we are currently building our first large application with Silverlight 4 (using PRISM) and Entity Framework 4. Now I'm having a general question about persisting view model data.
Suppose I have domain objects which translate to EF4 entities with multiple associations (Entity having collections, having collections again etc..). What would be the best way to persist those graphs during / after user actions? Would it be better to write more granular repository methods like "AddEntityToParent" and "RemoveEntityFromParent" or just take all the data from the view and push it to a "SaveLargeParentEntity" Method?
Can I "cache" the view model items for child objects in Silverlight and push it all down to EF4 later or would I have to make a granular update for every single item changed in the user interface? Any good advise? I hope my question was clear enough. Thank you.
You are actually making a choice between basic CRUD operations and working with object graphs. I would choose second approach because CRUD operations over web service can be very chatty.
When working with object graphs send over web service you have to deal with detached behavior. Detached entities + object graph couses some troubles when updating relations. The best approach usually is to load the whole graph before update (get attached entities) and merge received graph into attached one - it will correctly track changes for you.
But because you are using Silverlight which is stateful you can also think about using Self tracking entities (STE). STEs are able to track changes after they are detached from EF ObjectContext. So you can return object graph consisted of STEs from web service to Silverlight application, make some changes to STEs and send same object graph back to web service. Applying changes from STEs will handle a lot of work for you. Be aware that STEs are not the best solution for services which should be exposed to general web applications or non .NET clients.
Related
I am new to ADF and come from a .Net background. My goal is to move towards a DDD for my application so that the code is encapsulated and represents my business processes. That plan pushes me towards using CQRS to separate my Domain Models/Commands with the VOs used for query and display(possibly using ESS or SOA Components to push events to separate Data stores, but initially using a single DB).
I could not find any information on implementations of this in ADF, pros and cons, etc.
I would like to know:
Does what I am attempting makes sense in a ADF world? Why/Why not?
What challenges that may arise when using ADF in this case.
Offhand? I think you are over-engineering this. I would start with what ADF Architecture problems are you trying to solve with CQRS?
ADF has 4 "stacks" - ADF BC is the Data stack - EO/VOs based on tables/views and you can create VOs's based on web services if you need to integrate with SOA services ADF Faces is the server-generated UI Layer. ADF Controller handles page to page navigation. ADF Model is a data abstraction layer that sits between ADF BC and ADF Faces and allows for data movement and manipulation in the data layer by the view layer w/o direct connection - keeping the layers/tiers separate.
To manipulate a VO you either manipulate a Model Binding Iterator - which references the VO row set iterator and/or expose custom Java behaviors directly on the VO (not my chosen design) or on the Application Module (my choice) which can then be exposed to the UI via button/link or direct execution, while maintaining the separation of UI and Model and Data layer.
All this code is generated and maintained for you by JDeveloper wizards and tooling and editors. So only custom code need be added.
So, ADF implements a form of Model-View-Controller design pattern.
I do not see what problem ADF presents that you want to solve by adding yet another layer of abstraction in CQRS.
.
Background
I need to build a Rich-Client application using .NET. The app needs to handle TreeViewControls and TableViewControls with about 100000 entities. GUI is build with WPF, very likely using Telerik Controls. My question is about the general architecture of the data-layer. I've got some coarse ideas of the concepts, but would highly appreciate your comments / thoughts and hints into which technology I should dig deeper. Here're my thoughts:
Conceptual Layers
Presentation Layer
just the WPF Controls, I'd need performant synchronizing of different controls on property changes, but I don't anticipate major problems here.
Business Layer
creating views (object selections to be displayed in the controls), CRUD operations (modifications done directly with the POCOs), searching (global search, but also limited to a view)
Repository
holds POCOs in an enitity map, decides weather to load from persistence store
Persistence-Manager
I'm thinking of using a LocalDB or simple Key-Value Store as (persistent) Client-Cache. So, the Persistence-Manager would try to get an object from the local store. Otherwise get the data from the server. Also, persisting data to the Client-Cache. The data would be available via a webservice. I'm happy to give WCF Data Services a try.
Persistence-Layers
There would be two parts:
- Local DB connection using an ORM like EF or OpenAccess; or a simple key-value store
- HTTP connection to consume the Web-Service
Questions
In a layering like this, how about lazy loading referenced objects? I know EF and other ORMs take care of a lot of the issues I have here, too. But I don't see yet how to plug these frameworks into the above layering. Also, where to track changes? Where to secure consistency when deleting objects? (e.g. deleting references to these objects as well)
I would eager load whole views (hierarchical structures) and perform Linq to objects to those collections of POCOs. Maybe implement a simple inverted index if Linq performance would become a matter. But how should I best implement global searches on the server? Are there libraries ("Linq to OData") available?
What do you think about a fully "diconnected" scenario? Holding all data a user needs in a local database. Sync on start / stop and user triggered. I could use an ORM directly on the local DB, with good chances to save a lot of headaches trying to implement a lot of consistency features by hand (using the above layering).
Or in contrast, forget about the local database and batch eager load most of the needed data. Here I'm concerned about the performance of the webservices (without having experience with OData, WCF). I've build an app using Redis and Python that loads about 200000 business objects quite fast (< 1 min) to the client (the objects are already serialized cached in Redis).
I'll certainly do some prototyping and benchmarking, but to get a good start, any thoughts and recommendations are highly appreciate.
Cheers,
Jan
I want to use Entity Framework(with Self Track Entities) in my winform application; but i could not find any example of STE(Self Track Entities) with winform. Can someone tell if it's not recommended to use with winform?
As far as I know the use of STE is to track the changes being made and it requires little code for doing insert/update/delete. So, would it be a good idea to use it with that thought in mind?
The main purpose of STEs is that they can track changes when they are detached. They are mostly recommended in scenarios where your entity must cross physical boundary (like web services) so it needs to track changes when deserialized in another process and transport these tracked information back to original process.
Is it your scenario? If you don't have any process boundary between loading the entity and showing it in WinForm you don't need STEs. WinForm application is connected stateful scenario so you can use common attached entities and life context will track all changes for you (and it will do it much better than STEs).
I'm still pretty new to Silverlight, quite new to WCF, and am trying to broaden my horizons into both. I'd like to learn what is considered to be good practices while doing so.
On the client side, I have a Silverlight application. On the server side, I have a database that the Silverlight application will be utilizing. In between the two (okay, it's server-side, but...), I have a WCF service that the client calls upon to get the data from the database.
I have created a class that is marked as a DataContract and is used by the WCF service. That class is an object model populated with data from the database. On the client side, when it requests and receives an instance of this class, it uses the instance data to instantiate and populate a client-defined object that has additional client-defined members.
It's my use of the DataContract that most worries me. To create an instance of an object to be serialized and sent, only to be pillaged for its data so another object can be created seems...inefficient. But if it's considered a good practice I can get past that.
I did consider going the route of a web handler (.ashx) and using a proprietary binary standard to communicate the data, but I think going the WCF route may be more applicable and usable in the future (thinking: job).
I don't see any particular problem with your approach.
In my mind what you're describing is the transfer of data from service to client as a DTO (data-transfer object), and then using that DTO to populate a view model object. It is also quite common for the DTO and view model objects to use varying levels of granularity in terms of the data they represent (typically DTOs will be more coarse grained), and the view model will contain behaviour that is specific to the UI.
You might want to look at tools and frameworks that help in the mapping between DTOs and view model objects. One of my favourites is AutoMapper.
I have some trouble getting my head around how to implement more complex operations in a Domain Service in RIA Services. This is all Silverlight 4, VS 2010 and .Net Framework 4 in Beta 2.
Goal
I wish I could create an operation on my LinqToEntitiesDomainService that would have a signature something like this:
public UnwieldyOperationResult PerformUnwieldyOperation( UnwieldyOperationParameters p );
The idea is that this operation takes a colleciton of parameters and performs rather complex operations which would update different instances and types of the entities that are otherwise manipulated through the DomainService CRUD functionality.
Problem
The immediate problem i hit is that does not seem to be allowed to pass the custom type as parameter to the method, and I suppose something along those lines go for the return value. I want to encapsulate the operation parameters in a DTO for clarity, and this unwieldy operation does not have any corresponding entity in the legacy database that I have wrapped with Entity Framework 4.0 model, which I am in turn basing the Domain Service on.
Is a domain service supposed to deal with only the types that are entities in the underlying EF model? Is it not designed to expose more complex operations like my UnwieldyOperation?
If so, can I build another service somehow that allows both the operation signature and to manipulate the entity framework?
I have understood that only one Domain Service can handle an entity from the model. This has led me to cram all the CRUD and now also the UnwieldyOperation into one Domain Service, although my first idea was to split the service into smaller parts.
If I'd get the operation to work with parameters and return value in the Domain Service, my next wish would be to have the entities that are already loaded in the domain context at the client refresh themselves.
Is there any efficient mechanism for such a thing?
How would you go about to do that?
What I have so far...
In short, this is what I have so far:
I have wrapped an existing legacy database
with an Entity Framework 4.0 model with as
little extra padding/code as
possible. This means right-click, add and generate from database.
I have implemented the simpler CRUD operations in the DomainService and I am using them successfully to display and edit straight forward data. I have some encapsulation of logic through ViewModels in client but I expose the Entity classes directly, but I think this is unrelated to my problem/question.
I have realized that I can't add the UnwieldyOperation in an as straight forward manner as I initially thought... Also I suspect/hope that I have misunderstood some aspects of the Domain Service mechanism, which has led me to the current situation.
One way to go?
Writing this down in a question like this gives me the idea that perhaps I'd go in this direction:
LegacyModelService expose the CRUD operations as I have already done.
Expose the Unwieldy operations in another service. Should I make that a RIA Doamin Service or just plain WCF?
Access the Entity Framework model from the new UnwieldyOperationsService and manipulate the data layer there.
Explicitly reload or refresh the client domain context for the LegacyModelService at the client to reflect the changes that may have resultet from the UnwieldyOperation. What would be a good way get this done?
Check out http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee707373%28VS.91%29.aspx for naming conventions over and above simple CRUD, maybe Invoke or Named Update operations would be suitable?