I'm attempting to host an ActiveX control in a WPF app. After attempting to use existing info on the web and here, I've hit a dead-end.
I need to use an ActiveX control provided to communicate with a UV power meter. They provide an application that registers and uses the control and even includes some useful demo apps. I stripped out the OCX file and put it here if needed. You won't have the power meter to talk to, but the app and demos will still load the ActiveX control successfully.
I created a simple Windows Forms application. I was able to bring the ActiveX control into the toolbar, drop it into my form, and everything is fine. The demo apps they provide do this as well.
However, getting this to work in a WPF environment is another story. The control can't be added to the toolbox and "dragged" into the app.
So far I've tried two techniques:
Technique found here. I am able to add a reference to the control, but then I enter namespace hell. The xmlns:ax namespace it suggests making cannot find the information. Here's my attempt based on what the object viewer tells me: xmlns:ax="clr-namespace:OphirUsbXLib;assembly=Interop.OphirUsbXLib"
Technique found here. This is essentially to create a new project that creates a library based on Windows Forms, which contains the ActiveX control (yikes). I am able to add the Windows Forms Host, but I cannot get access to the ActiveX control within. I can make the control public, but I still cannot call methods etc. This doesn't look like the right solution.
In short, I have an ActiveX control that works beautifully in Forms, but is a real bitch to get working in WPF.
Any insight is appreciated!
In this situation I would consider making a WinForms usercontrol which wraps the ActiveX control you are trying to use.
You could make public properties and methods which expose each of the required properties and methods on the ActiveX control, and then host this WinForms UC on the in a WPF WinFormsHost control.
I have already done something similar to this, in reverse, hosting a WPF UserControl in a WinForms UserControl, then hosting that on a VB6 Form in a legacy application.
Related
I am wanting to rewrite one of my Revit Add ins so that it utilizes WPF with MVVM because I like the look and functionality of WPF better than Windows Forms.
I have used the Revit Template Wizzard from Jeremy Tammik for the Form based add in, but adding a WPF user control seems not to work (a run time error that the xaml resource cannot be found).
I found a WPF MVVM revit add in example (AddMaterials, here is the github link, which will add materials from an Excel spreadsheet) but it does not follow what I am expecting to see at the top level.
Revit Add ins have an app.cs file which tells Revit how to register and access the DLL (ribbon panel buttons etc).
A windows WPF app will have app.xaml as the top level entry point.
The Add Materials project has neither which tells me that it must be
a class library, however the views are not using UserControls
rather they are Windows which I prefer. However Visual Studio does not
let you add a Window for a Class Library type project.
The third issue is easily solved by simply copying windows from a WPF application project into a class library project. But I don't really understand how the class library will instantiate in Revit without following the app.cs code from the template. Is anyone else creating add-ins this way, and if so can you let me in on any tricks or discussions that will help? Has anyone created a WPF Revit addin template for Visual Studio?
When I add a WPF window and try to instantiate it I get an error that it cannot find the xaml resource (System.IO.IOException: Cannot locate resource 'xxxx.xaml'). I have tried to fix this according to advice found when googling for this error, but to no avail. I am thinking it comes from being in a form based project, and that I may have to just start with a new project without the form stuff.
I have now verified that indeed you can start with the Revit AddIn Wizzard and use WPF . . . I started from scratch and copied in a window created in another project and got it to run (after adding the various references, namespaces, etc). So my problem seems to just be with the original project which already had a bunch of form stuff added.
Yes, I'm using WPF to create Revit Addins. It works well. You can easily create your own WPF template from the SDK samples:
Start with one of the Autodesk-provided SDK samples. I used the "DockableDialogs" sample. I know this one works, your mileage may vary with the others. If you're looking for windows rather than docked panes in the UI, another sample (perhaps the AddMaterials sample) is probably simpler.
I used Visual Studio to turn the sample into a template. File - Export Template -> select "DockableDialogs" or other WPF sample project.
Create a new project based on the template you just created. This was the easiest method I could find to get the WPF internal bits wired up correctly.
I'm not specifically familiar with the AddMaterials project, but to clarify your bullet points.
Revit Addins - It's not the file name (app.cs) but rather they must extend IExternalApplication or IExternalCommand. If you are creating a xaml interface (rather than just running a command from a ribbon button) you'll use 'IExternalApplication' as your entry point. Look for something like this in the sample:
public class ThisApplication : IExternalApplication ...
I don't used a top level app.xaml, but instead have page.xaml pages which are called by the Revit app. In my case these are Pages rather than Windows, which extend the IDockablePaneProvider class. These must be registered with the application which can then can be show, hide, etc your Panes. I imagine this is simpler with Windows, but haven't done it myself. For the dockable panes, your xaml.cs should start out something like:
public partial class MainPage : Page, Autodesk.Revit.UI.IDockablePaneProvider ...
Yes, the project is a class library in the sense that it is a collection of classes, at least one of which extends IExternalApplication or IExternalCommand. Remember that you're not creating a standalone application, but adding functionality to an existing Windows application (Revit). Revit will instantiate the ThisApplication class and then call its .OnStartup() method when the Revit application starts. This shouldn't stop you from adding .xaml or .cs files to the project, though. I can do it using VS Community 2015 using Ctrl-Shift-A.
Hopefully this gets you started - I've been able to implement a WPF UI in Revit without any prior WPF experience, and I'm not even a real programmer, so it's definitely possible. Good Luck!
addendum
If you want to add WPF elements to an existing revit addin, you can follow the instructions here: How can I connect xaml and xaml.cs files
Ultimately I found it easier to migrate my addin code into a template made from a working sample, you may want to try this approach as well.
This is a question about design approach. I have limited COM experience and a little WCF experience. My constraints are given by the application environment, but I have some design flexibility.
From within a VB6 dll, I need to start, and communicate with, a WPF application. The WPF application is currently an exe, but I could make it a library if that helped. I would like to provide two way communication between the VB6 dll and the WPF application. I have some flexability to adjust the design of the VB6 dll.
I'm developing C# using in VS2010 and .NET 4.
How many components should I use? Can I start the WPF application In-Proc with the VB6 dll? Should there be a third component between them? Can COM+ play a helpful role? Do I have to make the entire WPF application COM-visible? Is there a down-side to doing this?
I'm looking for a design approach that I can prototype. I'm willing to research the details.
I would
Create a Web Service from the WPF application, using WCF. I would abstract out those aspects of the WPF application which should be accessed remotely. This would explicitly not include any of the user interface code.
I would create a simple class library project, and use "Add Service Reference" to add a reference to the WCF service.
I would make the methods of the class library COM-visible
I would call those methods from VB6
This has the benefit of removing any considerations of user interface from the equation.
Out of the options available I like the COM option more than the 'start another process' option for the simplicity that the inter 'application' communication will be via method calls rather than WCF or anything similar.
I am assuming that your VB DLL lives in a window'd process and not a service or web application. You would only need to mark any exposed types as COM visible, that is the classes, their argument and return types.
You may have to wrap your WPF UI inside the windows forms ElementHost [1] but I'm not sure, try it and see.
I'm not sure if you saw this [2] in your search, it sounds do-able but unsupported, ok as long as you don't have too much going on.
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.integration.elementhost.aspx
[2] http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/wpf/thread/7555ba6a-1359-4dfe-aa23-c31a8f121142/
I work on an application primarily written in VB6 but most of the recent code is written in .net with UI components built in WPF and some WinForms. Datasources for this application are WCF, MSSQL server, and a propritary unix based server. All the WCF calls are made from data access components referenced by the .net UI components.
You can host WPF in VB6 windows or other container controls. Start by getting the Interop Forms Toolkit and build shell user controls to host your WPF controls.
To be able to host WPF in these controls you need to build a WinForms usercontrol which contains a ElementHost, which you can set the content to your WPF usercontrol.
WPF Usercontrol inside an Element Host inside a
WinForms usercontrol inside a VB6 usercontrol or
window
The interop toolkit will want to build VB.Net code but you can do it in C#, although I have not tried this. The usercontrols created by the interop toolkit will be exposed as COM components which you can reference VB6 by adding them as components via Project > Components and then you will find them in the toolbox.
In terms of data sources (WCF, databases) etc, you should build all your data access in .net components referenced directly from the UI components, don't try to call back in to VB6 libraries, you will probably just create a mess.
In my application I also have a configuration section which I call from the VB6 application startup which sets up an IoC container for all the .net components.
From a best practice approach I actually would recommend rewriting your VB6 code to .net and putting VB6 out of the picture. If this is not an option then you have a number of options, my explanation is just one of them.
I want to integrate two existing applications into one. One of those apps is built on Windows Forms and the other on WPF.
Is it possible to achieve this?
WPF supplies the WindowsFormsHost class that allows you to host WinForms controls inside a WPF window; conversely, WinForms supplies ElementHost that allows you to host WPF controls inside a form.
Unfortunately how well things work out is highly dependent on exactly what you are doing, last time I checked there were more than a few rough edges. For more information, definitely start from this MSDN page.
If you want to have "independent" WPF windows and WinForms forms inside the same application, you will have to make both frameworks "share" some code in your UI thread's message loop. For a primer on how to do that, see here.
There are various classes to help you with this.
For hosting Windows Forms controls in a WPF Window, you can use the WindowsFormsHost class. For hosting WPF Controls in a Windows Forms Window, you can use the ElementHost class.
You can look here for mor information on the subject (windows forms section):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms753178.aspx
What are my options for interacting with a COM control from silverlight?
In my particular project, I have a legacy ActiveX authentication control which I would like to leverage in my silverlight application. Without too many boring details, the control takes a couple of parameters, prompts the user for credentials or tokens, and raises events. I need to set the parameters from my control, and somehow get the events' data to my control.
Furthermore, I would like to get the UI to seem as homogeneous as possible.
What are the best ways of doing this?
Silverlight 4 Beta was announced to have COM Interop for Trusted Applications.
More information on the Tim Heuer blog: http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2009/11/18/whats-new-in-silverlight-4-complete-guide-new-features.aspx#com
IIRC, Silverlight doesn't provide any way work with COM directly - there's no P/Invoke nor COM Interop - and the sandbox wouldn't allow you to do that in any case. However, you could host ActiveX control in the browser alongside your Silverlight application (which obviously restricts this to IE only), and then write some in-browser JavaScript glue to work with it - JavaScript can interact with both ActiveX and Silverlight.
I don't think you can reasonably host an ActiveX control inside your Silverlight application, however. The closest you can do is as described above, but position ActiveX control (in browser DOM) on top if Silverlight canvas in the right spot, so it looks like a single UI. Not sure if this will not produce any rendering artifacts, however.
I would like to create an ActiveX control that uses Silverlight. Is this possible/sensible and does anyone have an sample code for this?
I am working in a legacy (non web) system that cannot directly use WPF/Silverlight controls. But the system can access ActiveX controls. The thought is that we may be able to host Silverlight in an ActiveX control, and therefore update our rather dated UI.
Read this article.
Silverlight COM Ref.
The article indicates activeX controls in 'agcore.dll' On windows it is actually imported through 'npctrl.dll'.
you compile may have some sort of activex control wizard.
EDIT: With that said. It might be as easy to host IWebBrowser in an activeX control and embedd silvelight into the browser control from local storage via 'xaml'.