I was wondering how i would display the comments story tags with the following array....
{ "data": [ {
"id": "1364392319_4278554326462",
"from": {
"name": "Dave Morin",
"id": "1364392319" },
"story": "Dave Morin was tagged in Shae Rachael Garton's album Mobile Uploads.",
"story_tags": {
"0": [ {
"id": 1364392319,
"name": "Dave Morin",
"offset": 0,
"length": 10,
"type": "user" } ],
"25": [ {
"id": 100000204772261,
"name": "Shae Rachael Garton",
"offset": 25,
"length": 19, "type": "user" } ] },
Obviously its layed out better but thats the best i could grab :)
I don't completely understand your question, but it sounds like you're asking how to best use the information in the story_tags parameter to recreate the way Facebook highlights the username when such a post is displayed on Facebook.com?
It would help to know what code are you using and what the problem is if you want specific code examples, because it looks like you have the data you need there, but:
For each entry in the story_tags array:
id is the User or Page ID linked to by this tag
name is the name of that object
offset is the first character in the original message which should be highlighted/linked (i.e In this case, the original message is the story on the next level out` )
length is the number of characters to be highlighted/linked
type is the type of object linked in the tag
So for the example there:
Dave Morin was tagged in Shae Rachael Garton's album Mobile Uploads.
Tagging at offset 0 for 10 characters and offset 25 for 19 would highlight it like this:
Dave Morin was tagged in Shae Rachael Garton's album Mobile Uploads.
With the first link linking to Dave's profile and the second to Shae's
Related
I'm having trouble creating a Solr query to be able to pull out the right documents, and am starting to wonder if what I am trying to do is even possible.
Currently on Solr 8.9 using a managed schema and every field is using a wildcard field.
Firstly what the document looks like
(changed names due to redacting internal business language):
{
"id": "COUNTY:1",
"county_name_s": "Hertfordshire",
"coordinates_s": {
"id": "COUNTY:1COORDINATES:!",
"lat_s": "54.238948",
"long_s": "54.238948"
},
"cities": [
{
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:1",
"city_name_s": "St Albans",
"size": {
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:1SIZE:1",
"sq_ft_s": "100",
"sq_meters_s": "5879"
}
},
{
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:2",
"city_name_s": "Watford",
"size": {
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:2SIZE:2",
"sq_ft_s": "150",
"sq_meters_s": "10000"
}
}
],
"mayor": {
"title_s": "Mrs.",
"first_name_s": "Sheila",
"last_name_s": "Smith"
}
}
And what I want to return:
{
"id": "COUNTY:1",
"county_name_s": "Hertfordshire",
"coordinates": {
"id": "COUNTY:1COORDINATES:!",
"lat_s": "54.238948",
"long_s": "54.238948"
},
"cities": [
{
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:1",
"city_name_s": "St Albans",
"size": {
"id": "COUNTY:1CITY:1SIZE:1",
"sq_ft_s": "100",
"sq_meters_s": "5879"
}
}
],
"mayor": {
"title_s": "Mrs.",
"first_name_s": "Sheila",
"last_name_s": "Smith"
}
}
Basically my goal is to return more or less the entire thing, however with filtering out one of the cities. For example, the condition for the city would be like city_name_s:"St Albans". So it's to say that I want the parent and all children, however if the child is in that array (ie cities array), then the given field (city_name_s) must equal my defined value, or we don't want that child.
Things I've tried:
I've basically tried two approaches here:
I've tried to play around with {!child} and {!parent} to get a result that I want. Currently I can only get something from City level or the entire thing as if the filter was not there at county level.
I've tried to change values for the childFilter option, with things like:
city_name_s:"St Albans" OR (*:* NOT city_name_s:[* TO *]) to try and say 'if field exists it should be this'.
Anyhow I'm starting to run out of ideas with this; been hacking away at it for the past couple of days and not really got any closer.
Thanks in advance for any help; bashing my head against the wall currently so any suggestions are more than welcome :)
I had a similar issue in solr 9.0.0 and this solved it for me: Apache Solr Filter on Child Documents
In your case, just add fl=*,[child childFilter=city_name_s:"St Albans"]
Ok, so this is going to be a complicated question, I hope I'm clear. Full admission, I just finished a Bootcamp yesterday so I'm not aware of a lot of technologies out there, and I think I may need additional technologies to accomplish what I'm looking for...
Right now, I have an application that uses bandsintown API call to populate a database. What I've noticed is that bandsintown isn't consistent with their data returns in each object, which makes operations after retrieving the objects difficult/seemingly impossible. An example would be that different artists performing at the same venue returns different latitude, longitude, venue name, etc. Examples:
Here is Primus playing at Bonnaroo:
{
"offers": [],
"venue": {
"country": "United States",
"city": "Manchester",
"latitude": "35.4839582",
"name": "Bonnaroo Music and Arts Festival 2020",
"location": "",
"region": "TN",
"longitude": "-86.08963169999998"
},
"datetime": "2020-09-25T12:00:00",
"on_sale_datetime": "",
"description": "",
"lineup": [
"Primus"
],
"bandsintown_plus": false,
"id": "1020701795",
"title": "",
"artist_id": "1263",
"url": "https://www.bandsintown.com/e/1020701795?app_id=451f31b2808001d069daed45c32a9dac&came_from=267&utm_medium=api&utm_source=public_api&utm_campaign=event"
}
compared to The Weeknd playing at Bonnaroo:
{
"id": "18604416",
"url": "https://www.bandsintown.com/e/18604416?app_id=451f31b2808001d069daed45c32a9dac&came_from=267&utm_medium=api&utm_source=public_api&utm_campaign=event",
"datetime": "2017-05-17T19:00:00",
"title": "",
"description": "",
"venue": {
"location": "",
"name": "Bonnaroo",
"latitude": "35.476247",
"longitude": "-86.081026",
"city": "Manchester",
"country": "United States",
"region": "TN"
},
"lineup": [
"The Weeknd"
],
"offers": [],
"artist_id": "1371750",
"on_sale_datetime": "",
"bandsintown_plus": false
}
My issue is now I wish to aggregate and $group in MongoDB because both events were at Bonnaroo, but the Object{venue.name} is not the same... Even the latitude & longitude is different so I can't use those either. I'm wondering if there is a way to alter the data of the objects automatically without having to go into the DB and edit individual objects. Both these events include the word Bonnaroo, so could I have something find and match text and then slice out the text that isn't similar? If so, can I then use the matched venue name field as a reference to change the latitude & longitude values too?
I hope I was clear, feel free to ask any clarifying questions if I wasn't. This site has helped me so many times and I appreciate all the hard work the community puts in to help each other! Thanks ahead of time!
~~~EDIT~~~
Thanks for the first reply #morad takhtameshloo.
So I was able to build something before I saw your reply that splits the data into an array, which is along the same lines as what you offered. The only thing that won't work is the $arrayToElem with the index cause there are some venues that:
Have multiple-word names (e.g. The Stone Pony)
Have words before the actual venue name (saw it in one result that was like
"Verizon Live Presents at The Stony Pony")
Using this Bonnaroo example, I have the new field returning every word as a value in the array:
"venueName": ["Bonnaroo", "Music", "and","Arts","Festival","2020"]
My next step is going to be to compare the [venueName] of the 'Primus' object and the 'The Weeknd' object, find what values in the array are the same, and return them back to the value of "venueName".
Hope this makes more sense, I appreciate your input!
actual the trick depends to your data, you should provide more data if the ones you've provided does not depict the whole problem
in other words how deep you want to dive in.
for the dumbest answer, at least for the data you've provided
db.prod4.aggregate([
{
$addFields: {
venueName: {
$arrayElemAt: [{ $split: ['$venue.name', ' '] }, 0],
},
},
},
])
but that not the case of course, something that comes to mind is that venue's geolocations for the same venue should not be far away from each other, for instance, the data you've provided two locations are in 1.16 KM of each other.
so another dummy solution that works would be writing a simple script that selects a random element from the array of all data, and finds data that their lat/lng is for example in 2km of that point, and removes those elements from array and selects another random element from the array and do the same
if you provide more data it would be much more easier, because the easiest solution is to find many patterns and plan only for them
I'm using the AWS machine learning service Comprehend Medical to analyse clinical texts and extract data.
Some context info (skippable maybe):
This is the type of input:
Pt is 40yo mother, highschool teacher
HPI : Sleeping trouble on present dosage of Clonidine. Severe Rash on face and leg, slightly itchy
Meds : Vyvanse 50 mgs po at breakfast daily,
Clonidine 0.2 mgs -- 1 and 1 / 2 tabs po qhs
HEENT : Boggy inferior turbinates, No oropharyngeal lesion
Lungs : clear
Heart : Regular rhythm
Skin : Mild erythematous eruption to hairline
Follow-up as scheduled
This is the kind of output I get from AWS:
{
"Entities": [
{
"Id": 0,
"BeginOffset": 6,
"EndOffset": 10,
"Score": 0.9984116554260254,
"Text": "40yo",
"Category": "PROTECTED_HEALTH_INFORMATION",
"Type": "AGE",
"Traits": []
},
{
"Id": 1,
"BeginOffset": 19,
"EndOffset": 37,
"Score": 0.28823626041412354,
"Text": "highschool teacher",
"Category": "PROTECTED_HEALTH_INFORMATION",
"Type": "PROFESSION",
"Traits": []
},
...
Then I would like to render this kind of UI, the same way AWS does in their console to represent Comprehend medical outputs (see the image) :
AWS Console Comprehend Medical output representation
I managed to tag the text. But I have no idea in how to make the tagged arrows: represent those dependecies between html elements.
I have tried some react libraries like Taggy(only do tagging) and explored some other solutions like Spacey (will require SSR and not even the same output of tags + tagged arrows ),
Anyone could suggest an approach to do this kind of tagged arrows between those html components?
Thank you ma people.
I'm writing an Alexa Skill, and I can only get single word parameters into my code.
Here is the intent schema:
{
"intents": [
{
"intent": "HeroQuizIntent",
"slots": [
{
"name": "SearchTerm",
"type": "SEARCH_TERMS"
}
]
},
{
"intent": "HeroAnswerIntent",
"slots": [
{
"name": "SearchTerm",
"type": "SEARCH_TERMS"
}
]
},
{
"intent": "AMAZON.HelpIntent"
}
]
}
and my sample utterances are:
HeroQuizIntent quiz me
HeroAnswerIntent is it {SearchTerm}
For the HeroAnswerIntent, I'm checking the SearchTerm slot, and I'm only getting single words in there.
So, "Peter Parker" gives "Parker", "Steve Rogers" gives "Rogers", and "Tony Stark" gives "Stark".
How do I accept multiple words into a slot?
I've had same problem with my skill and that's the only solution which is worked for my skill to use several words, but you need to check are these slots not empty and concatenate them
Intent schema:
{
"intent": "HeroAnswerIntent",
"slots": [
{
"name": "SearchTermFirst",
"type": "SEARCH_TERMS"
},
{
"name": "SearchTermSecond",
"type": "SEARCH_TERMS"
},
{
"name": "SearchTermThird",
"type": "SEARCH_TERMS"
}
]
},
Sample utterance
HeroAnswerIntent is it {SearchTermFirst}
HeroAnswerIntent is it {SearchTermFirst} {SearchTermSecond}
HeroAnswerIntent is it {SearchTermFirst} {SearchTermSecond} {SearchTermThird}
And last one you need to put every of your words in separate line in SEARCH_TERMS slot definition
Also using AMAZON.LITERAL sometimes not pass variable into skill at all even if you test it using service simulator (skill console, test tab)
The solution #Xanxir mentioned works equivalently with the newer custom slots format. In this case, you'd just put multiple length examples in your custom list of values for your slot type.
I had to change the Slot type to AMAZON.LITERAL.
The trick was that in the sample utterances, I also had to provide multiple utterances to demonstrate the minimum and maximum sizes of literals that Alexa should interpret. It's wonky, but works.
Here's the reference for it: https://developer.amazon.com/public/solutions/alexa/alexa-skills-kit/docs/alexa-skills-kit-interaction-model-reference
AMAZON.SearchQuery
So you can use this in your utterances, and it will detect all words that the user speaks in between, Its rather accurate
It will solve your problem.
Ref Link: Alexa SearcQuery
in my mongo collection called pixels, I have documents like the sample
I'm looking for a way to search in the actions.tags part of the documents?
db.pixelsactifs.actions.find({tags:{$in : ["Environnement"]}})
db.pixelsactifs.find({actions.tags:{$in : {Environnement}})
doesn't work. I'm also looking for the PHP equivalent ?
I'm also asking myself should I make an "actions" collection instead of putting everything inside one document
I'm new to mongo so any good tutorial on structuring the db would be great
Thanks for the insight
{
"_id": { $oid": "51b98009e4b075a9690bbc71" },
"name": "open Atlas",
"manager": "Tib Kat",
"type": "Association",
"logo": "",
"description": "OPEN ATLAS",
"actions": [
{
"name": "Pixel Humain",
"tags": [ "Toutes thémathiques" ],
"description": "le PH agit localement",
"images": [],
"origine": "oui",
"website": "www.echolocal.org"
}
],
"email": "my#gmail.com",
"adress": "102 rue",
"cp": "97421",
"city": "Saint louis",
"country": "Réunion",
"phone": "06932"
}
you can try like this
collectionName->find(array("actions.tags" => array('$in' => "Environnement")));
I do not think you need to maintain the actions in separate collection. NoSQL gives you more flexibility to do embed th document . Event it allows sub document also be indexed . True power of NoSQL comes with merging the document into each other to get the faster retrieval. The only short coming I can see here , you can not get the part of sub document . find will always return the complete Parent document. In case you want to show one entry of subdocument array , it is not possible . It will return the whole subdocument and you have to filter in on the client side. So if you are planning to show action as individual to end user , it is better to have in separate collection
Read here : http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/use-cases/