I’ve asked this question before without getting to the solution, but since I have done a lot more testing and debugging, and have new information, I figured I would ask again in hopes of getting to the bottom of this once and for all.
My domain service is timing out after 1 minute. I have read all the posts and seen how to create a partial class and explicitly set timeout values, and I have done exactly that, but I still get timed out after one minute. The caveat to this is that after explicitly setting the timeout in my partial class/method, I no longer receive the standard timeout error. Instead I get this:
{System.Net.WebException: The remote
server returned an error: NotFound.
---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error:
NotFound. at
System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.InternalEndGetResponse(IAsyncResult
asyncResult) at
System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.<>c_DisplayClass5.b_4(Object
sendState) at
System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.<>c_DisplayClass2.b_0(Object
sendState) --- End of inner exception
stack trace --- at
System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.BeginOnUI(SendOrPostCallback
beginMethod, Object state) at
System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult
asyncResult) at
System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelAsyncRequest.CompleteGetResponse(IAsyncResult
result)}
Here is my partial class that I set the timeout values in. I have debugged this and know for certain that these values are being set prior to making the call into the service. The service method I am working with is TestTimeout(). It does nothing but sit and wait until the above exception is thrown - exactly one minute after the call.
public partial class MyDomainContext
{
partial void OnCreated()
{
var proxy = (WebDomainClient<MyDomainContext.IMyDomainServiceContract>)this.DomainClient;
proxy.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
proxy.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.ReceiveTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
proxy.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.CloseTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
proxy.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.OpenTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
}
}
My test function on the server:
[Invoke]
public void TestTimeout()
{
while (true)
{
Thread.Sleep(100); // after one full minute, I get the above exception
}
}
Could something else be timing out? I see the same problem on my local development machine as well as my production server running IIS7. I’m baffled as to what this could be. I don’t think the timeout values are being ignored since I no longer get the standard timeout exception. I just think there is another place that a timeout is happening.
Any ideas?
-Scott
This is just a thought, have you tried making your asp.net session timeout explicit, may be its on one minute..
Try putting this in the constructor of your proxy:
InnerChannel.OperationTimeout = new TimeSpan(24, 0, 0);
Related
I am new to protractor & using Protractor-net. Getting an "Asynchronous script timeout: result not received in 0 seconds" exception when running Protractor-net scripts.
https://github.com/bbaia/protractor-net
Does this mean the parameter passing to identify angular element is wrong?
Found this solution to solve this -
https://github.com/angular/protractor/issues/117
How do I achieve the same in protractor-net?
You need to set async timeout to increase the timeout if you don't want it to be 0 and do it wherever the driver is instantiated.
It is particularly essential due to the nature of Angular's asynchronous behavior.
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
//driver = new PhantomJSDriver();
driver = new ChromeDriver();
//SetScriptTimeout is the asysn script timeout
driver.Manage().Timeouts().SetScriptTimeout(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
}
See this
I have a service hosted in a WPF application with an async method with the Begin/end methods, and when I catch an exception in the service, I want to throw a faultException to warn to the client.
However, when I try to throw the faultException, the host application crash, shutdown suddenly.
In my repository, I catch the UpdateException, then, I create a custom exception, UniqueKeyException, that is throw to the caller. The caller is an auxiliar method that is called in the Begin method.
This auxiliar method, catch the UniqyeKeyException and only do a "throw", that is capture in the try/catch block of my end method. Here there is something that I don't understand, why in the end mehod this exception is catched in the block of AgregateException instead of the UniqueKeyException.
Well, anyway, in the catch block of the end method, in the AgregateException block, I check if the innerException is UniqueKeyException, if it is true, I create an object UniqueKeyArgs (a custom class with the information to send to the client), create a FaultException and finally do the throw FaultException. It is in this step, the throw, where the host application crash.
I think that I have all configure correctly, because my custom class UniqueKeyArgs is decorate as Datacontract and its properties as DataMember, in the app.config of my host application I configure the behavior to include exception details and in the contract I decorate it with faultContract.
Why the application crash?
My code is the following:
REPOSITORY
public List<Usuers> updateUsers(List<Users> paramUsers)
{
....
catch(UpdateException ex)
{
SqlException innerEx = (SqlException)ex.InnerException;
//Code 2627 is Unique Key exception from SQL Server.
if (innerEx != null && innerEx.Number == 2627)
{
//I create the conditions of searching
ConditionsUsers conditions = new conditions();
conditions.UserName = (Users)ex.StateEntries[0].Entity).userName;
//Search for the existing user
Users myUser = getUser(conditions);
string message = "the user " + conditions.userName + " exists.";
throw new UniqueKeyException(message, myUser);
}
throw;
}
SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION
//This is my auxiliar method, called in the Begin method.
private submitUpdates()
{
....
catch(UniqueKeyException ex)
{
//The code enter here
throw;
}
}
public IAsyncResult BeginUpdateUsers(List<users> paramUsers, AsyncCallback callback, object state)
{
Task<List<Users>> myTask= Task<List<Users>>.Factory.StartNew(p => sumbmitUpdates(paramUsers), state);
return myTask.ContinueWith(res => callback(myTask));
}
public List<Users> EndUpdateusers(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
return ((Task<List<Users>>)result).Result;
}
//Why agregateException and not is catched in the UniqueKeyException ???
catch(AgregateException ex)
{
if (innerExceptions[0] is UsuariosValorUnicoException)
{
//I assign manually the data to debug, to discard other problems.
Users myUser = new Users();
myUser.UserName = "Jhon";
myUser.Password = "pass123";
UniqueKeyArgs myArgs = new UniqueUserArgs("unique key error", myUser);
FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs> myException = new FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs>(myArgs);
//Crash here, in the throw myException
throw myException;
}
}
throw;
}
MY CONTRACT
[FaultContract(typeof(UniqueKeyArgs))]
IAsyncResult BeginUpdateUsers(List<Users> paramUser, AsyncCallback callback, object state);
List<Users> EndUpdateUsers(IAsyncResult result);
Crash when I throw myException in the End method.
I see in this post that the solution is catch the exception in the host application too, not only in the service object. However, this solution uses Application.ThreadException, that belong to System.Windows.Forms namespace, and I am using a WPF application.
How could I send the exception to the client from a service hosted in a WPF application?
Thanks.
EDIT1: well, I am use a try/catch block in the line where I throw the exception and I see that the error is that I have not indicated a reason, so when I create my FaultException I do:
FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs> myException = new FaultException<UniqueKeyArgs>(myArgs, new FaultReason("DummyReason");
In this case, the exception message is "DummyReason", the message that I set in the FaultReason, so it says me nothing. The FaultException is not throw, and throw the generic exception to the client.
In this case the host application does not shutdown, but close the connection with the client and I have to reconnect.
It seems that the problem is the creaton of the FaultException, but I don't see the problem.
#Roeal suggests that perhaps is only possible to use faultException with synch methods, but in this link I can see an example in which is used with async methods. I have seen others examples, is not the unique.
Thanks.
EDIT2: I solve my problem. My problem is that in the FaultException, T is an object that have a property that was a self tracking entity, and this is a problem, if I am not wrong, I only can use basic types as properties of the exception.
Then, in the exception, I have implmemented ISerialize. It's needed to be able to send the information to the client, without this, the client receives an exception.Detail with null properties.
Did you also declare the synchronous operation in your service contract? In that case, maybe this helps:
If fault contracts are defined on the service operation contract, the FaultContract attribute should be applied only on the synchronous operations.
-- Juval Lowy, "Programming WCF Services 3rd Edition" (p456)
I solve my problem. My problem is that in the FaultException, T is an object that have a property that was a self tracking entity, and this is a problem, if I am not wrong, I only can use basic types as properties of the exception.
Then, in the exception, I have implmemented ISerialize. It's needed to be able to send the information to the client, without this, the client receives an exception.Detail with null properties.
I have a problem using "fire()" with a GWT RequestFactory after I've used it to unfreeze and edit a proxy.
If I have two request factory objects and their associated contexts like this:
private SyntheticRequest req1 = requestFactory.someRequest();
private Request<xProxy> sendRequest1 = req1.something();
private SyntheticRequest req2 = requestFactory.someRequest();
private Request<xProxy> sendRequest2 = req2.something();
using "fire()" on the first request works fine:
sendRequest1.fire(new Receiver<xProxy>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(xProxy response) {
...
if (somethingIsTrue){
xProxy x = req2.edit(response); //<-- **I think this causes a problem later, although the proxy "x" works as expected here.**
x.setSomething("something");
update();
}
});
that part runs ok because I get to the "onSuccess". But when this one runs "update()", which looks like this:
private void update(){
sendRequest2.fire(new Receiver<xProxy>(){
...onFailure...
...onSuccess...
});
}
sendRequest2 always fails, with the error
Server Error Index:0 Size:0
and I put a breakpoint in the code for the "something()" service and it never even gets to that code! There must be something about the "req2.edit()" that hurts req2 and sendRequest2, but what?
Thanks.
what is 'b'? the line xProxy x = req2.edit(b); is the first time it's mentioned? is it supposed to be xProxy x = req2.edit(response);
Anyway.. that is not the problem..
'Server Error' indicates that RequestFactory caught an exception during the processing of a request, server-side. Something (but maybe not something()) is throwing an IndexOutOfBounds exception.
If you have a look at RequestFactoryServlet.java (which you can replace with your own very easily btw) you can see it setting up a try catch block that catches all exceptions when processing a request. It passes them to 'DefaultExceptionHandler' which wraps them in a ServerFailure, and that gets returned to you GWT code as an onFailure() call.
An easy way to find where the exception is being thrown is set a breakpoint on IndexOutOfBoundsException, making sure to catch 'caught' exceptions as well as uncaught.
I am making a call from my Silverlight client into my DomainService that normally takes about 2 minutes. I need to extend the timeout value of the endpoint to 5 minutes to be safe, but it appears to ignore the setting and I can't find out why. Here is how I am creating my DomainContext in my client:
MyDomainContext context = new MyDomainContext();
((WebDomainClient<MyDomainContext.IMyDomainServiceContract>)context.DomainClient).ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.ReceiveTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
context.Search(_myParms, p =>
{
if (p.HasError)
{
// Handle errors
}
// Should take about 2 min. to get here, but times out before
}, null);
I have tried setting the ReveiveTimeout and SendTimeout both, but I always get the error at exactly 1 minute.
Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong?
EDIT: This is the exact error I am getting:
{System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: NotFound. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: NotFound.
at System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.InternalEndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.<>c_DisplayClass5.b_4(Object sendState)
at System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.<>c_DisplayClass2.b_0(Object sendState)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at System.Net.Browser.AsyncHelper.BeginOnUI(SendOrPostCallback beginMethod, Object state)
at System.Net.Browser.BrowserHttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelAsyncRequest.CompleteGetResponse(IAsyncResult result)}
I have also tested to make sure it's not something in my service. At present, I just have my service run a while loop. Again, I get this error at exactly one minute.
Thanks,
-Scott
You should implement partial method OnCreated() of MyDomainContex class.
Sample:
public partial class TestDomainContext
{
partial void OnCreated()
{
var proxy = (WebDomainClient<Test.Server.Services.TestDomainContext.ITestDomainServiceContract>)this.DomainClient;
proxy.ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 5, 0);
}
This problem is one of the pain points in Silverlight.
I prefer an extension method for something like this rather than creating delicate partial classes.
See the solution here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kylemc/archive/2010/11/03/how-to-change-the-request-timeout-for-wcf-ria-services.aspx
if your using prism you can inject as follows:
_unityContainer.RegisterType<SurveyModuleContext>(new InjectionFactory(c => CreateSurveyContext()));
private object CreateSurveyContext()
{
var context = new SurveyModuleContext();
context.ChangeWcfSendTimeout(new TimeSpan(0, 10, 0));
return context;
}
public static class DomainContextExtensions
{
public static void ChangeWcfSendTimeout(this DomainContext context,
TimeSpan sendTimeout)
{
PropertyInfo channelFactoryProperty =
context.DomainClient.GetType().GetProperty("ChannelFactory");
if (channelFactoryProperty == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
"There is no 'ChannelFactory' property on the DomainClient.");
}
ChannelFactory factory = (ChannelFactory)channelFactoryProperty.GetValue(context.DomainClient, null);
factory.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = sendTimeout;
}
}
You can see in this screenshot that the solution does indeed work. (2m 1s) call
Could it be a request timeout on the server side web application that hosts the domain service? Check the settings of the web application where the service runs or the application pool.
I have a Silverlight 4 usercontrol that calls a very long running WCF RIA service. As shown below, I am increasing the default timeout period.
_domainContext = new WindowsDashboardDomainContext();
// Increase timeout -- this can be a very long running query
((WebDomainClient<WindowsDashboardDomainContext.IWindowsDashboardDomainServiceContract>)
_domainContext.DomainClient).ChannelFactory.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(99, 0, 0);
_domainContext.GetSections( "All", "All", "All" ).Completed += GetAllSectionsCompleted;
Unfortunately, it seems to ignore this timeout and still throws the timeout exception:
Error: Unhandled Error in Silverlight Application Load operation failed for query 'GetClicks'. An error occurred while executing the command definition. See the inner exception for details. Inner exception message: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. at System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition.ExecuteStoreCommands(EntityCommand entityCommand, CommandBehavior behavior)
Why is this happening?
I answered the same question here: WCF ria service SP1 timeout expired
The answer:
I'll explain my context and I wish it will work for my. I'm sure about that.
First of all to call RIA services, and using some domain context, in my example:
EmployeeDomainContext context = new EmployeeDomainContext();
InvokeOperation<bool> invokeOperation = context.GenerateTMEAccessByEmployee(1, 'Bob');
invokeOperation.Completed += (s, x) =>
{....};
Nothing new until here. And with this I was facing every time that same timeout exception after 1 minute. I spend quite a lot of time trying to face how to change the timeout definition, I tried all possible changes in Web.config and nothing. The solution was:
Create a CustomEmployeeDomainContext, that is a partial class localizated in the same path of the generated code and this class use the hook method OnCreate to change the behavior of created domain context. In this class you should wrote:
public partial class EmployeeDomainContext : DomainContext
{
partial void OnCreated()
{
PropertyInfo channelFactoryProperty = this.DomainClient.GetType().GetProperty("ChannelFactory");
if (channelFactoryProperty == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
"There is no 'ChannelFactory' property on the DomainClient.");
}
ChannelFactory factory = (ChannelFactory)channelFactoryProperty.GetValue(this.DomainClient, null);
factory.Endpoint.Binding.SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 10, 0);
}
}
I looking forward for you feedback.
There are two possibilities that come to mind:
You have not configured your DomainService to serilalize enough objects. The default is very small. Try this tip I put in yesterday to increase the resultset allocation
Your data source may be timing out. In that case you need to increase the command timeout for LINQ to SQL, EF, or ADO.NET accordingly. This is the less likely cause, but one to consider.