This code:
extern void *malloc(unsigned int);
struct Box {
int x, y ,w, h;
};
struct Wall {
char color[15];
struct Box *boxes[20];
};
int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
struct Wall *mywall = malloc(sizeof(struct Wall));
struct Box *myboxes[] = mywall->boxes;
return 0;
}
gives me invalid initializer error at line 14. What I am trying to do, is to get a copy of array of struct pointers, which are in a different struct.
Ouch; there are a number of problems here.
extern void *malloc(unsigned int);
Don't do that; use #include <stdlib.h> because that will be correct and what you wrote is typically incorrect (the argument to malloc() is a size_t, which is not necessarily an unsigned int; it might be unsigned long, or some other type).
struct Box {
int x, y ,w, h;
};
Apart from erratic space, struct Box is OK.
struct Wall {
char color[15];
struct Box *boxes[20];
};
And struct Wall is OK too.
int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
You aren't using argc or argv, so you'd be better using the alternative declaration of:
int main(void)
Original code again:
{
struct Wall *mywall = malloc(sizeof(struct Wall));
This allocates but does not initialize a single struct Wall. Of itself, it is OK, though you should check that the allocation succeeded before you use it. You also need to worry about allocating the struct Box items that the elements of the array will point to.
struct Box *myboxes[] = mywall->boxes;
You've got a minor catastrophe on hand here. You can't copy arrays like that. You haven't checked that you've got an array. Ignoring the error checking, you are stuck with one of:
struct Box *myboxes[] = { &mywall->boxes[0], &mywall->boxes[1], ... };
or:
struct Box **myboxes = &mywall->boxes;
I'm not convinced that you'd want the second version, for all it's shorter.
return 0;
I like to see return 0; at the end of main(), even though C99 allows you to omit it.
}
How about:
struct Box **myboxes = mywall->boxes;
?
Then you can do stuff like:
for ( int i = 0 ; i < 15 ; i++ )
mywall->boxes[i] = malloc(sizeof(Box));
Box* x = myboxes[1];
As the code is now, mywall->boxes isn't initialized.
NOTE: just re-read the question - this won't return a copy of the array, but point to the same location. There's no short solution for a copy without using memcpy or just copying the structs.
Related
I want to return the name of the smallest city population-wise, if it is the second city. (Please don't mind the if statement, I know it's bland), the missing return is what bothers me.
I assume I should declare a pointer inside the function rSmallestCity, like *rtrn but I guess the source variable is destroyed before it is used?
typedef struct Coordinate{
int x,y;
}Coordinate;
typedef struct city{
char name[20];
int population;
Coordinate coordinates;
}city;
char *rSmallestCity(city **cl, int n)
{
char *rtrn = NULL;
if(cl[n-2]->population>cl[n-1]->population)
{
rtrn = &cl[n-1]->name;
}
return rtrn;
}
int main()
{
city c1 ={.name="Mumbai", .population=310, .coordinates.x=3, .coordinates.y=4};
city c2 ={.name="Delhi", .population=300, .coordinates.x=3, .coordinates.y=2};
city *clist[2];
clist[0]=&c1;
clist[1]=&c2;
printf("\n%s is smallest\n",rSmallestCity(clist,2));
}
warning: assignment to 'char ' from incompatible pointer type 'char ()[20]' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]|
I assume I should declare a pointer inside the function rSmallestCity, like *rtrn but I guess the source variable is destroyed before it is used?
A good question. And your assumption is correct. Creating a variable inside a function it's existence ends upon leaving the function. But in this case, because the struct member name is already a char * you do not need to create another variable. Just return c1.name. (see code example below.)
A few other suggestions:
In the struct declaration:
typedef struct Coordinate{
int x,y;
}Coordinate;
You've used the same symbol (Coordinate) for the struct name, and for it's typedef. This is not a good practice. If you need both a struct name and a typedef, pick different symbols. BTW, in this this example, only one or the other is needed. Say you pick the typedef, then the struct is completely defined by:
typedef struct {
int x,y;
}Coordinate;
That suggestion applies to both struct declarations in your example code.
The signatures for the main function do not include int main(){...} rather
int main(void){..., return 0;} and int main(int argc, char *argv[]){..., return 0;}
The following code example illustrates some of the other suggestions for improvements in comments under your post,
typedef struct {
int x,y;
}Coordinate;
typedef struct {
char name[20];
int population;
Coordinate coordinates;
}city;
//return char * rather than char to allow for full null terminated char array (string)
char * rSmallestCity(city c1[],int cityCount)//generisize function prototype to
{ //to easily accommodate bigger arrays if needed
long long size, sizeKeep = 8e9; //index and population. initialize larger than possible population
int indexKeep = 0;
//note you do not need to define a char *, the struct already contains one
for(int i=0; i<cityCount; i++)//use a loop rather than a single comparison, keep the smalles
{
size = c1[i].population;
sizeKeep = (size < sizeKeep) ? indexKeep = i, size : sizeKeep;
}
printf("\n%s\n",c1[indexKeep].name);
return c1[indexKeep].name;
};
int main(void)//use minimum signature for main, and call return before leaving.
{
//combining your original declarations and assignments for struct
//into a single declaration/definition.
city c1[] = {{.name="Mumbai", .population=310, .coordinates.x=3, .coordinates.y=4},
{.name="Delhi", .population=300, .coordinates.x=3, .coordinates.y=2}};
int cityCount = sizeof(c1)/sizeof(c1[0]);
printf("\n%s is smallest",rSmallestCity(c1, cityCount));
return 0;
};
The solution that I originally left in comment under OP (remove & in the line &cl[n-1]->name;) needs some explanations to avoid problems later.
(It is an educational answer not a full answer on pointers, array decay, ... And many examples can be found on stackoverflow. I tried to simplify)
Try this simple code.
int main()
{
char myString1[25]="Toulouse" ; // French City
printf("%p\n",myString1);
printf("%p\n",&myString1);
}
The output is the same, but an array name and the address of an array name are not the same. The array name is evaluated to the address of its first element. So it works in your case but a warning is issued during compilation and it is very important. Firstly, do not remove compilation warnings.
Now, try this code :
int main()
{
char myString1[25]="Toulouse" ; // French City
printf("%p\n",myString1+1);
printf("%p\n",&myString1+1);
}
The outputs are different. Because myString1 is evaluated to char* and &myString1 to char [25]. So +1, in the first, case adds one (sizeof char) to the pointer and in the other case, it adds 25.
Delete the "&" in the line:
rtrn = &cl[n-1]->name;
To extremely simplify, you assigned an "address of char[]" to a char*, but array syntax makes it work regardless.
I created a certain struct and then I went on to create an array for the struct in the following manner:
struct members
{
char name[32];
intmax_t personalID;
}typedef struct members Member;
Member array_member[100];
Later on, I want to know how many elements there are in the array, according to some answers I have read, this should be enough
int nrofmembers = sizeof(array_member) / sizeof(array_member[0]);
But due to my experience, I know that this is not possible if the array itself is a parameter. So I tried this:
int nrofmembers = sizeof(*array_member) / sizeof(array_member[0]);
Unfortunately, this has turned out to be wrong. The value of nrofmembers after this is 1, but that's not true.
Any advice on how to do this?
If you have the pointer you cant use this simple compile time method. You need to pass the size of the array to the function
In C you always pass the pointer even if your declaration is ... foo(Member arr[]) or ... foo(Member arr[100])
struct members
{
char name[32];
intmax_t personalID;
}typedef struct members Member;
Member array_member[100];
int foo(Member *arr, size_t size)
{
/* .... */
}
int main()
{
/* correct */
foo(array_member, sizeof(array_member) / sizeof(array_member[0]));
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
I'm developing a driver in C for communication and the messages exchanged don't have a fixed size. The recommendation of communication bus is to use structs for multi-topics, which is also my case.
My 1st problem: I have to keep listening for new messages, and when I get one I have to process message data (it has a delay) and still listening for new messages.
1st solution: using thread when got new messages to process data.
My 2nd problem: Data in message can have multiple data of a struct, and my communicator requires using a struct to organize this multiple values.
2nd solution: using struct hack to allocate memory dynamic size of struct.
My current problem: when I'd pass my struct as argument to the thread, or any function, I'm loosing data structure and getting wrong values.
A short test which a made is:
typedef struct test{
int size;
int value[];
} test;
void allocation(test *v){
test *aux = (test *)malloc(sizeof(test)+3*sizeof(int));
int i;
aux->value[0] = 2;
aux->size = 3;
aux->value[1] = 1;
aux->value[2] = 5;
printf("Teste1 %d\n",aux->size);
for(i=0; i < aux->size; i++){
printf("%d\n", aux->value[i]);
}
*v = *aux;
}
void cleanup(test *v){
free(v);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
test v;
int i;
allocation(&v);
printf("Teste2 %d\n",v.size);
for(i=0; i < v.size; i++){
printf("%d\n", v.value[i]);
}
//cleanup(&v);
return 0;
}
In this test I got right values in first print and wrong values in second (only v.size is giving a right value).
And my struct is a little more complex than that in test. My struct is like:
typedef struct test1{
double v1;
double v2;
} test1;
typedef struct test2{
int size;
test1 values[];
} test2;
Do you know how to fix my memory struct in that function, once I have all elements necessary to fix? Please, keep in mind that is desirable (not required) that I could also allocate multiple test2 data.
The thing here is that you assign structs with incomplete member int value[]; Though it is in principle OK to copy two structs by value (and this is actually what happens if you write *v = *aux); However, as the compiler does not know which size member value[] will take on at runtime, the "sizeof" of v as well as the size of *aux is always 4, i.e. the known size of the one int member size. Hence, only this is copied, whereas the value[]-array simply gets not copied.
A way out out this situation would be require a pointer to a pointer (i.e. allocation(test **v), such that the memory reserved can be directly assigned to it, using a pointer to struct test in main, i.e. test *vptr, and call allocation(&vptr).
If you cannot avoid passing a reverence to the value (instead of a reference to a pointer to the value), I suppose you'll have to use memcpy to transfer the contents. But this does actually not make sense, because then the receiver must provide enough space to take on the value[]-array in advance (which is not the case if you simple declare a variable of the form test v). An then the malloc and the aux would make no sense; you could directly write into object v passed by reference.
You are declaring v as non-pointer, meaning that the memory is already allocated for v when you declare it in main. Sending the reference to your allocation only copies the size correctly since it is not dynamically allocated. Correct way to do this would be to:
Declare your v as pointer
Make your allocation return test* (test* allocation())
Assign it to v in main. i.e. something like v = allocate()
And use v like a pointer from then on
EDIT: Since OP wants this to work only as arguments, best way to go about it is using double pointer. Check the following code:
typedef struct test{
int size;
int value[];
} test;
void allocation(test **v){
test *aux = (test *)malloc(sizeof(test)+3*sizeof(int));
int i;
aux->value[0] = 2;
aux->size = 3;
aux->value[1] = 1;
aux->value[2] = 5;
printf("Teste1 %d\n",aux->size);
for(i=0; i < aux->size; i++){
printf("%d\n", aux->value[i]);
}
*v = aux;
}
void cleanup(test *v){
free(v);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
test **v;
v = malloc (sizeof (test*));
int i;
allocation(v);
printf("Teste2 %d\n",(*v)->size);
for(i=0; i < (*v)->size; i++){
printf("%d\n", (*v)->value[i]);
}
//cleanup(&v);
return 0;
}
Please note that your cleanup will change too after this.
I am trying to understand an assignment I have before I have to take a final. I am trying to understand what exactly I am declaring.
So in a given file the typedef struct's are declared as so:
(Struct Declaration)
/** The following two structs must be defined in your <gamename>.c file **/
typedef struct game_position_t *game_position;
/* move struct must code enough information to reverse the move, given the resulting position */
typedef struct move_t *move;
I have then built the structs out as so (yes this has to be separated just because it is interfaced programming):
(Struct Definition)
/** The following two structs must be defined in your <gamename>.c file **/
struct game_position_t {
int mathy;
int numrows;
int *sizes;
};
/* move struct must code enough information to reverse the move, given the resulting position */
struct move_t {
int rownum;
int move_size;
};
Then an example of a functions and declaration of game_position for example is:
(Example Function)
/* return the starting position, NULL if error */
game_position starting_position(int me_first, int argc, char **argv) {
if (argc < 3) {
printf("\n\nToo few arguments, see help below\n\n");
game_help(argv[0]);
return NULL;
}
int mathy;
if (strcmp(argv[2],"search")==0)
mathy = 0;
else if (strcmp(argv[2],"mathy")==0)
mathy = 1;
else {
printf("\n\nSecond argument must be \"search\" or \"mathy\", see help below\n\n");
game_help(argv[0]);
return NULL;
}
int play_default = (argc==3);
if (play_default) printf("\n\nOK, we will play the default game of 7 5 3 1\n\n");
int defaultgame[4] = {7,5,3,1};
game_position result = malloc(sizeof(struct game_position_t)*1);
result->mathy = mathy;
if (result) {
result->numrows = (play_default ? 4 : argc-3);
result->sizes = malloc(sizeof(int)*(result->numrows));
int row;
for (row=0; row<(result->numrows); row++)
(result->sizes)[row] = (play_default ? defaultgame[row] : strlen(argv[row+2]));
}
return result;
}
So my main misunderstanding is when using a struct declaration in this manner, specifically putting the * before the name like this, typedef struct move_t *move;. Is that previous line saying move it a struct pointer or dereferencing move? Continuing from that. When defining them I just use the struct name such as struct move_t. I don't fully understand how they are linking together and in what matter. Then inside the function I just declare game_position, but still need to use a derefencer, 'p->`, to access it fields. So if someone could explain to me when these struct variables are points to structs and when they are the actual struct.
An example of my misunderstanding is that in the Example Function after result was declared. I first thought to use the . operator to access and set it's fields. I then changed it due to compiler errors, but now I want to understand my misunderstanding. And why did I I have to malloc game_position_t and not game_position?
typedef defines a type, so typedef struct move_t *move defines a new type named move, which is a pointer type, pointing to struct move_t. So after this if you define a variable with move ptr, ptr will have a pointer type so that you should use the syntax of accessing members through a pointer. When allocating memory for it, of course you have to specify the exact size of the structure other than the size of a pointer, that's sizeof(struct move_t)
I'm currently trying to Null an array of pointers that point to a structure. Any help or documentation would be nice. I am a beginner so please be as clear as possible.
Here is an example of my code. Sorry if I don't have this listed correctly, it's my first posting.enter code here
#include "stdlib.h"
enum boxtype
{
Card,
Mask,
};
typedef struct
{
enum boxtype type;
int L;
int H;
int x;
int y;
int Area;
Float ManBox;
Float WomanBox;
}Boxes;
typedef struct
{
Boxes Info;
float Hight;
}Male;
typedef struct
{
Boxes Info;
int Size;
}Female;
void main()
{
Man Male[100];
Woman Female[100];
Boxes *Spaces[600]; //This is the array of pointers that needs to be nulled.
}
You can initialize an array with an initializer list like so:
Boxes *Spaces[600] = { NULL };
All of the elements in the array will be set to NULL.
if you initialize with calloc() the memory will be zero'ed before it is returned.
for(int i=0;i<600;i++)
{
*Space[i]=NULL;
}
the previous given answer was also right. If u don't understand the previous code then u can try this one.