I am very new to linq and am trying to figure out how to accomplish the following:
Currently, I have a Winforms project that has a Base Form with a DataRow as one of it's members. I have several derived Forms populate the DataRow based on data from a DataTable (SQL Query Result). There are controls on the derived Forms that are populated with the values from the data as well. When the Save button on the derived Forms is clicked, the DataRow in the Base Form is updated and then the Derived Form updates the Database via a DataAdapter.
I wanted to replace all of the SQL Commands using linqs so I tried implementing this functionality using LINQ by the following:
I created my Linq query in the Derived Form and assigned the result to an Object in the Base Form. I cast the Object in the Base Form to the class type of the Linq query and use reflection to populate all the controls on the Derived Form. When the save button is clicked I update the Object but I am not able to update the Database.
The problem that I can't solve is how to update the database once the object is updated. At this point I don't have the Data Context that I used for the linq query.
I am using an SQL function within the linq query so I had to create a separate class for these values as I was getting an anonymous type error. I am probably missing something here.
Any help would be most appreciated as I really how clean the linq code is.
Edit (Copied from Brad's Edit to Tomas's answer):
Here are the 3 steps of my code.
Step 1 - Get a singe record of data from database
private void GetDatabaseDetailData()
{
_db = new PriorityDataContext();
DetailData = (from db in _db.tblDatabases
where db.DatabaseID == Id
select db).SingleOrDefault();
DeveloperData = (from db in _db.tblDatabases
where db.DatabaseID == Id
select new DeveloperInfo
{
DeveloperName = _db.func_get_employee_name(db.Developer)
}).SingleOrDefault();
}
Step 2 - Populate all controls whos name exists in the Object. The DetailData Object is cast to the specific type passed into this method. All code not shown for brevity.
protected virtual void PopulateDetailControlsA(List<Control> controlContainers, string srcDataTableName)
{
Object data = null;
Type type = null;
switch (srcDataTableName)
{
case "tblDatabases" :
type = typeof(tblDatabase);
data = (tblDatabase)DetailData;
break;
}
if (type != null)
{
var properties = type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
foreach (var controlContainer in controlContainers)
{
foreach (var propertyInfo in properties)
{
if (!ControlExists(controlContainer, propertyInfo.Name)) continue;
var txtControl = controlContainer.Controls[propertyInfo.Name] as ExtendedTextBox;
if (txtControl != null)
{
try
{
var value = propertyInfo.GetValue(data, null).ToString();
if (propertyInfo.Name == "row_oper_name" || propertyInfo.Name == "row_last_chng_oper_name")
{
txtControl.Text = RowOperatorData.RowOperatorName;
txtControl.ValueMember = propertyInfo.GetValue(data, null).ToString();
}
else
txtControl.Text = value;
}
catch (NullReferenceException)
{
}
continue;...........
Step 3 - Try and save changes back to database in the derived From.
private void SaveData()
{
try
{
_db.SubmitChanges();
}
catch (Exception sqlException)
{
}
}
What I am really unclear about hear is how to store the result set in the Base Form so that I can use the same code for many different queries. The DataRow worked great because I use the some code for over 25 derive Forms.
If I understand you correctly, you create the DataContext in a derived form and then use it to write some queries (in a derived form). In order to be able to update the database, your queries must return the entities obtained from the table (i.e. the select clause should just return the entity). For example:
DataContext db = // ...
var q = from p in db.Things
where p.Some > 10 select p;
If you then modify the entities, you can use db.SubmitChanges() to store the changes (made to the entity objects) to the database. For this, you need the original db value.
In your scenario, you'll need to store the DataContext (as a field) in the derived form. If you need to perform the update from the base form, then I suggest you define a virtual method:
// Base form
protected abstract void UpdateDatabase();
// Derived from with field 'db' storing 'DataContext'
protected override void UpdateDatabase() {
db.SumbitChanges();
}
Related
I want to DELETE some items from my Model which I generated from the database like that:
db = new TestDBEntities();
foreach (var item in db.Farbe)
{
_model.Add(new Farbe { FarbauswahlNr = item.FarbauswahlNr, Kurztext = item.Kurztext, Ressource = item.Ressource,Vari1 = Convert.ToBoolean(item.Var1) ,Vari2 = item.Vari2 });
}
I'm showing this Model in a RadGridView and deleting by Selecting and Index per Rightcklick on the mouse like this:
public void ExecuteDelete(object obj)
{
farbliste.Model.Remove(SelectedIndex);
ListeAktualisieren();
}
Now the question is how do I Delete something from my Database because if I just Delete from my Model it wont work and that's also not what I want.
Btw some variable are named in German sorry...
you have to save your context. Your context in the first block of code is db.
So:
db = new TestDBEntities();
db.entity.Remove(db.entity.Find(SelectedIndex));
db.SaveChanges();
Entity is the name of your table/object from entity frramework. I would also suggest wraping this is a using block for the db
I'm currently using a Gwt CellTable, bound to my GAE/Objectify backend via RPC calls.
All right now! :-)
Then I want to sort columns, so I read http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiCellTable.html#columnSorting
The Async Remote sorting sections shows very well how to get sorting into my AsyncDataProvider but... how can I retrieve the name of the column the user wants to sort?
It shows this code: ColumnSortList sortList = table.getColumnSortList();
But how can I get String names from that? I simply want to know "surname" or "soldDate", the name of the field the column is bound to! Then I will pass it to my rpc service, and use it to sort data server-side query(...).order(<field_name>)
Am I missing something?
UPD: interesting stuff here: http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/77a0eaf8086218a6/effb8d3abe69270b#effb8d3abe69270b
You can keep a list of column names ordered as they are in the table:
List<String> columnNames = new ArrayList<String>();
table.addColumn(surnameColumn, "surname");
columnNames.add("surname");
// add the other columns
Then when you need to get the sort column name:
String sortColumnName;
ColumnSortList sortList = table.getColumnSortList();
if (sortList != null && sortList.size() != 0){
Column <MyEntity, ?> sortColumn = (Column <MyEntity, ?>)
sortList.get(0).getColumn();
Integer columnIndex = table.getColumnIndex(sortColumn);
sortColumnName = columnNames.get(columnIndex);
}
// do your rpc call
*where MyEntity is your data object displayed in the cell table.
A bit late to the party, but here's a more straight-forward solution based off of the current documentation (see section 'ColumnSorting with AsyncDataProvider').
When we're adding our columns we can simply set the dataStoreName:
TextColumn<MyData> surname = new TextColumn<MyData>() {
...
}
surname.setSortable(true);
surname.setDataStoreName("surname"); // Set the column name
table.getColumnSortList().push(surname);
table.addColumn(surname, "Last Name"); // eg. A different name for the UI
Then we can retrieve the column's dataStoreName later when sorting:
#Override
protected void onRangedChanged(HasData<MyData> display) {
...
ColumnSortList.ColumnSortInfo info = table.getColumnSortList().get(0);
String sortColumn = info.getColumn().getDataStoreName(); // Get the column name
boolean sortIsAscending = info.isAscending();
rpcService.requestMyData(
sortColumn,
sortIsAscending,
new AsyncCallback<ArrayList<MyData>>() {...}
);
...
}
Using this method we can pass the column name directly to our RPC method. It even allows us to use a different name (eg. the database column name) than the column name used on the UI/client side.
I have used something like this as an application column object.
public class ScrollTableColumn
{
// --------------------------------------------------------------- Field(s)
private int sequence;
private Column column;
private Header header;
private int size;
private int calculatedSize;
private boolean show;
private PartialColumn partialColumn;
private ColumnNameEnum columnName;
}
Now create a HashMap of the above as follows:
Map<Column, ScrollTableColumn> columnMap
= new HashMap<Column, ScrollTableColumn>();
Add all the columns as you create them both in the ScrollTableColumn and in the columnMap.
Finally you can get the required name as:
ColumnSortList sortList = dataTable.getColumnSortList();
Column<?, ?> column = sortList.get(0).getColumn();
ColumnNameEnum = columnMap.get(column);
String name = ColumnNameEnum.getName();
The proper way is to extend the base column class which will allow you to override cell rendering, pass in column configuration via your constructor, and most importantly set the DataStoreName which is where you should store the field name for the column. Lastly you should not reuse the onrangechanged fire, but access the columnsort handler directly by overriding it. on range change and column sort handler should call some type of method that you have to update your grid. I call mine updateGrid for sanity. This allows you to set any grid parameters used by your async request to specific sort column and direction. The main reason you want to use column sort handler is to access the ColumnSort event which contains your sort direction information
your column class that extends the base GWT column. You can also extend date or number columns too.
public GridStringColumn(String fieldName, String text, String tooltip, boolean defaultShown, boolean sortable, boolean hidden) {
super(new TextCell());
setDataStoreName(fieldName);
this.text_ = text;
this.tooltip_ = tooltip;
this.defaultShown_ = defaultShown;
setSortable(sortable);
this.hidden_ = hidden;
}
create your handler
dataGrid.addColumnSortHandler(new DataGridSortEvent());
your sort event class
protected class DataGridSortEvent implements ColumnSortEvent.Handler {
#Override
public void onColumnSort(ColumnSortEvent event) {
ColumnSortList sortList = dataGrid_.getColumnSortList();
if (sortList != null && sortList.size() > 0) {
Column<T, ?> sortColumn = (Column<T, ?>) sortList.get(0).getColumn();
LOG.info("col_sorta: " + event.isSortAscending());
LOG.info("col_index: " + sortColumn.getDataStoreName());
updateDataList();
}
}
}
updateDataList is your method you use to make the actual AJAX request to your server side. rather then logging you sould store this info in private members of your datagrid class so that your request can parameterize them.
you could also make this work for local caching too, just make a copy of the data from your server locally then return a sorted collection of that cached collection, rather then calling the updateDataList method.
Now you do not need to store a separate list for just string names, which is waste of memory not to mention a synchronicity issue if the column order is change from user interaction or whatever.
There is tons of information on this, but even after reading for hours and hours I can't seem to get this to work the way I want.
I'm trying to update a User object by passing in a User object and generically comparing changes to a User object I pull out of the database. I always end up getting the NotSupportedException when using this method:
An attempt has been made to Attach or
Add an entity that is not new, perhaps
having been loaded from another
DataContext. This is not supported.
Here is how I am trying to do it:
public void SaveUser(User User)
{
using (DataContext dataContext = new DataContext(WebConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["database"].ConnectionString))
{
// New user
if (User.UserID == 0)
{
dataContext.Users.InsertOnSubmit(User);
}
// Existing user
else
{
User dbUser = dataContext.Users.Single(u => u.UserID.Equals(User.UserID));
Type t = dbUser.GetType();
foreach (PropertyInfo p in t.GetProperties())
{
if (p.CanWrite & p.GetValue(dbUser, null) != p.GetValue(User, null))
{
p.SetValue(dbUser, p.GetValue(User, null), null);
}
}
//dataContext.Refresh(RefreshMode.KeepCurrentValues, dbUser);
}
dataContext.SubmitChanges();
}
}
The commented out line I tried uncommented too, but it was no help.
If I comment out the foreach() loop and add a line like dbUser.UserName = "Cheese"; it will update the User's name in the database fine. That leads me to believe it is something with how the foreach() loop changing the dbUser object that causes this to fail.
When I debug the dbUser object, it appears to correctly acquire all the changes from the User object that was passed as an argument.
I also did some reading on optimistic concurrency and added a column to the table of data type timestamp, but that didn't seem to have any effect either.
What exactly am I doing wrong here?
How can I get this to generically detect what has changed and correctly persist the changes to the database?
My guess is there's a foreign key relation that you are trying to copy over that was not initially loaded (because of lazy-loading) During the copying, it's attempting to load it, but the DataContext has already been disposed.
I've been working on a similar problem. I ended up using AutoMapper to handle copying the properties for me. I have configured AutoMapper to ignore the primary key field as well as any relations. Something like:
public void Update(User user)
{
using (var db = new DataContext(...))
{
var userFromDb = db.Users.Where(x => x.Id == user.Id).Single();
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(user, userFromDb);
db.SubmitChanges();
}
}
My automapper configuration is something like
AutoMapper.Mapper.Create<User, User>().ForMember(dest => dest.Id, opt => opt.Ignore())
.ForMember(dest => dest.SomeRelation, opt => opt.Ignore());
You can find AutoMapper here: http://automapper.codeplex.com/
I keep my repo pretty lean, it's only job is to interact with the database. I build a Service layer on top of the repo that does a little more work
public class EventRepository : IEventRepository
{
private DBDataContext dc;
public EventRepository()
{
dc = new DBDataContext();
}
public void Create(Event #event)
{
dc.Events.InsertOnSubmit(#event);
}
public System.Linq.IQueryable<Event> Read()
{
object events = (from e in dc.Eventse);
return events.AsQueryable;
}
public void SubmitChanges()
{
dc.SubmitChanges();
}
}
Then the corresponding call from the service layer looks like this
public void AddEvent(Event #event)
{
_EventRepository.Create(#event);
}
public void SubmitChanges()
{
_EventRepository.SubmitChanges();
}
And I call it from my controller.
// AutoMapper will allow us to map the ViewModel with the DomainModel
Mapper.CreateMap<Domain.ViewModels.EventsAddViewModel, Domain.Event>();
object #event = Mapper.Map<Domain.ViewModels.EventsAddViewModel, Domain.Event>(eventToAdd);
// Add the event to the database
EventService.AddEvent(#event);
EventService.SubmitChanges();
I have a DataGridView that is bound - via a binding source - to a list of entities:
VehicleRepository:
private IObjectSet<Vehicles> _objectSet;
public VehicleRepository(VPEntities context)
{
_context = context;
_objectSet = context.Vehicles;
}
List<Vehicle> IVehicleRepository.GetVehicles(Model model)
{
return _objectSet
.Where(e => e.ModelId == model.ModelId)
.ToList();
}
In my presenter
private List<Vehicle> _vehicles;
...
_vehicles = _vehicleRepository.GetVehicles(_model);
_screen.BindTo(_vehicles);
in my view
public void BindTo(List<Vehicle> vehicles)
{
_vehicles = vehicles;
if (_vehicles != null)
{
VehicleBindingSource.DataSource = _vehicles;
}
}
This works fine - my grid displays the data as it should. However, in the grid I am wanting to replace the ModelId column with a description field from the Model table. I've tried changing the binding for the column from ModelId to Model.ModelDescription but the column just appears blank.
I'm pretty sure that the data is being loaded, as I can see it when I debug, and when the same list is passed to a details screen I can successfully bind the related data to text fields and see the data.
Am I doing something obviously wrong?
It's a bit manual, but it 'works on my machine'.
Add a column to your DataGridView for the description field and then after you set your DataSource iterate through like so.
Dim row As Integer = 0
foreach (entity In (List<Entity>)MyBindingSource.DataSource)
{
string description = entity.Description;
MyDataGridView.Rows[row].Cells["MyDescriptionCell"].Value = description;
row ++;
}
You get a readonly view of your lookup. I make the new column readonly, but you could write something to handle the user changing the field if you wanted updates to run back to the server. Might be messy though.
The answer involves adding unbound read only columns and setting their value in the DataGridView's DataBindingComplete event
as described here
You can just add a column to your DataGridView, and in the DataPropertyName you must set the [entity].[Field name you need] in your case you could do: VehiclesType.Description
then you must add another binding source for the VehiclesTypes to the form, fill it using your context, and your good to go ;)
I have a grid bound to a BindingSource which is bound to DataContext table, like this:
myBindingSource.DataSource = myDataContext.MyTable;
myGrid.DataSource = myBindingSource;
I couldn't refresh BindingSource after insert. This didn't work:
myDataContext.Refresh(RefreshMode.OverwriteCurrentValues, myBindingSource);
myBindingSource.ResetBinding(false);
Neither this:
myDataContext.Refresh(RefreshMode.OverwriteCurrentValues, myDataContext.MyTable);
myBindingSource.ResetBinding(false);
What should I do?
I have solved the problem but not in a way I wanted.
Turns out that DataContext and Linq To SQL is best for unit-of-work operations. Means you create a DataContext, get your job done, discard it. If you need another operation, create another one.
For this problem only thing I had to do was recreate my DataContext like this.dx = new MyDataContext();. If you don't do this you always get stale/cached data. From what I've read from various blog/forum posts that DataContext is lightweight and doing this A-OK. This was the only way I've found after searching for a day.
And finally one more working solution.
This solution works fine and do not require recreating DataContext.
You need to reset internal Table cache.
for this you need change private property cachedList of Table using reflection.
You can use following utility code:
public static class LinqDataTableExtension
{
public static void ResetTableCache(this ITable table)
{
table.InternalSetNonPublicFieldValue("cachedList", null);
}
public static void ResetTableCache(this IListSource source)
{
source.InternalSetNonPublicFieldValue("cachedList", null);
}
public static void InternalSetNonPublicFieldValue(this object entity, string propertyName, object value)
{
if (entity == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("entity");
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(propertyName))
throw new ArgumentNullException("propertyName");
var type = entity.GetType();
var prop = type.GetField(propertyName, BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (prop != null)
prop.SetValue(entity, value);
// add any exception code here if property was not found :)
}
}
using something like:
var dSource = Db.GetTable(...)
dSource.ResetTableCache();
You need to reset your BindingSource using something like:
_BindingSource.DataSource = new List();
_BindingSource.DataSource = dSource;
// hack - refresh binding list
Enjoy :)
Grid Data Source Referesh by new query instead just Contest.Table.
Simple Solution < But Working.
Whre is eg.
!!!!! Thanks - Problem Solved after no of days !!! but with so simple way ..
CrmDemoContext.CrmDemoDataContext Context = new CrmDemoContext.CrmDemoDataContext();
var query = from it in Context.Companies select it;
// initial connection
dataGridView1.DataSource = query;
after changes or add in data
Context.SubmitChanges();
//call here again
dataGridView1.DataSource = query;
I have the same problem. I was using a form to create rows in my table without saving the context each time. Luckily I had multiple forms doing this and one updated the grid properly and one didn't.
The only difference?
I bound one to the entity similarly (not using the bindingSource) to what you did:
myGrid.DataSource = myDataContext.MyTable;
The second I bound:
myGrid.DataSource = myDataContext.MyTable.ToList();
The second way worked.
I think you should also refresh/update datagrid. You need to force redraw of grid.
Not sure how you insert rows. I had same problem when used DataContext.InsertOnSubmit(row), but when I just inserted rows into BindingSource instead BindingSource.Insert(Bindingsource.Count, row)
and used DataContext only to DataContext.SubmitChanges() and DataContext.GetChangeSet(). BindingSource inserts rows into both grid and context.
the answer from Atomosk helped me to solve a similar problem -
thanks a lot Atomosk!
I updated my database by the following two lines of code, but the DataGridView did not show the changes (it did not add a new row):
this.dataContext.MyTable.InsertOnSubmit(newDataset);
this.dataContext.SubmitChanges();
Where this.dataContext.MyTable was set to the DataSource property of a BindingSource object, which was set to the DataSource property of a DataGridView object.
In code it does looks like this:
DataGridView dgv = new DataGridView();
BindingSource bs = new BindingSource();
bs.DataSource = this.dataContext.MyTable; // Table<T> object type
dgv.DataSource = bs;
Setting bs.DataSource equals null and after that back to this.dataContext.MyTable did not help to update the DataGridView either.
The only way to update the DataGridView with the new entry was a complete different approach by adding it to the BindingSource instead of the corresponding table of the DataContext, as Atomosk mentioned.
this.bs.Add(newDataset);
this.dataContext.SubmitChanges();
Without doing so bs.Count; returned a smaller number as this.dataContext.MyTable.Count();
This does not make sense and seems to be a bug in the binding model in my opinion.