I have a list of items displayed as a ListBox.
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding ListOfSomeItems}">
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn Header="Name" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Name}"/>
<GridViewColumn Header="Status">
<GridViewColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding IsReceived}" />
</DataTemplate>
</GridViewColumn.CellTemplate>
</GridViewColumn>
</GridView>
</ListView.View>
</ListView>
Now there is 2 user cases I need to implement:
1) When user mark an Item as received (the CheckBox get checked) I need to update the item. How should I bind the checked event to ICommand in my ViewModel?
2) When user tries to remove received flag (un-checks the checkBox) a pop up should be provided with an option to cancel the operation (if someone clicked the checkBox by accident) or to provide a note for a reason. That note along with the Item that been unchecked should be sent to different ICommand in VM.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
UPDATE:
My viewModel do implements INoftiyPropertyChanged but I do not have property for the single item. The property is nested in complex class: something like Account.Holders[x].Requirements[y].IsReceived.
Why just not bind a command which should be exposed by ViewModel:
<CheckBox
Command="{Binding ReceivedStatusChangedCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding ...IsReceived}"
/>
Then in command handler you can analyze passed in value of the IsReceived as command parameter.
Since you're binding to an IsChecked property in your object, you can simply listen to the PropertyChanged event for that object and call whatever method you need when it changes.
For example,
// Wireup CollectionChanged in Constructor
public MyVMConstructor()
{
ListOfSomeItems = new List<SomeItem>();
ListOfSomeItems.CollectionChanged += ListOfSomeItems_CollectionChanged;
}
// In CollectionChanged event, wire up PropertyChanged event on items
void ListOfSomeItems_CollectionChanged(object sender, CollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NewItems != null)
{
foreach(SomeItem item in e.NewItems)
item.PropertyChanged += SomeItem_PropertyChanged;
}
if (e.OldItems != null)
{
foreach(SomeItem item in e.OldItems)
item.PropertyChanged -= SomeItem_PropertyChanged;
}
}
// In PropertyChanged, if property was IsReceived then verify and update
void SomeItem_PropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.PropertyName == "IsReceived")
{
if (MessageBox.Show("Are you sure?", "Confirm", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo) == DialogResult.Yes)
{
var item = sender as SomeItem;
UpdateSomeItem(item.Id, item.IsReceived);
}
}
}
Your ViewModel should implement INoftiyPropertyChanged. Just listen to the PropertyChanged event and respond to it.
Edit
Based on the structure of your ViewModel, if Account needs to respond the a Requirement, it might be best to use something like Prism's EventAggregator or MVVM Light's Messenger.
MVVM solution would be:
Since bindings are two way you don't need to do anything to have your object updated from UI. But if you want your UI to be updated on changes in model, your model classes need to implement INotifyPropertyChanged
I imagine this would be done in IsReceived setter. Add two fields to your model class.
public string ValidationError
{ get; set; }
public bool HasValidationError
{ get; set; }
Then create a PopUp with error which is hidden by default. Implement INotifyPropertyChanged in your class, and bind PopUp visibility to HasValidationError, and message in inner TextBlock to ValidationError.
Related
In my WPF application, I am developing a fairly straightforward page that allows either creating a new object or choosing one from a combo box, then editing the object.
One of the parts of the object that is editable is a related database table in a one-to-many relationship, so for that piece I used a DataGrid. The DataGrid itself has a data-bound ComboBox column, as you can see here:
<DataGrid AutoGenerateColumns="False" EnableRowVirtualization="True"
CanUserAddRows="False" CanUserDeleteRows="True"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=No.Lower_Assy}"
DataGridCell.Selected="dgAssy_GotFocus">
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTemplateColumn Header="Number & Type">
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding Path=DataContext.ComboSource, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=Page}}"
SelectedValuePath="bwk_No"
SelectedValue="{Binding Path=fwf_Higher_N, ValidatesOnDataErrors=True, ValidatesOnExceptions=True, NotifyOnValidationError=True, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}">
<ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Number}"/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Type}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
</ComboBox>
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
<!-- other text columns omitted -->
<DataGridTemplateColumn>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Button Content="Delete" Click="btnDeleteHigherAssy_Click" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
</DataGrid.Columns>
</DataGrid>
Code behind:
private void dgAssy_GotFocus(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.OriginalSource.GetType() == typeof(DataGridCell))
{
// Starts the edit on the row
DataGrid grd = (DataGrid)sender;
grd.BeginEdit(e);
}
}
And for the save button:
private void btnSave_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (CanUserEdit())
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(model.Data.Error))
{
repo.Save(model.Data);
StatusText = STATUS_SAVED;
model.CanSave = false;
// This is the data source for the main combo box on the page
model.ComboSource = repo.GetData();
// Set the combo box's selected item, in case this is a new object.
// cboNo is the main combo box on the page which allows selecting
// an object to edit
// Apparently setting SelectedItem directly doesn't work on a databound combo box
int index = model.ComboSource.ToList().FindIndex(x => x.bwk_No == model.Data.bwk_No);
cboNo.SelectedIndex = index;
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Invalid data:\n" + model.Data.Error, "Cannot save");
}
}
}
The problem
When I choose an item from the combo box in the data grid, it seems to work until I click on the save button. Then two things happen:
The combo box's selected item is set to null, blanking out the combo box.
As a result of (1), the save button is re-enabled because the data has changed. (The save button is bound to model.CanSave, which as you can see is set to false in the button handler; it is set to true by a property change event handler if there are no data errors.)
Why is it being reset? I've followed the code flow closely and can see the property change event for the combo box's backing field (fwf_Higher_N) being handled, and it appears to somehow come from the line model.ComboSource = repo.GetData();, but the stack only shows [external code] and I don't see why that line would modify an existing object.
The model class
// Names have been changed to protect the innocent
private class MyDataViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private DbData _Data;
public DbData Data
{
get { return _Data; }
set
{
_Data = value;
OnPropertyChanged("Data");
}
}
private IQueryable<MyComboModel> _ComboSource;
public IQueryable<MyComboModel> ComboSource {
get { return _ComboSource; }
set
{
_ComboSource = value;
OnPropertyChanged("ComboSource");
}
}
private bool _CanSave;
public bool CanSave
{
get { return _CanSave; }
set
{
_CanSave = value;
OnPropertyChanged("CanSave");
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string name)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
}
Your description of what is going on and your markup doesn't quite match. I'm going to make some assumptions, such as that Page.DataContext is an instance of MyDataViewModel.
I'm sorry to say it, but a SSCCE would do wonders here. I strongly suggest when anyone gets into situations where they are elbow deep in code they don't quite understand that they break out what they are attempting to do and create a minimal prototype that either exhibits the same behavior, or that helps you learn what's going wrong. I've made 500+ prototypes in the past five years.
As for this situation, you refer to a ComboBox named cboNo in btnSave_Click, but I don't see that in the xaml. This ComboBox's ItemSource appears to be bound to MyDataViewModel.ComboSource.
In addition, all ComboBoxes in the DataGrid also appear to be bound to the model's ComboSource. And, in the button handler event, you change what is in the property:
// This is the data source for the main combo box on the page
model.ComboSource = repo.GetData();
This fires PropertyChanged, and every ComboBox bound to this property will be updated. That means not only cboNo but also every ComboBox in the DataGrid.
It is expected behavior that, when ComboBox.ItemsSource changes, if ComboBox.SelectedItem is not contained within the items source, that SelectedItem is nulled out.
I just spun up a prototype (501+) and it appears that if the IEnumerable that the ComboBox is bound to changes, but the elements in the IEnumerable do not, then SelectedItem is not nulled out.
var temp = combo.ItemsSource.OfType<object>().ToArray();
combo.ItemsSource = temp;
So, within the btnSave_Click event handler, you change this ItemsSource, which probably does not have the same instances that are already in the combo, thus nulling out SelectedItem for all ComboBoxes bound to this property, and then only update cboNo's SelectedIndex.
Now, as for what to do about it...
Well, not sure. From the rest of your code, it appears you need to do some more codebehind work to make sure only the necessary ComboBoxes have their sources updated...
I know question similar to this has asked several times in SO. But non of them address my issue and have some difficulty with understanding those answers. This is my situation; I have a ItemsControl I have used ItemTemplate and bound some data.
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="AdditionalFieldTemlate">
<Grid>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding InfoName}"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding InfoValue,Mode=TwoWay}" Name="CustomValue"/>
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding AdditionalInformation}" x:Name="additionalInfo" ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource AdditionalFieldTemlate}"/>
</Grid>
I need to set TextBox text to empty(all the textboxes text inside datatemplate) once click on a Button. Don't know how to access these textboxes. Please help me.
You don't normally access the TextBoxes (the look) ....you access the data that is being bound to.
So you can just alter the "data" in your collection as follows:
foreach (var item in AdditionalInformation)
{
item.InfoValue = "";
}
The "TextBoxes" will then be emptied.
Make sure you have implemented INotifyPropertyChanged on the class being used by AdditionalInformation....so that when the InfoValue property is altered it raises a notification.
The text in the textboxes is databound to the InfoValue property of your class. Implement the class and proprty like this:
class InfoClass: INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _infoValue;
...
public string InfoValue
{
get { return _infoValue; }
set
{
_infoValue = value;
OnNotifyPropertyChanged("InfoValue")
}
}
...
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void OnPropertyChanged(string property)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property));
}
}
Then do what colinsmith suggests in your button click handler (or command if you went with the MVVM approach). The binding will be notified to the change and the view will be updated.
I would like to use a datatemplate for my datagrid columns and have a button for each item. I would like the item to be removed if the user clicks the button. I am using the MVVM pattern. How would I accomplish this?
<DataGridTemplateColumn>
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Button Width="50" Content="Remove" Command="{Binding RemoveItemCommand}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
public class ItemViewModel
{
public ItemViewModel()
{
RemoveCommand = new MyCommand(Remove);
}
public event EventHandler ItemRemoved;
public ICommand RemoveCommand { get; private set; }
private void Remove()
{
// Whatever it takes to remove item from your data store
service.Remove(this.Data);
var removeItem = ItemRemoved;
if (removeItem != null)
removeItem(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
public class ListViewModel
{
public ListViewModel(IEnumerable<ItemViewModel> items)
{
ItemVMs=new ObservableCollection<ItemViewModel>(items);
foreach (var item in ItemVMs)
item.ItemRemoved += RemoveSelectedItem;
}
public ObservableCollection<ItemViewModel> ItemVMs { get; private set; }
private void RemoveSelectedItem(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var item = sender as ItemViewModel;
item.ItemRemoved -= RemoveSelectedItem;
ItemVMs.Remove(item);
}
}
Each item's RemoveCommand would be bound to its button in your DataGrid. It sounds like you already have that part done. Make the ListViewModel's ItemVMs property the data source for your DataGrid.
The View is responsible for this. You can simply use codebehind to control the visibility of UI elements in response to user actions in the UI.
Sometimes, it is better to be practical than be rigidly dogmatic.
Well, now that you have edited your question, it becomes a completely different matter.
Your DataGrid should be bound to a collection of items.
Your button should be bound to a command on the ViewModel, and the CommandParameter should be the Model that particular row is bound to.
<DataTemplate>
<Button Content="Remove"
Command="{Binding DataContext.RemoveItemCommand,
ElementName=theWindow}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}" />
</DataTemplate>
Note some important things here. We need, from within the template, to bind to an ICommand on the ViewModel. The ViewModel is the DataContext of the Window. In this example, the window is named 'theWindow' (x:Name="theWindow"). Since the source of the Binding is the window, the Path must point to the ViewModel in the DataContext property on that Window.
We pass the current Model the DataGrid row is bound to into the command. This way, it is triival to remove it from the collection in the ViewModel.
public ObservableCollection<Model> Items {get;set;}
public ICommand RemoveItemCommand {get;set;}
// this method is called when RemoveItemCommand.Execute is called!
public void Execute(object parameter)
{
Items.Remove(parameter as Model);
}
This assumes you're using one of the standard delegated ICommand implementations out there. You can see how this is trivial to implement, and since the collection is an observable one, once you click the button and the Model is removed, the DataGrid will be notified of the change in the collection and remove that row.
You're probably better off using the standard routed events on the Click event of the button instead of a Command. The click event will allow you to retrieve the information about what control was clicked, and then you can also easily retrieve the parent of the button, to delete that item.
I am using the ScrollViewer with the MVVM pattern, and a list of items is wrapped by the ScrollViewer, such as
<ScrollViewer>
<ListView>
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn
Header = "Name"
DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Path=Name}"
/>
</GridView>
</ListView.View>
</ListView>
</ScrollViewer>
The items of the listview are bound to a collection of objects in the viewmodel. I want the scrollviewer to scroll to the top whenever a item is added or removed from the collection.
I need the viewmodel to trigger the event, rather than using the ScrollToTop() method in the code-behind of the view.
IMHO, the clearest way to do this is using a "Behavior" via an AttachedProperty. An AttachedProperty is a mechanism to extend existing controls functionality.
First, create a class to hold the AtachedProperty, for instance:
public class ScrollViewerBehavior
{
public static bool GetAutoScrollToTop(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (bool)obj.GetValue(AutoScrollToTopProperty);
}
public static void SetAutoScrollToTop(DependencyObject obj, bool value)
{
obj.SetValue(AutoScrollToTopProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty AutoScrollToTopProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("AutoScrollToTop", typeof(bool), typeof(ScrollViewerBehavior), new PropertyMetadata(false, (o, e) =>
{
var scrollViewer = o as ScrollViewer;
if (scrollViewer == null)
{
return;
}
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
{
scrollViewer.ScrollToTop();
SetAutoScrollToTop(o, false);
}
}));
}
This attached property allows a ScrollViewer having "magically" a new property of type Boolean, acting like a DependencyProperty in your XAML. If you bind this property to a standard property in your ViewModel, for instance:
private bool _reset;
public bool Reset
{
get { return _reset; }
set
{
_reset = value;
if(PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs("Reset"));
}
}
(again, the name is up to you) and then you set this Reset property to true, your ScrollViewer will scroll to top.
I have named the AtachedPropertyas AutoScrollToTop, but the name is not important for this purpose.
The XAML will be something like:
<ScrollViewer my:ScrollViewerBehavior.AutoScrollToTop="{Binding Reset, Mode=TwoWay}">
<ListView>
<ListView.View>
<GridView>
<GridViewColumn
Header = "Name"
DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Path=Name}"
/>
</GridView>
</ListView.View>
</ListView>
</ScrollViewer>
Note: my is the namespace where your ScrollViewerBehavior class lives. For example: xmlns:my="clr-namespace:MyApp.Behaviors"
Finally, the only thing you have to do in your ViewModel is to set Reset = true when you like, in your case, when you add or remove an element from the collection.
Create a new ListView control which extend Listview and use this new one instead
public class ScrollListView : ListView
{
protected override void OnItemsChanged(System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.OldItems.Count > 0)
this.ScrollIntoView(e.OldItems[e.OldStartingIndex]);
base.OnItemsChanged(e);
}
}
I have also faced a similar scenario where I needed to assign ScrollViewer's HorizontalOffset and VerticalOffset programmatically. I am afraid there is no direct binding mechanism for this. What I did was a way around (believe me, I still do not like the approach I followed, but I did not find any other option). Here is what I suggest:
Hook the ScrollViewer's Loaded event, cast the sender object to ScrollViewer and assign it to a property in DataContext (Means you need to keep a ScrollViewer propery in DataContext which will hold the reference of ScrollViewer in the UI). Hook up ObservableCollection's CollectionChanged events in ViewModel and using the ScrollViewer property, you can call methods like ScrollToTop() etc.
This is just a way around. I am still looking for better solution.
The simplest correct way to do this in MVVM is by creating an event in your viewmodel and subscribing to it from your view. And then, in the event handler, call ScrollToTop.
You fire the event from your viewmodel every time your collection is modified, for instance, and then it's up to the view to react to that event and scroll the list to the top.
Even if this involves some code-behind and demands that the view knows part of its viewmodel, it doesn't violate the MVVM pattern, unlike other workarounds.
public interface IMyViewModel
{
event EventHandler MyCollectionChanged;
}
public class MyViewModel : IMyViewModel
{
public event EventHandler MyCollectionChanged;
// More viewmodel related stuff
protected virtual void OnMyCollectionChanged(EventArgs e)
{
if (MyCollectionChanged != null)
MyCollectionChanged(this, e);
}
}
public class MyWindow : Window
{
public MyWindow(IMyViewModel viewModel)
{
this.DataContext = viewModel;
InitializeComponent();
(this.DataContext as IViewModel).MyCollectionChanged+= MyCollectionChangedEventHandler;
}
private void MyCollectionChangedEventHandler(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Do view related stuff
scrollViewer.ScrollToTop();
}
}
EDIT: But it can be refined a lot more, of course. If you want to avoid using code-behind, look for DataEventTriggers. If you don't mind about code-behind but are concerned about memory leaks, look for weak events.
And finally, since the logic you want is 100% view-related (have the ListView scroll every time an item is added or removed to it), you could also implement it as a Behavior / attached property, or extending the ListView. That could get a tad more convoluted, but I encourage you to give those options some thought.
I am implementing a listview, and a button next to it. I have to be able that when i select multiple items in a listview, and then click on a button, then the selected items are put into a list. But my question is , how do i bind the selected items towards the viewmodel?
I changed my selectionmode to multiple. But then, do i just have to do:
SelectedItem={Binding path= selectedItems}
and then make in my viewmodel a property selectedItems, and it will set these items i have selected? Or what is the right solution to do this?
Like Doctor has already pointed out, you can bind SelectedItems to XAML CommandParameter
After a lot of digging and googling, I have finally found a simple solution to this common issue.
To make it work you must follow ALL the following rules:
Following Ed Ball's suggestion', on you XAML command databinding, define CommandParameter property BEFORE Command property. This a very time-consuming bug.
Make sure your ICommand's CanExecute and Execute methods have a parameter of object type. This way you can prevent silenced cast exceptions that occurs whenever databinding CommandParameter type does not match your command method's parameter type.
private bool OnDeleteSelectedItemsCanExecute(object SelectedItems)
{
// Your goes here
}
private bool OnDeleteSelectedItemsExecute(object SelectedItems)
{
// Your goes here
}
For example, you can either send a listview/listbox's SelectedItems property to you ICommand methods or the listview/listbox it self. Great, isn't it?
Hope it prevents someone spending the huge amount of time I did to figure out how to receive SelectedItems as CanExecute parameter.
It's kind of tricky to do this Mutliple Selection in MVVM, because the SelectedItems property isn't a Dependency Property. However, there are some tricks you can use. I found this triology of blog posts that describe the matter in some details and provide some useful solutions.
Part I
Part II
Part III
Hope this helps
If you are using System.Windows.Interactivity and Microsoft.Expression.Interactions already, here is a workaround without any other code/behaviour to mess around. If you need these, it can be download from here
This workaround make use of interactivity event trigger and interactions set property mechanism in above assemblies.
Additional namespace declaration in XAML
xmlns:i="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Interactivity;assembly=System.Windows.Interactivity"
xmlns:ei="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/2010/interactions"
XAML:
<ListView Name="MyListView" ItemsSource="{Binding ModelList}" DisplayMemberPath="Name" Grid.Column="0">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<ei:ChangePropertyAction TargetObject="{Binding Mode=OneWay}" PropertyName="SelectedItems" Value="{Binding Path=SelectedItems, ElementName=MyListView}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</ListView>
View Model:
public class ModelListViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Model> ModelList { get; set; }
public ObservableCollection<Model> SelectedModels { get; set; }
public ModelListViewModel() {
ModelList = new ObservableCollection<Model>();
SelectedModels = new ObservableCollection<Model>();
}
public System.Collections.IList SelectedItems {
get {
return SelectedModels;
}
set {
SelectedModels.Clear();
foreach (Model model in value) {
SelectedModels.Add(model);
}
}
}
}
In example above, your ViewModel will pick up the selected items whenever the selection on ListView changed.
What you can do is you can handle the Button_Click(...) in your code-behind. Then in that code-behind method you can create a List of selected items by iterating over the selected items of the listView.
Since it is allowed to access the ViewModel from the View you can now call a method on your ViewModel and pass the list of selected items as a parameter.
I'm not sure if this would also work with Bindings only, however it is not bad practice to use code-behind as well.
Example Code:
public void Button_Click(object sender, EventArguments arg)
{
List<ListViewItem> mySelectedItems = new List<ListViewItem>();
foreach(ListViewItem item in myListView.SelectedItems)
{
mySelectedItems.Add(item);
}
ViewModel.SomeMethod(mySelectedItems);
}
EDIT
Here is a minimalist example, XAML:
<DataTemplate
x:Key="CarTemplate"
DataType="{x:Type Car}">
</DataTemplate>
<ListView x:Name="myListView"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Cars}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource CarTemplate}">
</ListView>
CODE-BEHIND:
public void Button_Click(object sender, EventArguments arg)
{
List<Car> mySelectedItems = new List<Car>();
foreach(Car item in myListView.SelectedItems)
{
mySelectedItems.Add(item);
}
ViewModel.SomeMethod(mySelectedItems);
}
Unfortunately the SelectedItems is a read only not bindable property.
I found a lot of help from this article How to Databind to a SelectedItems property in WPF
If you are using Metro/WinRT you may want to look at the WinRTXXAMLToolkit as it offers a bindable SelectedItems dependency property as one of its extensions.
You can't bind, but you can send to Command as an CommandParameter.
As a slight variation on Christian's post, I implemented similar code using the ListView.SelectionChanged event. Instead of calling a method on the ViewModel, I set a property called SelectedItems:
public void ListView_SelectionChanged( object s, SelectionChangedEventArgs e ) {
List<Car> mySelectedItems = new List<Car>();
foreach( Car item in myListView.SelectedItems )
mySelectedItems.Add(item);
ViewModel.SelectedItems = mySelectedItems;
}
This way, ViewModel.SelectedItems is available for any command you might have in your ViewModel and it can be used for data binding (if you turn it into an ObservableCollection).
I did a solution for this, to me this was simple enough.
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding ListOfModel}" x:Name="ModelList"
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedModel, Mode=TwoWay}">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding ExecuteListBoxSelectionChange}" CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=ModelList}">
</i:InvokeCommandAction>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</ListBox>
Then in the viewmodel:
public ICommand ExecuteListBoxSelectionChange { get; private set; }
ExecuteListBoxSelectionChange = DelegatingCommand<ListBox>.For(ListBoxSelectionChnageEvent).AlwaysEnabled();
SelectedModels is the list where I wanted the selection to be filled.
private void ListBoxSelectionChnageEvent(ListBox modelListBox)
{
List<ModelInfo> tempModelInfo = new List<ModelInfo>();
foreach(ModelInfo a in modelListBox.SelectedItems)
tempModelInfo.Add(a);
SelectedModels = tempModelInfo;
}