I've got an application that goes into high CPU usage (slowly over time) when the ErrorProvider control sets the blinking icon continuously on several controls.
The high CPU usage is not immediate but have a slow ramp until the application hits 100% CPU.
When there is no error shown then CPU goes back to normal. Is it normal that the ErrorProvider takes so much CPU time?
This isn't normal. In all likelihood you are leaking memory or window handles. Start diagnosing this with Taskmgr.exe, Processes tab. View + Select Columns and tick Memory (Commit size), Handles, USER objects and GDI objects. Observe the values of these columns while your app runs.
Steadily increasing values indicates a problem in your code that can drive up the cpu usage. A pretty classic problem is leaking USER handles, induced by removing controls from your form with Controls.Remove() or Controls.Clear() and forgetting to dispose those controls.
According to this MS connect bug report: Graphical Resources Leak In ErrorProvider
When there is an error associated with a control, the ErrorProvider component displays a blinking icon on its right. I've discovered that every time the icon blinks, an new DeviceContext is added to the System.Drawing.Internal.DeviceContexts internal list. And when I call the Dispose() method on the ErrorProvider object, the DeviceContexts list is not cleared.
Consequence : by default, the icon blinks every 250 ms so 4 DeviceContext objects are added to the System.Drawing.Internal.DeviceContexts list per second. When an ErrorProvider is active and the BlinkStyle is AlwaysBlink, the list grows indefinitely ... and when this list is very big (I've seen it with 500000+ objects!) the application drawing operations are very very very slow :(
This bug is marked as fixed but the most recent comment says it is under investigation.
Related
I have a WPF application showing a large image (1024x1024) inside a ZoomableCanvas. On top of the image, I have some 400 ellipses. I'm handling touch events by setting IsManipulationEnabled="True" and handling the ManipulationDelta event. This works perfectly when zooming slowly. But as soon as I start zooming quickly, there is a sudden frame-rate drop resulting in a very jumpy zoom. I can hear the CPU fan speeding up when this occurs. Here are some screenshots from the WPF Performance Suite at the time when the frame-rate drops:
Perforator
Visual Profiler
Software renderer kicks in?
I'm not sure how to interpret these values, but I would guess that the graphics driver is overwhelmed by the amount of graphics to render, causing the CPU to take over some of the job. When zooming using touch, the scale changes by small fractions. Maye this has something to do with it?
So far, I have tried a number of optimization tricks, but none seem to work. The only thing that seems to work is to lower the number of ellipses to around 100. That gives acceptable performance.
Certainly this is a common problem for zoomable applications. What can I do to avoid this sudden frame-rate drop?
UPDATE
I discovered that e.DeltaManipulation.Scale.X is set to 3.0.. in the ManipulationDelta event. Usually, it is around 1.01... Why this sudden jump?
UPDATE 2
This problem is definitely linked to multi-touch. As soon as I use more than one finger, there is a huge performance hit. My guess is that the touch events flood the message queue. See this and this report at Microsoft Connect. It seems the sequence Touch event -> Update bound value -> Render yields this performance problem. Obviously, this is a common problem and a solution is nowhere to be found.
WPF gurus out there, can you please show how to write a high performance multi-touch WPF application!
Well I think you've just reached the limits of WPF. The problem with WPF is that it tesselates (on CPU) vertex grafics each time it is rendered. Probably to reduce video memory usage. So you can imagine what happens when you place 600 ellipses.
If the ellipses are not resized then you could try to use BitmapCache option. In this way ellipses will be randered just once in the begining and then will be stored as textures. This will increase memory usage but should be ok I think.
If your ellipses are resized then previous technic won't work as each ellips will be rerendered when resized and and it will be even slower as this will rewrite textures (HW IRTs in perforator).
Another possibility is to design special control that will use RenderTargetBitmap to render ellipses to bitmaps and then will render it through Image control. In this way you can control when to render ellipses you could even render them in parralel threads (don't forget about STA). For example you can update ellipse bitmaps only when user interaction ends.
You can read this article about WPF rendering. I don't agree with the author who compares WPF with iOS and Android (both use mainly bitmaps compared to WPF). But it gives a good explanation about how WPF performs rendering.
I currently work in a customer assignment related to performance problems in a WPF rich client LOB application.
The problem is that the application runs very slow/sluggish. Especially data table handling (scrolling, sorting, selection) is extremely slow and leaves the application unusable.
I analyzed the system state when a single tab containing a few textboxes, comboboxes and labels is opened and left idle (waiting for user input).
These are my findings:
All the rendering is calculated on the GPU
There are no performance heavy features such as animations, bitmap effects, transparency, etc.
When the tab is idle (only the cursor is blinking in the focused textbox, the rest of the tab is static and does not even contain any data) the GPU runs up to 90%
GPU drops to 0 whenever the tab loses focus
GPU percentage directly relates to the window size. A small window brings it down to a few percent, full screen makes it go up to almost 100%
WPF Perforator tells me that WPF calculates the dirty region for the entire tab instead of only the blinking cursor
WPF Perforator reports dirty rect update rates larger than 20/sec on the idle tab and they directly correlate to GPU usage
My conclusion:
During development a lot of custom code (layout, event handling, etc..) has been introduced in order to fit WPF to the backend-driven architecture of the system as a whole. My guess is that due to some of the custom code the dirty-rect-mechanism of WPF has been broken. This leads to too much drawing activity and thus very high GPU usage. These innecessary activities lead to the problems described above.
Now I am looking for any advice where I should start my investigation. Or in other words: What are typical mistakes that a developer can make in order to break the WPF dirty-rect update algorithm. Any input is highly appreciated.
Many thanks and best regards!
Manuel
Thanks for the input. Let me clarify backend-driven: The UI is highly dynamic. A message from the backend defines the structure of the ui and the data to be displayed. Therefore, we do not have any xaml for the structure of the tabs, only c#.
In the meantime, I could solve the problem. I used Snoop and collapsed every element one by one while monitoring GPU usage. I found out that there was a very tiny pixelshader effect (DropShadowEffect) on one of the borders. As soon as I removed the effect, the GPU dropped from 80% to 1%. WPF drew correct dirty rectangles over small portions of the UI. Problem solved, case closed.
Things that seem interesting to me:
1. The tremendous impact that this small effect has on the GPU usage.
2. That it breaks the dirty-rect calculation.
3. Since it was not a BitmapEffect but a PixelshaderEffect I could not reveal it by disabling BitmapEffects in Perforator.
Thanks!
MM
I have a few fairly simple animations (moving text around, moving ellipses etc.) and running in full screen (1920x1080 minus the task bar) the WPF Performance Suite reports a good framerate around 50 FPS throughout the animation. Dirty Rect Addition is somewhere around 300 rect/s, the SW frames are between 0 and 4 and the HW frames are between 3 and 5. Video memory usage is around 80 MB.
Problem is that the animations stutters every other half second. It is definitely not fluid :-(
My machine is a new Dell laptop XPS 15 with the GeForce GT 435 with 2GB memory. - The drivers are up to date. (The same behavior occurs on my netbook (in full screen) as well so I don't think it is hardware related.)
If I make the window smaller the stutter goes away.
The stutter occurs with the simplest of animations - even with just a couple of elements but adding more elements certainly makes it more noticeable.
How can I find out what causes this stutter?
When I think of it, I have not actually seen any WPF animations which run smoothly in full screen. Is this even possible?
Have you tried to set a lower "max frame rate" to the animation?
<Storyboard Timeline.DesiredFrameRate="10">
<!-- ....blah blah blah -->
</Storyboard>
If your animation is causing massive recalculation of child or parent elements, changing the DesiredFrameRate will have a cascading effect on the number of calculations made by the system.
Also, check out the "Remarks" section of this link. It explains why/when you should use it.
If setting a lower frame rate fixes your stuttering, then you need to consider simplifying your XAML to limit the amount of recalculation needed at every frame of your animation (limiting the number of child or parent objects resized - or affected in any way - by every frames/changes made by the animation.
You might want to also check out the "WPF Performance Suite". It is an awesome set of tools to determine what exactly is going on in your WPF app, seeing which parts of your window are being repainted and when, and the CPU usage of each of your XAML elements!
Hope this helps!
Patrick,
I have no answers. All I can do is provide some solidarity. I'm trying to animate an ItemsControl. The concept is pretty simple, really. I've got a ListView and in the ListView I have a GridView. I want the items in the GridView to to smoothly go from one row to another row as the underlying list is sorted so that, for example, a sorted list will stay sorted as the values in the list change.
I've noticed this: animation on moderately complex controls is a CPU hog. The stuttering I'm pretty sure is simply related to the CPU being maxed out (I noticed you didn't provide the CPU graph on your dump above). Keep the CPU around 50% and the animation appears smooth, above 75% and you get these stutters.
Still working on the problem, but I think it goes deeper than my code.
Don
I had a similar issue where it was stuttering, nothing really major it just looked like little stutters here and there while I ran the program. On a hunch, I shut down Google Chrome while it was running and that fixed it,the scrolling became completely smooth...
So my advice would be if you have any internet browsers open check to see if closing them out fixes the problem.
I have a WPF window that contains a fancy image with roughly 200 controls (derived from buttons), all of which use one of my 5 templates (paths, shadow effects, etc). Agreed, it is a heavy window to draw. I can live with that.
My problem comes from resizing the window. Maximize/Restore take about 1-2 seconds, but manually dragging the bottom-left corner causes the system to hang for about 5-10 seconds. In that delay, the window is black & contains partial leftovers until the final result is shown. It looks amateurish and that, I can't live with.
Remote connection : using a remote account, I found that the window resize always takes 1-2 seconds, but doesn't draw the "intermediate" stages while I'm dragging the window borders. The result is as snappy as I would expect.
My conclusion is this: It's the redraws during the resize that are bottlenecks.
The inevitable question is this : how can I prevent redrawing the window until the resize is finished?
Thanks in advance for any ideas...
#Seb: I'm beginning to think WPF is
not designed for interfaces that go
beyond 2-3 controls at a time
Visual Studio 2010 and Expression Blend should be good counterexamples. Though Visual Studio sometimes freezes the bottleneck is definitely not in the WPF rendering.
#Seb: The inevitable question is this : how
can I prevent redrawing the window
until the resize is finished?
Simply set the window's content visibility to Visibility.Collapsed before the resize/maximize and make it visible afterwards. Though I think you asked the wrong question. Here is the right one
How to make my controls measure/arrange extremely fast?
And to answer it you should take a look at your code. Maybe you intensively use dependency properties in the measuring/arrange algorithm? Or maybe you picked wrong panels (e.g. Grid is slower than Canvas)? Or maybe... I stop guessing here :).
By the way, it's always better to launch your app under profiler and prove the bottleneck rather than assuming the place where it might be. Check Eqatec Profiler it's free yet powerful enough. VS 2010 also offers nice profiling features, though it's far from being free. And you may want to check WPF Performance Suite.
Hope this helps.
Let me know how this works... I am assuming that your root visual item is stretching to horizontally and vertically to fill your window with auto height/width. Get rid of the Auto height/width. On app start up set the dimensions of the root element. There is a FrameworkElements have a size changed event. Register for this on your Application.Current.MainWindow (maybe be a typo, that was from memory). Whenever this event fires, start a timer with a small interval. If you get another resize while the timer is running, ignore it and reset the timer. Once the timer fires, you now know the new size the user desires and that they have (at least for a short period) stopped resizing the window.
Hope that helps!
From Ragepotato's answer and your comment about needing to see roughly what the interface would look like while resizing, as long as you don't have your objects dynamically re-locating themselves (like a Wrap Panel) - you could take a screenshot of the window contents and fill your frame with it.
Set it to stretch both height and width, and you'd get a (slightly fuzzy) idea of what a particular size would be. It wouldn't be live while resizing, but for those few seconds that probably wouldn't matter..
I've created a WPF control (inheriting from FrameworkElement) that displays a tiled graphic that can be panned. Each tile is 256x256 pixels at 24bpp. I've overridden OnRender. There, I load any new tiles (as BitmapFrame), then draw all visible tiles using drawingContext.DrawImage.
Now, whenever there are more than a handful new tiles per render cycle, the framerate drops from 60fps to zero for about a second. This is not caused by loading the images (which takes in the order of milliseconds), nor by DrawImage (which takes no time at all, as it merely fills some intermediate render data structure).
My guess is that the render thread itself chokes whenever it gets a large number (~20) of new BitmapSource instances (that is, ones it had not already cached). Either it spends a lot of time converting them to some internal DirectX-compatible format or it might be a caching issue. It cannot be running out of video RAM; Perforator shows peaks at below 60MB, I have 256MB. Also, Perforator says all render targets are hardware-accelerated, so that can't be it, either.
Any insights would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance
Daniel
#RandomEngy:
BitmapScalingMode.LowQuality reduced the problem a little, but did not get rid of it. I am already loading tiles at the intended resolution. And it can't be the graphics driver, which is up-to-date (Nvidia).
I'm a little surprised to learn that scaling takes that much time. The way I understood it, a bitmap (regardless of its size) is just loaded as a Direct3D texture and then hardware-scaled. As a matter of fact, once the bitmap has been rendered for the first time, I can change its rotation and scale without any further freezes.
It's not just with a large number of images. Just one large image is enough to hold up rendering until it has been loaded in, and that can be quite noticable when your image dimensions start getting up in the thousands.
I do agree with you that it's probably the render thread: I did a test and the UI thread was still happily dispatching messages while this render delay was taking place from trying to display a fully pre-cached BitmapImage.
It must be doing some sort of conversion or preparation on the image, like you were speculating. I've tried to mitigate this in my app by "rendering" but hiding the image, then revealing it when I need to show it. However this is less than ideal because the rendering freezes happen anyway.
(Edit)
Some followup: After a discussion on the MS WPF alias I found what was causing the delays. On my Server 2008 machine it was a combination of old video drivers that don't support the new WDDM driver model and a delay for resizing the image.
If the source image size is different from the display size, that will delay the render thread before the image shows up. By default an image is set to the highest quality, but you can change the scaling options for rendering by calling RenderOptions.SetBitmapScalingMode(uiImage, BitmapScalingMode.LowQuality); . Once I did that, the mysterious freeze before displaying an image went away. An alternative, if you don't like the quality drop in scaling, is to load the BitmapImage with DecodePixelWidth/Height equal to the size it will be displayed at. Then if you load the BitmapImage on a background thread, you should have no delay in displaying it.
Also try these;
/* ivis is declared in XAML <Image x:Name="iVis" UseLayoutRounding="True" SnapsToDevicePixels="True" /> */
iVis.Stretch = Stretch.None;
RenderOptions.SetBitmapScalingMode(iVis, BitmapScalingMode.NearestNeighbor);
RenderOptions.SetEdgeMode(iVis, EdgeMode.Aliased);
VisualBitmapScalingMode = BitmapScalingMode.NearestNeighbor;
iVis.Source = **** your bitmap source ****
I was having some trouble with performance when using a huge amount of "A" channel color's, waiting until after the image had rendered to scale it worked much better for me.
Also, as you said your using a tiled graphic?
You would usually use a TileBrush to simply set as the Brush on your FrameworkElement. If you are animating them or adding new ones dynamically, you could generate your brushes then apply them to your object as you go manually too, be sure to Freeze them if you can. Also, VisualBitmapScalingMode is a property of any Visual.