pipe chain between processes - c

I want to have one parent with 2 children.
The parent reads from file "a.txt" and sends trough pipe to first child; the first child reads the chars and sends to the second child the lower letter chars.
The second child prints in "b.txt" each distinct char and number of appearances(per line) and then sends trough a pipe to the parent the number of distinct chars. The parent prints the result from the second child.
I've done the pipe from parent to 1 child and to test I've put a pipe back to the parent.
What I can't figure it out is how to make the pipe go to the second child. I've been searching for information on dup2 but I don't get on how to make it work.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
void main()
{
int pfd1[2], pfd2[2], pid1, pid2, pfin, status, fd;
char *c = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char));
if (pipe(pfd1) < 0) {
printf("Eroare la crearea pipe-ului\n");
exit(1);
}
if (pipe(pfd2) < 0) {
printf("Eroare la crearea pipe-ului\n");
exit(1);
}
if ((pid1 = fork()) < 0) {
printf("Eroare la fork\n");
exit(1);
}
if (pid1 == 0) { /*child */
close(pfd1[1]);
while (read(pfd1[0], c, 1) > 0) {
//printf("%s",c);
if (islower(*c)) {
close(pfd2[0]);
//inchid capul de citire; scriu in pipe
write(pfd2[1], c, 1);
////dup??????
}
}
printf("\n");
write(pfd[1], buff, len);
close(pfd1[0]);
close(pfd2[1]);
exit(0);
}
if ((pid2 = fork()) < 0) {
printf("Eroare la fork\n");
exit(1);
}
if (pid2 == 0) {
printf("second child");
exit(0);
}
/* parent */
close(pfd1[0]);
close(pfd2[1]);
fd = open("date.txt", O_RDONLY);
while (read(fd, c, 1) > 0) {
write(pfd1[1], c, 1);
}
close(pfd1[1]); /* la sfarsit inchide si capatul utilizat */
close(pfin);
while (read(pfd2[0], c, 1) > 0)
printf("%s", c);
close(pfd2[0]);
printf("%d", wait(&status));
printf("%d", wait(&status));
}

I have a few specific comments on your code:
char *c = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char));
While there is nothing wrong with this, there is also no need for this char to be allocated from the heap. The more idiomatic approach would use char c; here and then pass &c to read(2) and write(2) system calls. (Even more idiomatic would be to use the C Standard IO facility; freopen(3), getchar(3), and putchar(3) -- but do not make that transition until you have this code working exactly as you want it to, because it is an additional complication with the problem you're trying to solve.)
if ((pid1 = fork()) < 0) {
printf("Eroare la fork\n");
exit(1);
}
By using your own error message, you are missing out on important error information. You should use perror(3) to print an error message instead. This will give you and your users an actual cause for errors that they can search for. fork(2) can fail if your user is running into the setrlimit(2) NPROC maximum process limit, the system-wide process limit, out of kernel memory.
if ((pid1 = fork()) < 0) {
perror("Eroare la fork");
exit(1);
}
You should also check the return value from open(2) calls. (You're supposed to also check the return values from write(2) and close(2) for errors, but handling these errors is harder. Simply printing the error and quitting is a good start for most programs.)
while (read(pfd1[0], c, 1) > 0) {
//printf("%s",c);
if (islower(*c)) {
close(pfd2[0]);
This is the wrong location for the close(2) call -- you shouldn't be closing this filedescriptor over and over for every input character. If you were checking the close(2) return value, you would notice errno is set to EBADF because the file descriptor is no longer valid on the second and subsequent calls.
Now, onto the problem you came here for: the sequence of fork(), pipe(), and dup2() calls that will hook up all your processes in a pipeline and send data back to the parent process. Since pipe(2) creates uni-directional pipe(7)s, you need to call pipe(2) four times -- for both directions between parent and children. If you store the pipe endpoints in arrays with names that mean something to you, they will be easier to keep track of. Perhaps create arrays named to_ for writing into and from_ for reading from:
int to_child[2];
int from_parent[2];
int to_parent[2];
int from_child[2];
for (int i=0; i<2; i++) {
int p[2];
if (pipe(p) == -1) {
perror("pipe");
exit(1);
}
/* from parent to child */
to_child[i] = p[1];
from_parent[i] = p[0];
if (pipe(p) == -1) {
perror("pipe");
exit(1);
}
/* from child to parent */
to_parent[i] = p[1];
from_child[i] = p[0];
}
Note that you don't actually need to use dup2(2) to re-arrange the filedescriptors unless you want to execute other programs to handle the "filter" task. Just read(2) using the from_parent[...] or from_child[...] descriptors and write(2) to the to_child[...] and to_parent[...] descriptors.
Maybe the entire thing would be easier with socketpair(2) using AF_UNIX to create bi-directional sockets, which can then be read from and written to in the same fashion as any other BSD-style socket. See socket(7) and unix(7) for an overview.

You do not need dup(). Simply open the pipes in the parent and then in each process close() the endpoints you don't need and just use the endpoints you do need.
Note that this means that the parent will close both endpoints of the pipe for child-child communication. Each of the endpoints of this pipe will be used by one of the children. Each child should also close the endpoint it doesn't use.

Thank you for your answers.
Here is the code for the whole problem.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
void main()
{
int pfd1[2],pfd2[2],pfd3[2],pid1,pid2,status,fd,fo;
char letter[32][2];
int letternumber=0,i,sw=0;
char* c = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char));
//pipe creation
if(pipe(pfd1)<0){
perror("Eroare la crearea pipe-ului");
exit(1);
}
if(pipe(pfd2)<0){
perror("Eroare la crearea pipe-ului\n");
exit(1);
}
if(pipe(pfd3)<0){
perror("Eroare la crearea pipe-ului\n");
exit(1);
}
//make first child
if((pid1=fork())<0){
perror("Eroare la fork\n");
exit(1);
}
if(pid1==0) //child process
{
if(close(pfd1[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);} // close write end; process will read from pipe
if(close(pfd2[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);} //close read end; write in pipe
while (read(pfd1[0], c, 1) > 0){
if(islower(*c)) write(pfd2[1],c,1);//writing in pipe
}
if(close(pfd1[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);} /* close other ends */
if(close(pfd2[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd3[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd3[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
exit(0);
}
//make second child
if((pid2=fork())<0){
perror("Eroare la fork");
exit(1);
}
if(pid2==0){ /* second child*/
if(close(pfd1[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd1[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if((fo=open("statistica.txt", O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_RDWR,
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR | S_IRGRP |
S_IWGRP | S_IXGRP | S_IROTH | S_IWOTH | S_IROTH))==-1)
{perror("Eroare open");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd2[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
letter[0][0]='A';
letter[0][1]=0;
while(read(pfd2[0],c,1)>0) {
for(i=0;i<=letternumber;i++)
if(letter[i][0]==*c) {letter[i][1]++;sw=1;}
if (sw==0){
letter[letternumber][0]=*c;
letter[letternumber++][1]=1;
}
sw=0;
}
printf("\n");//why won't it write to file without it;
//wihtout it, it writes to screen?
if(close(pfd2[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
dup2(fo,1);
for(i=0;i<letternumber;i++)
printf("%c %d\n",letter[i][0],letter[i][1]);
if(close(fo)<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd3[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);} //close read end; going to write in pipe
dup2(pfd3[1],1);
printf("%d",letternumber);
if(close(pfd3[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
exit(0);
}
/* parent process */
if(close(pfd1[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);} // close read end; write in pipe
if(close(pfd2[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd2[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if(close(pfd3[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
if((fd=open("date.txt",O_RDONLY))==-1)
{perror("Eroare open");exit(1);}
while(read(fd,c,1)>0)
write(pfd1[1],c,1); //write in pipe
if(close(pfd1[1])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
//dup2(pfd3[0],0);
while(read(pfd3[0],c,1)>0) printf("%c",*c);
printf("\n");
if(close(pfd3[0])<0) {perror("Eroare close");exit(1);}
wait(&status);
wait(&status);
}

Related

writing to external program through pipe (C)

I wanted to use external program to process data in memory. Like external compressor, encoder, anything to process my data and get the result. I read a lot about pipes and it still din't work. So I ended up with simple program that tries to write to external program through pipe like this, letting it to print to stdout:
stdout
(w) pipeA (r) $prog +---+
+-----------+ /~~~~~~~~~~~\ |{1}|
|[1] [0]| ----> |{0} {1}| ----> | |
+~~> +-----------+ \~~~~~~~~~~~/ | |
| +---+
|
+-+
write() |
+-+
And I still got nowhere.
My code goes like this:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(void)
{
int pipA[2];
int pid;
char buf_IN[32] = "Hello pipe!\n";
ssize_t n_written;
if ((pipe(pipA) == -1)) {
perror("pipe failed");
exit(1);
}
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
perror("fork failed");
exit(2);
}
/*****************************/
if (pid == 0)
{ /* in child */
dup2(0, pipA[0]); // pipA[read(0)-end]->$prog[write{0}-end]
close(pipA[1]); // $prog won't write to this pipe(A)
// external ``$prog''ram
execlp("wc", "wc", (char *) 0); // out should be: ' 1 2 12'
//execlp("base64", "base64", (char *) 0); // out should be: 'SGVsbG8gcGlwZSEK'
;///if we're here something went wrong
perror("execlp() #child failed");
exit(3);
}
else
{ /* in parent */
//dup2(pipA[1], 0); // STDIN -> pipA // that supposed to connect STDIN->pipA; just in case I needed it
close(pipA[0]); // we won't read it, let $prog write to stdout
//perror("execlp() #parent failed");
//exit(4);
n_written = write(pipA[1], buf_IN, strlen(buf_IN));
close(pipA[1]); // I guess this will close the pipe and send child EOF
// base64: read error: Input/output error
// wc: 'standard input': Input/output error
// 0 0 0
}
return 0;
}
Comments show what I'm doing. I have to admit I don't get these dup()s in pipes and that's what I think is causing a problem here but don't know.
Can you help with this, seemingly simple problem? Any help appreciated.
Diagnosis
You have the arguments to dup2() back-to-front. You need:
dup2(pipA[0], 0);
Closing file descriptors
You are not closing enough file descriptors in the child:
Rule of thumb: If you
dup2()
one end of a pipe to standard input or standard output, close both of the
original file descriptors returned by
pipe()
as soon as possible.
In particular, you should close them before using any of the
exec*()
family of functions.
The rule also applies if you duplicate the descriptors with either
dup()
or
fcntl()
with F_DUPFD
Prescription
You have some unused defines and unused variables in your code, too. Shorn of all your comments (but with a few of mine to explain what's happening) and with appropriate fixes in place, I end up with:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(void)
{
int pipA[2];
int pid;
char buf_IN[32] = "Hello pipe!\n";
ssize_t n_written;
if ((pipe(pipA) == -1))
{
perror("pipe failed");
exit(1);
}
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(2);
}
if (pid == 0)
{
/* Child: Connect pipA[0] (read) to standard input 0 */
dup2(pipA[0], 0);
close(pipA[1]); /* Close write end of pipe */
close(pipA[0]); /* Close read end of pipe */
execlp("wc", "wc", (char *)0);
perror("execlp() #child failed");
exit(3);
}
else
{
close(pipA[0]); /* Close read end of pipe */
n_written = write(pipA[1], buf_IN, strlen(buf_IN));
if (n_written != (ssize_t)strlen(buf_IN))
{
perror("short write");
exit(4);
}
close(pipA[1]); /* Close write end of pipe — EOF for child */
}
/* Optionally wait for child to die before exiting */
// #include <sys/wait.h> // With other #include lines
// int corpse;
// int status;
// while ((corpse = wait(&status)) > 0)
// printf("Child %d exited with status 0x%.4X\n", corpse, status);
return 0;
}
When run, that produces:
1 2 12
That looks about right.
Without the wait() loop, it is possible that you'll see the output from wc after the prompt from the shell (so it might look as if the program is waiting for input from you, but in fact, it will be the shell waiting for input); with the waiting loop, you'll get proper separation of output from the shell prompt. You don't have to print anything in the body of the loop, but it is reassuring to do so.
To not make duplicates, nor to play expert in unfamiliar field I post it as answer.
I finished the task
(w) pipeA (r) child (w) pipeB (r)
+-----------+ /~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ +-----------+
+~~~>|[1] [0]| ----> |{0} $prog {1}| ----> |[1] [0]| ~~~+
| +-----------+ \~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ +-----------+ |
| \/
+-+ +--+
write() | | read()
+-+ +--+
dup(pA[0],0) dup(pB[1],1)
close(pA[1]) close(pA[0])
close(pA[0]) close(pA[1])
with second pipe that can be read. All by analogy. If there is something major that is wrong with it or something I should be aware of, say it please.
(Sorry for python style indentations, hope you don't mind)
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
ssize_t read_whole_file(int fildes, const void *buf, size_t nbyte);
int main(void)
{
int pipA[2], pipB[2];
int pid;
char buf_IN[32] = "Hello pipe!\n";
char buf_OUT[1024];
char *bptr;
ssize_t n_written, n_read = 0, a_read = 0, to_read = sizeof(buf_OUT);
if ((pipe(pipA) == -1) || (pipe(pipB) == -1))
{
perror("pipe failed");
exit(1);
}
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(2);
}
if (pid == 0)
{
/* in child */
dup2(pipA[0], 0); // connect pipe A (read end/exit) to stdin (write end/input)
close(pipA[1]); // close unused pipe A end
close(pipA[0]); // close - " - //
;
dup2(pipB[1], 1); // connect stdout (read end/output) to pipe B (write end/entry)
close(pipB[0]); // close unused pipe B ends
close(pipB[1]); // close - " - //
execlp("lzip", "lzip", "-c", (char *)0);
;
perror("execlp() #child failed");
exit(3);
}
else
{
/* in parent */
close(pipA[0]); // close pipe A read end - will only write to this one
n_written = write(pipA[1], buf_IN, strlen(buf_IN));
if (n_written < 0)
perror("error: read_whole_file(pipA[1], ...) failed miserably\n");
close(pipA[1]); // close write end which subsequently signals EOF to child
;
close(pipB[1]); // close pipe B write end - will only read form this one
a_read = read_whole_file(pipB[0], buf_OUT, sizeof(buf_OUT));
if (a_read < 0)
perror("error: read_whole_file(pipB[0], ...) failed miserably\n");
close(pipB[0]); // close read end after reading
;
write(STDOUT_FILENO, buf_OUT, a_read); // dump it to parent's stdout - equivalent of processing data received from external program/plugin
}
return 0;
}
ssize_t read_whole_file(int fildes, const void *buf, size_t nbyte) // read whole file
{
ssize_t n_read, a_read = 0, to_read = nbyte;
char *bptr = (char*)buf;
size_t BUF_SIZE = 4096;
do
{
if(to_read < BUF_SIZE)
BUF_SIZE = to_read;
n_read = read(fildes, bptr, BUF_SIZE);
if (n_read < 0) // recover from temporarily failed read (got it from git wrapper)
{
if ((errno == EINTR) || (errno == EAGAIN) || (errno == EWOULDBLOCK))
continue;
}
bptr += n_read;
to_read -= n_read;
a_read += n_read;
} while ((n_read>0) && (to_read>0));
;
if (n_read < 0)
a_read = n_read;
return a_read;
}
To note not so obvious - I still don't get close(pipA[0]); and close(pipB[1]); in child. Why are they not used anymore?
Also dup2(pipB[1], 1);, I thought it would be other way around but it didn't work so by trial end error I come with this.

How to Create IPC (Interprocess Communication) C programme to create with two child process

I want to create a IPC c program to create one parent and two child's processes. My code is:
#include <stdio.h>
void main()
{
int pid, status;
pid = fork();
if(pid == -1) {
printf(“fork failed\n”);
exit(1);
}
if(pid == 0) { /* Child */
if (execlp(“/bin/ls”, “ls”, NULL)< 0) {
printf(“exec failed\n”);
exit(1);
}
}
else { /* Parent */
wait(&status);
printf(“Well done kid!\n”);
exit(0);
}
}
I want to show you an other code snippet to create one parent and two child process. This is what I am looking for. Now I want to write shell script for IPC, first take look of this code.
Note: there is an other code with same logic but different process names UP, uc1, uc2 e.g in this way we have two parent VP and UC and there childs vp1 vp2 and uc1 uc2.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define MAX_BUF 1024
int main(){
int mypipe_c1[2];
int ret_c1;
char buf_c1[6];
ret_c1 =pipe(mypipe_c1);
int mypipe_c2[2];
int ret_c2;
char buf_c2[6];
ret_c2 =pipe(mypipe_c2);
if(ret_c1 == -1)
{
perror("pipe");
exit(1);
}
pid_t vc1;
pid_t vc2;
vc1 = fork ();
if (vc1 == 0)
{
read(mypipe_c1[0], buf_c1 , 37);
printf("PIPE1 :%s\n", buf_c1);
printf (" vc1 : I'm the child! My pid is (%d)\n", getpid ());
close(ret_c1);
int fd;
char * fifo1 = "/tmp/fifo1";
char buf[MAX_BUF];
/* open, read, and display the message from the FIFO */
fd = open(fifo1, O_RDONLY);
read(fd, buf, MAX_BUF);
printf("FIFO1: %s\n", buf);
close(fd);
exit(0);
}
if(vc1 < 0)
{
perror ("Ouch! Unable to fork() child process!\n");
exit (1);
}
vc2 = fork ();
if (vc2 == 0)
{
printf ("vc2 : I'm the child! My pid is (%d)\n", getpid ());
read(mypipe_c2[0], buf_c2 , 37);
printf("PIPE2 %s\n", buf_c2);
int fd;
char * fifo2 = "/tmp/fifo2";
/* create the FIFO (named pipe) */
mkfifo(fifo2, 0666);
/* write "Hi" to the FIFO */
fd = open(fifo2, O_WRONLY);
write(fd, " assignment VU 2 ", sizeof(" assignment VU 2 "));
close(fd);
/* remove the FIFO */
unlink(fifo2);
exit(0);
}
else if (vc2 < 0)
{
perror ("Ouch! Unable to fork() child process!\n");
exit (1);
}
printf ("I'm the parent! My pid is (%d)!\n",getpid());
write(mypipe_c1[1], "I am going to close you carry on UC1 \n", 37);
write(mypipe_c2[1], "I am going to close you carry on UC2 \n", 37);
exit(0);
}
Now I want shell script such that VP and UP should be started when users types … script.sh start VP or UP. vc1, vc2, uc1,uc2 should be stoppable only using script.sh stop vc1 or vc2 or uc1 or uc2
script.sh connect command should create two fifo and connect processes as shown in figure.
So you are asking for methods for IPC, with the sample code you provided, I think the best one is the use of pipes.
From the pipe() man page:
A pipe is a unidirectional data channel that can be used for interprocess communication
Basically, it is handled like a pair of file descriptors. First, you must init the pipe, and then create the childs using the fork() call, so both parents and childs share the resource. Then, using write and read methods, you can send data between them.
In this example I create a child which reads some data from the parent process:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main() {
int pid;
char buffer[255];
int fd[2]; // channel 0 for reading and 1 for writing
pipe(fd);
pid = fork();
if(pid == 0) {
close(fd[1]); // close fd[1] since child will only read
read(fd[0], &buffer, sizeof(buffer));
close(fd[0]);
exit(0);
} else { // parent
close(fd[0]) // close fd[0] since parent will only write
// init buffer contents
write(fd[1], &buffer, sizeof(buffer));
close(fd[1]);
}
return 0;
}
As you can see pipe creates a pair of file descriptors, one for writing (number 1) and one for reading (number 0).
In my sample code, the child process closes the writing one, since it will only read, and the parent closes the reading one, since it will only write data.
Note that pipes are unidirectional, so if you want that both the childs and the parent write and read data from it, you should create two pipes (so 4 file descriptors) for each of the childs. An example of how to handle that situation:
int pipeA[2], pipeB[2];
pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) { // child will write to pipeB and read from pipeA
close(pipeA[1]); // closing pipeA writing fd
close(pipeB[0]); // closing pipeB reading fd
write(pipeB[1],&buffer, sizeof(buffer));
read(pipeA[0], &buffer2, sizeof(buffer2));
close(pipeA[0]);
close(pipeB[1]);
exit(1);
} else { // parent will write to pipeA and read from pipeB
close(pipeA[0]); // closing pipeA reading fd
close(pipeB[1]); // closing pipeB writing fd
read(pipeB[0], &buffer, sizeof(buffer));
write(pipeA[1], &buffer2, sizeof(buffer2));
close(pipeA[1]);
close(pipeB[0]);
}
If you want more info about pipes you can check the man page here.
Also, other simple ways of IPC would be the use of Unix Sockets, although I think that for the example you presented pipes will be enough.
You'r code create one parent and one child, not two child, so you need to add another fork into child block :
#include <stdio.h>
void main()
{
int pid,status;
pid = fork();
if(pid == -1) {
printf(“fork failed\n”);
exit(1);
}
if(pid == 0) { /* Child */
fork();// another child
if (execlp(“/bin/ls”, “ls”, NULL)< 0) {
printf(“exec failed\n”);
exit(1);
}
}
else { /* Parent */
wait(&status);
printf(“Well done kid!\n”);
exit(0);
}
}

execl() does not seem to read from stdin

I'm trying to reproduce this command in c language:
ls | wc > output.txt
So, to do that, I wrote the following program:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main()
{
pid_t lsFork, wcFork;
int tube[2];
pipe(tube);
lsFork = fork();
if(lsFork == 0) // ls command
{
close(tube[0]);
dup2(tube[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
close(tube[1]);
if(execl("/usr/bin/ls", "ls", NULL) == -1)
perror("Cannot execute ls");
}
else
{
wcFork = fork();
if(wcFork == 0) // wc command
{
sleep(1);
int file = open("output.txt", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT);
if(file == -1)
perror("Cannot open output.txt");
close(tube[1]);
dup2(tube[0], STDIN_FILENO);
close(tube[0]);
dup2(file, STDOUT_FILENO);
close(file);
/*char buffer[BUFSIZ];
read(STDIN_FILENO, buffer, BUFSIZ);
write(STDOUT_FILENO, buffer, BUFSIZ);*/
if(execl("/usr/bin/wc", "wc", NULL) == -1)
perror("Cannot execute wc");
close(STDOUT_FILENO);
}
else // parent
{
int status;
waitpid(lsFork, &status, 0);
waitpid(wcFork, &status, 0);
}
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
But, the program does not exit. According to htop, the wc command is blocking the program. To understand this behaviour, I wrote a piece of code (the lines commented before execl()) and I don't understand what this works and not execl(). Am I forgetting something when calling this function?
The parent process still has the pipe open, so wc is waiting around in case the parent decides to write stuff (which wc would need to count).
Close both ends of the pipe in the parent too:
else // parent
{
int status;
close(tube[0]); // <---
close(tube[1]); // <---
waitpid(lsFork, &status, 0);
waitpid(wcFork, &status, 0);
}
Don't complicate things when you can do it easily..
Try the simpler code below & see if you can understand anything or not.
int main(){
int tube[2];
int fID;
pipe(tube);
if (fork() == 0){
// this is the child process
close(tube[0]); // reading end of the pipe
dup2(tube[1], 1); // stdout ---> pipe writing end
execlp("ls", "ls", NULL);
}else{
if (fork() == 0){
//umask(0022);
fID = open("sample.txt", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
close(tube[1]); // writing end of the pipe
dup2(tube[0], 0); // stdin ----> pipe reading end
dup2(fID, 1);
execlp("wc", "wc", NULL);
}
}
return 0;
}
Note If the purpose of the code is to solely implement the above mentioned piping, then you don't need to implement any waiting mechanisms. The OS will auto-kill all the zombie child, if any. Moreover execlp("wc", "wc", NULL); will auto block the program to end. Hence it will not exit early
You'll need to close the write end of the pipe in the parent too.

headache with named pipes and forks

I need to write program that have construction like this:
Parent makes fifo, then fork()
child 1 reads message from stdin and writes it to named pipe (FIFO)
then in parent process I need to create pipe (unnamed) and another fork()
child number 2 reades from FIFO, counts length of message and send number to parent via pipe(unnamed).
I created a simple program with one fork where child can communicate with parent:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define FIFO "/tmp/my_fifo"
int main()
{
pid_t fork_result;
int pipe_fd;
int res;
char writer[3];
char reader[3];
res = mkfifo(FIFO,0777);
if (res == 0)
{
printf("FIFO created!\n");
fork_result = fork();
if (fork_result == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr, "fork error");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (fork_result == 0)
{
printf("CHILD 1\n");
pipe_fd = open(FIFO, O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
scanf("%s", writer);
res = write(pipe_fd,writer,3);
if (res == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr,"error writing fifo\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
(void)close(pipe_fd);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
else
{
printf("PARENT\n");
pipe_fd = open(FIFO, O_RDONLY);
res = read(pipe_fd, reader, 3);
printf("reader: 0: %c\n",reader[0]);
printf("reader: 1: %c\n",reader[1]);
printf("reader: 2: %c\n",reader[2]);
(void)close(res);
}
}
else
{
printf("deleting fifo... run program again!\n");
unlink(FIFO);
}
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
and it is working very well. So I created code that have architecture described above:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define FIFO "/tmp/my_fifo"
int main()
{
pid_t fork_result;
pid_t fork_result2;
int pipe_fd;
int res;
char writer[3];
char reader[3];
res = mkfifo(FIFO,0777);
if (res == 0)
{
printf("FIFO created!\n");
fork_result = fork();
if (fork_result == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr, "fork error");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (fork_result == 0)
{
printf("CHILD 1\n");
pipe_fd = open(FIFO, O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
scanf("%s", writer);
res = write(pipe_fd,writer,3);
if (res == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr,"error writing to fifo\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
(void)close(pipe_fd);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
else
{
printf("PARENt 1\n");
//don't forget pipe!
fork_result = fork();
pipe_fd = open(FIFO, O_RDONLY);
if (fork_result == 0)
{
printf("CHILD 2\n");
res = read(pipe_fd, reader, 3);
printf("Odczytano: 0: %c\n",reader[0]);
printf("Odczytano: 1: %c\n",reader[1]);
printf("Odczytano: 2: %c\n",reader[2]);
(void)close(res);
}
}
}
else
{
printf("deleting fifo\n");
unlink(FIFO);
}
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
Running sequence is like this:
PARENT 1
CHILD 1
CHILD 2
so in Parent 1 I'm opening FIFO to read, in child 1 I'm writing to FIFO and child 2 should read it. I mean in code because when I run it I can't even write anything to FIFO. In blocks in scanf("%s", writer); which worked in first program.
Am I using open() correctly? Do I need to use getpid() somewhere? Why it's blocking when I try to write to fifo.
The problem is that CHILD1 is opening the fifo with O_NONBLOCK, which will fail (with EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN) if no other process has the fifo open for reading. Now in the first program, the parent continues running after the fork and opens the fifo for reading before the child gets going and opens the write end, so it works. But in the second case, the parent does an extra fork first, which slows it down just enough that CHILD1 gets to its open command before PARENT or CHILD2 has opened the fifo for reading, so the CHILD1 open fails.
Get rid of the O_NONBLOCK and it works just fine (though you do open the fifo for reading in both PARENT and CHILD2, which is probably not what you want).
You have another issue if you want to read from the keyboard. If you run this from the shell, PARENT will exit immediately (more or less), so the shell will go back to reading commands from the keyboard, which means that CHILD1 and the shell will be fighting over the input. If on the other hand, you do what you originally describe and have PARENT wait reading from a pipe from CHILD2, it should do what you want.
Isn't it because you use twice the same variable fork_result? As you created another variable fork_result2, which you don't use, it is probably unintended.
I don't know if this will solve your problem, but at least using fork_result2 at the second fork would make it easier to understand...

UNIX FIFO: the process hangs if I don't close the input side of the fifo

I've just started working with UNIX FIFOs, and I discovered something while experimenting with my first FIFO program. The program works this way: after creating the FIFO, two processes are started using the fork() function. The child process reads what the father passes to him through the FIFO, and prints it on the screen. The data exchanged is the string specified as an argument. The question is: in the father section, if I forget to close the input side of the FIFO (meaning that I exclude the close(fd) line) the program would just hang, even if the data between the processes is exchanged correctly. Otherwise, everything works fine and the program terminates withouth hanging. Can someone please explain me why?
Thanks for your patience. Here is the code of the main function:
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if(argc != 2)
{
printf("An argument must be specified\n");
return -1;
}
int ret = mkfifo("./fifo.txt", 0644);
char buf;
if(ret < 0)
{
perror("Error creating FIFO");
return -1;
}
pid_t pid = fork();
if(pid < 0)
{
perror("Error creating child process");
return -1;
}
if(pid == 0) /* child */
{
int fd = open("./fifo.txt", O_RDONLY); /* opens the fifo in reading mode */
while(read(fd, &buf, 1) > 0)
{
write(STDOUT_FILENO, &buf, 1);
}
write(STDOUT_FILENO, "\n", 1);
close(fd);
return 0;
}
else /* father */
{
int fd = open("./fifo.txt", O_WRONLY); /* opens the fifo in writing mode */
write(fd, argv[1], strlen(argv[1]));
close(fd);
waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);
return 0;
}
}
read(2) blocks until there are characters available or the channel is closed at the other end. The father process must close the pipe in order for the last child read() to return. If you omit the close(fd) in the father, the child will block in the read() until the father exits (closing the pipe automatically) but father will hang in waitpid() until the child exits.
First things first: there are several issues with the code you posted.
There are no #include directives, hence no prototypes in scope for any of the functions you call. C89 requires prototypes for variadic functions such as printf(); C99 requires prototypes for all functions. Both C89 and C99 require declarations in scope for O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, STDOUT_FILENO and NULL.
-1 is not an allowed return value for main().
C89 does not allow mixing declarations and statements.
A minor nit: the usual nomenclature is "parent and child", not "father and child".
I have modified your program to correct this issue and improve readability:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc != 2) {
printf("An argument must be specified\n");
return 1;
}
int ret = mkfifo("./fifo.txt", 0644);
char buf;
if (ret < 0) {
perror("Error creating FIFO");
return 1;
}
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) {
perror("Error creating child process");
return 1;
}
if (pid == 0) { /* child */
int fd = open("./fifo.txt", O_RDONLY); /* opens the fifo in reading mode */
while(read(fd, &buf, 1) > 0) {
write(STDOUT_FILENO, &buf, 1);
}
write(STDOUT_FILENO, "\n", 1);
close(fd);
return 0;
} else { /* parent */
int fd = open("./fifo.txt", O_WRONLY); /* opens the fifo in writing mode */
write(fd, argv[1], strlen(argv[1]));
close(fd);
waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);
return 0;
}
}
But most importantly, you did not mention what operating system and compiler you are using.
I am unable to reproduce the issue, and I suspect it may be related to one of the issues listed above.

Resources