Need help in coping buffer using memcpy - c

in the following code when i use fwrite its giving correct o/p. While memcpy is not working.
typedef struct
{
char *p1;
char *p2;
} node;
char s[] = "hello";
char t[] =" there";
node t1, t2;
char str;
FILE op_f;
t1.p1 = malloc(sizeof(strlen(s));
t1.p2 = malloc(sizeof(strlen(s));
t2.p1 = malloc(sizeof(strlen(s));
t2.p2 = malloc(sizeof(strlen(s));
t1.p1 = s;
t1.p2 = t;
copy(&t1,&t2);
str = malloc(sizeof(strlen(s) + strlen(t));
/* gives o/p hello there */
fwrite(t2.p1,1,strlen(s),op_f);
fwrite(t2.p1,2,strlen(s),op_f);
/* gives o/p there */
memcpy(str,t2.p1,strlen(s));
memcpy(str,t2.p2,strlen(s));
Is there any way to copy buffer to str ??
PS: above code is just for reference not the actual code

You should declare str as char array, not a single char:
char str[500];
when str is declared as array, the str is a pointer (to the first element of array). And in your code - str was a char, but not a pointer. Memcpy needs pointers as first and second arguments
Also, use malloc for strings without sizeof:
t1.p2 = malloc(strlen(s)+1);
Also, fwrite is used incorrectly, because the op_f is not initialized with fopen like:
op_f = fopen("filename.txt", "w");

Strings stored in char arrays need one extra byte for a terminator. When computing the size you need to add 1 extra position:
t1.p1 = malloc(strlen(s) + 1);
This code
t1.p1 = s;
doesn't copy the text from s to p1, but sets p1 to point to the same string as s.
This part
str = malloc(strlen(s) + strlen(t));
doesn't work because str is a single char and not a char*. You could try
char* str = malloc(strlen(s) + strlen(t) + 1);
If you really intend this to be tagged C++, you should consider using std::string instead. It handles all of these details.

I just noticed you use 'char str' instead of 'char *str', so the result of malloc (which is a pointer to string) it not correctly stored in the variable.
Also, when you malloc, you need to calculate the size the following way: strlen(s) + strlen(t) + 1. The extra byte is for the terminating NULL character. And you don't need to use sizeof there. The finally statement will look like:
str = malloc(strlen(s) + strlen(t) + 1);

/* These are static. You SHOULD NOT write to either s or t! */
char s[] = "hello";
char t[] =" there";
typedef struct
{
char *p1;
char *p2;
} node;
node t1, t2;
/* I think you wanted "*str" here... */
char *str;
/* You definitely want "length of string + 1" here */
t1.p1 = malloc(strlen(s) + 1);
strcpy (t1.p1, s);
...
/* strcpy() and strcat() might be applicable here */
/* strncpy() and strncpy() might be even better - it depends... */
str = malloc(strlen(s)+1 + strlen(t)+1);
strcpy (str, s);
strcat (str, t);

firstly, you should be using strcpy when working with strings (if they are null terminated), as your code currently has a bug which is hidden by the fact 'hello' and 'there' are the same length, to fix it you should be doing (same applies to the malloc calls):
fwrite(t2.p1,sizeof(char),strlen(t2.p1),op_f);
fwrite(t2.p2,sizeof(char),strlen(t2.p2),op_f); //was also a bug here, you used p1 instead of p2 and the size of each element should have been 1
/* gives o/p there */
memcpy(str,t2.p1,strlen(t2.p1));
memcpy(str,t2.p2,strlen(t2.p2));
Your real problem originates because memcpy doesn't increment pointers, hence you should be doing:
strcpy(str,t2.p1);
strcat(str,t2.p2);
or if you really want to use memcpy:
memcpy(str,t2.p1,strlen(t2.p1));
memcpy(str + strlen(t2.p1) - 1,t2.p2,strlen(t2.p2));
finally, your malloc's return pointers, not a char, so str should be a char*.

Related

How to create a copy of strcat?

I have to create a copy of some elements of the standard library in C and I have to create a copy of strcat. So I have to create a function that concatenate two strings in C. I know arrays in C can't change the allocated size. The only fonction i'm allowed to use is copies i made of strlen, strstr, and write() ... My code looks like this :
char *my_strcat(char *dest, char *src)
{
int dest_size;
int src_size;
int current_pos;
int free_space;
int pos_in_src;
src_size = my_strlen(src);
dest_size = my_strlen(dest);
while (dest[current_pos] != '\0')
current_pos = current_pos + 1;
free_space = dest_size - current_pos;
if (free_space < src_size)
return (0);
while (src[pos_in_src] != '\0')
{
dest[current_pos] = src[pos_in_src];
pos_in_src = pos_in_src + 1;
current_pos = current_pos + 1;
}
return (dest);
}
But I don't know how to declare my dest and src in the main.
I don't know how to create an array with a big size, declare it as a string like dest = "Hello\0" but this array has to still contains more than 6 characters.
Can you help me please ?
char dest[19] = "epite";
char *src = "chor42spotted";
my_strcat(dest, src);
Also, read the man for strcat(3)
the dest string must have enough space for the result.
https://linux.die.net/man/3/strcat
So your function is behaving incorrectly, you do not need to check that you have enough free space in dest
You want a function mystrcat which behaves exactly like stdlib strcat.
So the prototype is
/*
concatenate src to dest
dest [in / out] - the string to add to (buffer must be large enough)
src [in] - the string to concatenate.
Returns: dest (useless little detail for historical reasons).
*/
char *mystrcat(char *dest, const char *src);
Now we call it like this
int main(void)
{
char buff[1024]; // nice big buffer */
strcpy(buff, "Hello ");
mystrcat(buff, "world");
/* print the output to test it */
printf("%s\n", buff);
return 0;
}
But I'm not going to write mystrcat for you. That would make your homework exercise pointless.
The 1st parameter of the array simply has to be large enough to contain both strings + one null terminator. So if you for example have "hello" and "world", you need 5 + 5 +1 = 11 characters. Example:
#define LARGE_ENOUGH 11
int main (void)
{
char str[LARGE_ENOUGH] = "hello";
my_strcat(str, "world");
puts(str); // gives "helloworld"
}
In real world applications, you would typically allocate space for the array to either be same large number (couple of hundred bytes) or with a length based on strlen calls.
As for the implementation itself, your solution is needlessly complicated. Please note that the real strcat leaves all error checking to the caller. It is most likely implemented like this:
char* strcat (char* restrict s1, const char* restrict s2)
{
return strcpy(&s1[strlen(s1)], s2);
}
The most important part here is to note the const-correctness of the s2 parameter.
The restrict keywords are just micro-optimizations from the C standard, that tells the compiler that it can assume that the pointers point at different memory areas.
If you wish to roll out your own version with no library function calls just for fun, it is still rather easy, you just need two loops. Something like this perhaps:
char* lolcat (char* restrict s1, const char* restrict s2)
{
char* s1_end = s1;
while(*s1_end != '\0') // find the end of s1
{
s1_end++;
}
do // overwrite the end of s1 including null terminator
{
*s1_end = *s2;
s1_end++;
s2++;
} while(*s1_end != '\0'); // loop until the null term from s2 is copied
return s1;
}

c copying first letter of ptr

I have no idea what is wrong with the following code. I perused stackoverflow without finding much assistance.
char * abbreviate_name( const char * full_name) {
int length = strlen(full_name) + 1;
char * final = malloc(length);
*answer = '\0';
char ptr[51];
// above is where I declare all my variables
strncpy(ptr, full_name, length); // copy full_name because it is a const
// ...
final = &ptr[1]; // this line copies all of ptr when I do a prinf on it
I'm just wondering how to get the first letter of ptr.
I tried playing with the ptrs and addresses and couldn't get it to work.
to get the first char of a pointer you can either go *ptr or ptr[0].
Your code has other problems though, assign to final doesn't copy, it just points final to another location, in this case you are going to point to a stack variable and it's going to fail badly.
instead, just strcpy into final and get rid of "ptr"
final[0] = ptr[0];
*final = *ptr;
final[0] = *ptr;
*final = ptr[0];
You can, in addition to Keith's answer, accomplish the allocation and copy of full_name to final in one step by making use of strdup:
char *abbreviate_name (const char *full_name) {
char *final = strdup (full_name);
...
strdup will call malloc to dynamically allocate storage sufficient to hold full_name. Just as if you had used malloc, you are responsible for freeing the memory when it is no longer needed.
I am probably shooting in the dark and writing an answer which is very much prone to down-votes, but let me begin.
Probably OP is looking for a function which provides and abbreviated version of a string, thus first letter of each of the given words in a string ( full_string ). reason I thought this because of char * return type and function name.
char * abbreviate_name( const char * full_name) ;
If I am correct in understanding the question, then you are probably looking for
strtok
and here is a snippet for extracting what you are looking for
char *str1, *saveptr1, *token ;
for ( str1 = full_name; ; str1 = NULL) {
token = strtok_r(str1, " " , &saveptr1); // delimited with " "
if ( token == NULL ) {
break; // break once no tokens available
}
printf("%c ", *token); // Extract first letter for each word, which probably form the abbreviated string you are looking for
}

Segmentation fault? String tokenization

I'm trying to write a function will convert the characters from an array into ints so that I can produce a sum or other math process for each group. I know that first I have to use strtok to get rid of the spaces and '+'. I've been trying to first at least start with getting strtok to work but it keeps saying segmentation fault when I try to run it.
Any help?
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
char* string[] = { "10 + 20", "1 + 3 + 6 + 8" };
sum(string[0]);
}
int sum(char* s)
{
char *stringcopy = malloc( strlen(s) + 1 );
char* del = " +";
char* token;
int i;
stringcopy = s; /* 'copy' problem here */
token = strtok(stringcopy, del);
while( token ) {
printf("%s\n", token);
token = strtok(NULL, del);
}
return 11; /* placeholder until I get the sum */
}
There is a simple reason strtok gives you a segmentation fault:
You are running it on a string literal, which despite having type char[n] is an immutable object.
strtok modifies any string you run it on!
The work-around is simple: Run on a copy. Here a function for duplicating strings (most C libraries provide this non-standard function as char* strdup(const char*):
char* my_strdup(const char* s) {
size_t size = strlen(s)+1;
char* ret = malloc(size);
if(ret)
memcpy(ret, s, size);
return ret;
}
Don't forget to free() the copy later.
You tried doing so, but after getting off to a good start and reserving space for the string with malloc, you just discarded it (memory leak) by assigning a pointer to the literal to that same pointer.
This statement
textcopy = s; /* making copy for strtok */
does not do what you think.
In fact there us a memory leak because at first you allocated memory and textcopy got the address of the first byte of the storage
char *textcopy = malloc( strlen(s) + 1 );
and then you reassigned textcopy.
textcopy = s; /* making copy for strtok */
You have to use standard function strcpy instead
strcpy( textcopy, s ); /* making copy for strtok */
Also it would be better if the function would declared as
int stringSum(const char* s);
This line does not do what you thought it would:
textcopy = s; /* making copy for strtok */
No string is copied here. All that happens is that instead of pointing to the first byte of the block of memory that you just allocated for it (with malloc( strlen(s) + 1 )),
textcopy now points directly at the first byte of the literal string "10 + 20" that you passed to stringSum as s.
You probably wanted something like strcpy(textcopy, s). I had suggested strncpy earlier; strncpy(textcopy, s, strlen(s)) + 1 might work, but (as the comments explain) seems to be rather pointless to use in this context.
The line
textcopy = s; /* making copy for strtok */
doesn't make copy of s and put it in textcopy. Instead, you need to use:
strcpy(textcopy, s);

Issue with getting substring in C

I am new to C and working on a project where I need to be able to get a substring but I am having difficulty as there is a compiler warning about the initialisation and a core dump if I attempt to run the program which I am not sure how to resolve.
I have a function called substring which passes in the source string, the start index and to end index.
Below is my substring function.
char *substring(char * src, int from, int to)
{
char * dst = "\0";
strncpy(dst, src+from, to);
return dst;
}
Below is how I am calling the function
char * debug = substring(rowReport[bPartyColIndex], 1, 2);
rowReport is a MYSQL_ROW, and bPartyColIndex is just an int equal 0 to reference the correct column from the MYSQL_ROW.
At the moment the line above has a compiler warning of:
warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
which I am unable to determine how to fix this warning.
If I try and run the program I then get a coredump which says that it is a segmentation fault within the substring function performing the strncpy.
char * dst = "\0";
strncpy(dst, src+from, to);
That's why there's a segfault. Assigning dst with \0 isn't correct ! Actually, dst isn't big enough to store the src + from bytes. You should allocate it instead:
char *substring(char * src, int from, int to)
{
size_t src_size = to + 1 - from;
char * dst = malloc(src_size); // Assuming str + from is ok
if (dst != 0)
strncpy(dst, src+from, src_size);
return dst;
}
In this case, you will have to free dst :
char * debug = substring(rowReport[bPartyColIndex], 1, 2);
puts(debug);
free(debug);
You need to allocate new memory for your substring, or have the caller pass in the desired buffer. What you're trying won't work, you are never allocating the storage.
You need something like:
char * substring(const char *str, int from, int to)
{
const size_t len = to - from + 1;
char *out = malloc(len + 1);
if(out != NULL)
{
memcpy(out, str + from, len);
out[len] = '\0';
}
return out;
}
Then the caller needs to free() the returned pointer when done with it.
Your substring function, by itself, has some issues. You are not allocating any space for dst and copying into it. That could lead to a seg fault. You are also not checking if either from or to my go beyond the end of string (can be checked with strlen).
You should also check that from is less than to.
First:
char * dst = "\0";
strncpy(dst, src+from, to);
You are writing to a string literal but string literals are immutable in C. This invokes undefined behavior.
Second:
rowReport[bPartyColIndex] has to be a char * but it is of a different type.
You didn't specify the type of rowReport in your question, but assuming it is a char array you have to pass &rowReport[bPartyColIndex] instead of rowReport[bPartyColIndex] to substring function.

String concatenation without strcat in C

I am having trouble concatenating strings in C, without strcat library function. Here is my code
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
int main()
{
char *a1=(char*)malloc(100);
strcpy(a1,"Vivek");
char *b1=(char*)malloc(100);
strcpy(b1,"Ratnavel");
int i;
int len=strlen(a1);
for(i=0;i<strlen(b1);i++)
{
a1[i+len]=b1[i];
}
a1[i+len]='\0';
printf("\n\n A: %s",a1);
return 0;
}
I made corrections to the code. This is working. Now can I do it without strcpy?
Old answer below
You can initialize a string with strcpy, like in your code, or directly when declaring the char array.
char a1[100] = "Vivek";
Other than that, you can do it char-by-char
a1[0] = 'V';
a1[1] = 'i';
// ...
a1[4] = 'k';
a1[5] = '\0';
Or you can write a few lines of code that replace strcpy and make them a function or use directly in your main function.
Old answer
You have
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ...
a1 [V|i|v|e|k|0|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_]
b1 [R|a|t|n|a|v|e|l|0|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_]
and you want
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ...
a1 [V|i|v|e|k|R|a|t|n|a|v|e|l|0|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_]
so ...
a1[5] = 'R';
a1[6] = 'a';
// ...
a1[12] = 'l';
a1[13] = '\0';
but with loops and stuff, right? :D
Try this (remember to add missing bits)
for (aindex = 5; aindex < 14; aindex++) {
a1[aindex] = b1[aindex - 5];
}
Now think about the 5 and 14 in the loop above.
What can you replace them with? When you answer this, you have solved the programming problem you have :)
char a1[] = "Vivek";
Will create a char array a1 of size 6. You are trying to stuff it with more characters than it can hold.
If you want to be able to accommodate concatenation "Vivek" and "Ratnavel" you need to have a char array of size atleast 14 (5 + 8 + 1).
In your modified program you are doing:
char *a1=(char*)malloc(100); // 1
a1 = "Vivek"; // 2
1: Will allocate a memory chunk of size 100 bytes, makes a1 point to it.
2: Will make a1 point to the string literal "Vivek". This string literal cannot be modified.
To fix this use strcpy to copy the string into the allocated memory:
char *a1=(char*)malloc(100);
strcpy(a1,"Vivek");
Also the for loop condition i<strlen(b1)-1 will not copy last character from the string, change it to i<strlen(b1)
And
a1[i]='\0';
should be
a1[i + len]='\0';
as the new length of a1 is i+len and you need to have the NUL character at that index.
And don't forget to free your dynamically allocated memory once you are done using it.
You cannot safely write into those arrays, since you have not made sure that enough space is available. If you use malloc() to allocate space, you can't then overwrite the pointer by assigning to string literal. You need to use strcpy() to copy a string into the newly allocated buffers, in that case.
Also, the length of a string in C is computed by the strlen() function, not length() that you're using.
When concatenating, you need to terminate at the proper location, which your code doesn't seem to be doing.
Here's how I would re-implement strcat(), if needed for some reason:
char * my_strcat(char *out, const char *in)
{
char *anchor = out;
size_t olen;
if(out == NULL || in == NULL)
return NULL;
olen = strlen(out);
out += olen;
while(*out++ = *in++)
;
return anchor;
}
Note that this is just as bad as strcat() when it comes to buffer overruns, since it doesn't support limiting the space used in the output, it just assumes that there is enough space available.
Problems:
length isn't a function. strlen is, but you probably shouldn't call it in a loop - b1's length won't change on us, will it? Also, it returns a size_t, which may be the same size as int on your platform but will be unsigned. This can (but usually won't) cause errors, but you should do it right anyway.
a1 only has enough space for the first string, because the compiler doesn't know to allocate extra stack space for the rest of the string since. If you provide an explicit size, like [100], that should be enough for your purposes. If you need robust code that doesn't make assumptions about what is "enough", you should look into malloc and friends, though that may be a lesson for another day.
Your loop stops too early. i < b1_len (assuming you have a variable, b1_len, that was set to the length of b1 before the loop began) would be sufficient - strlen doesn't count the '\0' at the end.
But speaking of counting the '\0' at the end, a slightly more efficient implementation could use sizeof a1 - 1 instead of strlen(a1) in this case, since a1 (and b1) are declared as arrays, not pointers. It's your choice, but remember that sizeof won't work for pointers, so don't get them mixed up.
EDIT: New problems:
char *p = malloc(/*some*/); p = /* something */ is a problem. = with pointers doesn't copy contents, it copies the value, so you're throwing away the old pointer value you got from malloc. To copy the contents of a string into a char * (or a char [] for that matter) you'd need to use strcpy, strncpy, or (my preference) memcpy. (Or just a loop, but that's rather silly. Then again, it may be good practice if you're writing your own strcat.)
Unless you're using C++, I wouldn't cast the return value of malloc, but that's a religious war and we don't need one of those.
If you have strdup, use it. If you don't, here is a working implementation:
char *strdup(const char *c)
{
size_t l = strlen(c);
char *d = malloc(l + 1);
if(d) memcpy(d, c, l + 1);
return d;
}
It is one of the most useful functions not in the C standard library.
You can do it using strcpy() too ;)
char *a = (char *) malloc(100);
char *b = (char *) malloc(100);
strcpy(a, "abc"); // initializes a
strcpy(b, "def"); // and b
strcpy((a + strlen(a)), b); // copy b at end of a
printf("%s\n",a); // will produce: "abcdef"
i think this is an easy one.
#include<stdio.h>
int xstrlen(char *);
void xstrcat(char *,char *,int);
void main()
{
char source[]="Sarker";
char target[30]="Maruf";
int j=xstrlen(target);
xstrcat(target,source,j);
printf("Source String: %s\nTarget String: %s",source,target);
}
int xstrlen(char *s)
{
int len=0;
while(*s!='\0')
{
len++;
s++;
}
return len;
}
void xstrcat(char *t,char *s,int j)
{
while(*t!='\0')
{
*t=*t;
t++;
}
while(*s!='\0')
{
*t=*s;
s++;
t++;
}
}
It is better to factor out your strcat logic to a separate function. If you make use of pointer arithmetic, you don't need the strlen function:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h> /* To completely get rid of this,
implement your our strcpy as well */
static void
my_strcat (char* dest, char* src)
{
while (*dest) ++dest;
while (*src) *(dest++) = *(src++);
*dest = 0;
}
int
main()
{
char* a1 = malloc(100);
char* b1 = malloc(100);
strcpy (a1, "Vivek");
strcpy (b1, " Ratnavel");
my_strcat (a1, b1);
printf ("%s\n", a1); /* => Vivek Ratnavel */
free (a1);
free (b1);
return 0;
}

Resources