ExtJS 4.0: Localization issues - extjs

I followed closely guide on Localization: http://docs.sencha.com/ext-js/4-0/#!/guide/localization, however I cannot make it work in MVC pattern.
I don't need dynamic localization like previous example, I just want to set it when application loads.
I tried like this:
Ext.application({
name: 'KS',
appFolder: 'app',
controllers: ['Menu', 'DailyReport', 'DP'],
launch: function() {
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: 'lib/ext-4.0/locale/ext-lang-es.js',
success: function(response, opts) {
eval(response.responseText);
},
failure: function() {
Ext.Msg.alert('Error', 'Error al cargar archivos de idioma.');
}
});
Ext.create('Ext.container.Viewport', {
items: [{
xtype: 'menu'
},
{
xtype: 'dpedit'
}]
});
}
});
In firebug I get: "Ext.view is undefined" error, and nothing renders. If I try Ajax call after creating Viewport, I don't get any error, but translation is not applied.

A more elegant solution would be to let the autoloader load the class before your launch method is run.
You can do this by define Ext.view.View as required:
Ext.application({
name: 'KS',
appFolder: 'app',
controllers: ['Menu', 'DailyReport', 'DP'],
// This will make shure the class is loaded before your application runs:
requires : ['Ext.view.View'],
launch: function() {
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: 'lib/ext-4.0/locale/ext-lang-es.js',
success: function(response, opts) {
eval(response.responseText);
},
failure: function() {
Ext.Msg.alert('Error', 'Error al cargar archivos de idioma.');
}
});
Ext.create('Ext.container.Viewport', {
items: [{
xtype: 'menu'
},
{
xtype: 'dpedit'
}]
});
}
});
For more details refer to the extjs api

It will work in production mode, when all ext javascript files are loaded before your application start. I had this problem also. Try to do this to test: Import the 'ext-all.js' file and after that, import your language file. This will work. Not the best solution, but the only one I've found that works.
The cause of your problem:
If you open your translation file you will notice directives like this:
Ext.view.View.prototype.emptyText = "";
If the file 'Ext.view.View.js' isn't loaded in the moment that you load your translation file, you'll get an error, because the 'Ext.view.View' class didn't exists.
I hope anybody can help you with a better solution.

I solved this very easily. It's simple and it will work much better. Put this in your document head, after ext.js/ext-all.js, and before your app.js. (I put it at the bottom of the language.js per the localization guide)
var params = Ext.urlDecode(window.location.search.substring(1));
if (params.lang) {
var url = Ext.util.Format.format('/assets/extjs/locale/ext-lang-{0}.js', params.lang);
document.write("<script src='" + url + "'><\/script>");
}
I'm using the /assets to work with rails 3.1.
This facilitates the ?lang=fr in the query params, the rest of the app should work according to the guide.
http://docs.sencha.com/ext-js/4-0/#!/guide/localization

Related

What would keep setter methods from being created in sencha touch

I have a simple controller that I'm starting to build in sencha touch 2:
Ext.define('ScoreKeeper.controller.GameScores', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Controller',
config: {
refs: {
requestButton: 'button[name=RequestButton]',
responseArea: '#scoreResponse'
},
control: {
requestButton: {
tap: 'sendRequest'
}
}
},
sendRequest: function (){
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: 'message',
method: 'GET',
disableCaching: false,
scope: this,
callback: function(options, success, response) {
this.setResponse(response.responseText);
}
});
},
setResponse: function (responseText){
this.setResponseArea(responseText);
}
});
When I tap my requestButton the sendRequest method fires correctly but when it gets to the setResponse method, it fails on the this.setResponseArea step.
When I checked my browser dev tools, it looks like the getter methods for both of my refs get created, but neither of the setter methods do.
What would keep these methods from being created?
Assuming #responseArea refers to an HTML element like a <div>. To attribute the response from your server to the HTML element, do this:
this.getResponseArea.setHtml(responseText);
instead of
this.setResponseArea(responseText);.
Don't forget getResponseArea gets you the HTML element with #responseArea as id. When you got it, you can do whatever you want with it; for example:
this.getResponseArea.setValue(responseText);
or
this.getResponseArea.getValue();.
That's why there is a get but no set.

Sencha Touch Cards Layout not working

I'm learning Sencha Touch2 and trying do a simple application to see how it works.
I don't know what I'm doing wrong here: https://fiddle.sencha.com/?fiddle=2da#fiddle/2da
0.- In your Fiddle you are using ExtJs as your Framework instead of Sencha Touch.
1.- You were trying to use 'bolao.view.Main' when it was never declared.
2.- Ext.fly('appLoadingIndicator').destroy(); Is having trouble inside Fiddle but not when used normally in your server.
3.- Even with this changes I can't manage to see it in Chrome, but I do see it in FireFox.
4.- Try this code in your Fiddle and then deploy it to your Apache or whatever server you are using.
5.- Don't use Fiddle for learning purposes (though it is cool for showing code).
6.- I recommend you to follow this tutorial http://docs.sencha.com/touch/2.3.1/#!/guide/first_app
Code:
Ext.application({
name: 'bolao',
requires: [
'Ext.MessageBox'
],
views: [
'Main'
],
icon: {
'57': 'resources/icons/Icon.png',
'72': 'resources/icons/Icon~ipad.png',
'114': 'resources/icons/Icon#2x.png',
'144': 'resources/icons/Icon~ipad#2x.png'
},
isIconPrecomposed: true,
startupImage: {
'320x460': 'resources/startup/320x460.jpg',
'640x920': 'resources/startup/640x920.png',
'768x1004': 'resources/startup/768x1004.png',
'748x1024': 'resources/startup/748x1024.png',
'1536x2008': 'resources/startup/1536x2008.png',
'1496x2048': 'resources/startup/1496x2048.png'
},
launch: function() {
// Destroy the #appLoadingIndicator element
//Ext.fly('appLoadingIndicator').destroy(); this line is having problems in Fiddle I think 'cos in my local server does work fine
// Initialize the main view
//Ext.Viewport.add(Ext.create('bolao.view.Main')); this view ('bolao.view.Main') is never defined
Ext.Viewport.add(Ext.create('Ext.tab.Panel'));
},
onUpdated: function() {
Ext.Msg.confirm(
"Application Update",
"This application has just successfully been updated to the latest version. Reload now?",
function(buttonId) {
if (buttonId === 'yes') {
window.location.reload();
}
}
);
}
});
Best regards #code4jhon

getRootNode() is not a function

I try to develop an app with MVC architecture. I've the following Controller code:
Ext.define('PM.controller.Projects', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Controller',
models: ['Project'],
stores: ['Projects'],
views: [
'projects.Tree',
'Toolbar',
],
init: function(config) {
var tree = this.getProjectsTreeView();
var rootNode = tree.getRootNode();
console.log(rootNode);
this.callParent(config);
}
});
And this view code:
Ext.define('PM.view.projects.Tree', {
extend: 'Ext.tree.Panel',
xtype: 'projectsTree',
title: 'Projects',
hideHeaders: true,
root: {
text: "Projekte"
}
});
It try to get the root node from my tree view in the controller but I get the error that getRootNode() is not a valid function in my controller. Can anybody tell me why I get this error? My target is to add new children to this root node from an ajax request.
Thanks
The methods Ext generates for each string in the views array return constructors that can be used to create the respective views. That seems bizarre, but that's how it is.
If you want to access the actual view component, you'll need to create a ref for it. Your init method should not assume that the view exists yet. It's very likely that it won't since the controller's init method is called before the application's launch method which is probably where all the views are getting added to the page.
You want to put your logic in the controller's onLaunch template method which is called after the application has been launched and your view has been added.
Ext.define('PM.controller.Projects', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Controller',
refs: [{
ref: 'projectsTreeView',
selector: 'projectsTree'
}],
init: function() {
// It's safe to add selectors for views that don't exist yet.
this.control(/*...*/)
},
onLaunch: function(config) {
var tree = this.getProjectsTreeView();
var rootNode = tree.getRootNode();
console.log(rootNode);
}
});
If this doesn't work, that means you aren't actually adding your view anywhere. One place you could add it is in the application's launch method. Something has to add the treeview.
Ext.application({
// ...
views: ['projects.Tree']
launch: function() {
Ext.create('Ext.container.Viewport', {
layout: 'fit',
items: [new this.getProjectsTreeView()]
});
}
});
So the chronology of events is this:
Application#constructor
Controller#constructor
Controller#init (can't assume the view exists)
Application#onBeforeLaunch
Application#launch (view is now added)
Controller#onLaunch (do something with the view that is now available)
Also, your view alias may need to be 'widget.projectsTree' not just 'projectsTree'.

Building search application form and displaying result in grid upon submit in extjs-mvc

I am trying to build a search application using ExtJS. I have created dummy form to search for personal details. I have a php script connected to mysql DB. I am able to pass form parameters to php and able to get the return result in msg box. but I am not understanding how to pass it to store and display the same in grid in MVC. I have tried to pass the return data of php to store and then called Grid (List.js) in controller. still did not work. I have shown all the codes that i have used to do this.Another doubt which i have, is that essential to use proxy part of code (i.e url:app/scripts/Info.php) in both store and onSearchButtonClick function in controller? as I can directly pass the return values to store from onSearchButtonClick function, I hope it is not essential to connect php script in both places. However, it would be really nice experts clarify this.
Following is my store:
Ext.define('App.store.Info', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
model: 'App.model.Info',
alias: 'widget.infostore',
pageSize : 50,
autoLoad : false,
remoteFilter: true,
proxy :{
type : 'ajax',
url : 'app/scripts/Info.php',
reader : {
type : 'json',
root : 'result',
successProperty : 'success'
}
},
listeners: {
load : function(store) {
store.each(function(record) {
record.commit();
});
}
}
});
My model looks perfect, simply to reduce somuch code I havent put here
Here is my grid:
Ext.define('App.view.info.List' ,{
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
alias : 'widget.infolist',
store : 'Info',
initComponent: function(){
this.columns = [
{header:'PID',dataIndex:'pid'},
{header:'Name',dataIndex:'name'},
{header:'Address', dataIndex:'address'},
{header:'Contact', dataIndex:'contact'}
];
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
This is what my php script returns:
{'success':true, 'result':{'pid':'100','name':'Suman','address':'Bangalore','contact':'suman#xyz.com'}}
Here is controller:
Ext.define('App.controller.Info', {
extend: 'App.controller.Base',
models: ['Info'],
stores: ['Info'],
views: [
'info.Index',
'info.List'
],
refs: [{ref: 'info',selector: 'info'}],
init: function(){
console.log('Main controller init');
this.control({
'button[action=search]':{
click: this.onSearchButtonClick
}
});
},
onSearchButtonClick:function(){
var form = Ext.getCmp('ppanel');
if(form.getForm().isValid()){
Ext.Ajax.request({
waitMsg: 'Searching...',
method: 'POST',
url: 'app/scripts/Info.php',
params: {
searchData: Ext.encode(form.getValues())
},
scope:this,
success: this.onSearchSuccess,
failure: this.onSearchFailure
//Ext.MessageBox.alert("XXXXX","dat");
});
}
},
onSearchSuccess: function(response){
var gData = Ext.JSON.decode(response.responseText);
//var grid = Ext.widget('infolist'); //not working -need help
this.getInfoStore().load(gData);
//Ext.getCmp().setActiveItem('infolist'); //not working-need help
//this.getViewport().getLayout().setActiveItem('infolist'); //not working need help
Ext.MessageBox.alert("XXXXX",response.responseText); //works
},
onSearchFailure: function(err){
Ext.MessageBox.alert('Status', 'Error occured during searching...');
}
});
I hope I have provided required information to understand the problem. Looking forward some sort of help.
The problem is that you have two instances of the store, one in grid and one in controller.
If you want a single instance store (like it seems you want) you have two options:
Add it to your application
Assign a storeId to your store definition.
(if you already added that store to your application, ignore the above text)
Or, better yet, do not work directly with the store but with your grid, like this:
First add a ref to your view->grid in your controller:
refs: [{ref: 'info',selector: 'info'},{selector:'infolist', ref:'infoGrid'}]
And then, in your onSearchSuccess handler, instead of calling: this.getInfoStore().load(gData); you should call: this.getInfoGrid().getStore().loadData(gData);
BTW: this.getInfoStore().load(gData); will never load an array of data or a record, for that you should use: this.getInfoStore().loadData(gData);
Hope this gets you in the right track.

loading multiple views in init function breaks one or the other

I'm building my first backbone.js app, and I've run into a problem when trying to initialize my app and display both recipes and a shopping list, both of which are different (yet related) backbone objects.
My init function is
var MyApp= {
Models: {},
Views: {},
Routers: {},
Collections: {},
AppView: {},
Init: function() {
new MyApp.Views.ShoppingList;
new MyApp.Routers.Recipes;
Backbone.history.start();
}
};
Strangely, when I use
new MyApp.Routers.ShoppingList;
new MyApp.Routers.Recipes;
I don't get the shopping list View, I only get the recipes.
I also don't get any errors.
The shopping list router is fairly basic
MyApp.Routers.ShoppingList = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
"": "index",
"shopping_list/:id": "show"
},
index: function(){
console.log('this');
new MyApp.Views.ShoppingList();
}
});
so from what I understand, the app should load the router, and display the view, but I'm not getting that or the console.log.
--------------as requested, here is my 'recipes router'---------------
MyApp.Routers.Recipes = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
"": "index",
"recipes/:id": "show"
},
index: function(){
if(!MyApp.RecipeList){
MyApp.RecipeList = new MyApp.Collections.RecipeList;
MyApp.RecipeList.page = 1;
} else {
MyApp.RecipeList.page++;
}
MyApp.RecipeList.url='/recipes?page='+MyApp.RecipeList.page;
MyApp.RecipeList.fetch({
add: true,
success: function() {
new MyApp.Views.RecipeList({ collection: MyApp.RecipeList});
},
error: function() {
new Error({ message: "Error loading documents." });
}
});
},
show: function(id){
var recipe = MyApp.RecipeList.get(id);
new MyApp.Views.RecipeView({ model: recipe});
},
newRecipe: function(){
new App.Views.Edit({ model: new Recipe() });
},
edit: function(id){
var recipe = new Recipe({ id: id});
recipe.fetch({
success: function(model, resp){
new App.Views.Edit({ model: recipe});
},
error: function(){
new Error({message: "Hey!? Were'd it go? sorry I can't find your recipe"});
window.location.hash = '#';
}
});
}
});
----------------- some progress -----------------------------
I may be wrong, but in commenting out sections of the router, I find that the problem may be caused by my 'routes' as they both have index where the url is empty. Commenting out the 'routes' in one controller/router causes the other controller/router to display.
I've changed the routes so that they are more representative of their namespace
routes{
"recipes" : "recipes"
},
recipes: function()...
but I'm still not getting the right information to display. I'm now trying to figure out if I need an initialize function and what that would look like, or if I've even debugged this properly
--------------------- update, I was using backbone wrong ------------------------
It turns out I believe that I was mis-understanding Routers and was thinking of them more like controllers, so I was calling multiple routers on load, but the page was only loading the last one which pointed to an empty route as you can only request a single url route at a time.
Now I'm loading multiple Views on load and only one router.
After instantiating your view, you still need to render it and add it to the DOM.
index: function(){
console.log('this');
var view = new MyApp.Views.ShoppingList();
//you don't have to append to the whole body, but this is just an example
$('body').append(view.render().el);
}

Resources