I'm trying to bind a large collection to a ComboBox and I faced performance problems when opening ComboBox's popup. I searched internet and found that using VirtualizingStackPanel as a items panel template might help, but it helped only partially. If I bind a large collection to a ComboBox, I could open popup very quickly, that's ok, but if after that I bind another collection to a ComboBox and try to open popup again, it becomes very slow. Same is happening if you open popup for an empty ComboBox, then bind large collection and try to open popup again - it takes some seconds before popup opens.
Here is the XAML:
<ComboBox Name="cbBlah">
<ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<VirtualizingStackPanel />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
</ComboBox>
and the sample code for binding to reproduce the problem:
var list = new List<string>();
for (var i = 0; i < new Random().Next(9000, 10000); i++)
list.Add(i.ToString());
cbBlah.ItemsSource = list;
I tried to make virtualizing stack panel to look like this:
<VirtualizingStackPanel VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="True" VirtualizingStackPanel.VirtualizationMode="Recycling" />
but it doesn't help, seems VirtualizationMode is ignored so popup opens very fast only first time and then, each time after binding changes, it's very slow.
UPDATE: I thought about not binding new collection every time, but bind an ObservableCollection once and then just changing its content. Same thing, as soon as content of collection changes, opening a popup still takes several seconds :(
According to this blog: http://vbcity.com/blogs/xtab/archive/2009/12/15/wpf-using-a-virtualizingstackpanel-to-improve-combobox-performance.aspx
I've tested it with this code:
<ComboBox Name="cbBlah" ItemsSource="{Binding}">
<ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<VirtualizingStackPanel />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemsPanel>
</ComboBox>
It works fine for first time and next times. It's not necessary to code these lines:
<VirtualizingStackPanel VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="True" VirtualizingStackPanel.VirtualizationMode="Recycling" />
I had the issue with slow performance as well. But I had created a class that inherited form Combobox, therefor I would like to do this programmatically. So here is that solution for other googlers out there.
ItemsPanel = new ItemsPanelTemplate();
var stackPanelTemplate = new FrameworkElementFactory(typeof (VirtualizingStackPanel));
ItemsPanel.VisualTree = stackPanelTemplate;
I just ran into this issue as well. I'm using this code in a custom combo box with a style template. When I ran my code in VS debugging mode the virtualization did not work properly. Once I ran it outside of debugging I can switch the content of the ObservableCollection without locking the UI up. It also might help if you set a max height and max width.
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll" Value="True"/>
<Setter Property="VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing" Value="True"/>
<Setter Property="VirtualizingStackPanel.VirtualizationMode" Value="Recycling"/>
<Popup>
<Border/>
<ScrollViewer>
<VirtualizingStackPanel IsItemsHost="True" KeyboardNavigation.DirectionalNavigation="Contained"/>
</ScrollViewer>
</Grid>
</Popup>
From a usability perspective, using a standard combobox with more items than will fit on the screen is always cumbersome. It requires at least a textbox filter. In many cases the options can be prefiltered (e.g. by department, by first letter or range) that creates less objects and usualy is more user friendly.
Related
I'm working on a WPF application that contains a wrapper UI that is actually the MainWindow.xaml and the content in it (ContentPresenter) gets changed each time the user chooses to move to a different section of the application.
When the user returns to the main content, I want the application not to initialize it each time, but to preserve it in the memory somehow and restore it when the user clicks on the "Home" button.
In its current state, the Home view gets initialized over and over again when moving back to the "Home" section, which causes the application to be kinda slow. My question is this: Is there a way to preserve that user control in the memory somehow so that I would be able to restore it fast?
Thanks!
Hiding is an option ofcourse as #Matt suggested. An other way is to explorer the wonderfull world of frameworks (Prism, Caliburn, Caliburn.Micro, ... )
Those deliver a great assistance in managing WPF applications.
In essence you need to keep a reference to the ViewModel, a collection in the mainviewmodel or mainview that keeps track of the loaded viewmodels.
Eventually I decided to move the ContentControl into an ItemsControl and then just hide all content controls except for the active one.
Here's a snippet of my code:
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding ViewModels}">
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ContentControl Visibility="{Binding Visibility}" Content="{Binding ViewModel}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
In my ViewModel I have the actual content and another Visibility property that is set to false when the content is not the current one and true if it is.
Thanks to all helpers!
I am working on a silverlight page that will have a horizontal list box that will contain a list of "cards". Each "card" contains a vertical list box with some text in it. However, I am running into a lot of performance issues. Has anyone experienced any performance issues with nested listboxes in the past?
If its a DataGrid then Paging can give good performance. If its ListBox then we should keep an eye on the count of data binded with listbox.
Are you trying to bind the full list on single shot from server ? Then this will definitely affect the performance.
UI Virtualization might help you. Try to use VirtualizingStackPanel (instead of StackPanel) as the ItemsPanel of your Listbox:
<ListBox>
...
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<VirtualizingStackPanel />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
</ListBox>
(see below for my own answer that I came up with after letting this percolate for days & days)
I am trying to achieve the following scenario in WPF.
I have a datagrid that is displaying rows of data for viewing and additional data entry. It is a new app but there is legacy data.
One particular field in the past has had data randomly entered into it. Now we want to limit that field's values to a particular list. So I'm using a DataGridComboBoxColumn. FWIW I have alternatively tried this with a DataGridTemplateColumn containing a ComboBox.
At runtime, if the existing value is not on the list, I want it to display anyway. I just cannot seem to get that to happen. While I have attempted a vast array of solutions (all failures) here is the one that is most logical as a starting point.
The list of values for the drop down are defined in a windows resource called "months".
<DataGridComboBoxColumn x:Name="frequencyCombo" MinWidth="100" Header="Frequency"
ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource months}}"
SelectedValueBinding="{Binding Path=Frequency,UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}">
<DataGridComboBoxColumn.ElementStyle>
<Style TargetType="ComboBox">
<Setter Property="IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem" Value="False" />
</Style>
</DataGridComboBoxColumn.ElementStyle>
</DataGridComboBoxColumn>
What is happening is that if a value is not on the list then the display is blank. I have verified at runtime that the IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem element is indeed False. It is just not doing what I am expecting.
Perhaps I am just going down the wrong path here. Maybe I need to use a textbox in combination with the combobox. Maybe I need to write some code, not just XAML. I have spent hours trying different things and would be really appreciative of a solution. I have had a few suggestions to use this class or that control but without explanation of how to use it.
Thanks a bunch!
I have finally solved this.
The trick is to get rid of the comboboxcolumn and use a template that has a textbox for display and a combobox for editing. However, I still spent hours with a new problem...when making a selection in the combobox, it would modify any other rows where I had also used the combobox in the grid. Guess what solved the problem! The IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem property that I was trying to use before. :)
<DataGridTemplateColumn x:Name="frequencyCombo" Header="Frequency">
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Frequency}" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ComboBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource frequencyViewSource},
TargetNullValue=''}"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=Frequency}" IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="False"
/>
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
No ugly hacks. No non-usable choices hanging around at the bottom of the dropdown. No code to add those extra values and then clean them up.
I am not going to take away the "Answer" on Mark's suggestion since it enabled me to get the app into my client's hands, but this is the solution I was looking for. I found it buried in a "connect" item after hours of web searching.
Thanks for everyones help!
Could you please clarify what's happening here? It's unclear what the "existing value" is at runtime - if this is the field where data is being randomly entered, by limiting it does this mean you're running some sort of validation logic although you still want it to display?
Also, I'm more on the Silverlight side of things...does WPF also default to one way binding?
Rather than mixing the static resource and the view model property as a source for items on the list, have you tried using an ObservableCollection or CollectionViewSource in the view model? Then you could insert and remove the non-standard items at will and make them selected (or not) whenever you want. So the "normal" list would have the normal months, but when an odd one comes along, add that to the list and make it selected. Seems like it would be easier to control exclusively in the view model.
Why not just do something like:
//create collection
PagedCollectionView view = new PagedCollectionView(e.Result);
view.SortDescriptions.Add(
new SortDescription("Months", ListSortDirection.Ascending));
gridProducts.ItemsSource = view;
//filter collection by category
PagedCollectionView view = new PagedCollectionView(e.Result);
view.Filter = delegate(object filterObject)
{
Product product = (Product)filterObject;
return (product.CategoryName == "Legacy");
};
gridProducts.ItemsSource = view;
//create categories through grouping
PagedCollectionView view = new PagedCollectionView(e.Result);
view.GroupDescriptions.Add(new PropertyGroupDescription("Legacy"));
view.GroupDescriptions.Add(new PropertyGroupDescription("etc..."));
gridProducts.ItemsSource = view;
Try this:
<DataGridTemplateColumn>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding Months}"
Text="{Binding Value}"
IsEditable="True" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
I have a WPF ListBox that displays images loaded from a local folder,
usually somewhere between 1- 300).
I'm using a converter in my imageTemplate to make sure and show thumbnails of the images,
and not the images in their full size. Even while doing this, it still
can take several seconds to load initially.
My question is, how do I know in my ListBox when the loading of ListBoxItems
Begins/Ends, so that I can set the Mouse Cursor to a waiting status? I'm looking
for a way to notify that user that something is happening..
Here is what my ListBox looks like in XAML:
<ListBox SelectionMode="Extended"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=ImageFiles}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource imageTemplate}"
ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll="True"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled"
ScrollViewer.IsDeferredScrollingEnabled="False"
VirtualizingStackPanel.VirtualizationMode="Recycling"
x:Name="images">
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<WrapPanel />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
</ListBox>
Thanks!
I answered a similar question, here.
If you don't want to do a pop-up, you could also do something similar by attaching a translucent rectangle (or some other filling control), with a message/animation in front of it, to the listbox or its parent control that gets closed asynchronously like the popup in the linked answer does. I did something like that for Silverlight back before the BusyIndicator was available, and it worked quite well. I set it up as a user control with a property for the control it should cover, so it was easily re-used.
I met a problem when deveoping a photo viewer application.
I use ListBox to Show Images, which is contained in a ObservableCollection.
I bind the ListBox's ItemsSource to the ObservableCollection.
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type modeldata:ImageInfo}">
<Image
Margin="6"
Source="{Binding Thumbnail}"
Width="{Binding ZoomBarWidth.Width, Source={StaticResource zoombarmanager}}"
Height="{Binding ZoomBarWidth.Width, Source={StaticResource zoombarmanager}}"/>
</DataTemplate>
<Grid DataContext="{StaticResource imageinfolder}">
<ScrollViewer
VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto"
HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled">
<ListBox Name="PhotosListBox"
IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True"
Style="{StaticResource PhotoListBoxStyle}"
Margin="5"
SelectionMode="Extended"
ItemsSource="{Binding}"
/>
</ScrollViewer>
I also bind the Image'height in ListBox with a slider.(the slider's Value also bind to zoombarmanager.ZoomBarWidth.Width).
But I found if the collection become larger, such as: contains more then 1000 images, If I use the slider to change the size of iamges, it become a bit slow.
My Question is.
1. Why it become Slow? become it tries to zoom every images,or it just because notify("Width") is invoked more than 1000 times.
2. Is there any method to solve this kind of problem and make it faster.
The PhotoListBoxStyle is like this:
<Style~~ TargetType="{x:Type ListBox}" x:Key="PhotoListBoxStyle">
<Setter Property="Foreground" Value="White" />
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type ListBox}" >
<WrapPanel
Margin="5"
IsItemsHost="True"
Orientation="Horizontal"
VerticalAlignment="Top"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" />
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style~~>
But If I use the Style above, I have to use ScrollViewer outside ListBox, otherwise I have no idea how to get a smooth scrolling scrollerbar and the wrappanel seems have no default scrollerbar. Anyone help? It is said listbox with scrollviewer has poor performance.
The problem is that your new Layout Panel is the WrapPanel and it doesn't support Virtualization! It is possible to create your own Virtualized WrapPanel... Read more here
Also read more about other issues like the implementation IScrollInfo here
I also highly recommend that your do not create a new control template just to replace the layout panel... Rather do the following:
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<WrapPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
The advantage of doing this is that you do not need to wrap your listbox in a scrollviewer!
[UPDATE] Also read this article by Josh Smith! To make the WrapPanel wrap... you also have to remember to disable horizontal scrolling...
<Setter Property="ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility" Value="Disabled" />
I am not familiar with this component, but in general there is going to be limitations on the number of items a listbox can display at one time.
A method to solve this kind of problem is to keep the number of images loaded in the control within the number the control can display at acceptable performance levels. Two techniques to do this are paging or dynamic loading.
In paging, you add controls to switch between discrete blocks of pictures, for example, 100 at a time, with forward and back arrows, similar to navigating database records.
With dynamic loading, you implement paging behind the scenes in such a way that when the user scrolls to the end, the application automatically loads in the next batch of pictures, and potentially even removes a batch of old ones to keep the responsiveness reasonable. There may be a small pause as this occurs and there may be some work involved to keep the control at the proper scroll point, but this may be an acceptable trade-off.
I would recommend you not bind the Width/Height property of each individual image, but rather you bind a LayoutTransform on the ListBox's ItemsPanel. Something like:
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel.LayoutTransform>
<ScaleTransform
ScaleX="{Binding Path=Value, ElementName=ZoomSlider}"
ScaleY="{Binding Path=Value, ElementName=ZoomSlider}" />
</StackPanel.LayoutTransform>
</StackPanel>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
Part of the problem is that it is loading the full image in each. You have to use an IValueConverter to open each image in a thumbnail size by setting either the DecodePixelWidth or DecodePixelHeight properties on the BitmapImage. Here's an example I use in one of my projects...
class PathToThumbnailConverter : IValueConverter {
public int DecodeWidth {
get;
set;
}
public PathToThumbnailConverter() {
DecodeWidth = 200;
}
public object Convert( object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture ) {
var path = value as string;
if ( !string.IsNullOrEmpty( path ) ) {
FileInfo info = new FileInfo( path );
if ( info.Exists && info.Length > 0 ) {
BitmapImage bi = new BitmapImage();
bi.BeginInit();
bi.DecodePixelWidth = DecodeWidth;
bi.CacheOption = BitmapCacheOption.OnLoad;
bi.UriSource = new Uri( info.FullName );
bi.EndInit();
return bi;
}
}
return null;
}
public object ConvertBack( object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture ) {
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
try to virtualize your stackpael with the VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="True" attached property. this should increase performance.
using a listbox with many items in a scrollviewer is another known performance issue within wpf. if you can, try to get rid of the scrollviewer.
if your itemtemplates are kinda complex you should consider using the Recycling VirtualizationMode. this tells your listbox to reuse existing objects and not create new ones all the time.
What does your PhotoListBoxStyle style look like? If it's changing the ListBox's ItemsPanelTemplate then there's a good chance your ListBox isn't using a VirtualizingStackPanel as its underlying list panel. Non-virtualized ListBoxes are a lot slower with many items.