How can I create a persistent vanity URL in DotNetNuke? - dotnetnuke

I'm not aware of a solution for implementing custom persistent vanity URLs (my term, not sure if thats what they're really called) in DotNetNuke. Does anyone know of a solution? It can be configuring the core, using a third party module, or a suggestion of how to write it from scratch.
Here is what I'm thinking:
I want to point people to: http://mywebsite.com/awesome
I want the underlying URL to be http://mywebsite.com/genericpage.aspx?key=awesome&etc=etc
I don't want the URL to redirect. I want the user to see http://mywebsite.com/awesome only.
Essentially I'd envision an administrator being able to create these vanity URLs and specify what the vanity URL is and what the underlying URL is.

The closest thing, out of the box, is to define your friendly urls in SiteUrls.config found in the DotNetNuke root.
This way:
you point people to:
http://mywebsite.com/awesome.aspx
you have an underlying URL
http://mywebsite.com/Default.aspx?tabid=ID&etc=etc
users see:
http://mywebsite.com/awesome.aspx
Main restriction is that you will have an .aspx extension.
SiteUrl.config rules look like this:
<RewriterRule>
<LookFor>.*/awesome.aspx</LookFor>
<SendTo>~/default.aspx?tabid=ID&etc=etc</SendTo>
</RewriterRule>
Rewriter rule matches incoming url to a regular expression in the LookFor section, and sends it to an underlying url in the SendTo section. You need to be careful with the XML escape character '&' in the querystring parameters.
3rd party extensions like URL Master provide much more fine grained control, and you can have a global friendly url scheme based on page names, with or without .aspx extensions. Nevertheless, a simple "one url at a time" approach can be safer if you have custom modules with URL dependencies.

ActiveSocial supports these and I thought I saw something about support for this in Version 2.x of IFinity's URL Master, but I can't find anything on it now.

Related

How to setup one word local aliases to external urls?

I want to setup a better local flow for myself so I want to one word urls to my regularly used sites.
eg
jira/ -> my.atlassian.net/jira/your-work
jira/test-123 -> my.atlassian.net/browse/test-123
github -> github.com
github/repo -> github.com/org/repo
etc.
Currently I am trying to set this up using VirtualHosts and have a /etc/apache2/vhosts/personal.conf which lets me do the simple jira and github cases, but not the jira/test-123 or github/repo cases. and I also have to modify the hosts file to pick up these new aliases and redirect them to my localhost first.
It'd be great if there was simple regex -> url config that'd make this possible, that was not something I came across.
I am aware that I could use url shorteners to do this, but was hoping to make it work just on my machine instead.

Can I point a domain at a google app engine service?

I have two very simple services set up (in python) on google app engine. I have a site which has been up for a while as the defualt service of my example project, and I just deployed another service, lets call it foo. I have dns forwarding working for the default service, so I can go to example.com (which I own in this hypothetical scenario) and see my default service. I can also go to foo.example.appspot.com and see my foo service, which works at the url.
I have also registered another domain, let's call it foo.com. What I want is for foo.com to use my foo.example.appspot.com service. To make matters trickier, foo.com has a bunch of sub-domains of it's own, so I need x.foo.com to go to my foo service as well (and even x.y.foo.com would be ideal, but if that is hard I can work around that one easily enough by just substituting out another character so it would be x-y.foo.com or something along those lines).
I'm pretty new to web dev (which is honestly a generous description for this simple project), but Iv'e spent a while reading and googling and haven't found a solution to this, so any advice would be helpful. My last resort would be to un-service-ify (if you will) the two services, and just bundle it all up into one big main.py which routes differently depending on the domain, and then point both domains at the default service. The big downside to this is that I already have everything working with services (which seems like a better approach).
I expect to get very few users so scaling isn't really an issue (though it's always interesting to learn about).
EDIT:
attempted to create a dispatch.yaml file to solve this as follows:
dispatch:
- url: "foo.com"
module: foo
- url: "*.foo.com"
module: foo
but when I run appcfg.py -A <project_id_here> update_dispatch . it says
Error parsing yaml file:
Unable to assign value 'foo.com' to attribute 'url':
invalid url 'foo.com'
in "./dispatch.yaml", line 3, column 10
Yes, it should be possible. I didn't actually use 2 different top-level domains, but the development console appears to be ready to accept a second one (I can't actually check as I don't own a 2nd domain). Follow the Adding a custom domain for your application procedure.
Pay special attention to the Wildcard mappings section - since your foo.com domain already has sub-domains in use you can't use wildcards at/above those sub-domains, you'll have to specify the desired subdomains.
The procedure only maps (sub)domains to the app as a whole, not to individual services/modules. You'll also have to use a dispatch file, to route the specific subdomains to the corresponding modules/services. You can find examples here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/32103486/4495081 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/34111170/4495081 (the last one has rules to allow the module to work on the custom domain, on appspot.com and on the local development server).
I got it to work following The links in the answer. My dispatch file wound up looking like this:
dispatch:
- url: "foo.com/*"
module: foo
- url: "*.foo.com/*"
module: foo

Semantics of dispatch.yaml

I'm looking at various pages about dispatch.yaml, most of which contain similar information and examples:
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/flexible/nodejs/how-requests-are-routed#routing_with_a_dispatch_file
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/dispatchref
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/go/config/dispatchref
etc.
I happen to be using node.js on GAE Flexible Environment, but I think it would be the same for every language and environment.
The problem is that these pages don't really specify how dispatch.yaml works. In particular:
Are rules applied in the order given? I'm assuming that the first matching rule is the one used, but nothing seems to say so.
Do leading glob (wildcard) characters match only the domain name, or could they match the first part of the URL's path? If the rule is */hello, would that match myapp.appspot.com/path/hello? I'm guessing not, based on some vague hints in the docs, but it isn't very clear.
If no rule in dispatch.yaml matches the URL, will it be routed to the default service? I would think it would have to, but again, these pages don't say.
Do URLs get rewritten based on the rules before they're sent to the service? If the rule is */path/* and the URL is https://myapp.appspot.com/path/hello, will the service see it as /path/hello or as /hello? I'm guessing the former.
I'm doing some trial and error now, so I may be able to answer my own question soon. I'm also submitting this to Google through their documentation feedback system.
Things I know so far:
Yes, rules are tried in order. So for example, if you want one URL to go to a specific service, and all other URLs to go to another service, you should specify the specific one first:
dispatch:
- url: "*/specific"
module: specific
- url: "*/*"
module: general
If you put those rules in the opposite order, module specific will never be used, because the URL /specific will be caught by the wildcard rule.
Unknown
Yes. You can test this by making a request not matching any dispatch.yaml rule and watching the default's service logs.
No rewriting. If the rule is */path/* and the actual URL is https://myapp.appspot.com/path/hello, your service should still handle /path/hello, not /hello.
Just to fill in the blank (feel free to paste this into the accepted answer):
No. It only matches the start of the path.
I created two apps with the following resources:
default -> /abc/def/test.html -> <h1>default</h1>
other -> /abc/def/test.html -> <h1>other</h1>
And 1 route:
<dispatch>
<url>*/def/*</url>
<module>other</module>
</dispatch>
When I hit {app engine}/abc/def/test.html I got "default"

authentication/http headers support in forge.file trigger.io module?

in the official trigger.io docs there seems to be no provision for custom http headers when it comes to the forge.file module. I need this so I can download files behind an http authentication scheme. This seems like an easy thing to add, if support is not already there.
any workarounds? any chance of a quick fix in the next update? I know I could use forge.request instead, but I'd like to keep a local copy (saveURL).
thanks
Unfortunately the file module just uses simple "download url" methods rather than a full HTTP request library, which makes it a fairly big task to add support for custom headers.
I've added a task to our backlog for this, but I don't have a timeframe for it being added.
Currently on iOS you can do basic auth by using urls in the form http://user:password#url.com in case that helps.
Maybe to avoid this you can configure your server differently, or have a proxy server in front that allows you to pass authentication details as get parameters?

Using a subdomain to identify a client

I'm working on building a Silverlight application whereas we want to be able to have a client hit a url like:
http://{client}.domain.com/
and login, where the {client} part is their business name. so for example, google's would be:
http://google.domain.com/
What I was wondering was if anyone has been able, in silverlight, to be able to use this subdomain model to make decisions on the call to the web server so that you can switch to a specific database to run a query? Unfortunately, it's something that is quite necessary for the project, as we are trying to make it easy for their employees to get their company specific information for our software.
Wouldn't it work to put the service on a specific subdomain itself, such as wcf.example.com, and then setup a cross domain policy file on the service to allow it to access it?
As long as this would work you could just load the silverlight in the proper subdomain and then pass that subdomain to your service and let it do its thing.
Some examples of this below:
Silverlight Cross Domain Services
Silverlight Cross Domain Policy Helpers
On the server side you can check the HTTP 1.1 Host header to see how the user came to your server and do the necessary customization based on that.
I think you cannot do this with Silverlight alone, I know you cannot do this without problems with Javascript, Ajax etc. . That is because a sub domain is - for security reasons - treated otherwise than a sub-page by the browsers.
What about the following idea: Insert a rewrite rule to your web server software. So if http://google.domain.com is called, the web server itself rewrites the URL to something like http://www.domain.com/google/ (or better: http://www.domain.com/customers/google/). Would that help?
Georgi:
That would help if it would be static, but alas, it's going to all be dynamic. My hope was to have 1x deployment for the application, and to use the http://google.domain.com/ idea to switch to the correct database for the user. I recall doing this once when we built an asp.net website, using the domain context to figure out what skin to use, etc.
Ates: Can you explain more about what you are saying... sounds like you are close to what I am trying to come up with. Have you seen such a tutorial for this?
The only other way I have come up with to make this work is to have a metabase that when the user logs in, it will switch them to the appropriate database as required... was just thinking as well that telling Client x to hit:
http://ClientX.domain.com/ would have been sweeter than saying to hit http://www.domain.com/ and login. It seemed as if they were to hit their name, and to show it personalized for them right from the login screen would have been much more appealing for the client base.
#Richard B: No, I can't think of any such tutorial that I've seen before. I'll try to be more verbose.
The server-side approach in more detail:
Direct *.example.com to the same IP in your DNS settings.
The backend app that handles login checks the Host HTTP header (e.g. the "HTTP_HOST" server variable in some platforms). That would contain the exact subdomain.example.com that the client used for reaching your server. Extract the subdomain part and continue...
There can also be a client-side-only approach. I don't know much about Silverlight but I'm assuming that you should be able to interface Silverlight with JavaScript. You could read document.location with JavaScript and pass it to your Silverlight applet, whereon further data fetching etc. logic would rely on the subdomain that was passed in by JavaScript.
#Ates:
That is what we did when we wrote the ASP.Net system... we pushed a slew of *.example.com hosts against the web server, and handled using the HTTP headers. The hold-up comes when dealing with WCF pushing the info between the client and the server... it can only exist in one domain...
So, for example, when you have {client}.example.com and {sandbox}.example.com, the WCF service can't be registered to both. It also cannot be registered to just *.example.com or example.com, so that's where the catch 22 is coming in at. everything else I have the prior knowledge of handling.
I recall a method by which an application can "spoof" another domain name in certain instances. I take it in this case, I would need to do such a configuration? Much to research yet I believe.

Resources