I've been trying to resolve this issue for some time.
I'm trying to bind a TextBlock's text to a string property using the INotifyPropertyChanged interface. For some reason the PropertyChangedEventHandler is always null when the value of the property is changed thus the target never gets updated...
Any suggestions?
Code below:
XAML code:
<UserControl x:Class="MoleDashboard.MainPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008" xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:basics="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Controls;assembly=System.Windows.Controls"
xmlns:datacontrols="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Controls;assembly=System.Windows.Controls.Data"
xmlns:primitives="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Controls.Primitives;assembly=System.Windows.Controls.Data"
xmlns:prop="clr-namespace:MoleDashboard"
<UserControl.Resources>
<prop:YearScreen x:Key="YearScreenProps"/>
</UserControl.Resource>
<TextBlock Margin="10 5" x:Name="DataGridLabel" Visibility="Visible" Text="{Binding YearProperty, Source={StaticResource YearScreenProps}, Mode=OneWay}"/>
Bound property code:
public class YearScreen : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string metricProperty;
private string yearProperty;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public YearScreen()
{
}
public string YearProperty
{
get { return yearProperty; }
set { yearProperty = value; this.OnPropertyChanged("YearProperty"); }
}
public string MetricProperty
{
get { return metricProperty; }
set { metricProperty = value; this.OnPropertyChanged("MetricProperty"); }
}
public void OnPropertyChanged(string property)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property));
}
}
}
This is based on the comments provided and not just the question above.
Basically the problem is that you are creating updating a second instance of your ViewModel (called a YearScreen in your code) and updating that.
A YearScreen is already being created and bound to your Xaml, by the inclusion of:
<UserControl.Resources>
<prop:YearScreen x:Key="YearScreenProps"/>
</UserControl.Resource>
You are then creating a second ViewScreen elsewhere in code (via new ViewScreen()) and updating that, however there is no connection between the 2 ViewScreen instances, so nothing will update in the Xaml page.
One Possible (quick) solution:
Create your YearScreen as a singleton. That is add a static accessor of type YearScreen in the class and set it from the constructor.
public class YearScreen : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private static YearScreen _This;
public static YearScreen This { get { return _This; } }
[snip]
public YearScreen()
{
_This = this;
}
The you can access the "single" instance of your YearScreen from elsewhere using the static singleton accessor e.g.:
YearScreen.This.YearProperty = DateTime.Now.ToString():
There are better patterns for sharing ViewModels than singletons, but that will get you going.
The pattern you started with is ViewFirst creation (the view creates the ViewModel). ModelFirst does the opposite, but is bad as the model knows how it is displayed. Using a controller object to create the View and ViewModel and connect them is a better alternative, but that is then getting quite complicated. Using injection of single instance objects is a better option, but involves a whole load of new concepts. Lookup Silverlight Prism after you solve your current problems.
Instead of creating the ViewModel in the resources you should set it into the DataContext of the view from external code.
If you really want to put it in the Resources like that you can get it out of the resources in the code behind Loaded method or in the constructor after the initializecomponent call. Like so:
private YearScreen model;
public MainPage()
{
this.Loaded += MainPage_Loaded;
this.InitializeComponent();
}
void MainPage_Loaded(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.model = (YearScreen)this.Resources["YearScreenProps"];
}
Maybe expose it as a property so you can then access it externally. But personally I'd rather create the model externally than pass it into the View instead. Put it into the DataContext.
Related
I am building a WPF application that as part of its flow, checks for network connectivity and display the IP address in a TextBlock.
Now I am trying to update the TextBlock Text property everytime the IP address changes for whatever reason.
I have the IP address change working fine, but i could not get INotifyPropertyChanged to work.
I read all the possible solutions and implementations but I couldn't come up with a working code.
The public property gets the value from a static string from the Network Helper class.
So, the code:
public partial class MainWindow : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = this;
}
public string ipAddress
{
get { return NetworkStatus.localIP; }
set
{
if (value != NetworkStatus.localIP)
{
NetworkStatus.localIP = value;
NotifyIPChanged("IpAddress");
}
}
}
private void NotifyIPChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
XAML:
<TextBlock x:Name="ipTxt"
TextWrapping="Wrap"
HorizontalAlignment="Left"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Text="{Binding DataContext.ipAddress}"
Height="30"
Width="110"
Margin="-30,10,0,-10"
/>
UPDATE
NetWorkStatus.cs -- static bool IsNetworkAvailable()
...
if (statistics.BytesReceived > 0 || statistics.BytesSent > 0)
{
IPHostEntry host = Dns.GetHostEntry(Dns.GetHostName());
localIP = host.AddressList.FirstOrDefault(ip => ip.AddressFamily == AddressFamily.InterNetwork).ToString();
return true;
}
As you can see this method sets a static string "localIP". This is then evaluated by IpAddress property.
Why the TextBlock Text property doesn't get updated when the IP Address changes?
Rename the property to IpAddress so that it adheres to widely accepted naming conventions.
public string IpAddress
{
get { return NetworkStatus.localIP; }
set
{
if (value != NetworkStatus.localIP)
{
NetworkStatus.localIP = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
Use the CallerMemberName attribute on the propertyName parameter of your notification method, so that you do not have to write the name explicitly.
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
...
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
Bind it correctly. The current DataContext is already used as source object of the Binding. You must not add it to the property path.
<TextBlock Text="{Binding IpAddress}" ... />
In a possible next step you might want to separate the view from the view model and put the property in a separate class:
public class ViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public string IpAddress
{
get ...
set ...
}
...
}
and assign the Window's DataContext to an instance of the view model class:
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new ViewModel();
}
I think you need to take a closer look to how WPF works.
As a remark, there is no need to implement INotifyPropertyChanged in code behind. If you are using events, then you can automatically refresh the properties of the targeted UI element.
However, using code behind is not a good practice in our days. You should take a look at MVVM pattern. You have there a Model, View and ViewModel. The ViewModel should implement INotifyPropertyChanged.
The fact is that your code is in my opinion absolutely wrong. The naming is not fine : when you implement INotifyPropertyChanged you should not implement it only for a property, and the name should not look like : NotifyIPChanged, instead you should use RaisePropertyChanged, NotifyPropertyChanged or OnPropertyChanged. In setters you should not refresh something else, but only the property that you are targeting, because otherwise the Single Responsability principle is violated, as in your case. Also a bad practice is to bind to Code Behind.
I hope this post would make you to read more about MVVM and WPF. Good luck!
is it possible that the Event doesnt react, because the first letter of IpAdress is an Upper?
NotifyIPChanged("IpAddress");
public string ipAddress
Text="{Binding DataContext.ipAddress}"
Is there a way to bind directly to a Collection in the model and manually tell WPF that the binding needs refreshing without having to create an ObservableCollection for it in the viewmodel?
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Position.PossibleMoves}">
...
</ListBox>
Position is my model, part of a chess library, and PossibleMoves is a Collection within it. I do not want to implement INotifyProperty changed or put ObservableCollections in a stand alone optimized library.
I want to avoid copying PossibleMoves into an ObservableCollection every time the position is updated. The data binding works on initialization but it would be handy if I could also refresh the binding at will inside the viewmodel.
Calling OnNotifyPropertyChanged("Position.PossibleMoves") from the viewmodel doesn't work because the reference to the collection itself does not change.
You can do this by using an attached behavior to bind a handler to an event that gets triggered in the view model. You can't bind directly to events though so you have to wrap them in a class like so:
public class Refresher
{
public delegate void RefreshDelegate();
public event RefreshDelegate Refresh;
public void DoRefresh()
{
if (this.Refresh != null)
this.Refresh();
}
}
Now add an instance of that to your view model:
public class MyViewModel
{
public IList<string> Items { get; set; }
private Refresher _Refresher = new Refresher();
public Refresher Refresher {get {return this._Refresher;}}
}
Next create an attached behavior that registers a delegate instance with that event and forces the listbox to refresh its binding:
public static class RefreshBehavior
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty RefresherProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"Refresher",
typeof(Refresher),
typeof(RefreshBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(null, OnRefresherChange));
public static void SetRefresher(DependencyObject source, Refresher value)
{
source.SetValue(RefresherProperty, value);
}
public static Refresher GetRefresher(DependencyObject source)
{
return (Refresher)source.GetValue(RefresherProperty);
}
private static void OnRefresherChange(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
Refresher.RefreshDelegate handler = () =>
{
var listBox = d as ListBox;
listBox.Items.Refresh();
};
if (e.NewValue != null)
(e.NewValue as Refresher).Refresh += handler;
if (e.OldValue != null)
(e.OldValue as Refresher).Refresh -= handler;
}
}
And finally attach it to your listbox in the xaml:
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Items}"
local:RefreshBehavior.Refresher="{Binding Refresher}"/>
That's it. Call Refresher.DoRefresh() in your view model and it will force a listbox update.
This works but it's really hammering a square peg into a round hole. If I were you I'd do everything I could to try and do proper collection changed notification in your view model. I understand you wanting to keep ObservableCollection out of your model but there are ways to proxy change notification automatically (e.g. Castle DynamicProxy).
You need to NotifyPropertyChange for the PossibleMoves from inside the Position class or make a property that delegates to the Position.PossibleMoves and notify that one.
I have created a few Custom Controls (NOT UserControls) with bind-able "ClearCommand" ICommand dependency properties. This property will do exactly what it sounds: it will clear all the values from the control (textboxes, etc). I also bind (some) of those same properties to the VM I describe below.
Now I'm stuck trying to trigger the ClearCommand in those controls in the following MVVM scenario:
I've added a few such controls into my View. The View also includes a "Save" button that binds to my ViewModel's SaveCommand DelegateCommand property.
What I need to happen is that, upon a successful save, the VM should trigger the ClearCommand on those controls found in the View.
UPDATE
I've added code examples below. I have a few controls that resemble the ExampleCustomControl. Also, just to note, I am open to restructuring some of this if it's completely off.
Example Control snippet:
public class ExampleCustomControl : Control {
public string SearchTextBox { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<CustomObject> ResultList { get; set; }
public ExampleCustomControl() {
ClearCommand = new DelegateCommand(Clear);
}
/// <summary>
/// Dependency Property for Datagrid ItemSource.
/// </summary>
public static DependencyProperty SelectedItemProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("SelectedItem",
typeof(CustomObject), typeof(ExampleCustomControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(CustomObject)));
public CustomObject SelectedItem {
get { return (CustomObject)GetValue(SelectedCustomObjectProperty); }
set { SetValue(SelectedCustomObjectProperty, value); }
}
public static DependencyProperty ClearCommandProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("ClearCommand", typeof(ICommand),
typeof(ExampleCustomControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(ICommand)));
/// <summary>
/// Dependency Property for resetting the control
/// </summary>
[Description("The command that clears the control"), Category("Common Properties")]
public ICommand ClearCommand {
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(ClearCommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(ClearCommandProperty, value); }
}
public void Clear(object o) {
SearchTextBox = string.Empty;
SelectedItem = null;
ResultList = null;
}
}
Example View snippet:
<Grid HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="30"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<control:ExampleCustomControl Grid.Row="0"
SelectedItem="{Binding Selection, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
<Button Grid.Row="1" x:Name="ResetButton" Command="{Binding SaveCommand}">
Save
</Button>
</Grid>
Example ViewModel:
public class TestViewModel : WorkspaceTask {
public TestViewModel() {
View = new TestView { Model = this };
SaveCommand = new DelegateCommand(Save);
}
private CustomObject _selection;
public CustomObject Selection {
get { return _selection; }
set {
_selection = value;
OnPropertyChanged("Selection");
}
}
public DelegateCommand SaveCommand { get; private set; }
private void Save(object o) {
// perform save
// clear controls
}
}
As others have said the VM shouldn't know about the view directly in MVVM so it doesn't make sense really that the VM triggers something on your custom control to clear everything.
I would have set the DataContext of the custom control to an object that has all the properties you want to clear, which are all each bound (two-way) to your textboxes etc. Then in the Save() method you can set a new object (which the custom control DataContext is bound to) and all the properties will be cleared for you (assuming you have implemented INotifyPropertyChanged on the object).
UPDATED:
As per my comment, see an example of the workaround for your current setup (untested btw):
public static DependencyProperty SelectedItemProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("SelectedItem",
typeof(CustomObject), typeof(ExampleCustomControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(CustomObject), OnSelectedItemChanged));
private static void OnSelectedItemChanged(DependencyObject source, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var cont = source as ExampleCustomControl;
//do all the clearing of txtboxes etc here....
cont.SearchTextBox = string.Empty;
}
But I would still try and move all this into the VM. i.e. have a clear command, like you do with the save command and bind the textbox text etc to a property in the VM and when the command is called it clears everything, which you can then easily call from the Save method in the VM too. But obviously I have no idea what you are trying to achieve in the long run or how selectedItem and the textboxes etc are related, so depends (as always) i guess.
It sounds like you are thinking about this the wrong way. In MVVM the ViewModel should never know anything about the custom controls (hence you are having a problem with this Clear functionality).
Your requirements are a bit vague, but have you considered:
1) If the properties are bound from the VM, can't the Control detect when these are changed?
2) If you really need to call Clear from the XAML layer and want to keep it pure MVVM, then consider something like the Expression Blend SDK's CallMethodAction.
As a followup to my comment. I suspect your command is targeting the View and clearing the TextBoxes directly. Instead, have your command target the ViewModel and clear the properties the View is bound to. Then you can have the command be a property on the ViewModel and call it whenever needed.
Matt Hamilton told me an interesting fact about WPF: binding in two way mode with a static variable is possible in version 4.5.
Unfortunately V4.5 ist still beta, I decided to change my code to get my app finally run correct.
But - still I have similar problems, here we go:
I have a very simple class 'RecallConnectionSettings'. This member of this class should be accessible from everywhere in the code, so I decided to make them static (like this):
public class RecallConnectionSettings
{
private static string Server {get;set;}
}
As you can see: there is only one variable 'Server'.
Now what I want is to make 2WayMode binding from a TextBox Text-property to that 'Server' value.
So I tried this:
<UserControl....>
<UserControl.Resources>
<local:RecallConnectionSettings x:Key="recallConf"/>
</UserControl.Resources>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Source={StaticResource recallConf}, Path=Server,
Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" ... Name="txtServerAdress" />
</UserControl>
This works great when I change the value in the textbox - but not from the other side.
If I change the 'Server' value (by hand), the text-property in my textbox will not update.
Of course not - as I now know I have to implement INotifyProperty in my RecallConnectionSettings-class.
Then it looks like this:
public class RecallConnectionSettings : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private static string s_server;
public static string Server
{
get { return s_server; }
set
{
s_server = value;
OnPropertyChanged("Server");
}
}
public static event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected static void OnPropertyChanged(string name)
{
PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
}
}
}
Well - this can't work too. Because there are only static methods, I can't use the class instance to call the event:
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
So - what to do now?
I thought about using a singleton, so I did this:
public class RecallConnectionSettings : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private static RecallConnectionSettings instance;
private RecallConnectionSettings(){}
public static RecallConnectionSettings Instance
{
get
{
if(instance == null)
{
instance = new RecallConnectionSettings();
}
return instance;
}
}
// ... here comes the other stuff
}
To make it work, I also have to prepare my UserControl, so I did this:
...
<UserControl.DataContext>
<local:RecallConnectionSettings/>
</UserControl.DataContext>
...
At this point there is no need to go on trying, because for doing this, the default constructor must be public.
No matter what I am doing: it does not work.
Seems to me that I still do not understand how that works - would you be so kind and show me the trick ?
Keep the singleton solution and replace this:
...
<UserControl>
<UserControl.DataContext>
<local:RecallConnectionSettings/>
</UserControl.DataContext>
...
</UserControl>
...
By this:
...
<UserControl DataContext="{x:Static local:RecallConnectionSettings.Instance}">
...
</UserControl>
...
WOW -
thanks Nicolas, that works !
For the other readers - here is what you have to code for the textbox now:
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Server, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" Name="txtServerAdresse"/>
Someone please help me understand why this binding does not work...
I have a class called SelectionManager with a property called 'dates' which is populated by a WCF service. The property is an array of structs which bundles a DateTime and an integer count of business objects.
public class SelectionManager : INotifyPropertyChanged {
... other properties ...
public DQMServiceDateCountPair[] dates { get; private set; }
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void NotifyPropertyChanged(string propertyName) {
if (PropertyChanged != null) { PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName)); }
}
I have another class called DateSelector which has a DependencyProperty called 'pairs' setup to be the binding target of 'dates'.
public partial class DateSelector : UserControl {
... other stuff ...
public static readonly DependencyProperty pairsProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"pairs",
typeof(DQMServiceDateCountPair[]),
typeof(DateSelector),
new PropertyMetadata(new DQMServiceDateCountPair[0])
);
public DQMServiceDateCountPair[] pairs {
get { return (DQMServiceDateCountPair[])GetValue(pairsProperty); }
set {
Debug.WriteLine("adding dates");
SetValue(pairsProperty, value);
dateMode = DateMode.Years;
}
}
}
In my MainPage.xaml, I have a line like this:
<date:DateSelector x:Name="dateSelector" pairs="{Binding dates}" />
It's weird, because all my other bindings in MainPage.xaml update correctly, including a ComboBox bound to 'dates'. My UserControl however, will not update. The Debug.Writeline doesn't get called in the set statement of the 'pairs' property.
In playing around with it, I've tried making the DQMServiceDateCountPair[] property into an ObservableCollection and implementing INotifyCollectionChanged, but that doesn't help.
If I leave either the source property or the target property as an array, and make the other an ObservableCollection, then I get a binding error that says it can't automatically convert one to the other, so Silverlight seems aware of the binding, it just doesn't update it.
Can anyone help?
P.S. I'm using Silverlight 3.
Try changing your code as follows:
1. Add DataMember/DataContract attributes
2. Make "set" public
[DataContract]
public class SelectionManager : INotifyPropertyChanged {
[DataMember]
public DQMServiceDateCountPair[] dates { get; set; }
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void NotifyPropertyChanged(string propertyName) {
if (PropertyChanged != null) { PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName)); }
}
Whats actually wierd is that the other stuff is working when you've coded your class the way you have. My guess is that the dates array gets set by some code that runs internally in your selection manager on completion of a WCF request.
Howerver whilst you have implemented INotifyPropertyChanged you aren't actually raising the event that it defines. You can't really combine INotifyPropertyChanged with the Auto-property C# syntax. You need this:-
public SelectionManager : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private DQMServiceDateCountPair[] myDates;
public DQMServiceDateCountPair[] dates
{
get { return myDates; }
set
{
myDates = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("dates");
}
// rest of your code
}
So, here's what what going on. The binding has been working perfectly well this whole time. For the past week I've been struggling with this, it's been happily updating along--but because of a faulty assumption on my part, I could never see it.
In case anyone else harbors this faulty assumption, let me spell it out:
The GetValue and SetValue calls are not made automatically by virtue of the fact that you are declaring a Dependency Property. The "new PropertyMetadata()" part of the declaration has an overload that takes a callback method. In this callback method, you have to set the property value yourself. For instance, in my code, I made this the PropertyMetadata call:
new PropertyMetadata(new PropertyChangedCallback(OnPairsPropertyChanged))
and the callback method reads like this:
private static void OnPairsPropertyChanged( DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e ) {
((DateSelector)d).pairs = (DQMServiceDateCountPair[])e.NewValue;
}
Thanks to everyone who tried to help!