Is there any plan to include a "did you mean" feature in the Google App Engine Full Text Search API? It would be very powerful to have a default way of testing full text queries. For example the query "barcak obama" would generate: "Did you mean: barack obama ?" And it would be good to have the feature being able to simultaneously handle many different languages.
Not at this time (but who knows what the future will bring), you would have to implement something on top of it yourself.
One way to get native support is file a feature request and get enough people vote for it. This will help to set the right priorities.
Related
Ok, here is what I'm trying to do. When we receive a new RingCentral Voicemail, I want Zap to search Salesforce to see if the From phone number exists in a lead or contact. If it doesn't, I then want RingCentral to send a text message to the phone number that left a voicemail. Any ideas on how to go about this?
I have RingCentral Voicemail as the trigger. I can then set up Salesforce to search specific fields to see if this number exists. But, there aren't any options to continue if the phone number doesn't exist.
David here, from the Zapier Platform team.
That's (mostly) not possible at this time, but that's a great feature request! The best way to get this heard is writing into our support at contact#zapier.com and letting them know. They'll be able to collect info from you and let you know if that gets released.
I say mostly above because it's not possible on an actual "search" step. You can write a custom app that behaves differently, but writing a custom app for Salesforce would be quite an undertaking. I don't personally recommend it.
I am trying to formulate a proposal for an application that allows a user to print a batch of documents based on data stored in a SQL table. The SQL table indicates which documents are due and also contains all demographic information. This is outside of what I normally do and am trying to see if these is a platform/application that already exists to do such a task
For example
List of all documents: Document #1 - Document #10
Person 1 is due for document #: 1,5,7,8
Person 2 is due for document #: 2.6
Person 3 is due for document #: 7,8,10
etc
Ideally, what I would like is for the user to be able to push a button and get a printed stack of documents that have been customized for each user including basic demographic info like name, DOB, etc
Like i said at the top, I already have all of the needed information in a database, I am just trying to figure out the best approach to move that information onto a document
I have done some research and found some people have used mail merge in Word or using Access as a front end but I don't know if this is the best way. I've also found this document. Any advice would be greatly appreciated
If I understand your problem correctly, your problem is two-fold: Firstly, you need to find a way to generated documents based on data (mail-merge) and secondly, you might need to print them two.
For document generation you have two basic approaches: template-based and programmatically from scratch. I suppose that you will opt for a template based approach which basically means that you design (in MS Word) a template document (Word, RTF, ...) that acts as a template and contains placeholders and other tags that designate »dynamic« parts of the document. Then, at document generation time, you need a .NET library/processor that you will pass this template document and the data, where the processor will populate the template with the data and return the resulting document.
One way to achieve this functionality would be employing MS Words' native mail-merge, but you should know that this would involve using Office COM and Word Application Automation which should be avoided almost always.
Another option is to build such a system on top of Open XML SDK. This is velid option, but it will be a pretty demanding task and will most probably cost you much more than buying a commercial .NET library that does mail-merge out-of-the-box – been there, done that. But of course, the good side here is that you will be able to tailer the solution to your needs. If you go down this road I recoment that you use Content Controls for tagging documents/templates. The solution with CCs will be much easier to implement than the solution with bookmarks.
I'm not very familliar with the open source solutions and I'm not sury how many there are that can do mail-merge. One I know is FlexDoc (on CodePlex) but its problem is that uses a construct (XmlControl) for tagging that is depricated in Word 2010+.
Then there are commercial solutions. Again I don't know them in detail but I know that the majority of them are a general purpose document processing libraries. Our company has been using this document generation toolkit for some time now and I can say it covers all our »template-based document generation« needs. It doesn't require MS Word at doc generation time, and has really helpful add-in for MS word and you only need several lines of code to integrate it in your project. Templating is very powerful and you can set-up a template in a very short time. While templates are Word documents, you can generate PDF or XPS docs as well. XPS is useful because you can use .NET/WPF prining framework that works with XPS docs to print documents. This is a very high-end solution, but of course, the downside here is that it is not a free solution.
I need a database of interests for a coming project.
By saying "interests" I mean like:
Sports - Football, Basketball and so on...
Is somebody know something like this?
I just don't want start writing thousands (or even millions) of interests.
Try to google on "interests list" or "hobbies list" and the write simple parcer to extract all (based on neko-html for example). Examples of useful links:
http://www.notsoboringlife.com/list-of-hobbies/
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/list-types-of-hobbies/
Also it is possible to ask admins of any dating sites to make a simple DB-query to get relevant result.
There is an API from google called Freebase. I allows you suggest to the user what input he should give the same way google search suggests you what to look for.
Freebase
I’m trying to help a friend in his election campaign.
We mainly need a tool to manage a list of possible voters. We need to be able to:
1. Easily update details about the voters, and
2. Query for voters according to various parameters, and show and print the resulting lists
To enable campaigners to work from multiple workstations, we would like the system to be distributed, probably web based.
We would also like that to be in Hebrew, if possible.
Is there any existing tool that easily enables it?
If not, can you recommend on an easy way to implement such a tool?
(I have a solid programming knowledge, but not much time to devote to that)
You can achieve this easily with iFreeTools Creator. Just create the entities and attributes for Voters and add campaigners as users providing their Google email-id.
Regarding your requirements..
* This app is web-based. It runs on Google App Engine.
* The interface is English only, but data can be in unicode. Entity name and attribute names are also "data", so they can be in unicode too.
Other related features which might be useful in this context..
* You can import voter list using CSV files.
* Campaigners can search for voters near their workstation by filtering out records based on nearness to a geo-location.
// Disclosure : I wrote code for this web-app. Hope you like it. Feedback welcome.
Some possible answers might be found in the same question I asked in the web apps forum
Background:
I'm building a poetry site with user submitted content. The relevant user actions for my questions are that users can:
a. Go to fancysitename.com/view to see all poems so far
b. Go to fancysitename.com/submit to submit your own poem.
c. Go to fancysitename.com/apoemid to view a particular poem you've bookmarked before.
d. Go to fancysitename.com/search to enter a word to search for in all the poems.
All the poems are stored as text fields in a database and referenced by a poem id. So the "apoemid" in step c will be the primary key of the tuple and I'll just pull up the text after getting the key from the url.
Question:
The poems exist nowhere except in a database. My webapp is literally 4 html files. Will this approach affect my search engine rankings?
Is there a more efficient way to do 'd' rather than do a Select * on the db and manually parsing the text on the server? Each poem will be at the most 10 lines long, so I would imagine using a full text search engine like Lucerne will probably be overkill.
Caveat
I'm running this on the google app engine for now, so my database customization options are pretty limited. So while I'd certainly be interested in hearing about the ideal way to do this, this is a pet side project so my budget is limited :(
Thanks!
Edit: Apparently I don't google so well at 7am. I've since found a solution for question 2 here so please disregard question 2.
AppEngine currently doesnt support full text indexing, they do have a better than nothing SearchableModel.
Some details of SearchableModel can be found here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/f64eacbd31629668/8dac5499bd58a6b7?lnk=gst&q=searchablemodel
Regarding search engine ranking, yes having all your poems in the datastore can affect your ranking. This is generally overcome through the use of a sitemap. Here is an article about how StackOverflow uses a sitemap to help its search ranking.
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001174.html
In most database engines, you can accomplish this kind of searching. For example MysQL does have full text searching. I am not sure how app engine works but you can always have a stored procedure does this search.
Where you store your data will not affect your site's ranking, only how you serve it up (on what URLs, etc). There's absolutely no way for an arbitrary search spider to tell where you store your data, and no reason for it to care, either.
Regardless of the length of your text, you will need full-text searching if you want to search inside a string. As Sam points out, SearchableModel ought to work just fine for that.