I'm really confused about what is supposed to be inside a Module.
When I call RegisterViewWithRegion for many views they are all loaded together during Module initialization... All those views are intended to be hosted inside the same region because they are diferent processes of the same module.
Let-s say that I have a Module named Inventory and it contains a view for Products, a view for Orders, etc. All of them are associated with a region named "MainRegion" and I would like to instantiate those views when user requests them, not when the module gets initialized.
In my mind, the only answer to this enigma is that Prism modules are intended to have (what I call) ONLY ONE process inside, so this way I'll end up with different modules like this:
Inventory.Products.xap
Inventory.Orders.xap
... and so on.
Is that right?
Is there any alternative that let me keep those processes together inside One module? and in this case, is this convenient?
Thanks in Advance!
Jean Paul
Prism makes a distinction between instantiating a view and displaying it. Prism 4 has a new API for displaying regions on demand, but display-on-demand can be done with older versions, as well. Unless your views are resource intensive, I'd suggest loading them at bootstrap-time, then displaying them as requested by the user.
Here are a couple of articles that should help:
Prism 4.0 Display-on-Demand
Display-on-Demand - Older Versions of Prism
Just to add to what #David said, Prism helps u logically separating different modules, and separating each view to its own module is (a) a huge overkill, and (b) a bad architecture.
good architecture is knowing how to divide & conquer the tasks of the application, which means knowing when to divide things, and sometimes even more importantly, when not to divide things.
Well, I guess I finally understand how it's supposed to work.
In order to set the grounds for this post, let's say that an application Module (not a prism module) is a collection of views (previously named Forms) and procedures related to specific activities on a business process, for example: Sales, Inventory, banking... etc.
Inside each Application module, we will find processes like Sales.Invoices, Sales.Orders, Inventory.Products, Inventory.Stocks, etc.
Now, in prism as #Elad says, create a new project for each process inside inside an Application Module may be a huge overkill, And as #David says, Prism makes a distinction between instantiating a view and displaying it.
Well, to do the right thing (which is listen to these guys), I decided to go like this:
1) Differenciate a Visual Studio project from a Prism Module:
It's not really necessary to break Application Modules into different project in your solution, all you need to do is create one project by "Application Module"
2) Create different Module Initializer Classes inside each "Application Module" project, one for each process e.g.:
For Process "A" Inside MyApplicationModule:
<ModuleExport(GetType(MyApplicationModule.ProcessAInitializer))> _
Public Class ProcessAInitializer
Implements IModule
<Import()> _
Public Property RegionManager As IRegionManager
#Region "IModule Implementation"
Public Sub Initialize()
Implements Microsoft.Practices.Prism.Modularity.IModule.Initialize
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.SubMenuView,
GetType(MyApplicationModule.SubMenuViewA))
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.ContentRegion,
GetType(MyApplicationModule.ContentViewA))
End Sub
#End Region
End Class
For Process "B" Inside MyApplicationModule:
<ModuleExport(GetType(MyApplicationModule.ProcessBInitializer))> _
Public Class ProcessBInitializer
Implements IModule
<Import()> _
Public Property RegionManager As IRegionManager
#Region "IModule Implementation"
Public Sub Initialize()
Implements Microsoft.Practices.Prism.Modularity.IModule.Initialize
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.SubMenuView,
GetType(MyApplicationModule.SubMenuViewB))
RegionManager.RegisterViewWithRegion(RegionNames.ContentRegion,
GetType(MyApplicationModule.ContentViewB))
End Sub
#End Region
End Class
3) Once we got this, let's change a little bit how your modulecatalog is being created on your shell project. In my case, I'm using code to add Prism Modules one by one, you could load the Modules Definition from a file but the principle is the same:
Protected Overrides Function CreateModuleCatalog() As
Microsoft.Practices.Prism.Modularity.IModuleCatalog
Dim objModuleCatalog = New ModuleCatalog
objModuleCatalog.AddModule(New ModuleInfo()
With {.InitializationMode = InitializationMode.OnDemand,
.Ref = "MyApplicationModule.xap",
.ModuleType = "MyApplicationModule.ProcessAInitializer, MyApplicationModules, Version 1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null",
.ModuleName = "ProcessAInitializer"})
objModuleCatalog.AddModule(New ModuleInfo()
With {.InitializationMode = InitializationMode.OnDemand,
.Ref = "MyApplicationModule.xap",
.ModuleType = "MyApplicationModule.ProcessBInitializer, MyApplicationModule, Version 1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null",
.ModuleName = "ProcessBInitializer"})
Return objModuleCatalog
End Function
Conclusion
This way, Your views will be instantiated only when user request this specific "Business Process", you don't need to split your solution into smaller parts so it take forever compiling and your solution still being "team friendly".
Thank you #David & #Elad
Related
I want to create two modules that describes toolbar and menu feature, but I don't want to define them in two different assemblies, and I tried to do it in that way,It works fine,but I'm afraid that would it takes twice as much as memory like just define them in one module? Follow is my demo code, they're written in one project.
public class MainMenuModule : IModule {
public void Initialize() {
RegionHelper.RegisterViewWithRegion(Shell.RegionNames.Menu, typeof(Views.Menu));
}
}
public class ToolBarModule : IModule {
public void Initialize() {
RegionHelper.RegisterViewWithRegion(Shell.RegionNames.ToolBarRegion, typeof(Views.ToolBar));
}
}
Note that RegionHelper is a wrapper prism region API.
That's fine. Although I don't really see a use case for two modules in one assembly...
And btw, the module definition classes are ready for collection once their Initialization methods return.
Is it OK to put two Prism modules in a single assembly? Well, yes. It will work and there is nothing stopping you from really. You can put as many module classes in a single assembly as you want to.
Keep in mind that a module is supposed to be a set of loosely coupled functional units though. If you put two modules in a single assembly, you can no longer load the first one without also loading the second one and vice versa. This may be a problem or it may not depending on how the modules are used by your application.
The possible down-sides of using too many assemblies are discussed here: Specific down-sides to many-'small'-assemblies?
This is generally not an issue.
I have a WPF application with MVVM. Assuming object composition from the ViewModel down looks as follows:
MainViewModel
OrderManager
OrderRepository
EFContext
AnotherRepository
EFContext
UserManager
UserRepository
EFContext
My original approach was to inject dependencies (from the ViewModelLocator) into my View Model using .InCallScope() on the EFContext and .InTransientScope() for everything else. This results in being able to perform a "business transaction" across multiple business layer objects (Managers) that eventually underneath shared the same Entity Framework Context. I would simply Commit() said context at the end for a Unit of Work type scenario.
This worked as intended until I realized that I don't want long living Entity Framework contexts at the View Model level, data integrity issues across multiple operations described HERE. I want to do something similar to my web projects where I use .InRequestScope() for my Entity Framework context. In my desktop application I will define a unit of work which will serve as a business transaction if you will, typically it will wrap everything within a button click or similar event/command. It seems that using Ninject's ActivationBlock can do this for me.
internal static class Global
{
public static ActivationBlock GetNinjectUoW()
{
//assume that NinjectSingleton is a static reference to the kernel configured with the necessary modules/bindings
return new ActivationBlock(NinjectSingleton.Instance.Kernel);
}
}
In my code I intend to use it as such:
//Inside a method that is raised by a WPF Button Command ...
using (ActivationBlock uow = Global.GetNinjectUoW())
{
OrderManager orderManager = uow.Get<OrderManager>();
UserManager userManager = uow.Get<UserManager>();
Order order = orderManager.GetById(1);
UserManager.AddOrder(order);
....
UserManager.SaveChanges();
}
Questions:
To me this seems to replicate the way I do business on the web, is there anything inherently wrong with this approach that I've missed?
Am I understanding correctly that all .Get<> calls using the activation block will produce "singletons" local to that block? What I mean is no matter how many times I ask for an OrderManager, it'll always give me the same one within the block. If OrderManager and UserManager compose the same repository underneath (say SpecialRepository), both will point to the same instance of the repository, and obviously all repositories underneath share the same instance of the Entity Framework context.
Both questions can be answered with yes:
Yes - this is service location which you shouldn't do
Yes you understand it correctly
A proper unit-of-work scope, implemented in Ninject.Extensions.UnitOfWork, solves this problem.
Setup:
_kernel.Bind<IService>().To<Service>().InUnitOfWorkScope();
Usage:
using(UnitOfWorkScope.Create()){
// resolves, async/await, manual TPL ops, etc
}
Is it possible to register a region adapter within a module?
I have a ContentControl in my Shell.xaml set to region "MainRegion" that currently gets populated with a module containing the AvalonDock control. I currently have the AvalonDock region adapter in my Shell app but would like to place it in the module and register itself. I want to keep this program flexible so that if we decide to use something other than AvalonDock, I can easily use another module without having to modify my Shell assembly (removing the avalondock region adapter).
I imagine something like this is possible. Has anyone done this before?
In bootstrapper right now is:
protected override RegionAdapterMappings ConfigureRegionAdapterMappings()
{
RegionAdapterMappings mappings = base.ConfigureRegionAdapterMappings();
var regionBehaviorFactory = Container.GetExportedValue<IRegionBehaviorFactory>();
var regionManager = Container.GetExportedValue<IRegionManager>();
mappings.RegisterMapping(typeof(Pane), new AvalonRegionAdapter(regionBehaviorFactory, regionManager));
return mappings;
}
This is what I would like to perform in the Module instead of the Shell bootstrapper.
Answer is here from codeplex http://compositewpf.codeplex.com/discussions/250892
The scenario you're describing is
possible. Although custom region
adapters are intended to be registered
in the RegionAdapterMappings in the
Bootstrapper's
ConfigureRegionAdapterMappings method,
it is possible to register a custom
region adapter from within a module.
You could, for example, obtain a
reference to the RegionAdapterMappings
in your Module class by using
constructor injection, and call the
RegisterMapping method there. This is
possible since there is a class named
MefRegionAdapterMappings, which
exports the RegionAdapterMappings as a
shared export. Note that you should be
aware of the timing issues that may
arise due to this. You should be
careful to register the custom mapping
before attempting to create a region
which uses that adapter.
I want to have create a WPF or Silverlight module which cannot only be utilised by Shell's bootstrapper, but also can be embedded in non-PRISM applications.
In short is there a way PRISM module can be intialised from module itself rather than initialsing from Shell?
Ulimate goal is to have WPF/Silverlight PRISM module, which can be initialsed by non-PRISM applications.
There is no barrier to this.
The IModule interface has a single, parameterless void method: Initialize().
A non-prism application can initialize the module by calling that method. That's it.
If the other application has a different plugin system, with a different interface, your module can implement that interface as well, and the body of whatever initialization method that interface uses can simply call Initialize(), or vice versa.
For example:
public interface IMyPluginModule
{
void StartModule();
}
public class MyModule : IModule, IMyPluginModule
{
public void Initialize()
{
// actual initialization code here
}
public void StartModule()
{
Initialize();
}
}
It's a little more complicated than it appears at first glance, but it is doable. I don't know if you are using Prism 4 yet, but if so, Microsoft actually provides guidance for this scenario:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff921109(v=PandP.40).aspx
There is a bit of project manipulation you need to do to get two projects running side-by-side. There is a sample included with Prism v4 called "MultiTargeting" if you need to see a working sample.
Your question regarding to allowing a module to be initialized by itself, rather than having the orchestrating Shell / Bootstrapper is the wrong approach, however. Essentially what you would have would be two shells... one WPF and one Silverlight. Take a look at the samples and see what you think.
Hope this helps.
I have been using Prism for a while now and enjoy how much easier it is to decouple my modules.
This works especially great for views and view models since you can inject the view models via interfaces and the views via the region manager.
Unfortunately this only works when my views are full blown user controls unless I'm missing something here (and I sincerely hope I am).
A lot of times though, I'll create a ViewModel and a matching DataTemplate. These can then be used by other assemblies to compose a view.
My problem is, that I see no way of referring to these datatemplates without referencing the containing assembly, so in my xaml file I write something like:
<ResourceDictionary Source="pack://application:,,/......>
Of course this is not really decoupled, although I try to make sure, that I don't refer to the assembly anywhere else in my code.
Another solution I thought of, was to put the datatemplates into the Infrastructure project, but I don't like that too much either,as I want everything that belongs to a module to be contained in it (except the interfaces of course).
So, does anyone have a good workaround, or did I miss some Prism feature?
I would suggest creating a service that encapsulates adding resource dictionaries to the Application.Resources.MergedDictionaries collection.
// Service interface (defined in the 'infrastructure' project)
public interface IResourceAggregator
{
void AddResource(Uri resourceUri);
}
// Service implementation (implemented at the application/shell level)
class ResourceAggregator : IResourceAggregator
{
public void AddResource(Uri resourceUri)
{
var resourceDictionary = new ResourceDictionary() { Source = resourceUri };
var app = Application.Current;
app.Resources.MergedDictionaries.Add(resourceDictionary);
}
}
I would expect you would "resolve" this service during module load and use it to "register" the module-local resource dictionaries.
You would need to merge the resources when the module starts. You can read more about this here: http://blogs.southworks.net/jdominguez/2008/09/presentation-model-with-datatemplates-in-compositewpf-prism-sample/
Of course you can further abstract this functionality into a reusable service.