I have currently learning backtracking and got stuck on the 8-queen problem, I am using a 8x8 matrix and I think I've got some problems regarding the matrix passing to functions, any help would be highly apreciated.I wouldn't mind if anyone would bring any optimisation to the code, thanks.
here is my code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAX 7
//void azzera(int **mat);
void posiziona(int **mat, int r,int c);
void stampa(int **mat);
int in_scacchi(int **mat,int r ,int c);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i=0,j=0;
int **mat=(int **)malloc(sizeof(int *)*MAX);
for(i=0;i<=MAX;i++){
mat[i]=(int *)malloc(MAX*sizeof(int));
for(j=0;j<=MAX;j++){
mat[i][j]=-1;
}
}
printf("insert pos of the first queen on the first row (1-8) :");
scanf("%d",&i);
i-=1;
mat[0][i]=1;
posiziona(mat,1,0);
stampa(mat);
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
/*void azzera(int **mat){
int i=0,j=0;
for(i=0;i<=MAX;i++){
for(j=0;j<=MAX;j++){
mat[i][j]=-1;
}
}
}*/
void stampa(int **mat){
int i,j;
for(i=0;i<=MAX;i++){
for(j=0;j<=MAX;j++){
printf(" %d",mat[i][j]);
}
printf("\n");
}
}
void posiziona(int **mat, int r,int c){
int i=0,riga=1,flag_col=-1,flag_riga=-1;
if(riga<=7&&flag_riga!=1){
if(flag_riga==1){
flag_riga=-1;
posiziona(mat,r+1,0);
}
else if(in_scacchi(mat,r,c)==1){
if(c==MAX)
posiziona(mat,r-1,0);
posiziona(mat,r,c+1);
}
else{
flag_riga=1;
}
}
}
int in_scacchi(int **mat,int r ,int c){
int i,j,k,m;
int flag=0;
//col
for(i=0;i<r;i++){
for(j=0;j<=c;j++){
if(((mat[i][j]==1)&&(c==j)))
return 1;
}
}
//diag \
for(i=0;i<MAX-r;i++){
for(j=0;j<=MAX-c;j++){
if(mat[MAX-r-i][MAX-c-j]==1)
return 1;
}
}
//antidiag
for(i=r+1;i<=MAX;i++){
for(j=c+1;j<=MAX;j++){
if(mat[r-i][c+j]==1) {
return 1;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
1. One glaring problem is the memory allocation:
int **mat=(int **)malloc(sizeof(int *)*MAX);
for(i=0;i<=MAX;i++){
mat[i]=(int *)malloc(MAX*sizeof(int));
Given that MAX is 7, both mallocs are allocating too little memory for the matrix (seven elements instead of eight).
To be honest, I'd rename MAX to SIZE or something similar, and change all your loops to use strict less-than, i.e.
for(i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) {
I would argue that this is slightly more idiomatic and less prone to errors.
2. I haven't tried to debug the logic (I don't think it's fair to expect us to do that). However, I have noticed that nowhere except in main do you assign to elements of mat. To me this suggests that the code can't possibly be correct.
3. Beyond that, it may be useful to observe that in a valid solution every row of the chessboard contains exactly one queen. This means that you don't really need an 8x8 matrix to represent the solution: an 8-element array of column positions will do.
edit In response to your question in the comments, here is a complete Python implementation demonstrating point 3 above:
def can_place(col_positions, col):
row = len(col_positions)
for r, c in enumerate(col_positions):
if c == col or abs(c - col) == abs(r - row): return False
return True
def queens(n, col_positions = []):
if len(col_positions) >= n:
pretty_print(n, col_positions)
return True
for col in xrange(n):
if can_place(col_positions, col):
if queens(n, col_positions + [col]):
return True
return False
def pretty_print(n, col_positions):
for col in col_positions:
print '.' * col + 'X' + '.' * (n - 1 - col)
queens(8)
Your matrix must iterate from 0 to MAX-1,
i.e
int **mat= malloc(sizeof(int *)*MAX);
for(i=0;i< MAX;i++){ //see for i<MAX
mat[i]= malloc(MAX*sizeof(int));
for(j=0;j<MAX;j++){ //see for j<MAX
mat[i][j]=-1;
}
}
malloc must be called with sizeof(...) * (MAX+1) in both the i- and j-loop.
Moreover, when I ran your program I got an access violation in the antidiag portion of in_scacchi(...) due to the fact that the code tries to access mat[r-i][c+j] which evaluates to mat[-1][1] because r==1 and i==2.
So there seems to be a logical error in your description of the anti-diagonal of the matrix.
Related
Im in the process of learning C and the basis of the class is C primer plus(6th edition). We use Eclipse as an IDE.
For an project we have to create to arrays. One array that takes numbers in a loop and another array that display the cumulative value. So if array 1 has values 1, 5 and 3(out of 10 inputs total) then the resulting input in array 2 should be 9(on the 3th input because of the 3 inputs in array 1).
Im having trouble getting started the right way - anyone here has ideas how I could proceed?
So far I have this for starters but forgive me for it it very weak:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE 10
void doublearrays (double usernumber);
int main(void)
{
double usernumbers = 0.0;
int loop1 = 1;
while(loop1)
{
printf("Type numbers as doubles. \n");
fflush(stdout);
loop1 = scanf("%lf", &usernumber);
if(loop1)
{
doublearrays(usernumber);
}
}
return 0;
}
All the text in a homework assignment shall be read:
For a project we have to create two arrays... 10 inputs total...
Why on earth do not you declare them?... You already have defined SIZE so
double usernumbers[SIZE];
double cumulnumbers[SIZE];
Next do yourself a favour and handle one problem at a time:
One array that takes numbers in a loop...
Ok, so write a loop up to 10 reading floats directly into the array and note how many numbers were received
int n;
for(n=0; n<SIZE; n++) {
if (scanf("%lf", &usernumbers[n]) != 1) break;
}
// ok we now have n number in the first array
Let us go on
and another array that display the cumulative value.
Ok cumul is initially 0. and is incremented on each value from the first array:
double cumul = 0.;
for(int i=0; i<n; i++) {
cumul += usernumbers[i];
cumulnumbers[i] = cumul;
}
(your current code isn't what you need... delete it and then...)
anyone here has ideas how I could proceed?
Well the first step would be to actually define some arrays.
double input[SIZE];
double cum[SIZE];
The next step would be a loop to read input.
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; ++i)
{
if (scanf("%lf", &input[i]) != 1)
{
// Input error - add error handling - or just exit
exit(1);
}
}
The next step is to add code for calculating the the cumulative value.
I'll leave that for you as an exercise.
The last step is to print the array which I also will leave to you as an exercise.
The straight forward way of doing this, which would also use two arrays and a loop construct would be to create something like this.. I've changed the doubles to integers. (and i am also ignoring any errors from scanf()).
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE 10
static void
print_array(int *arr, const char *arr_name)
{
int i;
printf("%s = [");
for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
printf("%d%s", arr[i], i < SIZE -1 ? ",":"");
printf("]\n");
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i;
int input[SIZE];
int cumsum[SIZE];
for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
{
int _input;
printf("Give me numbers!\n");
fflush(stdout);
scanf("%d", &_input); /* assuming integer */
input[i] = _input;
cumsum[i] = i > 0 ? cumsum[i-1] + _input : _input;
}
print_array(input, "input");
print_array(cumsum, "cumulative");
return 0;
}
or If you'd like to play around with pointers and have a bit more compact version.. perhaps this could be something to study to help you understand pointers, it does the same thing as my code above
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE 10
static int data[SIZE*2];
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int *input_p = &data[0];
int *cumsum_p = &data[0] + SIZE;
for (; input_p != &data[0] + SIZE; input_p++, cumsum_p++)
{
printf("Give me numbers!\n");
scanf("%d", input_p);
*cumsum_p = input_p == &data[0] ? *input_p : *(cumsum_p-1) + *input_p;
}
}
I want to generate numbers 1 to 4 in a random fashion using C programming.
I have made provision to print a[0] directly in a while loop and for any further element the program checks whether the new number from a[1] to a[3] is same as any of the previous elements. A function has been created for the same. int checkarray(int *x, int y).
The function checks current element with previous elements one by one by reducing the passed address. If it matches the value it exits the loop by assigning value zero to the condition variable (int apply).
return apply;
In the main program it matches with the int check if check==1, the number is printed or else the loop is repeated.
Problem faced: The number of random numbers generated is varying between 2 and 4.
e.g
2 4
2 4 3
1 3 3 4
etc
Also repetition is there sometimes.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
int checkarray(int *x, int y);
void main() {
int a[4], i = 0, check;
srand(time(0));
while (i < 4) {
a[i] = rand() % 4 + 1;
if (i == 0) {
printf("%d ", a[i]);
i++;
continue;
} else {
check = checkarray(&a[i], i);
}
if (check == 1) {
printf("\n%d ", a[i]);
} else {
continue;
}
i++;
}
getch();
}
int checkarray(int *x, int y) {
int arrcnt = y, apply = 1, r = 1;
while (arrcnt > 0) {
if (*x == *(x - 2 * r)) {
apply = 0;
exit(0);
} else {
arrcnt--;
r++;
continue;
}
}
return apply;
}
Let's look at the checkarray function, which is supposed to check if a number is already present in the array.
It is called this way:
check = checkarray(&a[i], i);
Where a is an array of 4 integers and i is the actual index, so it tries to scan the array backwards looking for any occurrences of a[i]
int checkarray(int *x,int y)
{
int arrcnt=y,apply=1,r=1;
while(arrcnt>0)
{
if(*x==*(x-2*r))
// ^^^ Why? This will cause an out of bounds access.
{
apply = 0;
exit(0); // <-- This ends the program. It should be a 'break;'
}
else
{
arrcnt--;
r++;
continue;
}
}
return apply;
}
Without changing the interface (which is error prone, in my opinion) it could be rewritten as
int check_array(int *x, int y)
{
while ( y )
{
if ( *x == *(x - y) )
return 0;
--y;
}
return 1;
}
Testable here.
There are many other issues which should be addressed, though, so please, take a look to these Q&A too.
Does "n * (rand() / RAND_MAX)" make a skewed random number distribution?
Why do people say there is modulo bias when using a random number generator?
Fisher Yates shuffling algorithm in C
int main() vs void main() in C
Why can't I find <conio.h> on Linux?
Your approach is tedious but can be made to work:
there is no need to special case the first number, just make checkarray() return not found for an empty array.
you should pass different arguments to checkarray(): a pointer to the array, the number of entries to check and the value to search.
you should not use exit(0) to return 0 from checkarray(): it causes the program to terminate immediately.
Here is a modified version:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
int checkarray(int *array, int len, int value) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (array[i] == value)
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
int main() {
int a[4], i = 0, value;
srand(time(0));
while (i < 4) {
value = rand() % 4 + 1;
if (checkarray(a, i, value)) {
printf("%d ", value);
a[i++] = value;
}
}
printf("\n");
getch();
return 0;
}
I should mention that I am in my 1st 2 weeks of an intro to programming class before people get too crazy with answers.
Using this array as an example,
int scores[30] = {90,85,100,50,50,85,60,70,55,55,80,95,70,60,95,
80,100,75,70,95,90,90,70,95,50,65,85,95,100,65}
I am trying to parse through it to create 2 new parallel arrays to use later. The idea is to make one array that holds the "scores" and one that holds the "occurrences" of each score. I end up compiling with no errors however during run time it crashes.
void frequency(int scores[], int max){
int i, x=0, temp=0, count=0, sum=0, mode=0;
int score[sum]; //unknown length of array, sum gets added after the while loop
int freq[sum];
printf("score\tfrequency\n");
printf("-----\t---------\n");
fprintf(fp, "score\tfrequency\n");
fprintf(fp, "-----\t---------\n");
for (i = 0; i < max; ++i){
while (scores[i]==scores[x]){
x++;
count++;
sum++;
temp = x-1;
if(scores[i] != scores[x]){
//printf(" %d\t %d\n",scores[i], count);
freq[i] = count;
score[i] = scores[i];
count=0;
i=temp;
x=temp+1;
sum++;
printf("%d\t%d", score[i], freq[i]);
fprintf(fp, "%d\t%d", score[i], freq[i]);
}
}
}
}
This part:
int i, x=0, temp=0, count=0, sum=0, mode=0;
int score[sum];
int freq[sum];
looks wrong.
You set sumto zero and then use it for the array dimension. Did you mean to do:
sum = max;
I end up compiling with no errors however during run time it crashes.
Reason:
The reason why your program crashes is because you have not allocated sufficient memory to the arrays that you use int the frequency() function
void frequency(int scores[], int max){
int i, x=0, temp=0, count=0, sum=0, mode=0;
int score[sum];
int freq[sum];
Solution:
So, is there a way to provide memory during run time according to requirements or change memory size of blocks during compile time?
Yes, that's the very reason why Dynamic memory allocation is used.... though you send a fixed array to the frequency() function in your code, the function I've provided works for any integer array you send..
Here I've provided code in which
one array stores all the unique scores
and other array stores number of occurrences of each score
I've done this using dynamic memory allocation.. I think it's easy to understand if you have basic understanding of dynamic memory allocation functions.. if you have any doubts, ask me through the comments :) and by the way I've assumed your main function to be :
int main()
{
int scores[30] = {90,85,100,50,50,85,60,70,55,55,80,95,70,60,95,
80,100,75,70,95,90,90,70,95,50,65,85,95,100,65};
frequency(scores,30);
return 0;
}
Code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void frequency(int scores[], int max);
int main()
{
int scores[30] = {90,85,100,50,50,85,60,70,55,55,80,95,70,60,95,
80,100,75,70,95,90,90,70,95,50,65,85,95,100,65};
frequency(scores,30);
return 0;
}
void frequency(int scores[], int max)
{
int i,j,count=0,flag=0,occur=0;
int *score=malloc(sizeof(int));
if(malloc==NULL)
{
printf("memory allocation failed");
exit(1);
//it's good to check if memory allocated was successful or not
//I've avoided it for further allocations,to decrease the size of post :)
}
int *freq=malloc(sizeof(int));
printf("score\tfrequency\n");
printf("-----\t---------\n");
//building array which has only scores
for(i=0;i<max;i++)
{
if(count==0) //first time
{
score=realloc(score,(count+1)*sizeof(int));
//increasing size of array by 1*sizeof(int)
score[count]=scores[i];
count++;
}//first one requires no checking whether it's repeated or not
else
{
flag=0; //resetting flag value
for(j=0;j<count;j++)
{
if(scores[i]==score[j])
{
flag=1; //
break;
}
}
if(flag==0) // if not repeated need to add new element
{
score=realloc(score,(count+1)*sizeof(int));
score[count]=scores[i];
count++;
}
}
}
//allocating memory for frequency array
freq=realloc(freq,count*sizeof(int));
//building array which has frequency of each score
for(i=0;i<count;i++)
{
occur=0;
for(j=0;j<max;j++)
{
if(score[i]==scores[j])
occur++;
}
freq[i]=occur;
}
for(i=0;i<count;i++) //printing output
printf("\n %d\t %d\n",score[i],freq[i]);
free(score); //freeing the blocks
free(freq);
}
My approach is quite simple to understand
first I create array score which creates extra memory whenever it encounters unique elements and stores in it
and then I check occurrences for each of the element of score array in the scores array and store them in freq array.
Output:
score frequency
----- ---------
90 3
85 3
100 3
50 3
60 2
70 4
55 2
80 2
95 5
75 1
65 2
I hope this is what you were trying to achieve :)
The problem is a 0-1 Knapsack and tries to minimize the output based on 2 constraint factors. Can somebody suggest whats wrong with the following code? Its giving WA.I am using a bottom-up approach.
Can somebody point out the test-cases where it fails?
#include<cstdio>
#include<climits>
using namespace std;
#define DEBUG 0
inline int min(int x, int y)
{
int p= (x<y?x:y);
return p;
}
int dp[1001][22][80];
int main()
{
int tc,o,n;
int num;
int ox[1000],nn[1000],wt[1000];
scanf("%d",&tc);
while(tc--){
scanf("%d %d",&o,&n);
scanf("%d",&num);
for(int i=1;i<=num;i++){
scanf("%d %d %d",ox+i,nn+i,wt+i);
}
//DP
for(int i=0;i<=o;i++){
for(int j=0;j<=n;j++){
dp[0][i][j]=INT_MAX;
}
}
dp[0][0][0]=0;
for(int items=1;items<=num;items++){
for(int oxygen=0;oxygen<=o;oxygen++){
for(int nitrogen=0;nitrogen<=n;nitrogen++){
if(oxygen>=ox[items] && nitrogen>=nn[items] && dp[items-1][oxygen-ox[items]][nitrogen-nn[items]]!=INT_MAX){
dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]=min(dp[items-1][oxygen][nitrogen],(dp[items-1][oxygen-ox[items]][nitrogen-nn[items]]+wt[items]));
}
else if(oxygen>=ox[items] && nitrogen<nn[items] && dp[items-1][oxygen-ox[items]][0]!=INT_MAX){
dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]=min(dp[items-1][oxygen][nitrogen],(dp[items-1][oxygen-ox[items]][0]+wt[items]));
}
else if(nitrogen>=nn[items] && oxygen<ox[items] && dp[items-1][0][nitrogen-nn[items]]!=INT_MAX){
dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]=min(dp[items-1][oxygen][nitrogen],(dp[items-1][0][nitrogen-nn[items]]+wt[items]));
}
else if(oxygen<ox[items] && nitrogen<nn[items]){
dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]=min(dp[items-1][oxygen][nitrogen],wt[items]);
}
else{
dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]=INT_MAX;
}
#if DEBUG
printf("\ndp[%d][%d][%d]=%d",items,oxygen,nitrogen,dp[items][oxygen][nitrogen]);
#endif
}
}
}
printf("%d\n",dp[num][o][n]);
}
}
Your program will fail when n=1000 because you are using 1-based indexing for the test cases, and therefore you will be accessing elements beyond the ends of your arrays.
Solution: use 0-based indexing (best solution) or increase the array sizes to 1001 (ugly hack).
There may be other bugs too, but this one definitely needs to be fixed.
I hope you have spent beautiful Christmas holidays. I am studying for an exam and I have a problem with my project in ANSI C. My code works but not always, it's strange because for some input values it works for other not. I have two arrays, A and B, that must be different in size and I have to write a function that do the mathematical union of the two arrays in another array. If there are elements of the same value I have to insert in the new array only one. I write all the code (I also post a question here because I had some problems with the union) but it does not work always. Gcc compile and I execute but it's not correct. I debugged with gdb and it said
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000400d1c in unionearraycrescente (a=0x7fffffffdd50, indice_m=4,
b=0x7fff00000005, indice_n=5, minimo=6, indiceMinimo=22)
at array.c:152
152 if(b[i]==c[j])
And this is the code near the problem
int arrayun(int a[], int index_m, int b[], int index_n, int minimum, int indexMinimum)
{
int i=0;
int j=0;
int found;
int lenc=0;
int c[lenc];
for(i=0;i<index_m;i++){
found = 0;
for(j=0; j<i && !found;j++)
if(a[i]==c[j])
found = 1;
if(!found)
c[lenc++] = a[i];
}
for(i=0;i<index_n;i++){
found=0;
for(j=0;j<i && !found;j++)
{
if(b[i]==c[j]) //debug gbd problem - segfault
found = 1;
}
if(!found)
c[lenc++] = b[i];
}
I am Italian so the comments are in my language, if you have any problems I will translate the comments. I want only to resolve this memory error. Thank you.
I follow some of your advices and in that part of code it works, I changed all the variables with index_m and I don't receive segfault but after the union I use the selection sort to sort in ascending order and it return me not the right values but in the first position negative values.
int arrayun (int a[], int index_m, int b[], int index_n, int minimum, int indexMinimum)
{
int i=0;
int j=0;
int found;
int lenc;
int c[index_m];
for(i=0;i<index_m;i++){
found = 0;
for(j=0; j<i && !found;j++)
if(a[i]==c[j])
found = 1; //setta trovato = 1
if(!found)
c[index_m++] = a[i];
}
for(i=0;i<index_n;i++){ //index_m or index_n?
found=0;
for(j=0;j<i && !found;j++)
{
if(b[i]==c[j]) //debug gbd problem - segfault - SOLVED but
found = 1;
}
if(!found)
c[index_m++] = b[i];
}
for (i=0; i<index_m-1;i++)
{
minimum=c[i];
indexMinimum=i;
for (j=i+1;j<index_m; j++)
{
if (c[j]<minimum)
{
minimum=c[j];
indiexMinimum=j;
}
}
c[indexMinimum]=c[i];
c[i]=minimum;
}
for(i=0;i<index_m;i++)
printf("Element %d\n",c[i]);
return c[index_m]; //I think here it's wrong
}
int c[lenc]; means in your program it is c[0]
and you are allocating ZERO Memory for the array.
And if you try for b[i]==c[i] where i>=0 means its a segmentation fault only.
Instead you can initialize like,
c[index_m];
int lenc=0;
int c[lenc];
this is array of 0 length.and in loop you are trying to access c[1],c[2]... etc.
To cure this problem you can pass length of the bigger array
int unionearraycrescente (int a[], int index_m, int b[], int index_n,int len, int minimum, int indexMinimum)
and you can then initialize like
int c[len];