There are two similar questions asked here and here but no adequate answers are given.
I found that I can use Enunciate to create WADL for a RestEasy service. So I tried it.
In one of my services I have a method mapped to HTTP GET which I am using like below
...
import org.jboss.resteasy.annotations.Form;
...
#GET
#Produces({MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON})
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public WebServicePageResponse<D> find(#Form WebServicePageRequest<E> wsPageRequest)
{
...
}
Enunciate performs a validation on the service methods before it generates the WADL, and throws this error and fails
"A resource method that is mapped to HTTP GET must not specify an entity parameter."
#Form is a RestEasy specific annotation, while Enunciate can only parse JSR-311 annotations.
Has anyone done something similar? Has anyone successfully used Enunciate to generate documentation for a RestEasy service? Are there any alternatives?
Looks like a great suggestion for a new feature. Tracking it here.
It might be an awkward workaround, but have you tried using the signature override?
The best solution I found to this was to remove #Form annotation and use the individual annotations instead (enter link description hereatleast till Enunciate start supporting this).
Related
We are tying to use a WebService OutFaultInterceptor as per this blog post and it doesn't seem to work in JBoss 7.x.
The problem is simple in that it just ignores the #OutFaultInterceptor annotation. I tested this by putting in a erroneous interceptor name and it didn't error out. Logging within the interceptor is simply not called (when the interceptor name is correct).
I have also tried using the WEB-INF/jboss-webservices.xml to define out interceptors but that also seems to get ignored.
Removing the #Stateless annotation also does not seem to help.
This was working fine on JBoss 5.1 but simply seems to not work on JBoss 7.x. What am I missing here?
Is there an alternative way to "translate" exceptions into soap faults?
In order for using Apache CXF APIs and implementation classes you need to add a dependency to the org.apache.cxf (API) module and / or org.apache.cxf.impl (implementation) module.
Dependencies: org.apache.cxf services
According documentation:
When using annotations on your endpoints / handlers such as the Apache
CXF ones (#InInterceptor, #GZIP, ...) remember to add the proper
module dependency in your manifest. Otherwise your annotations are not
picked up and added to the annotation index by JBoss Application
Server 7, resulting in them being completely and silently ignored
See also: JBoss Modules
I hope this help.
I am learning endpoints and saw that other Google APIs have this "fields" query attribute.
Also it appears in the api explorer.
I would like to get a partial response for my api also, but when using the fields selector from the api explorer it is simply ignored by the server.
Do I need to implement something in the server side?
Haven't found anything in the docs.
Any help is welcome.
From what I gather, Google has enabled partial response for their APIs, but has not yet explained how to enable it for custom APIs.
I'm assuming if they do let us know, it might entail annotations, and possibly overriding a method or two.
I've been looking also, to no avail.
I've been looking into this just due to a related question, where I'd like to know how to force the JSON object in the response from my google Endpoint API, to include even the members of the class that are null valued.
I was trying to see if anything would be returned if I used a partial response with a field indicated that was null.. would the response have the property at least, or would it still not even exist as a property.
Anyway, this lead me into the same research, and I do not believe we can enable partial responses in our own APIs yet.
You can return a partial response by defining the parameter in #MyModel.method
#MyModel.method(path='mymodel',
http_method='POST',
name='mymodel.insert',
response_fields=('model_id', 'date_time'))
def mymodel_insert(self, mymodel):
mymodel.put()
return mymodel
Check out this tutorial Endpoints tutorial
I'm trying to create my first GAE Endpoint app, and instead of generating an endpoint from a class, I'd like to create my own personalised Endpoint... is this possible?
I've written this class:
#Api(name="my_endpoint", path="my_endpoint")
public class MyFirstEndpoint {
#ApiMethod (name="my_method", path="my_method", httpMehod=HttpMethod.GET)
public Response myMethod(#Named("param1") String param1) {
...
}
}
But when I try to generate the Endpoint Client Library in Eclipse, it says that there was an error... and the worst thing is that it doesn't say what error it is!
Yes it's possible to create custom Endpoints.
I had the same error. I think you can't use "_" in the name of the Api nor the ApiMethod...
Try using "myEndpoint" and "myMethod" as the names and keep the "_" in the paths.
A bit unrelated to this particular case, but it's the first thing that popped up on Google when searching for the error: you can't have overloaded methods in your Endpoints classes. Found this by looking in the Error console as described above in a comment.
We have a Web Service client generated with CXF from a WSDL.
We now need to have an access to the generated SOAP requests in order to persist them.
It seems that the framework does not provide this behaviour by default.
Anyway do you guys ever tried to do such a thing?
I am thinking of building my own interceptor that can access to the fully generated message but maybe there is a better choice?
Any advice?
Thanks in advance.
By default CXF uses stax to stream your requests. If you add an interceptor, you can get access to the stax output writer and copy the events.
There is existing code in CXF to force the existence of a DOM tree; see code related to SAAJ and security.
In general, detailed CXF questions get better answers on the CXF user mailing list than here.
I'm trying to use Guice to inject properties of a JSF managed bean. This is all running on Google App Engine (which may or may not be important)
I've followed the instructions here:
http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-guice&s=google-guice&t=GoogleAppEngine
One problem is in the first step. I can't subclass the Servlet module and setup my servlet mappings there because Faces is handled by the javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet which subclasses Servlet, not HttpServlet. So, I tried leaving my servlet configuration in the web.xml file and simply instantiating a new ServletModel() along with my business module when creating the injector in the context listener described in the second step.
Having done all that, along with the web.xml configuration, my managed bean isn't getting any properties injected. The method is as follows
#ManagedBean
#ViewScoped
public class ViewTables implements Serializable
{
private DataService<Table> service;
#Inject
public void setService( DataService<Table> service )
{
this.service = service;
}
public List<Table> getTables()
{
return service.getAll();
}
}
So, I'm wondering if there is a trick to get Guice injecting into a JSF managed bean? I obviously can't use the constructor injection because JSF needs a no-arg constructor to create the bean.
Check the following JSF-Guice integration framework/advice:
http://code.google.com/p/jsf-sugar/
http://notdennisbyrne.blogspot.com/2007/09/integrating-guice-and-jsf.html
http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/integrating_guice_and_jsf/
http://snippets.dzone.com/posts/show/7171
You can also create an HTTP servlet that then simple delegates the request on to a FacesServlet (like a wrapper). This should give you the same effect using Guice Servlet.
How about this approach, works well for us:
http://uudashr.blogspot.com/2008/12/guicing-jsf-with-guice.html
being the developer of jsf sugar I really would like to know the problem you had using it. We are already using it in production here so there shouldn't be any "show stoppers", maybe something is just not well documented? Just drop me a mail: murbanek(at)gmx_net (replace the _ with a .) .
check out http://code.google.com/p/guice2jsf/, and website starchu.blogspot.com, it has excellent library that provides Guice and JSF 2.0 integration
As information in this post are getting out of date but the question is still relevant, I'd like to share my findings about this topic. I wrote a little tutorial including a runnable sample project on how to setup a fully guice powered web stack. You can find it here: https://github.com/skuzzle/guice-jsf