I have a TextBox ( TextBoxConsumer ) and i would like to enable a button in my UI when the length of the TextBox.Text is greater than 3,
i digged it down to
IsEnabled="{Binding
ElementName=TextBoxConsumer,
Path=Text.Length}"
for my button's IsEnabled Property but im not sure how to find the length and convert it to bool depending on the length of the text box how do i do it?
i would like to do it entirely in Xaml instead of code using Binding instead of code
I would prefer to use an IValueConverter class for this. I'll provide some quick code though its not exactly what you are looking for you should be able to tweak it.
In a cs file by itself:
using System;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Windows.Data;
public class IntCorrectAnswerToTrueFalseConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (int)value > 0;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (bool)value ? 1 : 0;
}
}
In App.xaml, add this line to the ResourceDictionary:
<app:IntCorrectAnswerToTrueFalseConverter x:Key="IntCorrectAnswerToTrueFalseConverter" />
Then in the xaml of where you use it:
<CheckBox
x:Name="answerCheckBox"
IsChecked="{Binding Score, Converter={StaticResource IntCorrectAnswerToTrueFalseConverter}}"
Click="CheckBoxChecked"/>
I did something similar using a tutorial similar to this using the INotifyPropertyChanged interface. I assume you have a model you are using for binding to the UI. You have a string member (like TextBoxConsumerString) which binds to you textbox. Now you need to add a boolean like TextBoxConsumerEnabled which you will set inside of the setter of TextBoxConsumerString and call the notify changed method.
this.OnPropertyChanged( new PropertyChangedEventArgs( "TextBoxConsumerEnabled" ) );
Here is an example:
public class TextBoxConsumerModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _textBoxConsumerString;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public string TextBoxConsumerString
{
get
{
return _textBoxConsumerString;
}
set
{
if (_textBoxConsumerString == value)
return;
TextBoxConsumerEnabled = value != null && value.Length > 3;
_textBoxConsumerString = value;
OnPropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("TextBoxConsumerEnabled"));
}
}
public bool TextBoxConsumerEnabled { get; set; }
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, e);
}
}
That should be it as far as the model goes. Now you just need to bind to the two model properties from the XAML.
Related
Boolean is for storing economically in SQL Database. But the datagridview when using datasource function in C# just show true or false by the checkbox each row.
I want to display the string value in the datagridview, not Boolean using checkbox .
True = "Spin On"
False = "Element"
How can I change the checkbox to a string value?
You have at least two options to obtain this:
Binding
First, you could change the binding during on RowDataBound of GridView. Give a look at this example, where you have the following class:
public class Student
{
public int Roll { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public bool Status { get; set; }
}
and you can change the default behavior of GridView as follows:
/// <summary>
/// Handles the RowDataBound event of the GridView2 control.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender">The source of the event.</param>
/// <param name="e">The <see cref="System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridViewRowEventArgs"/> instance containing the event data.</param>
protected void GridView2_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow)
{
Student s = (Student)e.Row.DataItem;
if (s.Status == true)
{
e.Row.Cells[2].Text = "1";
}
else
{
e.Row.Cells[2].Text = "0";
}
}
}
Formatting
Another way to address this problem consists in using custom formatting, handling the CellFormatting event according to your needs:
void gridView2_CellFormatting(object s, DataGridViewCellFormattingEventArgs evt)
{
if (evt.ColumnIndex == yourcolumnIndex){
if (evt.Value is bool){
evt.Value = ((bool)evt.Value) ? "Yes" : "No";
evt.FormattingApplied = true;
}
}
}
Using a Converter will allow you to do it easily
using System;
using System.Windows.Data;
namespace WpfApplication2
{
[ValueConversion(typeof(Boolean), typeof(String))]
internal class BooleanToStringConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
Boolean state = (Boolean)value;
return state ? "Spin On" : "Element";
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
}
then, in your XAML, bind your String (a label in my example) to the Boolean ('state' variable in the example) using the Converter :
<Label Content="{Binding State, Converter={StaticResource BooleanToStringConverter }, Mode=OneWay}" />
I have several Tiles (TileLayoutControl Class) in my xaml (only shown 2 in this example) whose Visibility are binded to Boolean Properties and converted through BooleanToVisibilityConverter.
This works just fine. My question is
Can I bind the visibility to the Command instead so that I can remove the need of those several Boolean Properties?
Something like binding the Visibility to Command.CanExecute
If Yes, How can I achieve that? Any help will be really appreciated! Thanks.
<dxlc:Tile Command="{Binding Tile1Command}"
Visibility="{Binding Path=IsTile1Visible , Converter={StaticResource BooleanToVisibilityConverter}}"/>
<dxlc:Tile Command="{Binding Tile2Command}"
Visibility="{Binding Path=IsTile2Visible , Converter={StaticResource BooleanToVisibilityConverter}}"/>
ViewModel
private bool _isTile1Visible;
public bool IsTile1Visible
{
get { return _isTile1Visible; }
set { this.RaiseAndSetIfChanged(ref _isTile1Visible, value); }
}
public ReactiveCommand Tile1Command { get; private set; }
Tile1Command = new ReactiveCommand();
Tile1Command.Subscribe(p => PerformTile1Operation());
Yes, just use RxUI bindings:
<dxlc:Tile x:Name="Tile1" />
Then in your View constructor (make sure to implement IViewFor<Tile1ViewModel> to get this extension):
this.BindCommand(ViewModel, x => x.Tile1Command);
this.WhenAnyObservable(x => x.ViewModel.Tile1Command.CanExecuteObservable)
.BindTo(this, x => x.Tile1.Visibility);
You could also solve this in the ViewModel level, though that's not what I would do - in the ViewModel ctor:
Tile1Command = new ReactiveCommand(/* ... */);
Tile1Command
.Select(x => x ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed)
.ToProperty(this, x => x.Tile1Visibility, out tile1Visibility);
ReactiveCommand is an ICommand implementation that is simultaneously a RelayCommand implementation...
Assume that the ReactiveCommand has been declared like this...
public ReactiveCommand FileCommand { get; private set; }
...and has been instantiated in a View Model like this...
SomeText = "";
FileCommand = new ReactiveCommand(this.WhenAny(vm => vm.SomeText, s => !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(s.Value)));
FileCommand.Subscribe(param => MessageBox.Show("Processing"));
... which means if the property SomeText is empty, then the command cannot be executed, otherwise the command can be executed. And if the command is executed, a message box will get displayed.
If your objective is to simply eliminate the boolean IsTile1Visible, you can make a Xaml declaration like this...
<Button Content="File"
Command="{Binding FileCommand}"
Visibility="{Binding FileCommand, Converter={genericMvvm1:CommandToVisibilityConverter}}" />
where the visibility is bound to the same command and uses a value converter...
and the value converter looks like this...
public class CommandToVisibilityConverter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
try
{
ICommand iCommand = value as ICommand;
if (iCommand != null)
{
if (iCommand.CanExecute(parameter))
{
return Visibility.Visible;
}
return Visibility.Collapsed;
}
}
catch
{
}
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return null;
}
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
}
The value converter simply dereferences the command into a basic ICommand and converts it into a visibility. Note that since this converter inherits from Markup Extension, there's no need to declare it as a static resource in the Xaml's object graph.
NOTE: the same functionality can be achieved by using 'code-behind' available in ReactiveUI, but the Xaml/ValueConverter appeals to developers who do not want their View Models to deal explicitly with the 'Visibility' property.
You could potentially do that, but it would require subclassing the command so that it also implements INotifyPropertyChanged, and the underlying condition would need to raise PropertyChange for the CanExecute property whenever it changes.
It won't work without that, as ICommand doesn't implement INotifyPropertyChanged - it uses CanExecuteChanged instead.
Note that you could simplify the property, however, by just handling it yourself in the constructor:
// In constructor:
Tile1Command = new ReactiveCommand();
Tile1Command.Subscribe(p => PerformTile1Operation());
IReactiveObject self = this as IReactiveObject;
Tile1Command.CanExecuteChanged += (o,e) => self.RaisePropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("IsTile1Visible"));
Then your property becomes:
// Use command directly here...
public bool IsTile1Visible
{
get { return Tile1Command.CanExecute; }
}
I am trying to bind a dependency property to an INotifyPropertyChanged-enabled property with a multi-level property path.
When the owner object of the property is not null, the binding works, but if the owner object is null, the binding does not do anything (the converter is not called and TargetNullValue is not used).
Here is some minimal sample code to reproduce the problem:
Window1.xaml.cs:
using System;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.ComponentModel;
namespace NPCPropertyPath
{
public abstract class VMBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
OnPropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("e");
}
if (PropertyChanged != null) {
PropertyChanged(this, e);
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}
public partial class Window1 : Window
{
private class MyConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value == null) {
return null;
} else if (value is int) {
return (((int)value) + 15).ToString();
} else {
return "no int";
}
}
object IValueConverter.ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
private class InnerVM : VMBase
{
private int myValue;
public int MyValue {
get {
return myValue;
}
set {
if (myValue != value) {
myValue = value;
OnPropertyChanged("MyValue");
}
}
}
}
private class OuterVM : VMBase
{
private InnerVM thing;
public InnerVM Thing {
get {
return thing;
}
set {
if (thing != value) {
thing = value;
OnPropertyChanged("Thing");
}
}
}
}
private readonly OuterVM vm = new OuterVM();
public Window1()
{
InitializeComponent();
var txt = new TextBlock();
txt.SetBinding(TextBlock.TextProperty,
new Binding("Thing.MyValue") {
Source = vm,
Mode = BindingMode.OneWay,
Converter = new MyConverter(),
TargetNullValue = "(error)"
});
container.Content = txt;
var txt2 = new TextBlock();
txt2.SetBinding(TextBlock.TextProperty,
new Binding("Thing") {
Source = vm,
Mode = BindingMode.OneWay,
Converter = new MyConverter(),
TargetNullValue = "(error)"
});
container2.Content = txt2;
}
void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
vm.Thing = new InnerVM();
vm.Thing.MyValue += 10;
}
}
}
Window1.xaml:
<Window x:Class="NPCPropertyPath.Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="NPCPropertyPath" Height="300" Width="300">
<StackPanel>
<Button Content="Change value" Click="Button_Click"/>
<ContentControl Name="container"/>
<ContentControl Name="container2"/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
Of course, this is a significantly simplified form of my real application, where there is quite a bit more going on and the involved classes are not crammed together in two files (or even in the same assembly) where they can all see each other.
This sample displays a window with a button and two content controls. Each of the content controls contains a TextBlock whose Text property is bound to a property from a view-model. The view-model instance (of type OuterVM) is assigned to the Source property of each binding.
OuterVM implements INotifyPropertyChanged; it has a property Thing of type InnerVM (which also implements INotifyPropertyChanged), which in turn has a property MyValue.
The first text block is bound to Thing.MyValue, the second one just to Thing. Both of the bindings have a converter set, as well as a value for the TargetNullValue property that should be displayed on the text block if the target property is null.
The Thing property of the OuterVM instance is initially null. When clicking the button, something is assigned to that property.
The problem: Only the second text block displays anything initially. The one that is bound to Thing.MyValue neither invokes the converter (as evidenced by setting breakpoints), nor does it use the value of the TargetNullValue property.
Why? And how can I have the first text block display a default value instead of Thing.MyValue while Thing is not assigned?
For this purpose you should not use TargetNullValue, you should use FallbackValue property of the Binding.
is it possible to bind the Path property of a binding to another property?
I want to realize this code:
Text="{Binding Path={Binding Path=CurrentPath}}"
So I can adjust dynamically to which Property my actual binding is refering.
Thanks for your Help
Jonny
I worked it out on myself.
Heres the solution, I hope it might help anyone got the same problem like me.
public class CustomBindingBehavior : Behavior<FrameworkElement>
{
public bool IsBinding
{
get
{
return (bool)GetValue(IsBindingProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(IsBindingProperty, value);
}
}
public string PropertyPath
{
get
{
return (string)GetValue(PropertyPathProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(PropertyPathProperty, value);
}
}
public static DependencyProperty
PropertyPathProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("PropertyPath", typeof(string),
typeof(CustomBindingBehavior), null);
public static DependencyProperty
IsBindingProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("IsBinding", typeof(bool),
typeof(CustomBindingBehavior), null);
protected override void OnAttached()
{
if (AssociatedObject is TextBlock)
{
var tb = AssociatedObject as TextBlock;
tb.Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(tb_Loaded);
}
}
private void tb_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
AddBinding(sender as TextBlock, TextBlock.TextProperty);
}
private void AddBinding(DependencyObject targetObj, DependencyProperty targetProp)
{
if (IsBinding)
{
Binding binding = new Binding();
binding.Path = new PropertyPath(this.PropertyPath, null);
BindingOperations.SetBinding(targetObj, targetProp, binding);
}
else
{
targetObj.SetValue(targetProp, this.PropertyPath);
}
}
}
And heres the implementation in XAML:
<TextBlock >
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<behaviors:CustomBindingBehavior PropertyPath="{Binding Path=HeaderPropertyBinding}" IsBinding="{Binding Path=HeaderIsBinding}" />
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
</TextBlock>
Greetings
Jonny
As other posters have mentioned, you can only set a binding on a dependency property - which path is not. The underlying reason is that xaml is source code that gets compiled. At compile time the compiler has no idea what the value of 'CurrentPath' is, and would not be able to compile. Essentially what you are looking to do is runtime reflection of a property value - which could be done using another property in the ViewModel you are binding to, or using a converter.
ViewModel:
public string CurrentValue
{
get
{
var property = this.GetType().GetProperty(CurrentPath);
return property.GetValue(this, null);
}
}
Using a converter:
public class CurrentPathToValueConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
var viewModel = (ViewModel)value;
var property = viewModel.GetType().GetProperty(viewModel.CurrentPath);
var currentValue = property.GetValue(viewModel, null);
return currentValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
Of couse these only work if you want to get a simple property of the object - if you want to get something more complex your reflection code is going to get a lot more complex.
Unless you are building something like a property grid, or for some other reason you actually want to introspect the objects running in your application, I would suggest you revisit your design, as reflection is really only suited to a few situations.
Path is not a dependency property, therefore the binding will not work.
Perhaps you could bind to a property that returns another property based on a switch statement and bind to that. Change the 'switch' property and you change the output of the other property.
Just don't forget to include your NotifyPropertyChanged stuff in the switch property for the bound property otherwise your view will not update.
e.g.
private int _mySwitch;
//Set this to determine what the other property will return.
public int SwitchProperty
{
get { return _mySwitch; }
set
{
_mySwitch = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MySwitchableProperty");
}
}
public String PropertyA { get; set; }
public String PropertyB { get; set; }
//Bind to this property
public String MySwitchableProperty
{
get
{
switch (SwitchProperty)
{
case 1:
return PropertyA;
break;
case 2:
return PropertyB;
break;
default :
return String.Empty;
break;
}
}
}
I think converter can helps your.
Expample
First control
Text="{Binding Path=CurrentPath}"
Second control
Text="{Binding Path=CurrentPath, Convertor={converters:MyConvertor}}"
Base converter
public abstract class ConvertorBase<T> : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
where T : class, new()
{
public abstract object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
CultureInfo culture);
public virtual object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
#region MarkupExtension members
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
if (_converter == null)
_converter = new T();
return _converter;
}
private static T _converter = null;
#endregion
}
MyConverter
public class MyConverter: ConvertorBase<MyConverter>
{
public override object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (string)value.Equals("blabla") ? "Yes" : "No"; // here return necessary parametr
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return null;
}
}
When I select (by clicking or by keyboard) blank row on my DataGrid (when I want to add new row), unexpected validation error occurs (but with no exception) - the border of datagrid changes to red color, as you can see on the image below. When I click second time on blank row, the red border dissapears. Everything other works fine, the new row is added. Besides, I don't have any validation rules. And when I make a row with empty text, value is valid.
I don't want this behavior and this red border, anybody knows, why this happens and how to fix it? Why and where some validation fails?
Below I append some source code:
DataGrid definition in xaml:
<DataGrid IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True" DisplayMemberPath="Name"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=ConfigFiles}" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=SelectedConfigFile}"
Grid.Column="1" Height="87" Margin="0,26,11,32" Style="{DynamicResource DataGridStyle}">
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTextColumn Width="1*" Binding="{Binding Name}" />
</DataGrid.Columns>
</DataGrid>
My ViewModel's part:
public class ManageModulesVM : BaseVM // Implements INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// ...
public ObservableCollection<ConfigFile> ConfigFiles
{
get { return selectedModule == null ? null : selectedModule.ConfigFiles; }
set
{
selectedModule.ConfigFiles = value;
OnPropertyChanged(() => ConfigFiles);
}
}
public ConfigFile SelectedConfigFile
{
get { return selectedModule == null ? null : selectedModule.SelectedConfigFile; }
set
{
if (value != null)
{
selectedModule.SelectedConfigFile = value;
}
OnPropertyChanged(() => SelectedConfigFile);
OnPropertyChanged(() => Parameters);
}
}
// ...
}
ConfigFile class:
public class ConfigFile
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public IList<Parameter> Parameters { get; set; }
public ConfigFile() { Name = ""; Parameters = new List<Parameter>(); }
}
Edit:
After further investigation I know, that SelectedItem Binding is causing problems (when I remove this binding, validation error stops to appear), but I still don't know why and how to fix this.
I've found my own solution to this question. I've written a value converter and tied it to the binding:
(SelectedItem="{Binding Path=SelectedConfigFile,Converter={StaticResource configFileConverter}}")
The converter class:
namespace Converters
{
public class SelectedConfigFileConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
if(value is ConfigFile)
return value;
return null;
}
}
}
Define resource in resources.xaml file (or in any other resources place):
<ResourceDictionary (...) xmlns:conv="clr-namespace:Converters" >
<conv:SelectedConfigFileConverter x:Key="configFileConverter" />
</ResourceDictionary>
The advantage of this solution is that the SelectedConfigFile property's type did't changed (to the general object type) so it is still strongly typed.
To get the reason, when you click the new row of DataGrid in Debug mode, please see the debug window. There are first exception messages which will give you the idea why your problem is occurred.
Yes, the problem is from type casting. You need to modify the type of SelectedItem to object type as below.
public class ManageModulesVM : BaseVM // Implements INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// ...
public object SelectedConfigFile
{
get { return selectedModule == null ? null : selectedModule.SelectedConfigFile; }
set
{
if (value != null)
{
selectedModule.SelectedConfigFile = value;
}
OnPropertyChanged(() => SelectedConfigFile);
OnPropertyChanged(() => Parameters);
}
}
// ...
}
Here's a general-purpose converter you can use for any DataGrid, binding any kind of item:
public class DataGridItemConverter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
static DataGridItemConverter converter;
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (value != null && value.GetType() == targetType) ? value : null;
}
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
if (converter == null)
converter = new DataGridItemConverter();
return converter;
}
}
Since it implements MarkupExtension you don't even need to define a static resource, you can just reference it like this:
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedThing,Converter={conv:DataGridItemConverter}}"
You can just add this line to your DataGrid:
<DataGrid Validation.ErrorTemplate="{x:Null}" />
You can just add this line to your DataGrid:
<DataGrid Validation.ErrorTemplate="{x:Null}" />
It will solve the problem