Failure to create elevation COM object on Windows Seven - c

I am developing a COM surrogate object in C, it will be used by my applications to call the UAC elevation dialog for certain actions that require administrative rights.
The plan is to make this it export a function that takes a pointer to a function with a variable number of arguments and executes it in a different context. This way, an application can use this object to perform some actions with admin rights, all they need to do is use that object and pass it a pointer to the function that has to be executed with said rights.
This works partially, calling CoCreateInstance goes fine, the function pointer is passed and my function is executed.
However, when I create an instance of this object using the COM Elevation Moniker archive, and Microsoft's sample code for CoCreateInstanceAsAdmin, problems occur.
Here is the code:
HRESULT CoCreateInstanceAsAdmin(HWND hwnd, REFCLSID rclsid, REFIID riid, __out void ** ppv)
{
// Manual implementation of CreateInstanceAsAdmin
CComPtr<IBindCtx> BindCtx;
HRESULT hr = CreateBindCtx(0,&BindCtx);
BIND_OPTS3 bo;
memset(&bo, 0, sizeof(bo));
bo.cbStruct = sizeof(bo);
bo.grfMode = STGM_READWRITE;
bo.hwnd = hwnd;
bo.dwClassContext = CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER;
hr = BindCtx->SetBindOptions(&bo);
if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
{
// Use the passed in CLSID to help create the COM elevation moniker string
CComPtr<IMoniker> Moniker;
WCHAR wszCLSID[50];
WCHAR wszMonikerName[300];
StringFromGUID2(rclsid,wszCLSID,sizeof(wszCLSID) / sizeof(wszCLSID[0]));
//Elevation:Administrator!new
hr = StringCchPrintfW(wszMonikerName, sizeof(wszMonikerName)/sizeof(wszMonikerName[0]), L"Elevation:Administrator!new:%s", wszCLSID);
if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
{
// Create the COM elevation moniker
ULONG ulEaten = 0;
ULONG ulLen = (ULONG)wcslen(wszMonikerName);
LPBC pBindCtx = BindCtx.p;
hr = MkParseDisplayName(pBindCtx,wszMonikerName,&ulEaten,&Moniker);
if (SUCCEEDED(hr) && ulEaten == ulLen)
{
// Use passed in reference to IID to bind to the object
IDispatch * pv = NULL;
hr = Moniker->BindToObject(pBindCtx,NULL,riid,ppv);
}
}
}
return hr;
}
Calling CoCreateInstanceAsAdmin fails with "Class not registered".
The object is registered by creating the following registry keys (here's the body of the REG file)
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\COMsurrogate]
#="COMsurrogate Class"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\COMsurrogate\CurVer]
#="COMsurrogate.1"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\COMsurrogate\CLSID]
#="{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}]
#="COMsurrogate Class"
"LocalizedString"="#C:\\Windows\\system32\\COMsurrogate.dll,-101"
"DllSurrogate"=""
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}\ProgID]
#="COMsurrogate.1"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}\VersionIndependentProgID]
#="COMsurrogate"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}\InprocServer32]
#="#C:\\windows\system32\COMsurrogate.dll"
"ThreadingModel"="Apartment"
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}\NotInsertable]
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{686B6F70-06AE-4dfd-8C26-4564684D9F9F}\Programmable]
I suppose that some registry entries are missing - that's the conclusion I reach when reading the error message. However, this list of registry keys was compiled after exploring the documentation on MSDN and other sites - so I am pretty certain that nothing was missed.
Among the things I've tried to solve this is to implement it via ATL (such that registration is automated). That works, but the problem is that I can't pass a funtion pointer to the MIDL generated function prototype.
I tried to pass it using the VARIANT type:
v.vt = VT_PTR;
void (*myptr)(void);
myptr = &DoTheStuff;
v.byref = myptr;
hr = theElevated->CoTaskExecuter(0, v);
as result I get "Invalid argument type".
Could someone shed some light on the subject? Perhaps what I am trying to achieve is not possible by design?

I believe the issues you are having is by design and that the intent of window's security improvements were to help avoid potential security risks.

Microsoft doesn't really want you to elevate your privileges if it can stop you from doing so. Executing arbitrary functions as a privileged user shouldn't be easy in any way if Windows is even a decently secured system. You might could try impersonating a different user using tokens and getting better access that way, but even then it would be a stretch. If I remember right, user impersonations won't even guarantee that you'll get full access. The best solution in this case is just to use the super user account and properly request the correct privileges.

Related

GetNetworkType in Android 11

Following the changes posted here, the getNetworkType method is deprecated from Android R and onwards.
When trying to use this method in a R compiled application, results in the following exception being thrown:
java.lang.SecurityException: getDataNetworkTypeForSubscriber: uid 10225 does not have android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE.
at android.os.Parcel.createExceptionOrNull(Parcel.java:2285)
at android.os.Parcel.createException(Parcel.java:2269)
at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:2252)
at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:2194)
at com.android.internal.telephony.ITelephony$Stub$Proxy.getNetworkTypeForSubscriber(ITelephony.java:7565)
at android.telephony.TelephonyManager.getNetworkType(TelephonyManager.java:2964)
at android.telephony.TelephonyManager.getNetworkType(TelephonyManager.java:2928)
at com.ironsource.environment.ConnectivityService.getCellularNetworkType(ConnectivityService.java:197)
at com.ironsource.sdk.service.DeviceData.updateWithConnectionInfo(DeviceData.java:98)
at com.ironsource.sdk.service.DeviceData.fetchMutableData(DeviceData.java:54)
at com.ironsource.sdk.service.TokenService.collectDataFromDevice(TokenService.java:120)
at com.ironsource.sdk.service.TokenService.getRawToken(TokenService.java:177)
at com.ironsource.sdk.service.TokenService.getToken(TokenService.java:166)
at com.ironsource.sdk.IronSourceNetwork.getToken(IronSourceNetwork.java:183)
This is fine and is expected according to the documentation. If I compile the application to any version before Android R, the exception doesn't show.
This exception indicates that I need to request the android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE permission.
I wanted to know if there is a way to get the network type with any other API that does NOT require this permission (as this permission's level is dangerous and I would rather not ask the user for it).
Take runtime permission for READ_PHONE_STATE to ignore crash of getDataNetworkTypeForSubscriber
#Override
protected void onStart() {
super.onStart();
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.R) {
int res = checkSelfPermission(android.Manifest.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE);
if (res != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
requestPermissions(new String[]{android.Manifest.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE}, 123);
}
}
}
private final static int REQUEST_CODE_ASK_PERMISSIONS = 1002;
#Override
public void onRequestPermissionsResult(int requestCode,
#NonNull String[] permissions, #NonNull int[] grantResults) {
switch (requestCode) {
case REQUEST_CODE_ASK_PERMISSIONS:
if (grantResults[0] != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "READ_PHONE_STATE Denied", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT)
.show();
} else {
}
stepAfterSplash();
break;
default:
super.onRequestPermissionsResult(requestCode, permissions, grantResults);
}
}
You can still use getDataNetworkType(); This method does not necessarily need READ_PHONE_STATE, as stated in his Doc, but that it's sufficient "that the calling app has carrier privileges".
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/telephony/TelephonyManager#getDataNetworkType()
For what I know about getting those privigileges, it could be tricky/really hard, you may look into getting carrier privileges and using this method, which is also the suggested substitution for getNetworkType().
This method necessarily need READ_PHONE_STATE by this way in your activity not just manifest >>>
// Check if the READ_PHONE_STATE permission is already available.
if(ActivityCompat.checkSelfPermission(this,Manifest.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE)
!= PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
if (ActivityCompat.shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(this,
Manifest.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE)) {
//here >> use getNetworkType() method
// like this example
mStationInfo.set_networkType(mTelephonyManager.getNetworkType());
}
else {}
We can use ConnectivityManager#getNetworkCapabilities and NetworkCapablities#hasTransport like this
ConnectivityManager cm = (ConnectivityManager) context.getSystemService(Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE);
NetworkCapabilities caps = cm.getNetworkCapabilities(cm.getActivityNetwork());
boolean isMobile = caps.hasTransport(NetworkCapabilities.TRANSPORT_CELLULAR);
boolean isWifi = caps.hasTransport(NetworkCapabilities.TRANSPORT_WIFI);
Reference:
android.net.NetworkInfo
This class was deprecated in API level 29. Callers should instead use the ConnectivityManager.NetworkCallback API
to learn about connectivity changes, or switch to use
ConnectivityManager#getNetworkCapabilities or
ConnectivityManager#getLinkProperties to get information
synchronously. Keep in mind that while callbacks are guaranteed to be
called for every event in order, synchronous calls have no such
constraints, and as such it is unadvisable to use the synchronous
methods inside the callbacks as they will often not offer a view of
networking that is consistent (that is: they may return a past or a
future state with respect to the event being processed by the
callback). Instead, callers are advised to only use the arguments of
the callbacks, possibly memorizing the specific bits of information
they need to keep from one callback to another.
So my friend I have the same trouble as you but so far I came with a temporary fix I use the compileSdkVersion 29 not 30 as well as the targetSdkVersion 29 and my buildToolsVersion 28.0.3 and my app is loading fine.
Since this problem by me its coming due a third party library so till the fix the error I can not fix it alone, but I think with this temporary solution for now is quite well.

Is a custom IDispatch with native meta-programming possible?

Recently I've been looking at how the IDispatch works. Below is an example of how an automation client may call a method of an automation server object, which implements IDispatch:
HRESULT hresult;
IDispatch * pdisp = (IDispatch *)NULL;
DISPID dispid;
OLECHAR * szMember = "color";
// Code that sets a pointer to the dispatch (pdisp) is omitted.
hresult = pdisp->GetIDsOfNames(
IID_NULL,
&szMember,
1, LOCALE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT,
&dispid);
pdisp->Invoke(
dispid,
...
)
When implementing a server, this suggests to me that you could implement GetIDOfNames as:
HRESULT GetIDsOfNames(
REFIID riid,
LPOLESTR *rgszNames,
UINT cNames,
LCID lcid,
DISPID *rgDispId
){
rgDispId = 10;
return S_OK;
};
In this way we tell the client, essentially, that all method calls are okay, and all method calls will call method with DISPID==10.
myObject->a();
myObject->ab();
myObject->abc();
myObject->abcd();
//^^ Are all valid and will all call DispID 10.
So my question is, Can we somehow store the name that was called, such that our DispID 10 method, will know which method is being called?
Note: The ultimate goal of this is to build a COM server which has the ability to be a COM server for other COM clients, which might lack the capability/knowledge of being COM servers themselves.

(Why) Does Windows "Calc.exe" lack a WndProc?

I am fiddling with wndprocs and WinSpy++ and i stumbled upon a strange thing with calc.exe.
It appears to lack a WndProc.
Here is my screenshot: a test program I made, the WinSpy++ window,, showing N/A, and the culprit.
Maybe the tool is a bit outdated, but the empirical evidence proves no WndProc is there.
I don't know if this is by design(this would be strange), or if I am missing something...
Here is referenced code:
Function FindWindow(title As String) As IntPtr
Return AutoIt.AutoItX.WinGetHandle(title)
End Function
Function GetWindowProc(handle As IntPtr) As IntPtr
Return GetWindowLong(handle, WindowLongFlags.GWL_WNDPROC)
End Function
In short (about your code): GetWindowLong() fails because you're trying to read an address in target process address space.
EXPLANATION
When GetWindowLong() returns 0 it means there is an error, from MSDN:
If the function fails, the return value is zero. To get extended error information, call GetLastError.
Check Marshal.GetLastWin32Error() and you probably see error code is ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (numeric value is 0x5).
Why? Because GetWindowLong() is trying to get address (or handle) of window procedure (not in your code, but in target process, in theory it may even be default window procedure but I never saw an application main window that doesn't hanle at least few messages). You may use this trick (but I never tried!) to see if a window is using default procedure (you have an address or not), I don't know...someone should try.
Now think what WNDPROC is:
LRESULT (CALLBACK* WNDPROC) (HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
An address (valid in process A) is not callable in process B (where it makes no sense at all). Windows DLLs code segments are shared across processes (I assume, I didn't check but it's reasonable in the game between safety and performance).
Moreover CallWindowProc(NULL, ...) will understand that NULL as a special value to invoke window procedure for that window class (on HWND owner). From MSDN:
...If this value is obtained by calling the GetWindowLong function ...the address of a window or dialog box procedure, or a special internal value meaningful only to CallWindowProc.
How Microsoft Spy++ does it (and maybe WinSpy++ does not)? Hard to say without WinSpy++ source code. For sure it's not such easy like GetWindowLong() and right way should involve CreateRemoteThread() and to do LoadLibrary() from that but both Microsoft Spy++ and WinSpy++ source code aren't available (AFAIK) for further inspection...
UPDATE
WinSpy++ inspection/debugging is pretty off-topic with the question (you should post a ticket to developers, your source code may fail for what I explained above, you should - always - check error codes) but we may take a look for fun.
In InjectThread.c we see it uses WriteProcessMemory + CreateRemoteThread then ReadProcessMemory to read data back (not relevant code omitted):
// Write a copy of our injection thread into the remote process
WriteProcessMemory(hProcess, pdwRemoteCode, lpCode, cbCodeSize, &dwWritten);
// Write a copy of the INJTHREAD to the remote process. This structure
// MUST start on a 32bit boundary
pRemoteData = (void *)((BYTE *)pdwRemoteCode + ((cbCodeSize + 4) & ~ 3));
// Put DATA in the remote thread's memory block
WriteProcessMemory(hProcess, pRemoteData, lpData, cbDataSize, &dwWritten);
hRemoteThread = CreateRemoteThread(hProcess, NULL, 0,
(LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)pdwRemoteCode, pRemoteData, 0, &dwRemoteThreadId);
// Wait for the thread to terminate
WaitForSingleObject(hRemoteThread, INFINITE);
// Read the user-structure back again
if(!ReadProcessMemory(hProcess, pRemoteData, lpData, cbDataSize, &dwRead))
{
//an error occurred
}
Window procedure in "General" tab and in "Class" tab differs (in "Class" tab it correctly display a value). From DisplayClassInfo.c:
//window procedure
if(spy_WndProc == 0)
{
wsprintf(ach, _T("N/A"));
}
else
{
wsprintf(ach, szHexFmt, spy_WndProc);
if(spy_WndProc != spy_WndClassEx.lpfnWndProc)
lstrcat(ach, _T(" (Subclassed)"));
}
//class window procedure
if(spy_WndClassEx.lpfnWndProc == 0)
wsprintf(ach, _T("N/A"));
else
wsprintf(ach, szHexFmt, spy_WndClassEx.lpfnWndProc);
As you see they're different values (obtained in different ways). Code to fill spy_WndProc is in WinSpy.c and GetRemoteWindowInfo.c. Extracted code from GetRemoteInfo() in WinSpy.c:
GetClassInfoEx(0, spy_szClassName, &spy_WndClassEx);
GetRemoteWindowInfo(hwnd, &spy_WndClassEx, &spy_WndProc, spy_szPassword, 200);
Now in GetRemoteWindowInfo() we see a call to GetClassInfoExProc (injected in the other process):
pInjData->wndproc = (WNDPROC)pInjData->fnGetWindowLong(pInjData->hwnd, GWL_WNDPROC);
pInjData->fnGetClassInfoEx(pInjData->hInst,
(LPTSTR)pInjData->szClassName, &pInjData->wcOutput);
As you can see (please follow using source code) wcOutput is what is displayed in "Class" tab and wndproc what is displayed in "General" tab. Simply GetWindowLong() fails but GetClassInfoEx does not (but they do not necessarily retrieve same value because (if I'm not wrong) what you have in WNDCLASSEX is what you registered with RegisterClassEx but what you get with GetWindowLong() is what you hooked with SetWindowLong().
You are right. It does not have a WndProc(...) function. It is just simply using a DlgProc to process the dialog events. I now this as I have written 'server/thin client' code in C/C++ to capture direct calls into windows API functions like WndProc(...). Any Windows GUI function really - BeginPaint(...) as an example. I used CALC.EXE as a test and executable runs on server while GUI calls are relayed/returned to/from the thin client. Have only tested calc.exe versions thru Vista. There is a chance the newer versions have been 'programmed' differently - meaning not using Win32 SDK. But, even MFC is just a shell to the Win32 SDK,

Microsoft Crypto API Disable Use of RSAES-OAEP Key Transport Algorithm

I'm using CryptEncryptMessage to generate a PKCS#7 enveloped message. I'm using szOID_NIST_AES256_CBC as the encryption algorithm.
The generated message appears to be valid but is the RSAES-OAEP for the Key Transport Algorithm which has limited support in the wild (Thunderbird, OpenSSL SMIME Module among many others don't support it).
I'll like for CAPI to revert to the older RSAencryption for key transport.
Is there any possible way to do that, I could revert to the low level messaging functions if there is a way rather than to use CryptEncryptMessage but I can't find a way to do that even using the low level functions.
Code:
CRYPT_ENCRYPT_MESSAGE_PARA EncryptMessageParams;
EncryptMessageParams.cbSize = sizeof(CMSG_ENVELOPED_ENCODE_INFO);
EncryptMessageParams.dwMsgEncodingType = PKCS_7_ASN_ENCODING;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.pszObjId = szOID_NIST_AES256_CBC;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.Parameters.cbData = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.Parameters.pbData = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.hCryptProv = NULL;
EncryptMessageParams.pvEncryptionAuxInfo = NULL;
EncryptMessageParams.dwFlags = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.dwInnerContentType = 0;
BYTE pbEncryptedBlob[640000];
DWORD pcbEncryptedBlob = 640000;
BOOL retval = CryptEncryptMessage(&EncryptMessageParams, cRecipientCert, pRecipCertContextArray, pbMsgText, dwMsgTextSize, pbEncryptedBlob, &pcbEncryptedBlob);
The Key Transport Algorithm is a bit tricky to handle, and it may not serve its purpose (I see you noted that you'd like CAPI to support RSAencryption; trust me, I would too). It looks like you've alaready detected the bulk of your problem - The generated message appears is valid, but your method makes it necessary to use CryptEncryptMessage, which won't work well/at all in the long run.
Step 1 - Examine the Code
CRYPT_ENCRYPT_MESSAGE_PARA EncryptMessageParams;
EncryptMessageParams.cbSize = sizeof(CMSG_ENVELOPED_ENCODE_INFO);
EncryptMessageParams.dwMsgEncodingType = PKCS_7_ASN_ENCODING;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.pszObjId = szOID_NIST_AES256_CBC;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.Parameters.cbData = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.ContentEncryptionAlgorithm.Parameters.pbData = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.hCryptProv = NULL;
EncryptMessageParams.pvEncryptionAuxInfo = NULL;
EncryptMessageParams.dwFlags = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.dwInnerContentType = 0;
BYTE pbEncryptedBlob[640000];
DWORD pcbEncryptedBlob = 640000;
BOOL retval = CryptEncryptMessage(&EncryptMessageParams, cRecipientCert, pRecipCertContextArray, pbMsgText, dwMsgTextSize, pbEncryptedBlob, &pcbEncryptedBlob);
Pretty basic, isn't it? Although efficient, it's not really getting the problem done. If you look at this:
EncryptMessageParams.dwFlags = 0;
EncryptMessageParams.dwInnerContentType = 0;
you will see that it is pre-defined, but used only in the definition of retval. However, I could definitely see this as a micro-optimization, and not really useful if we're going to re-write the code. However, I've outlined the basic steps blow to integrate this without a total re-do of the code (so you can keep on using the same parameters):
Step 2 - Editing the Parameters
As #owlstead mentioned in his comments, the Crypto API is not very user-friendly. However, you've done a great job with limited resources. What you'll wanna add is a Cryptographic Enumeration Provider to help narrow down the keys. Make sure you have either Microsoft Base Cryptographic Provider version 1.0 or Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider version 1.0 to use these efficiently. Otherwise, you'll need to add in the function like so:
DWORD cbName;
DWORD dwType;
DWORD dwIndex;
CHAR *pszName = NULL;
(regular crypt calls here)
This is mainly used to prevent the NTE_BAD_FLAGS error, although technically you could avoid this with a more low-level declaration. If you wanted, you could also create a whole new hash (although this is only necessary if the above implementation won't scale to the necessary factor of time/speed):
DWORD dwBufferLen = strlen((char *)pbBuffer)+1*(0+5);
HCRYPTHASH hHash;
HCRYPTKEY hKey;
HCRYPTKEY hPubKey;
BYTE *pbKeyBlob;
BYTE *pbSignature;
DWORD dwSigLen;
DWORD dwBlobLen;
(use hash as normal w/ crypt calls and the pbKeyBlobs/Signatures)
Make sure to vaildate this snippet before moving on. You can do so easily like so:
if(CryptAcquireContext(&hProv, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL, 0)) {
printf("CSP context acquired.\n");
}
If you're documenting or releasing, might want to add a void MyHandleError(char *s) to catch the error so someone who edits but fails can catch it quickly.
By the way, the first time you run it you'll have to create a new set because there's no default. A nice one-liner that can be popped into an if is below:
CryptAcquireContext(&hCryptProv, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL, CRYPT_NEWKEYSET)
Remember that syncing server resources will not be as efficient as doing the re-work I suggested in the first step. This is what I will be explaining below:
Step 3 - Recode and Relaunch
As a programmer, re-coding might seem like a waste of time, but it can definitely help you out in the long run. Remember that you'll still have to code in the custom params when encoding/syncing; I'm not going to hand-feed you all the code like a baby. It should be well sufficient to show you the basic outlines.
I'm definitely assuming that you're trying to handle to the current user's key container within a particular CSP; otherwise, I don't really see the use of this. If not, you can do some basic edits to suit your needs.
Remember, we're going to bypass CryptEncryptMessage by using CryptReleaseContext, which directly releases the handle acquired by the CryptAcquireContext function. Microsoft's standard on the CAC is below:
BOOL WINAPI CryptAcquireContext(
_Out_ HCRYPTPROV *phProv,
_In_ LPCTSTR pszContainer,
_In_ LPCTSTR pszProvider,
_In_ DWORD dwProvType,
_In_ DWORD dwFlags
);
Note that Microsoft's scolding you if you're using a user interface:
If the CSP must display the UI to operate, the call fails and the NTE_SILENT_CONTEXT error code is set as the last error. In addition, if calls are made to CryptGenKey with the CRYPT_USER_PROTECTED flag with a context that has been acquired with the CRYPT_SILENT flag, the calls fail and the CSP sets NTE_SILENT_CONTEXT.
This is mainly server code, and the ERROR_BUSY will definitely be displayed to new users when there are multiple connections, especially those with a high latency. Above 300ms will just cause a NTE_BAD_KEYSET_PARAM or similar to be called, due to the timeout without even a proper error being received. (Transmission problems, anyone with me?)
Unless you're concerned about multiple DLL's (which this doesn't support due to NTE_PROVIDER_DLL_FAIL errors), the basic set up to grab crypt services clientside would be as below (copied directly from Microsoft's examples):
if (GetLastError() == NTE_BAD_KEYSET)
{
if(CryptAcquireContext(
&hCryptProv,
UserName,
NULL,
PROV_RSA_FULL,
CRYPT_NEWKEYSET))
{
printf("A new key container has been created.\n");
}
else
{
printf("Could not create a new key container.\n");
exit(1);
}
}
else
{
printf("A cryptographic service handle could not be "
"acquired.\n");
exit(1);
}
However simple this may seem, you definitely don't want to get stuck passing this on to the key exchange algorithm (or whatever else you have handling this). Unless you're using symmetric session keys (Diffie-Hellman/KEA), the exchange keypair can be used to encrypt session keys so that they can be safely stored and exchanged with other users.
Someone named John Howard has written a nice Hyper-V Remote Management Configuration Utility (HVRemote) which is a large compilation of the techniques discussed here. In addition to using the basic crypts and keypairs, they can be used to permit ANONYMOUS LOGON remote DCOM access (cscript hvremote.wsf, to be specific). You can see many of the functions and techniques in his latest crypts (you'll have to narrow the query) on his blog:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jhoward/
If you need any more help with the basics, just leave a comment or request a private chat.
Conclusion
Although it's pretty simple once you realize the basic server-side methods for hashing and how the client grabs the "crypts", you'll be questioning why you even tried the encryption during transmits. However, without the crypting clientside, encrypts would definitely be the only secure way to transmit what was already hashed.
Although you might argue that the packets could be decrypted and hashed off the salts, consider that both in-outgoing would have to be processed and stored in the correct timing and order necessary to re-hash clientside.

Sharing a DNSServiceRef using kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection stalls my program

I'm building a client using dns-sd api from Bonjour. I notice that there is a flag called kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection that it is used to share the connection of one DNSServiceRef.
Apple site says
For efficiency, clients that perform many concurrent operations may want to use a single Unix Domain Socket connection with the background daemon, instead of having a separate connection for each independent operation. To use this mode, clients first call DNSServiceCreateConnection(&MainRef) to initialize the main DNSServiceRef. For each subsequent operation that is to share that same connection, the client copies the MainRef, and then passes the address of that copy, setting the ShareConnection flag to tell the library that this DNSServiceRef is not a typical uninitialized DNSServiceRef; it's a copy of an existing DNSServiceRef whose connection information should be reused.
There is even an example that shows how to use the flag. The problem i'm having is when I run the program it stays like waiting for something whenever I call a function with the flag. Here is the code:
DNSServiceErrorType error;
DNSServiceRef MainRef, BrowseRef;
error = DNSServiceCreateConnection(&MainRef);
BrowseRef = MainRef;
//I'm omitting when I check for errors
error = DNSServiceBrowse(&MainRef, kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection, 0, "_http._tcp", "local", browse_reply, NULL);
// After this call the program stays waiting for I don't know what
//I'm omitting when I check for errors
error = DNSServiceBrowse(&BrowseRef, kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection, 0, "_http._tcp", "local", browse_reply, NULL);
//I'm omitting when i check for errors
DNSServiceRefDeallocate(BrowseRef); // Terminate the browse operation
DNSServiceRefDeallocate(MainRef); // Terminate the shared connection
Any ideas? thoughts? suggestion?
Since there are conflicting answers, I dug up the source - annotations by me.
// If sharing...
if (flags & kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection)
{
// There must be something to share (can't use this on the first call)
if (!*ref)
{
return kDNSServiceErr_BadParam;
}
// Ref must look valid (specifically, ref->fd)
if (!DNSServiceRefValid(*ref) ||
// Most operations cannot be shared.
((*ref)->op != connection_request &&
(*ref)->op != connection_delegate_request) ||
// When sharing, pass the ref from the original call.
(*ref)->primary)
{
return kDNSServiceErr_BadReference;
}
The primary fiels is explained elsewhere:
// When using kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection, there is one primary _DNSServiceOp_t, and zero or more subordinates
// For the primary, the 'next' field points to the first subordinate, and its 'next' field points to the next, and so on.
// For the primary, the 'primary' field is NULL; for subordinates the 'primary' field points back to the associated primary
The problem with the question is that DNSServiceBrowse maps to ref->op==browse_request which causes a kDNSServiceErr_BadReference.
It looks like kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection is half-implemented, because I've also seen cases in which it works - this source was found by tracing back when it didn't work.
Service referenses for browsing and resolving may unfortunately not be shared. See the comments in the Bonjour documentation for the kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection-flag. Since you only browse twice I would just let them have separate service-refs instead.
So both DNSServiceBrowse() and DNSServiceResolve() require an unallocated service-ref as first parameter.
I can't explain why your program chokes though. The first DNSServiceBrowse() call in your example should return immediately with an error code.
Although an old question, but it should help people looking around for answers now.
The answer by vidtige is incorrect, the may be shared for any operation, provided you pass the 'kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection' flag along with the arguments. Sample below -
m_dnsrefsearch = m_dnsservice;
DNSServiceErrorType mdnserr = DNSServiceBrowse(&m_dnsrefsearch,kDNSServiceFlagsShareConnection,0,
"_workstation._tcp",NULL,
DNSServiceBrowseReplyCallback,NULL);
Reference - http://osxr.org/android/source/external/mdnsresponder/mDNSShared/dns_sd.h#0267

Resources