I'm thinking out different ways to have a WPF ComboBox show blank as if nothing is selected when IsEnabled is set to false. Like always I'm trying to do this without having to redefine the whole control template for the ComboBox which is always a struggle I have with WPF. If anybody has any solutions more elegant than redefining the whole ComboBox control template please let me know.
The reason for what I'm trying to do is I have a CheckBox that represents an "All" option and when checked it disables the ComboBox which is used to pick only a single individual item. If my CheckBox is checked it is sometimes confusing to the users to see a value remaining in the ComboBox since that value has no meaning in that state of the UI.
Another requirement is that the solution cannot modify the SelectedValue, SelectedIndex, or SelectedItem values of the ComboBox since I would like to retain the previuosly selected item in the case that the users unchecks the "All" CheckBox.
Solution based on HCL's answer:
<ComboBox IsEnabled="{Binding ElementName=myCheckBox, Path=IsChecked}"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=MyItems}"
SelectedValue="{Binding Path=MySelectedItem}">
<ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ContentControl x:Name="content" Content="{Binding MyItemDescription}" />
<DataTemplate.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType=ComboBox}, Path=IsEnabled}"
Value="False">
<Setter TargetName="content"
Property="Visibility"
Value="Hidden" />
</DataTrigger>
</DataTemplate.Triggers>
</DataTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
</ComboBox>
You can do something with triggers:
Try setting the ItemTemplate to an empty DataTemplate when the box is disabled. This will affect the rendering of the selected item and therefore hide it.
Another simple but not very nice solution would be to set the foreground color to the same as a background color.
I believe you can do this with a Style, rather than redefining the control template. Use a Trigger on the IsEnabled property to set the text shown in the ComboBox. Altering the SelectedItem would be my first approach, but since you don't want to do that, you may find success setting the DisplayMemberPath. Something like this (untested)...
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ComboBox}">
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsEnabled" Value="False">
<Trigger.Setters>
<Setter Property="DisplayMemberPath" Value="{x:Null}"/>
</Trigger.Setters>
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
Here's a style that does what you want. It employs a technique that I use all the time: a grid that contains multiple versions of the control, and data triggers that ensure that only one version is visible at any one time.
<ComboBox.Style>
<Style TargetType="ComboBox">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="ComboBox">
<DockPanel>
<CheckBox x:Name="IsActive" DockPanel.Dock="Left"/>
<Grid>
<ComboBox
ItemsSource="{TemplateBinding ItemsSource}"
SelectedItem="{TemplateBinding SelectedItem}"
SelectedIndex="{TemplateBinding SelectedIndex}"
SelectedValue="{TemplateBinding SelectedValue}">
<ComboBox.Style>
<Style TargetType="ComboBox">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Visible"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding ElementName=IsActive, Path=IsChecked}" Value="False">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Collapsed"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ComboBox.Style>
</ComboBox>
<ComboBox>
<ComboBox.Style>
<Style TargetType="ComboBox">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Collapsed"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding ElementName=IsActive, Path=IsChecked}" Value="False">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Visible"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ComboBox.Style>
</ComboBox>
</Grid>
</DockPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</ComboBox.Style>
This preserves the selected item, selected index, and selected value, just as you want. In fact, it does this a little too well; there's not actually a way of telling that the user deactivated the combo box, since there's no property on ComboBox that exposes this information. I'd probably actually implement this as a custom control derived from ComboBox that exposed the value of the check box as an IsActive property. There are lots of other ways to do it.
Related
I am working on WPF MVVM project and I have a ObservableCollection with class that contains a boolean property and a string property. That Observablecollection is bound xceedwpfgrid. I am trying to add a datatrigger that checks the boolean and based on that property shows or hides the row. I tried a few things but im not able to hit the datatrigger on the xceedgrid can someone help me.
<TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid ItemsSource="{Binding Path=.DataList}"
AutoCreateColumns="False"
IsTabStop="False"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=.SelectedItem}"
ContextMenuBuilder="{Binding Path=.ContextMenuBuilder}">
<TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid.Resources>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type DataGridRow}" >
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=.DataList.IsOnExclusionList}" Value="true">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Visible"/>
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=.DataList.IsOnExclusionList}" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Collapsed"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid.Resources>
<TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid.Columns>
<xcdg:Column FieldName="IsOnExclusionList" Title="IsOnExclusionList" Width="30" CellContentTemplate="{StaticResource cellCashDeliveringTemplate}" CellEditorDisplayConditions="None"/>
<xcdg:Column FieldName="Name" Title="Name" Width="30" CellContentTemplate="{StaticResource cellCashDeliveringTemplate}" CellEditorDisplayConditions="None"/>
</TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid.Columns>
</TreeGrid:XceedColumnBindingGrid>
I am hoping that the datatrigger will show and hide the row depnding on the boolean variable
I am trying to switch the content of a contentpresenter based on a datatrigger.I want to display a usercontrol in the contentpresenter.content, if i have a value set or else i need to display an error message.But the binding on my datatrigger fails stating that the property is not found.I cant get the datacontext to inherit for the datatrigger checking.I can make it work by using the commented out code.But i am confused why it doesn't work the normal way.
<ContentPresenter.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentPresenter}">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{Binding UC}"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<!--<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding DataContext.HasValue,RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ContentPresenter}}}" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="No preview"/>
</DataTrigger>-->
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding HasValue}" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="No value"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentPresenter.Style>
</ContentPresenter>
If you want to use triggers to display UserControl, you should use ContentControl not ContentPresenter.
I prefer to use ContentPresenter for CustomControls and When I am using the UserControl for views of Custom Data Types in my system and Allow to give dynamic behavior.
Example: To switch templates for ContentPresenter you need to set ContentTemplateSelector like this
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding MyContent}"
ContentTemplate="{Binding MyContentTemplate}"
ContentTemplateSelector="{Binding MyContentTemplateSelector}"/>
MyContent, MyContentTemplate & MyContentTemplateSelector are Dependency Properties and can be binded wherever you are using its instance.
READ :
Usage of ContentPresenter
What is the difference between ContentControl and ContentPresenter
The binding mentioned in the question won't work as
ContentPresenter’s DataContext is automatically set to the value of
its Content property, while ContentControl’s DataContext is not.
Bindings are resolved relatively to the value of the DataContext property. If you declare a binding on the ContentPresenter, the moment its content is set, the binding would be re-evaluated.
ContentControl.Content Property can be changed on any trigger based on your requirement. If you want to use it to change on PropertyChanged Event of a property of ViewModel, DataTrigger can be used by binding it with a DataTemplate with UserControl instance in it or using static resource of that UserControl.
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentControl}">
<Setter Value="{StaticResource UnSelectedDataTemplate}" Property="ContentTemplate" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=IsSelected}" Value="True">
<Setter Value="{StaticResource SelectedDataTemplate}" Property="ContentTemplate" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentContro.Style>
</ContentControl>
READ How to use triggers for content template, more details here
Difference in DataTemplate and StaticResource scope is DataTemplate creates a new instance of the template every time its applied.
Whereas, StaticResource is using the same instance of UserControl again (Static Instance).
You can also use EventTriggers to change content base don Control Events like MouseOver etc.
Alternate approach
Very similar to the above with slight difference. Defining as a data template in resources. Triggering for the content change is essentially identical.
...in <x.Resources /> tag:
<DataTemplate x:Key="DesignerTemplate" DataType="{x:Type vm:SolutionViewModel}">
<vw:SolutionDesignerView />
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:SolutionViewModel}">
<ContentControl Content="{Binding }">
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentControl}">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsLoaded}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource DesignerTemplate}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentControl.Style>
</ContentControl>
</DataTemplate>
...then:
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Solution}" />
I usually use trigger Like this...
<UserControl>
<UserControl.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="normalTemplate" >
<!-Fav UserControl->
</DataTemplate >
<DataTemplate x:Key="overWriteTempalte">
<!-Fav UserControl-> </DataTemplate>
</UserControl.Resources>
<ContentPresenter x:Name="ContentField"
Content="{Binding}"
ContentTemplate="{StaticResource ResourceKey=normalTemplate}" />
<UserControl.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=MyProperty}" Value="True">
<Setter TargetName="ContentField" Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource ResourceKey=overWriteTempalte}" />
</DataTrigger>
</UserControl.Triggers>
</UserControl>
If Bindings are a problem Use Snoop to Detect binding errors
I'm looking to a way to bind a Button Text or IsEnabled property for example to the IsChecked property in an ItemsControl
Here is my simplified source code :
<StackPanel>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Tasks}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Margin="10,0,10,0" Text="{Binding Name}"/>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding InProgress}"/>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding Done}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
<Button/>
</StackPanel>
I would like (for example) if all the "Done" CheckBoxes are Checked, to set Button Text to some value or to enable it. I thought doing this with Data Binding in Xaml using DataTriggers but I don't know how to do it.
Ca anyone give me a full xaml solution ?
New Answer
Sorry, I misunderstood the question. I would expose another property from your DataContext that simply returns true/false if all the items in the collection are checked or not, and base your Button's Text/IsEnabled off that property using a DataTrigger
<Style TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsAllChecked}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
Old Answer
DataTriggers simply take a binding, and check if the result is equal to some value.
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Done}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
If you need to test more than one condition, you need a MultiDataTrigger
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<MultiDataTrigger>
<MultiDataTrigger.Conditions>
<Condition Binding="{Binding Path=InProgress}" Value="True" />
<Condition Binding="{Binding Path=Done}" Value="True" />
</MultiDataTrigger.Conditions>
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</MultiDataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
Note that the default value of setter is part of the style. This is important because if you set the default value on the <TextBox> then it has a higher priority than triggered values, so triggered values are unable to change the current value.
You can change this line...
<Button/>
To this
<Button Content={Binding ButtonContent}/>
And set the 'ButtonContent' property in your ViewModel whenever your 'Done' check box gets checked.
Usually, the best way to do that is to synthesize the state you want to apply to your button into a property of your ViewModel.
The WPFy way in that case is for your ViewModel to expose a command that implements the action of your button.
The command in turns can react to changes in your data to signal if it is available or not, and thus will automaticaally disable/enable your button. An added bonus is that you can easily implement a menu for example, that will be properly enabled/disabled at no cost once you have your command.
It's been a long time since I had any chance to touch WPF, so I do not have any really useful links at hand, but if I were you I would learn about commands in WPF, they are a very important part of the MVVM architecture.
In a WPF application, I have correctly bound a DataTemplate to an XML node that looks like:
<answer answer="Tree", correct="false" score="10" />
In my application, I have a TextBlock with the answer in it. At first, I want it invisible, but when the correct attribute in the XML file changes to "true", it must become visible.
My DataTemplate is hooked up correctly, because everything else works. For example, if I change the answer attribute in the XML file (just for testing), it changes in my WPF view. But I'm having troubles with the visibility. This is my XAML:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding XPath=#answer}" Visibility="Hidden">
<TextBlock.Style>
<Style>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding XPath=#correct}" Value="true">
<Setter Property="TextBlock.Visibility" Value="Visible" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</TextBlock.Style>
</TextBlock>
I'm guessing the Databinding in the DataTrigger isn't working correctly. Anyone have a clue?
I have run into the same problem with databound ToggleButtons. Try removing the Visibility="False" and replacing it with another DataTrigger that handles the incorrect case.
I think the issue is that the Visibility property is hard-coded. Try setting the Visibility in the style:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding XPath=#answer}">
<TextBlock.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBlock}">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Hidden"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding XPath=#correct}" Value="true">
<Setter Property="TextBlock.Visibility" Value="Visible" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</TextBlock.Style>
</TextBlock>
Sure, it works if you give a specific else case instead of just false. As in my case, it was {x:Null} and value. So when its value to bind is present, it will be true and TextBlock.Visibilty will be set using setters value and when binding path does not have any value inside it, i.e. null in my case, its simply {x:Null} :)
Let's say that I have a simple layout such as this:
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Title}" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=ShortDescription}" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=LongDescription}" />
</StackPanel>
Now when I have ShortDescription set to null or empty string there's still a gap in place of second TextBlock. Is there some property to prevent an empty textblock from occupying space? Or should I use some other control?
Thanks.
You want to set the visibility of the textbox to "Collapsed".
Visibility can be either:
Visible - Self explanatory
Hidden - Invisible but still takes up space
Collapsed - Invisible and takes up no space
Edit: You should probably set up a trigger, like so:
<Trigger Property="Text" Value="{x:Null}">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Collapsed"/>
</Trigger>
You may want to try this:
<TextBlock.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBlock}">
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="Text" Value="">
<Setter Property="Visibility" Value="Collapsed"/>
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</TextBlock.Style>
This should fix the empty space issue based on a Null / Empty Binding.