I have a reportviewer control in a pop up window inside my WPF application. When the report is to be printed, on some client machines it gives the following message "Some parameters or credentials have not been specified".
This error does not come on every client machine even though the machines are identical in every respect.
I have tried the explicit refresh on the local report as well as all the options mentioned when a similar question has been posted.
Thanks in advance for all the help.
If you have code like this:
ReportViewer.LocalReport.Refresh()
Change it to:
ReportViewer.LocalReport.ExecuteReportInCurrentAppDomain(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Evidence)
This latter routine says it's obsolete but it makes that error message go away... at least it does in my testing so far!!
I have 2 Reports (rdcl) in the same XAML.
I was having this same problem when I wanted to change datasource, after a button click.
After I've moved both refreshes to the end of the click function, never got this message again and everything is working fine.
this.viewerGraphic.RefreshReport();
this.viewerInstance.RefreshReport();
Related
In my App I have an annoying behavior. It is causing problems to my costumers.
The app has several points where I need to show a Dialog (Modal), then the users can fill some fields and then they can close the dialog. So the system follows its natural path.
In determined moments this works fine. The dialog is shown, user interacts with it, closes it , ....
But, in others moments (the same code) the dialog doesn't appear automatically. The user needs to execute some external action on device (like change its orientation, touch in the center of the screen, execute scroll gesture, etc). Some action that isn't intuitive at the moment.
This behavior makes the user think my app froze.
For me it is clear that the dialog was called, simply it wasn't drawed on the screen.
I tryed read about this problem.I did some researches in similar questions without success.
I guess the cause is related to EDT.
In short, How can I call a Dialog Modal without breaking EDT-rules.
And more specifically, How can I resolve this problem.
when I request a dialog to be displayed on the screen, I want it really appears in 100% of cases. Today works randomly.
Additional infomations:
My app uses Java 5 yet.
Do you recommends migration to Java 8?
======= Additional Informations (1) ===========
This problem is strongly dependent of device model.
In MotoG3 (Android 6) this problem is a exception. Rarely it occurs.
In my Galaxy Note 8 is the opposite. Always occurs.
In Lenovo Vibe5 (Android 6). Frequently occurs.
I added these informations. Maybe it help to compound problem picture.
Additional question:
Is it possible write a snippet that I can use as a template
to execute Dialog Modal call without break some rule of EDT?
Turn on the EDT violation detection tool in the simulator which should detect such issues. Inspect potentially problematic cases of Dialog calls and post them specifically if you don't know how to fix them.
Java 8 is unrelated although migrating a project is non-trivial.
Try putting the following code inside Load event handler for WinForms or Loaded for WPF.
Dim doc As New XmlDocument
Dim nsmgr As New XmlNamespaceManager(Nothing) 'this line throws an exception
Problem is that exception is not thrown, and stack corruption happens. It may have different side effects, depending on the IDE - see below.
Affected IDEs are: 2008, 2010 and 2012 (those I could test). 2010 resets stack state, and returns from sub/handler, like nothing happened (but without proceeding with other statements there). 2012 may warn a user about a failed application and an attempt to run in compatibility mode. Next time after that it runs the same as 2010. 2008 properly throws an exception, but only on default configuration (AnyCPU). Switching platform target to x86 makes the problem reappear in 2008 as well.
Affected frameworks are WinForms and WPF. Console apps and ASP.NET
seem to work fine. .NET v2.0-4.5.
Affected scope is only Load event so far.
Putting this code into a button makes it work.
Affected build
configuration = any. Tried on default Debug and Release.
Why I consider it a bug is because it can leave objects in an unstable state - they did not finish initializing, which is not an expected behavior. What's critical about it is that nobody will know it happened, as it does not throw an exception. Depending on your design, you may end up with incorrect data in your database, which in the worst case may lead to severe consequences.
Does anyone have a good explanation to why this may be happening and if there is a workaround?
The problem is caused by the wow64 emulation layer that comes into play when you target x86 platform on a x64 OS.
It swallows exceptions in the code that is responsible to fire the Load event.
Thus the debugger doesn't see the exception and cannot step in to handle the situation.
This article seems to document well what's happening there,
This previous answer from Hans Passant (to which goes all the credits and upvotes) explains possible workarounds.
My preferite one is to move everything out of Form_Load event and put the problematic code in the form constructor. (Of course I don't know if it is applicable in your case)
(see update below)
While running within the VisualStudio 2010 environment, I can easily tell if my Winform application causes an exception. I just have to go to Debug | Exceptions and make sure that both columns of checkboxes are checked. I then run the application and if any exceptions then I get dropped straight into the offending piece of code.
How do I determine exceptions during testing, when I give test build to a tester. I do not want the tester to run within Visual Studio, just as a regular user. I still want to know if there are exceptions and the pertinent details.
Obviosualy, I should be able to control the process, so that when the code gets released normal execution happens.
Yes, I know about and use try/catch blocks, but I am talking about a method similar to Visual Studio exception catcher and reporter, just possibly compiled into the product and used for deployment to beta testers.
Maybe Visual Studio has such a feature, in which case where and how to set up, or possibly a third party component.
[Update:
I added two sub-questions, which you can find at Unhandled Exception next line or exit.
The solution mentioned below sounds great and with a tweak probably works, just not at the moment.
Inside the Visual Studio both 2010 and now 2012 works great. The exception handler gets called, okay after VS breaks at the line and I say to continue. I decided to test outside the VS2012 IDE, good thing for that. The OS traps the bug, shows the standard an "An Unhandled Exception Occurred" dialog giving the details along with a continue and quit buttons. Selecting continue, just continues the application with no trapping into my uber exception handler. Selecting quite, whites-out the application and displays the standard close window dialog. The quit button also does not call my uber handler.
The purpose is so that my exception handler gets called. I do not need an uber exception handler if I am working inside the VS2012 IDE. The purpose of the handler is for end users and beta testers, namely anyone other than myself and who will not have my development station.
So unless I am missing something, the question is still open.
There are code samples in the other question, enough to copy and paste and create a test application in a couple minutes time.
]
Thanks in advance,
Sarah
I don't know of any automagical ways to reports error in Visual Studio but here is what I do.
Hook into the UnhandledException event for the application.
Use a logging framework like nLog or Log4Net to log the exception and other data you get from that event. Or just write to a text file.
Upload that data either from within your application or have the beta-tester send it to you.
Okay, the Google Uberlord took pitty upon me and I found this wonderful article solving the problem. Praise to the almighty Google.
Here is the link:
http://www.switchonthecode.com/tutorials/csharp-tutorial-dealing-with-unhandled-exceptions
Basically, JRadness had the right idea, just slightly in error. He should have used
Application.ThreadException +=
new System.Threading.ThreadExceptionEventHandler(Application_ThreadException);
rather than
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException +=
new UnhandledExceptionEventHandler(CurrentDomain_UnhandledException);
The author on Switch on the Code talked of three methods, the first of which is what JRadness proposed and does not work for Windows forms.
The autor even solved my other question of Continue and Abort. The OS got bypassed.
Yeah!!
I've got a strange problem I haven't seen before. I can open an OpenFileDialog in Windows 7 without any problems. However, when I try my app on Windows XP, calling OpenFileDialog.ShowDialog() immediately crashes the application. It just vanishes! When running from the debugger, I don't get any unhandled exceptions. If I wrap the code in a try/catch block, nothing gets caught. I have also checked all thrown exceptions in Debug -> Exceptions, but nothing pops up. I'll try some of the other suggestions in the answers below and will report back.
Does anyone know how to resolve this problem? I found a post about something similar, but it was the opposite problem. I'll try tweaking the desktop settings to see if it's related to that, but I am dubious.
EDIT -- as a sanity check, I wrote a test WPF application that displays an OpenFileDialog directly via the main window as well as another Window that can be displayed by the main window. It totally works fine under Windows XP. So now I'm really confused. I have verified that I'm not doing something stupid like trying to display the dialog from a worker thread. The OpenFileDialog displays briefly, then disappears along with the application.
EDIT -- I'm going to try to reproduce this problem on another XP computer. For now, I'll try Windows XP mode and we'll see what happens.
I got a similar error when a DLL crashes when I open a OpenFileDialog. It turned out that OpenFileDialog changed the working directory so my dll tried to write to a relative file that did not exist.
Do you see any "First Chance" exceptions in the Output? Any entries in the event log? Does the default path you're using exist on the XP machine?
Try adding a handler to the App Domain's UnhandledException
Does the same happen when you use a brand new, stock FileOpenDialog without any tweaks? What about from a brand new app which does nothing but show a file open dialog?
See Galet's post
I cannot tell you what exactly the problem is, but here's what you could do to get a clue what's really happening. I assume you're using VS2008 or 2005.
1.Switch to release mode
2.Go to Debug\Exceptions, and mark all "Thrown" exceptions, like illustrated here: http://vvcap.net/db/JbWS_tzy2IpBoI7R7amm.htp
3.Run executable in debugger, ignore the warnings from VS that there's no debug info
It does seem that there's a win32 exception thrown some time during execution, but this way or another, you will get one or more messages from debugger explaining what kind of exception happened and where. In most cases those messages make it pretty clear what exactly went wrong
EDIT: One thing I forgot to mention is that unmanaged debugging must also be turned on, such like here (when you start program directly from IDE) or here (when you attach to running process)
link|edit|flag edited Apr 12 '09 at 22:32
answered Apr 10 '09 at 19:01
galets
1,2201924
Edit: In addition to the bounty, we're willing to pay $250 to have this bug fixed in the Firefox/Gecko codebase. Here is a simple test project (Visual Studio 2008 C#) that reproduces the problem.
Edit #2 we're willing to pay $600 to have this bug fixed. See above for sample project that reproduces the problem.
We have a Firefox (Gecko) ActiveX control on our C# Windows Form to display HTML.
When this Firefox ActiveX control is on our form, about 2-3% of our key presses don't make it through. Or rather, a different Windows message is sent:
We hold down the TAB key to tab through 3 regular WinForms text boxes. It will behave correctly 97% of the time. Spy++ tells us WM_KEYDOWN message is sent properly:
normal behavior http://judahhimango.com/images/normaltab.jpg
But randomly, maybe 2-3% of the time, the tab key (or other key) isn't processed right. Spy++ tells us WM_CHAR is being sent instead:
odd behavior http://judahhimango.com/images/screwytab.png
When the odd behavior occurs, either the key is not processed at all, or is processed incorrectly (such as inserting a '\t' character into a textbox that doesn't support tab characters.
This only occurs if the Firefox ActiveX control is on our form.
Our question is: does Firefox/Gecko engine install some kind of keyboard hook that might cause these side effects? Or better yet, how do we fix this problem?
The WM_CHAR message is generated by TranslateMessage call, so a good place to start looking would be the TranslateMessage calls in the Gecko source code.
In the first example code you provided the function is imported only by two libraries - mozctl.dll and xul.dll. Since you claim that the same error happens also with GeckoFX we can take mozctl.dll out of the equation. That leaves us with xul.dll, so given the Gecko source code I would suggest to look into widget\src\windows\nsToolkit.cpp. I am not sure if the code is run if the engine is embedded, but if it is then the library starts a whole new message pump in different thread, which is bound to break.
Unfortunately I can't run or compile the code on my machine (Windows 7 x64 w/o the Mozilla ActiveX control installed), so I can't verify any of this with a debugger. Hope it helps someone to track it down further.
The root problem is that when Mozilla is embedded in another application, it incorrectly pumps Windows messages when it dispatches internal events. Mozilla uses an event system to coordinate across threads or to schedule deferred processing on a thread (see nsIThread, nsIEventTarget). If you embed a web page with a lot of active XMLHTTPRequests, for example, Mozilla will use its event dispatching interface to dispatch events back to javascript and it will pump windows messages as a side effect. Once Mozilla events are fully dispatched, it goes back to the main event loop.
When Mozilla pumps windows messages, it doesn't include the extra processing done by the application's event loop - IsDialogMessage(), TranslateMessage(), PreTranslateMessage(), or any other pre-processing are skipped when Mozilla gets into this state. Symptoms therefore include tab key presses getting inserted as a character instead of being used for dialog navigation, keyboard hotkeys being sporadically ignored, or custom message pre-processing being sporadically skipped. For example, the Outlook 2007/2010 "Compose" screen sporadically loses keystrokes because it relies on custom message pre-processing to handle keyboard input.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582790 for a patch that addresses the problem.
I have Snoop Free and PSM Anti-Keylogger.
One of them detected firefox trying to install a Keyboard Hook.
Mozilla/Firefox file xul.dll attempt at installing at keyboard hook.
DENIED.
I noticed that you have implemented all of the interoperability yourself. Can you try this with the GeckoFX project and see if you get the same error? I use this project at work and haven't encountered any issues yet.