I have areally wierd problem when i'm using some simple custom control i've built:
this is the custom control code :
public partial class ToolButton : Button
{
public string ToolID
{
get { return (string)GetValue(ToolIDProperty); }
set { SetValue(ToolIDProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ToolIDProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ToolID", typeof(string), typeof(ToolButton), new UIPropertyMetadata(""));
public ToolButton()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Now when i'm trying to ude this custom control in the main window like that :
<ItemsControl Margin="100" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Students}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<customControls:ToolButton Height="100" Width="100" Margin="10" Content="{Binding Value.Name}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
And the binding doesn't work !!
but when i'm using simple button the binding works excellent..
is someone faced similliar problem ??
Thanks...
put the following line into your ToolButton's constructor:
this.DataContext = this;
Related
I'm trying to create a UserControl in my WPF project which I want should have a DependencyProperty that I can bind to in the parent. The project is written as MVVM and I'm using Caliburn micro.
I really want to write clean and maintainable code using MVVM, so I want my UserControls to utilize viewmodels as much as possible and code behind as little as possible.
The problem is that I'm unsuccessful in getting the binding between the parent and the UserControl viewmodel to work correctly.
MyUserControl:
public partial class MyUserControlView : UserControl
{
public MyUserControlView()
{
InitializeComponent();
// If no Datacontext is set, binding between parent property and textbox text works - one way only (set from parent)!.
// -
// If Datacontext is set to this, bindings with properties in MyUserControlView code behind works.
//DataContext = this;
// If Datacontext is set to MyUserControlViewModel, binding between MyUserControlViewModel and MyUserControlView works, but not with parent.
DataContext = new MyUserControlViewModel();
}
public string ProjectNumber
{
get { return (string)GetValue(MyUserControlValueProperty); }
set { SetValue(MyUserControlValueProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MyUserControlValueProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ProjectNumber", typeof(string), typeof(MyUserControlView), new PropertyMetadata(null, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnProjectNumberUpdate)));
private static void OnProjectNumberUpdate(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var view = d as MyUserControlView;
view.ProjectNumberText.Text = e.NewValue as string;
}
}
MyUserControl code behind:
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="In MyUserControl: " />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ProjectNumber}" />
</StackPanel>
<TextBox Name="ProjectNumberText" Text="{Binding ProjectNumber, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, Mode=TwoWay}" />
</StackPanel>
MyUserControl ViewModel:
public class MyUserControlViewModel : Screen
{
private string _projectNumber;
public string ProjectNumber
{
get { return _projectNumber; }
set
{
_projectNumber = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => ProjectNumber);
}
}
}
Parent view:
<StackPanel>
<local:MyUserControlView ProjectNumber="{Binding ParentProjectNumber}" />
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="In parent: "/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ParentProjectNumber}" />
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
Parent ViewModel:
public class ShellViewModel : Screen
{
public ShellViewModel()
{
ParentProjectNumber = "Hello from parent!";
}
private string _parentProjectNumber;
public string ParentProjectNumber
{
get { return _parentProjectNumber; }
set
{
_parentProjectNumber = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => ParentProjectNumber);
}
}
}
I know I'm probably way off here, but I have no idea what to do to get the bindings to work correctly.
Is there a better way to bind between a DependencyProperty and a viewmodel? Can I put the DP in the viewmodel somehow?
Here is the entire project solution: https://github.com/ottosson/DependencyPropertyTest
don't change UserControl.DataContext from inside UserControl. it can and will create issues later.
use proper name for DP (ProjectNumberProperty and corresponding ProjectNumber) and add BindsTwoWayByDefault to metadata:
public partial class MyUserControlView : UserControl
{
public MyUserControlView()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string ProjectNumber
{
get { return (string)GetValue(ProjectNumberProperty); }
set { SetValue(ProjectNumberProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ProjectNumberProperty = DependencyProperty.Register
(
"ProjectNumber",
typeof(string),
typeof(MyUserControlView),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault)
);
}
fix bindings in xaml:
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="In MyUserControl: " />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=ProjectNumber, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}}" />
</StackPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=ProjectNumber, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, Mode=TwoWay, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}}" />
</StackPanel>
that should do it.
btw, "clean and maintainable code using MVVM" and "want my UserControls to utilize viewmodels as much as possible" sort of contradict each other.
also nothing wrong with code-behind in UserControls as long as that code handles only view functionality. for example: DataGrid source code contains 8000+ LoC
I have this Custom Control
XAML:
<UserControl x:Class="WpfApplication1.UC"
...
x:Name="uc">
<StackPanel HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Top" Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBox Text="{Binding Test, ElementName=uc}" Width="50" HorizontalAlignment="Left"/>
</StackPanel>
</UserControl>
C#
public partial class UC : UserControl
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty TestProperty;
public string Test
{
get
{
return (string)GetValue(TestProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(TestProperty, value);
}
}
static UC()
{
TestProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Test",typeof(string),
typeof(UC), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata("", FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault));
}
public UC()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
And this is how i used that custom control:
<DockPanel>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Path=DataList}"
DockPanel.Dock="Left">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Button Content="{Binding}" CommandParameter="{Binding}" Click="Button_Click"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
<local:UC Test="{Binding SelectedString, Mode=OneWay}"/>
</DockPanel>
--
public partial class MainWindow : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected void OnPropertyChanged(string name)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
private ObservableCollection<string> _dataList;
public ObservableCollection<string> DataList
{
get { return _dataList; }
set
{
_dataList = value;
OnPropertyChanged("DataList");
}
}
private string _selectedString;
public string SelectedString
{
get { return _selectedString; }
set
{
_selectedString = value;
OnPropertyChanged("SelectedString");
}
}
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataList = new ObservableCollection<string>();
this.DataList.Add("1111");
this.DataList.Add("2222");
this.DataList.Add("3333");
this.DataList.Add("4444");
this.DataContext = this;
}
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
this.SelectedString = (sender as Button).CommandParameter.ToString();
}
}
If I do not change text of UC, everything is ok. When I click each button in the left panel, button's content is displayed on UC.
But when I change text of UC (ex: to 9999), Test property lost binding. When I click each button in the left panel, text of UC is the same that was changed (9999). In debug I see that SelectedString is changed by each button click but UC's text is not.
I can 'fix' this problem by using this <TextBox Text="{Binding Test, ElementName=uc, Mode=OneWay}" Width="50" HorizontalAlignment="Left"/> in the UC.
But I just want to understand the problem, can someone help me to explain it please.
Setting the value of the target of a OneWay binding clears the binding. The binding <TextBox Text="{Binding Test, ElementName=uc}" is two way, and when the text changes it updates the Test property as well. But the Test property is the Target of a OneWay binding, and that binding is cleared.
Your 'fix' works because as a OneWay binding, it never updates Test and the binding is never cleared. Depending on what you want, you could also change the UC binding to <local:UC Test="{Binding SelectedString, Mode=TwoWay}"/> Two Way bindings are not cleared when the source or target is updated through another method.
The issue is with below line
<local:UC Test="{Binding SelectedString, Mode=OneWay}"/>
The mode is set as oneway for SelectString binding so text will be updated when the value from code base changes. To change either the source property or the target property to automatically update the binding source as TwoWay.
<local:UC Test="{Binding SelectedString, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
I am binding a list of urls to a ListBox (MVVM) and found that if the model is a string[] everything works fine but if it's a List<Uri> then no items are displayed in my ListBox. I assume this is because WPF doesn't know how to convert a Uri into a string but
I'd figure it would just call ToString() which is what I want
I don't know how to tell WPF how to do the right thing
Here's my XAML:
<ListBox Height="200" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=UrlsFound, Mode=OneWay}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="String">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
Now as long as UrlsFound is a string[] the binding works, but if I refactor to make it a List<Uri> nothing is displayed in the ListBox. I changed the DataType="String" to "Uri" but that didn't help
There must be something else wrong as I've copied your XAML and it works.
Here's my code-behind:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
urlsFound.Add(new Uri("http://www.google.com"));
urlsFound.Add(new Uri("http://www.google.com"));
urlsFound.Add(new Uri("http://www.google.com"));
this.DataContext = this;
}
private List<Uri> urlsFound=new List<Uri>();
public List<Uri> UrlsFound
{
get { return urlsFound; }
set { urlsFound = value; }
}
}
I have implemented my own usercontrol based on listboxes. It has a dependency property with type of a collection. It works fine when I have only one instance of the usercontrol in a window, but if I have multiple instances I get problem that they share the collection dependency property. Below is a sample illustrating this.
My user control called SimpleList:
<UserControl x:Class="ItemsTest.SimpleList"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Name="_simpleList">
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Title, ElementName=_simpleList}" />
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Numbers, ElementName=_simpleList}">
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
</ListBox>
</StackPanel>
</UserControl>
Code behind:
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
namespace ItemsTest
{
public partial class SimpleList : UserControl
{
public SimpleList()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string Title
{
get { return (string)GetValue(TitleProperty); }
set { SetValue(TitleProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TitleProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Title", typeof(string), typeof(SimpleList), new UIPropertyMetadata(""));
public List<int> Numbers
{
get { return (List<int> )GetValue(NumbersProperty); }
set { SetValue(NumbersProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty NumbersProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Numbers ", typeof(List<int>), typeof(SimpleList), new UIPropertyMetadata(new List<int>()));
}
}
I use like this:
<StackPanel>
<ItemsTest:SimpleList Title="First">
<ItemsTest:SimpleList.Numbers>
<sys:Int32>1</sys:Int32>
<sys:Int32>2</sys:Int32>
<sys:Int32>3</sys:Int32>
</ItemsTest:SimpleList.Numbers>
</ItemsTest:SimpleList>
<ItemsTest:SimpleList Title="Second">
<ItemsTest:SimpleList.Numbers>
<sys:Int32>4</sys:Int32>
<sys:Int32>5</sys:Int32>
<sys:Int32>6</sys:Int32>
</ItemsTest:SimpleList.Numbers>
</ItemsTest:SimpleList>
</StackPanel>
I expect the following to show up in my window:
First
123
Second
456
But what I see is:
First
123456
Second
123456
How do I get multiple SimpleList not to share their Numbers Collection???
Found the answer, the constructor needs to initialize the property instead of letting the static property do itself:
public SimpleList()
{
SetValue(NumbersProperty, new List<int>());
InitializeComponent();
}
Collection-Type Dependency Properties
I am having trouble getting the following scenario to work (this code is not the actual code but the principals are the same. Basically I need to pass a value down from a MainPage down to a nested "reusable user control" that binds to it's own properties. I want to see the "This is it!" text on the screen but it's not being set in the SilverlightControl2 control (I suspect due to the setting of the DataContext) - but I how do I fix it?
MainPage.xaml
<Grid>
<ContentPresenter>
<ContentPresenter.Content>
<Local:SilverlightControl1 OneValue="This is it!"/>
</ContentPresenter.Content>
</ContentPresenter>
</Grid>
SilverlightControl1.xaml
<Grid>
<Local:SilverlightControl2 TwoValue="{Binding OneValue}"/>
</Grid>
SilverlightControl1.xaml.cs
public partial class SilverlightControl1 : UserControl
{
public string OneValue
{
get { return (string)GetValue(OneValueProperty); }
set { SetValue(OneValueProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty OneValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"OneValue", typeof(string), typeof(SilverlightControl1), new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
public SilverlightControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = this;
}
}
SilverlightControl2.xaml
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding TwoValue}" Foreground="Blue" />
</Grid>
SilverlightControl2.xaml.cs
public partial class SilverlightControl2 : UserControl
{
public string TwoValue
{
get { return (string)GetValue(TwoValueProperty); }
set { SetValue(TwoValueProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TwoValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"TwoValue", typeof(string), typeof(SilverlightControl2), new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
public SilverlightControl2()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = this;
}
}
As soon as you find yourself feeling the need to do this:-
this.DataContext = this;
know that you have probably got things wrong. Its probably the first thing I would expect to find on Silverlight specific "bad smell list".
In this case where you are specialising UserControl a better approach is to do this:-
SilverlightControl1.xaml
<Grid>
<Local:SilverlightControl2 x:Name="MyControl2" />
</Grid>
SilverlightControl1.xaml.cs (I'm just showing the constructor the rest is as you have it)
public SilverlightControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
MyControl2.SetBinding(SilverlightControl2.TwoValueProperty , new Binding("OneValue") { Source = this });
}
SilverlightControl2.xaml
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White">
<TextBlock x:Name="MyTextBox" Foreground="Blue" />
</Grid>
SilverlightControl1.xaml.cs (I'm just showing the constructor the rest is as you have it)
public SilverlightControl2()
{
InitializeComponent();
MyTextBox.SetBinding(TextBox.TextProperty , new Binding("TwoValue") { Source = this });
}
Since in UserControls you know the structure of the XAML and you can name the elements that you need access to in code, you can create the binding using a line of code instead.
This leaves the DataContext free to do what is designed for rather than be hi-jacked for a different purpose.
The alternative approach where instead of specialising UserControl you create a templated control, in this case the binding can be expressed in XAML using something like:-
<TextBox Text="{TemplateBinding TwoValue}" />
Template binding only works in ControlTemplate so you can't use it in a UserControl.