say, SIGRTMIN+0)
Set read end of pipe to generate pipe signal (F_SETSIG)
Set own PID as read end owner (F_SETOWN)
Set read end of pipe nonblocking and async (F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC)
If read(pipefd[0], buffer, sizeof buffer) == 0,
the parent process has already exited.
Continue with normal work.
Child process pipe signal handler:
If siginfo->si_code == POLL_IN and siginfo->si_fd == pipefd[0],
parent process has exited.
To immediately die, use e.g. raise(SIGKILL).
Parent process:
Close read end of pipe
Continue with normal work.
I do not expect you to believe my word.
Below is a crude example program you can use to check this behaviour yourself. It is long, but only because I wanted it to be easy to see what is happening at runtime. To implement this in a normal program, you only need a couple of dozen lines of code. example.c:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
static volatile sig_atomic_t done = 0;
static void handle_done(int signum)
{
if (!done)
done = signum;
}
static int install_done(const int signum)
{
struct sigaction act;
memset(&act, 0, sizeof act);
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_handler = handle_done;
act.sa_flags = 0;
if (sigaction(signum, &act, NULL) == -1)
return errno;
return 0;
}
static int deathfd = -1;
static void death(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *context)
{
if (info->si_code == POLL_IN && info->si_fd == deathfd)
raise(SIGTERM);
}
static int install_death(const int signum)
{
struct sigaction act;
memset(&act, 0, sizeof act);
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_sigaction = death;
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
if (sigaction(signum, &act, NULL) == -1)
return errno;
return 0;
}
int main(void)
{
pid_t child, p;
int pipefd[2], status;
char buffer[8];
if (install_done(SIGINT)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Cannot set SIGINT handler: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Cannot create control pipe: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
child = fork();
if (child == (pid_t)-1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Cannot fork child process: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (!child) {
/*
* Child process.
*/
/* Close write end of pipe. */
deathfd = pipefd[0];
close(pipefd[1]);
/* Set a SIGHUP signal handler. */
if (install_death(SIGHUP)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Child process: cannot set SIGHUP handler: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
/* Set SIGTERM signal handler. */
if (install_done(SIGTERM)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Child process: cannot set SIGTERM handler: %s.\n", strerror(errno));
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
/* We want a SIGHUP instead of SIGIO. */
fcntl(deathfd, F_SETSIG, SIGHUP);
/* We want the SIGHUP delivered when deathfd closes. */
fcntl(deathfd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
/* Make the deathfd (read end of pipe) nonblocking and async. */
fcntl(deathfd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC);
/* Check if the parent process is dead. */
if (read(deathfd, buffer, sizeof buffer) == 0) {
printf("Child process (%ld): Parent process is already dead.\n", (long)getpid());
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
while (1) {
status = __atomic_fetch_and(&done, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
if (status == SIGINT)
printf("Child process (%ld): SIGINT caught and ignored.\n", (long)getpid());
else
if (status)
break;
printf("Child process (%ld): Tick.\n", (long)getpid());
fflush(stdout);
sleep(1);
status = __atomic_fetch_and(&done, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
if (status == SIGINT)
printf("Child process (%ld): SIGINT caught and ignored.\n", (long)getpid());
else
if (status)
break;
printf("Child process (%ld): Tock.\n", (long)getpid());
fflush(stdout);
sleep(1);
}
printf("Child process (%ld): Exited due to %s.\n", (long)getpid(),
(status == SIGINT) ? "SIGINT" :
(status == SIGHUP) ? "SIGHUP" :
(status == SIGTERM) ? "SIGTERM" : "Unknown signal.\n");
fflush(stdout);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
/*
* Parent process.
*/
/* Close read end of pipe. */
close(pipefd[0]);
while (!done) {
fprintf(stderr, "Parent process (%ld): Tick.\n", (long)getpid());
fflush(stderr);
sleep(1);
fprintf(stderr, "Parent process (%ld): Tock.\n", (long)getpid());
fflush(stderr);
sleep(1);
/* Try reaping the child process. */
p = waitpid(child, &status, WNOHANG);
if (p == child || (p == (pid_t)-1 && errno == ECHILD)) {
if (p == child && WIFSIGNALED(status))
fprintf(stderr, "Child process died from %s. Parent will now exit, too.\n",
(WTERMSIG(status) == SIGINT) ? "SIGINT" :
(WTERMSIG(status) == SIGHUP) ? "SIGHUP" :
(WTERMSIG(status) == SIGTERM) ? "SIGTERM" : "an unknown signal");
else
fprintf(stderr, "Child process has exited, so the parent will too.\n");
fflush(stderr);
break;
}
}
if (done) {
fprintf(stderr, "Parent process (%ld): Exited due to %s.\n", (long)getpid(),
(done == SIGINT) ? "SIGINT" :
(done == SIGHUP) ? "SIGHUP" : "Unknown signal.\n");
fflush(stderr);
}
/* Never reached! */
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Compile and run the above using e.g.
gcc -Wall -O2 example.c -o example
./example
The parent process will print to standard output, and the child process to standard error. The parent process will exit if you press Ctrl+C; the child process will ignore that signal. The child process uses SIGHUP instead of SIGIO (although a realtime signal, say SIGRTMIN+0, would be safer); if generated by the parent process exiting, the SIGHUP signal handler will raise SIGTERM in the child.
To make the termination causes easy to see, the child catches SIGTERM, and exits the next iteration (a second later). If so desired, the handler can use e.g. raise(SIGKILL) to terminate itself immediately.
Both parent and child processes show their process IDs, so you can easily send a SIGINT/SIGHUP/SIGTERM signal from another terminal window. (The child process ignores SIGINT and SIGHUP sent from outside the process.)
Your last code snippet still contains a race condition:
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int f = fork();
if (fork() == 0) {
// <- !!!race time!!!
prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGKILL); // ignore error checking for now
execl("./child", "child", NULL, NULL);
}
return 0;
}
Meaning that in the child, after the fork, until the prctl() has visible effects (think: returns), there is a time-window where the parent may exit.
To fix this race you have to save the PID of the parent before the fork and check it after the prctl() call, e.g.:
pid_t ppid_before_fork = getpid();
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) { perror(0); exit(1); }
if (pid) {
; // continue parent execution
} else {
int r = prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, SIGTERM);
if (r == -1) { perror(0); exit(1); }
// test in case the original parent exited just
// before the prctl() call
if (getppid() != ppid_before_fork)
exit(1);
// continue child execution ...
(see also)
Regarding executing a setuid/setgid program: You can then pass the ppid_before_fork by other means (e.g. in the argument or environment vector) and execute the prctl() (including the comparison) after the exec, i.e. inside the execed binary.
I don't know this for sure, but clearing the parent death signal on execve when invoking a set-id binary looks like an intentional restriction for security reasons. I'm not sure why, considering that you can use kill to send signals to setuid programs that share your real user ID, but they wouldn't have bothered making that change in 2.6.23 if there wasn't a reason to disallow it.
Since you control the code of the set-id child, here is a kludge: make the call to prctl, then immediately afterward, call getppid and see if it returns 1. If it does, then either the process was started directly by init (which is not as rare as it used to be) or the process was reparented to init before it had a chance to call prctl, which means its original parent is dead and it should exit.
(This is a kludge because I know of no way to rule out the possibility that the process was started directly by init. init never exits, so you have one case where it should exit and one case where it shouldn't and no way to tell which. But if you know from the larger design that the process will not be started directly by init, it should be reliable.)
(You must call getppid after prctl, or you have only narrowed the race window, not eliminated it.)

Invalid commands for child process in background in C

I have the following code in C:
if ((childpid = fork()) == 0) {
if (execvp(argv[0], argv) < 0) {
//execute failed
exit(1);
}
} else if (childpid < 0) {
//fork failed
} else {
//if execvp failed don't do anything here
//else do something
}
What I want is:
I enter a command.
If it is not executable it should not do anything but wait for my next entered command.
If it is executable it should do some things in the parent process.
If I enter e.g. sleep 1m it should execute it in my child process, do things in the parent process and should be still able to execute more jobs (this works fine). But when I execute something like abcdef (invalid command) it does the stuff in my parent process anyway.
Can someone tell me how the code should look like?
I also tried the following:
void signalHandler(int signal)
{
if (signal==SIGCHLD) {
printf("Child ended\n");
wait(NULL);
}
}
//in main
signal(SIGCHLD,signalHandler);
//...
if ((childpid = fork()) == 0) {
if (execvp(t_argv[0], t_argv) < 0) {
kill(getppid(),SIGCHLD);
}
}
Is this correct?
This way I get an error afterwards (when it's finished).
waitpid(childpid, &status, WNOHANG)
tells me it finished with an error (-1).
One possible solution is to use a pair of anonymous pipes, where the child process writes in the write-end of the pipe any status it needs to pass on to the parent. Then in the parent you check the read-end of the pipe, if you don't receive anything before the child-process exits then everything was okay and the child process successfully executed the program.
If the parent does receive anything before the child process exits, then it means that the exec call failed.
One possible solution is to terminate abnormally with a signal (for example, SIGUSR1) and check for that in the parent. This assumes that whatever program you execute in the child never terminates with SIGUSR1 - a reasonable assumption in most cases, I'd say. The parent can then check the termination status of the child.
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
pid_t childpid;
if ((childpid = fork()) == 0) {
if (execvp(argv[1], &argv[1]) < 0) {
raise(SIGUSR1);
}
} else if (childpid < 0) {
perror("fork()");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
} else {
int term_status;
if (wait(&term_status) < 0) {
perror("wait()");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (WIFSIGNALED(term_status) && WTERMSIG(term_status) == SIGUSR1) {
printf("execvp failed\n");
} else {
printf("success\n");
}
}
return 0;
}
Side note: you probably want execvp(argv[1], &argv[1]), because execvp(argv[0], argv) will execute this same program over and over.
Again, this works as long as the process executed by execvp(2) never terminates with SIGUSR1. Notice that if the process executed by execvp(2) terminates with SIGSEGV or other abnormal termination condition, it is still seen as success by the parent.

Launch execlp as background process

I'm trying to launch a program using execlp, continue with the program. and get control of the shell back.
This is what I did after some research from SO.
pid_t child;
pid_t sid;
child = fork();
if (!child) {
sid = setsid();
if(!sid) {
exit(1);
}
execlp(RUN_EXE, RUN_EXE, SPEC_RUN.run_args[j], (char *)0);
}
But I'm unable to print anything after execlp. The execlp works correctly for me.
What do I need to do for the shell to return back?
When successful, the execve(2) syscall does not return (it can return only on failure). So does the execlp(3) wrapper.
You usually want to execve inside the child process. And fork(2) could fail. You usually should call fflush(3) before fork-ing . So code:
fflush(NULL);
pid_t p = fork();
if (p < 0) { perror("fork"); exit (EXIT_FAILURE); };
if (p == 0) { /* child process */
execlp(RUN_EXE, RUN_EXE, SPEC_RUN.run_args[j], (char *)0);
perror("execlp");
fflush(NULL);
_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
/// continue in the parent process
printf("child process is %d\n", (int)p);
Don't forget to wait the child, e.g. using waitpid(2)
See also system(3), popen(3), daemon(3), posix_spawn and read Advanced Linux Programming (which has a nice chapter explaining these things).
Also, use strace(1) to understand how things work.
If I understand you correctly, you want to create a subprocess, run a program in that process, and then wait for it to finish. Each of those three steps is its own operation on Unix, when working with system primitives directly. You know about fork() and execlp() already; the third step, waiting for a subprocess to finish, is done with waitpid() and its relatives.
Building on what Basile wrote, here is the missing piece:
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L /* strsignal */
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
void run_program(void)
{
int status;
pid_t pid;
fflush(0);
/* create the subprocess */
pid = fork();
if (p < 0) { /* fork failed */
perror("fork");
exit(1);
}
/* in the child only, execute a program */
if (p == 0) {
execlp(RUN_EXE, RUN_EXE, SPEC_RUN.run_args[j], (char *)0);
/* If execlp returns, it failed. It is unsafe to call `exit` if this
happens; you must instead use `_exit`. This means you have to flush
output manually. */
fprintf(stderr, "execlp: %s: %s\n", RUN_EXE, strerror(errno));
fflush(stderr);
_exit(1);
}
/* in the parent, wait for the child to finish */
if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) {
perror("waitpid");
exit(1);
}
/* decode and report any failure of the child */
if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
if (WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0)
return; /* success! */
fprintf(stderr, "%s: unsuccessful exit %d\n",
RUN_EXE, WEXITSTATUS(status));
exit(1);
}
if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s%s\n",
RUN_EXE,
strsignal(WTERMSIG(status)),
WCOREDUMP(status) ? " (core dumped)" : "");
exit(1);
}
fprintf(stderr, "%s: impossible exit status %04x\n",
RUN_EXE, status);
exit(1);
}
... If that looks like a giant ball of hair that you don't want to deal with, you should consider using the higher-level library functions system() and/or popen() instead. They have their own flaws -- most importantly, they go through /bin/sh, which is often Not What You Want -- but they are easier to work with in simple cases.

waitpid() not allowing SIGINT to be sent to child process?

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <strings.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pwd.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <signal.h>
void sig_handler(int signal);
int pid, forkFlag = 0;
int main( int argc, char **argv, char **envp )
{
sigset(SIGINT, sig_handler); //handle ctrl + c
sigignore(SIGTSTP);
sigignore(SIGSTOP);
int ex, rv, status;
forkFlag = 1; //fork is being called
pid = fork();
if(pid == -1){
perror("fork");
exit(2);
}
else if (pid == 0){ //if child process
ex = access(argv[0], X_OK); //check if file is executable
if(ex){
perror("access");
exit(1);
}
else{
rv = execve(argv[0], argv, envp); //run program in child process
if(rv == -1){
perror("execve");
exit(1);
}
}
exit(0); //end child process
}
else{
rv = waitpid(pid, &status, 0); //wait for child
if(rv == -1){
perror("waitpid");
}
if(WEXITSTATUS(status)){ //check status of child if it did ot return 0
printf("The return status of the child was %d\n", WEXITSTATUS(status));
}
}
forkFlag=0;
}
void sig_handler(int signal)
{
if(signal == SIGINT && (pid && forkFlag)){
kill(pid,signal); //send kill to child
}
}
I'm trying to make my program ignore ctrl + C, except when there is a child process running, then it sends the the SIGINT to the child process. However, when I press ctrl + c when the child process is running, waitpid() returns -1 with the error "Interrupted System Call." This makes the child process stop running, but if I use ps, the child process is still there, but now labeled as defunct. I know from printf statements that kill is being calle din the function sig_handler, and that pid and forkFlag are their correct values. Is waitpid() making my program ignore the kill? How do I fix this? I know this code does next to nothing, but it's a small portion of my code (the only part involving fork)
Thanks for any help.
The problem is that the child processes get the same overridden handler for SIGINT. You probably want to reset the signal handler in the child process after the fork, or you might want to install the signal handler in the parent after you've already forked the child, so it doesn't inherit the overriden handler.

Resources