I am having a problem with _sbrk. In a link phase of compilation i use below comand to link my objects and i get undefined reference to _sbrk.
arm-none-eabi-ld -static -T linkerscript.ld -o exe timer_example.o /home/ziga/projects/cs_lite/arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a /home/ziga/projects/cs_lite/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/4.5.1/libgcc.a
I am compiling for arm926ej-s and in ARM mode so i think i have chosen the right multilib (libc.a and libgcc.a) which is located in folder home/ziga/projects/cs_lite/arm-none-eabi/lib/.
I have been searching internet for _sbrk function and it is some sort of a memory managment call which isnt included in standard C libraries as it is dependant on microprocessor. So do I have to write _sbrk function on my own? How do I do it? Do you have any example for arm926ej-s? After writing this function I intend to compile it into an object file and link it together with other objects, libraries.
This helps:
-mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb -specs=nano.specs -specs=nosys.specs -mfpu=fpv4-sp-d16 -mfloat-abi=hard
The important switches "seem" to be:
-specs=nano.specs -specs=nosys.specs
I was having the same problem, and adding those to the linker flags helped:
-specs=nano.specs -specs=nosys.specs
Also, just with the nosys.specs fixed the issue, but the code size was a lot bigger.
The problem has little to do with _sbrk itself, but rather your attempt to invoke the linker directly, bypassing the compiler driver. Instead, use the gcc command to invoke the linker and the -Wl,-linkeroptionhere syntax to pass extra options to the linker.
One possible solution, if you must invoke the linker yourself.. Try repeating both libc.a and libgcc.a a second time at the end of the command line. There's also some "as group" linker option you could use to achieve this but I don't know it right off.
recently I also ran into this(again). the easiest solution which worked for me was to provide/redirect "malloc" and "free" apis to the one available from the SDK on which I was building my application.
Basically it happens because of mem management apis missing while linking. like the above answer mentions its not that _sbrk is specifically missing here. brk/sbrk syscall intenrally is used for heap management. hence the _sbrk ,missing link when it comes to mem management apis.
I noticed that adding -lnosys (i.e libnosys.a) also helped a this to a degree in some integrations.
with visualgdb (using gcc), and nanolib, I had to add the linker flag
-specs=nosys.specs
I solved this problem and will post solution here so i give something back to comunity. The function _sbrk is located inside NXP CDL package for ARM. Package is available for download (link is for all who dont know this already) here in subfolder CDL_v005/csps/lpc313x/bsps/ea3131/source you will find source file named libnosys_gnu.c which should be added to the project and compiled to object file and after that linked to executable file alongside other objects and libraries.
Best wishes and a lot of success.
Related
I'm trying to use pcap functions, but it giving me compiler error:
project.c:(.text+0x140): undefined reference to `pcap_open_offline'
I have installed library and while compiling I give "-lpcap" at the and as it advised in many forums.
What can be wrong, please?
You need to understand what the arguments evoke into the linker.
I am supposing you are using Linux system with gcc, using ld as linker (note that this could change depending on the system and the linker used).
In such case, -Lpath tell the linker where to look for the libraries that you tell it that are needed to be linked with your program to create the final binary. For example -L/usr/lib.
when you type in for example:
# gcc -L/usr/lib -lcap my_program.c -o my_program
You are telling the linker to append /usr/lib to the list of paths to locate libraries, and to link the dynamic library "libcap.so" with your program.
Other modifiers for the path used to locate libraries is LD_LIBRAY_PATH (the name of this environment variable could change from one system to another, review the manual of your linker).
As you are using "-lcap" the error you get look to be related with the fact that no path is found where libcap.so exist. Locate that file into your system and pass the argument
-L/path/to/the/directory/that/contain/libcap.so
By the way, try to run this before any other thing and recompile:
# sudo ldconfig
I am not sure if the question is framed correctly. But I am using code blocks on a windows machine. I want to use gcc -o myfile myfile.c -lpthread. But in my code blocks I don't have this -lpthread flag(is that called a flag?). So where do I need to add this in code blocks so that when I click build, it will simply call gcc -o myfile myfile.c -lpthread.
-lpthread is a flag to the linker saying to include the library pthread (POSIX threads). I'm not particularly good with code blocks but in the main settings you should be able to find options for configuring the compiler or linker. You need to add the library "pthread" there.
Take a look at this possible duplicate: How do I link to a library with Code::Blocks?
In codeblocks 16.01, you can specify the library you want to link (in this case libpthread.so) via Settings > Compiler... > Linker Settings > Add
Then you need to add the location of libpthread.so via locate libpthread.so
In this case, you may also need to specify -D_REENTRANT compiler flag to tell gcc about necessary headers for thread usage.
There is a vendor whose software I'd like to work with. They have a code base which they can only compile using IAR Embedded Workbench (as far as I know, their code does not compile with GCC). Unfortunately their hardware only works with their software stack, so I don't really have a choice about whether or not I'd like to use it. They distribute this code as a .a static library file (and accompanying headers) compiled for the ARM Cortex-M4 CPU. (They don't want to distribute sources.) For the sake of this discussion, let's call it evil_sw_stack.a.
I'd like to use this piece of code but I don't have an IAR license and have zero expertise with IAR. I'd like to use GCC.
Is there a way to make IAR produce such a static library that GCC can link to? What kind of compiler option would the vendor need to use to produce such a binary?
(I would guess that the ABI of the resulting binary can be somehow specified and set to a setting which statisfies GCC. )
Example usage of GCC
Their default software stack is very GCC-friendly, this specific one is the only one in their offering which isn't. Generally, I can compile a simple piece of example code if I have the following:
startup_(devicename).S: GCC-specific assembly file
system_(devicename).c
(devicename).ld: linker script
Some header files for the specific device
For example, I can compile a simple piece of example like this:
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc helloworld.c startup_(devicename).S system_(devicename).c -T (devicename).ld -o helloworld -D(devicename) -I. -fno-builtin -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mfpu=fpv4-sp-d16 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb -mno-sched-prolog -Wl,--start-group -lgcc -lc -lnosys -Wl,--end-group
So far, so good. No warnings, no errors.
How I try to use the static library
For the sake of this discussion, let's call it evil_sw_stack.a.
This is how I attempted to use it:
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc evil_sw_stack.a helloworld.c startup_(devicename).S system_(devicename).c -T (devicename).ld -o helloworld -D(devicename) -I. -fno-builtin -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mfpu=fpv4-sp-d16 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mthumb -mno-sched-prolog -Wl,--start-group -lgcc -lc -lnosys -Wl,--end-group
Unfortunately this complains about multiple definitions of a bunch of functions that are defined in system_(devicename).c. Maybe they accidentally compiled that into this library? Or maybe IAR just compiled it this way? Now, if I try to remove system_(devicename).c from the GCC command line and simply link to the .a file, I get these errors:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/5.2.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: warning: thelibrary.a(startup_chipname.o) uses 2-byte wchar_t yet the output is to use 4-byte wchar_t; use of wchar_t values across objects may fail
undefined reference to `__iar_program_start'
undefined reference to `CSTACK$$Limit'
undefined reference to `__iar_program_start'
Poking the file with readelf gets me nowhere:
$ readelf -h evil_sw_stack.a
readelf: Error: evil_sw_stack.a: did not find a valid archive header
Interestingly though, this seems to be getting somewhere:
$ arm-none-eabi-ar x evil_sw_stack.a
Now I've got a bunch of object files which do have ELF headers according to readelf, and yup, they did compile a startup file (of another of their devices) into the library... I'm wondering why, but I think this is a mistake.
This also works:
$ arm-none-eabi-objdump -t evil_sw_stack_objfile.o
So now the question is, is it safe to try to compile these object files into my own application using GCC? According to this other SO question, the object file formats are not compatible.
I assume that the startup code is mistakenly compiled into the library. I can delete it:
$ arm-none-eabi-ar d evil_sw_stack.a startup_(otherdevicename).o
$ arm-none-eabi-ar d evil_sw_stack.a system_(otherdevicename).o
Now I get an evil_sw_stack.a which gcc can accept as an input without complaining.
However, there is one thing that still worries me. When I use the object files instead of the static library, I get these warnings:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/5.2.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: warning: evil_objfile.o uses 2-byte wchar_t yet the output is to use 4-byte wchar_t; use of wchar_t values across objects may fail
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/5.2.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: warning: evil_objfile.o uses 32-bit enums yet the output is to use variable-size enums; use of enum values across objects may fail
So it seems that evil_sw_stack.a was compiled with (the IAR equivalents of) -fno-short-enums and -fshort-wchar. GCC doesn't complain about this when I use evil_sw_stack.a at its command line but it does complain when I try to use any object file that I extracted from the library. Should I worry about this?
I don't use wchar_t in my code so I believe that one doesn't matter, but I would like to pass enums between my code and the library.
Update
Even though the linker doesn't complain, it doesn't work when I actually call some functions from the static library. In that case, make sure to put the libraries in the correct order when you call the linker. According to the accepted answer to this question, they need to be in reverse order of dependency. After doing this, it still misses some IAR crap:
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memclr4'
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memclr'
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memmove'
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memset4'
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memset'
undefined reference to `__iar_vla_alloc2'
undefined reference to `__iar_vla_dealloc2'
undefined reference to `__aeabi_memclr4'
I've found out that the __aeabi functions are defined in libgcc but even though I link to libgcc too, the definition in libgcc doesn't seem to be good enough for the function inside evil_sw_stack.a.
EDIT: after some googling around, it seems that arm-none-eabi-gcc doesn't support these specific __aeabi functions. Take a look at this issue.
Anyway, after taking a look at ARM's runtime ABI docs, the missing __aeabi functions can be trivially implemented using their standard C library equivalents. But I'm not quite sure how __iar_vla_alloc2 and __iar_vla_dealloc2 should work and couldn't find any documentation on them online. The only thing I found out is that VLA means "variable length array".
So, it seems that this will never work unless the chip vendor can compile their static library in such a way that it doesn't use these symbols. Is that right?
Disclaimer
I'd prefer not to disclose who the vendor is and not to disclose which product I work with. They are not proud that this thing doesn't work properly and asked me not to. I'm asking this question to help and not to discredit them.
I am having extreme trouble cross compiling a project related to gstreamer. I am trying to link it to a library on my cross compile machine's /usr/lib
If I do the standard linker flags -L{FILESYS_DIR}/usr/lib -lGLESv2 I get pthread complaints from my cross compile toolchain. Thus, I am trying to link to this library without using the -L flag.
No matter what I do, I am getting undefined symbol glFramebuffer2D. However a quick readelf -Wc $FILESYS_DIR/usr/lib/libGLESv2.so | glFrame shows me a glFramebuffer2D symbol.
I'm pulling my hair out because no matter what flags I specify to autoconf, something called libtool throws away my link request unless I use the -L -l approach...
Edit: I had another idea, I tried -Wl, $FILESYS_DIR/usr/lib/libGLESv2.so which worked in compiling and linking but not during runtime... Obvious to me (now) because the host machine root is $FILESYS_DIR. Anyways, this is on the right approach, but I guess I need relative names.
libtool: link: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -shared .libs/libgstbla_la-gstblaoverlay.o
.libs/libgstbla_la-gstblastabilize.o .libs/libgstbla_la-gles2_utilities.o -Wl,-
rpath -Wl,/home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib -Wl,-rpath -
Wl,/home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib -L/home/z3/z3-
netra/filesys/fs/opt/gstreamer/lib /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgstvideo-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lrt /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-
0.4/lib/libglib-2.0.so -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgstbla.so -Wl,-version-script -
Wl,.libs/libgstbla.ver -o .libs/libgstbla.so
If needed, in one line as well:
libtool: link: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -shared .libs/libgstbla_la-gstblaoverlay.o .libs/libgstbla_la-gstblastabilize.o .libs/libgstbla_la-gles2_utilities.o -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib -L/home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs/opt/gstreamer/lib /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgstvideo-0.10.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lrt /home/z3/z3-netra/filesys/fs//opt/gstreamer-0.4/lib/libglib-2.0.so -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgstbla.so -Wl,-version-script -Wl,.libs/libgstbla.ver -o .libs/libgstbla.so
/usr/lib should already be on the library search path, so you shouldn't need to specify an RPATH. What you do need to do though, is to tell your (cross-)linker where to find the libraries. I think that includes transitively dependencies, such as libpthread. Do you have $FILESYS_DIR/usr/lib/libpthread.so? Does it point to /lib/libpthread.so.N? Oh wait, I see something now that I wrote it out: notice the (likely) absence of $FILESYS_DIR there: so it's possible that your linker is looking for libpthread transitively needed by libGLESv2, but not finding it, since $FILESYS_DIR/lib is not on the library include path. Add -L $FILESYS_DIR/lib to your linker flags and try again.
All, this was related to the following question: set global gcc default search paths
The problem here is related to the pthread.so (also glib.so). /usr/lib/pthread.so on a lot of systems is an ASCII script which then further links to the system's /lib/pthread.so.0 (which is a soft link). When compiling, my $(FILESYS_DIR) was correct, however the the libpthread.so there pointed to the host systems pthread.so
I made a HUGE mistake here which could have been easily avoided with correct cross compilation management. When compiling for a target system, do not use files on the target system filesystem (if it's a NFS as mine was.) Use local libraries compiled for that target system. FURTHERMORE, specify -Wl,-rpath-link=/[local location where your *.so reside]
That compiler/linker flag allows for the runtime path to be on the local system during compile and link, but maintain the standard runtime path during runtime.... Hope that made sense.
I am creating a utility which depends on libassuan aside other depends. While these ‘others’ provide shared libraries, libassuan comes with static one only.
libassuan comes with simple libassuan-config tool which is meant to provide CFLAGS & LDFLAGS for the compiler/linker to use. These LDFLAGS refer to the library as -lassuan.
The result of standard call of make is then:
cc -I/usr/include/libmirage -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -lmirage -lglib-2.0 -L/usr/lib64 -lassuan -o mirage2iso mirage2iso.c mirage-getopt.o mirage-wrapper.o mirage-password.o
mirage-password.o: In function `mirage_input_password':
mirage-password.c:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `assuan_pipe_connect'
mirage-password.c:(.text+0x32): undefined reference to `assuan_strerror'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [mirage2iso] Error 1
(I've just started writing this unit and that's why there aren't more errors)
So, if I understand the result correctly, gcc doesn't want to link the app to libassuan.a.
Using -static here will cause gcc to prefer static libraries over shared which is unindented. I've seen solution suggesting using something like that:
-Wl,-Bstatic -lassuan -Wl,-Bdynamic
but I don't think it would be a portable one.
I think the best solution would be to provide full path to the static library file but libassuan-config doesn't provide much of help (all I can get from it is -L/usr/lib64 -lassuan).
Maybe I should just try to create the static library path by ‘parsing’ returned LDFLAGS and using -L for the directory name and -l for the library name — and then hoping that in all cases libassuan-config will return it like that.
What do you think about that? Is there any good, simple and portable solution to resolve the issue?
PS. Please note that although I'm referring to gcc here, I would like to use something that will work fine with other compilers.
PS2. One additional question: if package does install static library only, returning such LDFLAGS instead of full .la path can be considered as a bug?
gcc will link to libassuan.a if it doesn't find libassuan.so
It's probably the order symbols are looked up in the static library when you link. The order matters.
)
Assuming gcc can find libassuan.a and it actually provides the functions the linker complains about, try:
cc -I/usr/include/libmirage -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -lmirage -lglib-2.0 -L/usr/lib64 -o mirage2iso mirage2iso.c mirage-getopt.o mirage-wrapper.o mirage-password.o -lassuan
Since you say libassuan is under /usr/lib64 it's probably a 64 bit library, are your app and the other libraries 64 bit as well ?
Compiler's command-line options are not a portable thing. There's no standard for it. Every compiler uses its own and several can merely informally agree to comply with each other in command-line format. The most portable way for your linking is to use libassuan-config, of course. I think, it can generate not only flags for gcc, but for other compilers as well. If it can't, then no portable way exists, I suppose (other than CMake or something on higher level).
The command line to cc you shown is totally correct. If you have a static library libassuan.la and path to it is supplied to -L option, then the compiler does link against it. You can see it from its output: has it not found the static library, would it complain with error message like "can't find -lassuan". I
Moreover, if no libassuan.so is found, then compiler links against your library statically, even if you haven't used -Wl,-Bstatic stuff or -static flag.
Your problem may be in persistence of several versions of libassuan in your system. Other that that, I don't see any errors in what you've provided.
Which directory is libassuan.a in
I think the first error is not gcc doesn't want to link the app to libassuan.a it is more gcc does not know where libassuan.a . You need to pass gcc a -L parameter giving the path to libassuan.a .
e.g.
-L /home/path