all: run
run: test.o list.o matrix.o smatrix.o
gcc test.o list.o matrix.o smatrix.o -o matrix-mul
list.o: list.c list.h
gcc -g -c list.c
matrix.o: matrix.c matrix.h
gcc -g -std=c99 -c -o matrix.o matrix.c
smatrix.o: smatrix.c smatrix.h
gcc -g -c -o smatrix.o smatrix.c
test.o: test.c test.h
gcc -g -c test.c
I was having lots of problems to make a makefile and I finally got this working. And I just want to make sure these are ok (not just for making program running but in term of a good make file)
One question is that why do matrix.o and smatrix.o have .o files in the line gcc -g -c ... where as list.o and test.o don't have that line..
I had to add -std=c99 because I was getting some weird for loop error but still don't understand why I need to put matrix.o in the line..
The file is OK-ish. It is not very easily maintainable.
This website has a really good tutorial on how to make nice makefiles:
http://mrbook.org/blog/tutorials/make/
Especially look at the last example:
CC=g++
CFLAGS=-c -Wall
LDFLAGS=
SOURCES=main.cpp hello.cpp factorial.cpp
OBJECTS=$(SOURCES:.cpp=.o)
EXECUTABLE=hello
all: $(SOURCES) $(EXECUTABLE)
$(EXECUTABLE): $(OBJECTS)
$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o $#
.cpp.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
This should show you how to enhance maintainability (add extra files to SOURCES, and the rest is done automatically.
The below file supports make all make depend and make clean - you only need to change the first lines. Remember to make depend if you change includes in any file.
TARGET:=matrix-mul
SOURCES:=test.c list.c matrix.c smatrix.c
OBJECTS:=$(SOURCES:%.c=%.o)
CC=gcc
CFLAGS=-g -std=c99 -Wall
LD=gcc
LDFLAGS=
# First target - simply say that we want to produce matrix-mul
all: $(TARGET)
# To create the target we need all .o files, and we link with LD/LDFLAGS
# $# is the file we're making, aka matrix-mul
$(TARGET): $(OBJECTS)
$(LD) -o $# $(OBJECTS) $(LDFLAGS)
#Creating a .o from a .c
# $< is the c file, $# is the corresponding .o file
.c.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $#
# Regenerate dependencies
depend:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -MM $(SOURCES) > .depend
# Remove produced files
clean:
rm -rf $(OBJECTS) $(TARGET) .depend
# If there's no dependency file, create it
.depend: depend
# Include the autogenerated dependency file
include .depend
EDIT: If you want this even more generic, you can replace the SOURCE:= line with:
SOURCES:=$(wildcard *.c)
This makefile will then simply build TARGET from all .c files in the current directory.
One thing I would highly suggest here would be to add a clean target that deletes all your intermediate files (probably all the .o files), like so:
clean:
rm *.o
For extra credit, put all your *.o files in a make variable, and use that variable as the target of the run rule, and after the rm command above.
The reason I want you to do this is for debugging purposes. It could be that you have one of the above rules wrong, but since you already built all your .o files once, it is just picking up an old one every time. If you do a make clean before your build, it will catch that.
Related
In a program, I have a list.c file, list.h file and run.c file. In the run.c file, the code contains my main program and also "#include list.h". In my list.h file, my functions are just void and being defined. Finally, in my list.c file, I include list.h again and I have the meaning and code of what each function is going to do. I made a makefile that looks like so:
SOURCES = run.c list.c
OBJECTS= run.o list.o
HEADERS = list.h
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -Wall
lab1: $(OBJECTS)
(tab) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o lab1
clean:
(tab) rm -fR *o lab1
There is nothing wrong in any of my code because it is already finished and I am just copying code. However, I am unsure how to use the makefile to run these multiple files. I am only familiar with runner files after compiling with gcc and using "./". Is there something wrong with my makefile or is there a step for compiling these files in a different way?
Thank you for any help
The given makefile is working and generates an executable lab1 file. However, the .o files depend on the list.h file, and this dependency is not captured.
You should specify targets to build the .o files, as follows:
SOURCES = run.c list.c
OBJECTS= run.o list.o
HEADERS = list.h
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -Wall
lab1: $(OBJECTS)
(tab) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJECTS) -o lab1
%.o: %.c $(HEADERS)
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
clean:
rm -fR *o lab1
Word of caution: With this makefile, if the list of HEADERS grows, a change in any of the headers will warrant a rebuild of all .o files.
For example, imagine we also have buf.c which uses buf.h. Now HEADERS = list.h buf.h. If we change buf.h, our makefile would rebuild both list.o and buf.o, even though a buf.o rebuild would suffice.
To remedy this, we could use a more verbose makefile which identifies the specific header prerequisites for each .o file with rules such as the following:
list.o: list.c list.h
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
buf.o: buf.c buf.h
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $< -o $#
Solution 1: Simply list each .c file separately as input and compile once
gcc list.c run.c -o lab1
Solution 2: Compile each .c file separately
gcc -c list.c
gcc -c run.c
gcc -o lab1 list.o run.o
Your project is small and simple enough that a fully generalized makefile is overkill:
SOURCES = run.c list.c
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -Wall
all:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(SOURCES) -o lab1
clean:
rm -fR *o lab1
The all: is a default target that executes when you simply type make with no arguments.
After compiling, it did end up making a lab1 file that I could run and everything worked. My makefile ended up working fine, I was just completely oblivious to the fact that it was making a file called lab1. I did change my makefile to the above options and that also worked. Thank you
Here is the makefile:
OBJS = main.o hashFunction.o input.o list.o list_inverted_index.o memory.o operations.o sort.o
SOURCE = main.c hashFunction.c input.c list.c list_inverted_index.c memory.c operations.c sort.c
HEADER = hashFunction.h input.h list.h list_inverted_index.h memory.h operations.h sort.h
OUT = myexe
CC = gcc
FLAGS = -g -c -Wall
# -g option enables debugging mode
# -c flag generates object code for separate files
all: $(OBJS)
$(CC) -g $(OBJS) -o $(OUT)
# create/compile the individual files >>separately<<
main.o: main.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) main.c
hashFunction.o: hashFunction.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) hashFunction.c
input.o: input.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) input.c
list.o: list.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) list.c
list_inverted_index.o: list_inverted_index.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) list_inverted_index.c
memory.o: memory.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) memory.c
operations.o: operations.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) operations.c
sort.o: sort.c
$(CC) $(FLAGS) sort.c
# clean house
clean:
rm -f $(OBJS) $(OUT)
# do a bit of accounting
count:
wc $(SOURCE) $(HEADER)
I tried to append this *.o to the clean section (because of this answer), but it didn't work.
I had to modify the makefile as such:
all: $(OBJS)
$(CC) -g $(OBJS) -o $(OUT)
make clean
You might lack a
.PHONY: all clean count
rule. The .PHONY: target and rule should appear near the start of the Makefile, just after the variables definition (in your case, below the definition of FLAGS).
If you happen to have all or clean files (check with ls -l clean all in a terminal), you need to remove them using rm
You'll clean using make clean command.
See also this answer for useful hints (about remake -x & make --trace)
BTW, your FLAGSĀ should probably be CFLAGS (see output of make -p)
Read the documentation of make
You should not normally need or want to "clean object files". The whole point of using Make, is that you don't clean up but stay dirty!
If you always want to clean everything up and start each build from scratch, then don't bother using Make, but write a shell script instead.
I have this simple structure:
.
test.c
plugins/a.c
plugins/b.c
plugins/c.c
And I'm compiling this with a bash script:
gcc -o test test.c -std=gnu99 -ldl -Wl,--export-dynamic
gcc -c plugins/a.c -o plugins/a.o -pedantic -g -Wall -std=c99 -fpic -I.
gcc plugins/a.o -o plugins/a.so -shared
...same for b and c...
Anyways, I want to port that to a Makefile. Here's what I have:
CC = gcc
PLUGIN_DIR = plugins
PLUGINS_C = $(wildcard $(PLUGIN_DIR)/*.c)
PLUGINS_O = $(patsubst %.c,%.o, $(PLUGINS_C))
new: clean all
all: test plugins
test: test.o
$(CC) -o $# $^ -std=gnu99 -ldl -Wl,--export-dynamic
plugins:
???
$(PLUGIN_DIR)/*.c:
$(CC) -c $(PLUGIN_DIR)/$# $^ -pedantic -g -Wall -std=c99 -fpic -I.
$(PLUGIN_DIR)/*.o:
$(CC) $# $^ -shared
clean:
rm -rf test *.o *.a plugins/*.o plugins/*.so
But this won't work as the plugins rule is empty and I really can't find out what should I write in there to make it compile all the plugins inside the plugins folder.
Also, I'm not sure if I messed up things with $# and $^.
There are a number of problems with your makefile before we get to your question.
The wildcard character in a rule target is % not * (in lines like your $(PLUGIN_DIR)/*.c:).
Rules specify how the files named by the target/target pattern are built. So your %.c rule is telling make how to build .c files (which I trust you'll agree) isn't exactly what you meant. (Similarly your %.o rule is telling make how to build .o files).
You don't have any prerequisites (right-hand side of : in a target line) listed for your build rules so make cannot intelligently rebuild targets as their prerequisites are changed (and will never rebuild them instead).
To get to your question, you likely don't want anything in the body of the plugins target. Instead you want to list the desired plugins output files (the .so files) as the prerequisites of the plugins target. (You will also want to include .PHONY: plugins in your makefile to tell make that plugins is not a real file but instead a phony target.)
Your %.so rule wants to be more like:
$(PLUGINS_DIR)/%.so: $(PLUGINS_DIR)/%.o
$(CC) $^ -o $# -shared
and your %.o rule wants to be more like:
$(PLUGINS_DIR)/%.o: $(PLUGINS_DIR)/%.c
$(CC) -c $< -o $# -pedantic -g -Wall -std=c99 -fpic -I.
I'm trying to make a Makefile but I'm having some problems
first I have
2 source files: ~/main.c ~/lib/library.c
1 header file: ~/include/library.h
main.c and library.c both share the same header file library.h
# Compiler options
CC = gcc
INC = -I../include
CFLAGS = -Wall -g -c $(INC)
LIB = -L../lib
LFLAGS = -Wall -g $(LIB)
# Dependencies
LIBS = -libmylib
OBJS = main.o
SRCS = $(OBJS:.o=.c)
EXEC = a.out
# Other rules
RM = rm -rf
TAGS = tags
BAK = Makefile.bak
all: $(EXEC)
#echo ------------------------ Compile Complete ----------------------------
.PHONY: clean depend
$(EXEC): $(OBJS)
$(CC) $(LFLAGS) -o $# $^ $(LIBS)
.c.o:
$(CC) $(INC) -M $^
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $# $<
clean:
$(RM) *.o *~ $(EXEC) $(TAGS) $(BAK)
depend: $(SRCS)
makedepend $(INC) $^
it keeps saying that I it can't make a rule out of library.o
plus I have another question
I acknowledge the fact that when Makefile comes in to action after calling 'make',
and subsequently go to the line .c.o or %c: %o(in GNU enhanced version) and make
.o files. but why doesn't it also call clean and depend automatically?
I've edited some things from the previous version of Makefile
this time, (well pretty similar to the previous problem) even though I
clarified the library path(-I../lib),
the Makefile cannot find the archive file (which I created as libmylib.a in ../lib dir)
now it's driving me crazy
but why doesn't it also call clean and depend automatically?
Because make only builds the target you tell it. If you don't specify one, the first target is built, which in many cases, such as yours, is the 'all' target.
I have three files: program.c, program.h and headers.h.
program.c includes program.h and headers.h.
I need to compile this on Linux using gcc compiler. I'm not sure how to do this. Netbeans created one for me, but it's empty.
Interesting, I didn't know make would default to using the C compiler given rules regarding source files.
Anyway, a simple solution that demonstrates simple Makefile concepts would be:
HEADERS = program.h headers.h
default: program
program.o: program.c $(HEADERS)
gcc -c program.c -o program.o
program: program.o
gcc program.o -o program
clean:
-rm -f program.o
-rm -f program
(bear in mind that make requires tab instead of space indentation, so be sure to fix that when copying)
However, to support more C files, you'd have to make new rules for each of them. Thus, to improve:
HEADERS = program.h headers.h
OBJECTS = program.o
default: program
%.o: %.c $(HEADERS)
gcc -c $< -o $#
program: $(OBJECTS)
gcc $(OBJECTS) -o $#
clean:
-rm -f $(OBJECTS)
-rm -f program
I tried to make this as simple as possible by omitting variables like $(CC) and $(CFLAGS) that are usually seen in makefiles. If you're interested in figuring that out, I hope I've given you a good start on that.
Here's the Makefile I like to use for C source. Feel free to use it:
TARGET = prog
LIBS = -lm
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -Wall
.PHONY: default all clean
default: $(TARGET)
all: default
OBJECTS = $(patsubst %.c, %.o, $(wildcard *.c))
HEADERS = $(wildcard *.h)
%.o: %.c $(HEADERS)
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $#
.PRECIOUS: $(TARGET) $(OBJECTS)
$(TARGET): $(OBJECTS)
$(CC) $(OBJECTS) -Wall $(LIBS) -o $#
clean:
-rm -f *.o
-rm -f $(TARGET)
It uses the wildcard and patsubst features of the make utility to automatically include .c and .h files in the current directory, meaning when you add new code files to your directory, you won't have to update the Makefile. However, if you want to change the name of the generated executable, libraries, or compiler flags, you can just modify the variables.
In either case, don't use autoconf, please. I'm begging you! :)
For example this simple Makefile should be sufficient:
CC=gcc
CFLAGS=-Wall
all: program
program: program.o
program.o: program.c program.h headers.h
clean:
rm -f program program.o
run: program
./program
Note there must be <tab> on the next line after clean and run, not spaces.
UPDATE Comments below applied
all: program
program.o: program.h headers.h
is enough. the rest is implicit
The simplest make file can be
all : test
test : test.o
gcc -o test test.o
test.o : test.c
gcc -c test.c
clean :
rm test *.o
Depending on the number of headers and your development habits, you may want to investigate gccmakedep. This program examines your current directory and adds to the end of the makefile the header dependencies for each .c/cpp file. This is overkill when you have 2 headers and one program file. However, if you have 5+ little test programs and you are editing one of 10 headers, you can then trust make to rebuild exactly those programs which were changed by your modifications.