I have a set of C files that I would like to use. Can I just copy them to my include directory, or do I have to compile them. I would think they would be compiled in the final binary.
You need to compile those C files if you want to use them.
To make use of what's in those C files, you'll nead a header file that declares what's inside them.
Those header files is what you'd put in your include folder, and you'll compile the C files together with your other C files. (Or you could make a library out of those C files)
Yes, they need to be compiled so that they are available at the linking step. C is not an interpreted language, so having the sources present in an include directory would do nothing for execution.
You can keep the source files at the same location. The include files will be in the include directory. You can use the compilation option -I./<include-file-directory> to specify from where to fetch the include files.
The final binary will be compiled version of all your source files which you give to the compiler. You have to explicitly specify every file to be compiled along the with final executable name.
In case you dont do so a default executable is created with the name a.out(i am assuming the platform to be linux and compiler to be gcc) in the directory where you compile.
Check the link for more details on compilation using Makefile.
Related
I'm trying to figure out how to add header and object files to the standard library so that I can use my custom files as easy as the standard library.
Currently I have to type the path to the header file in the .c file and then link the object file path when compiling.
I would like to just be able to add:
#include <mystdlib.h>
and not worry about linking the object file like I do when I reference the stdio.h header file.
I have searched around, but I fear I'm not using the proper terminology as I don't seem to find the results I need. Am I the first to want to do this, or it is just impossible, and therefore people don't even try?
gcc uses environment variables C_INCLUDE_PATH and LIBRARY_PATH to look for header and library files. Setting them somewhere (eg., your bash_profile) should achieve what you describe:
export C_INCLUDE_PATH="$HOME/include"
export LIBRARY_PATH="$HOME/lib"
Alternatively, the -I and -L flags add directories to the list of directories to be searched for header files and library files, respectively.
edit: As noted by #ChrisStratton below, the library name or object file needs to be explicitly specified. AFAIK, there is no way to make gcc always link against a library (like with libc).
sources:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Environment-Variables.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Directory-Options.html
I work for a group in which our test bucket has hundreds of .c source programs. The .c programs are fairly small and they all include the same 10 .h header files. These .h files are fairly large.
Each time we get a new library file to link our test programs to test, we run a script to recompile and run our test bucket against. The problem is that the compiling takes fairly long, especially if the environment is virtual.
Is there a way to compile the .h header files once, put in a separate object file and have those many .c source files link to said object file? I think this will speed up compiling time. I am willing to change/remove all the #include in the .c source programs.
Any suggestions to speeding up compile time is greatly appreciated.
Also, I should say that a script executes a makefile PER .c source test program! The makefile is not told to compile all programs in the current directory. Each test program is compiled into its own executable.
You could use precompiled header feature. See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Precompiled-Headers.html
You've asked further suggestions to speed up your compilation.
One way can be using ccache. Basically, ccache keeps a cache of the object files compiled so far and returns them (instead of re-compiling again over and over) when it recognises that the same source file is being compiled again.
Using it should be as simple as
Install ccache
Prefix your gcc/cc/g++ command with ccache
Rewrite your headers. Strip off all definition and leave in header. Strip off all implementation and put in new .c. Compile as library. Link with solution. Distribute library on runtime system.
If I understand correctly, the way libraries typically work is by using precompiled code in object files ( .so on Linux systems? ), while providing header files ( .h ) for use in projects.
What happens is when you compile, the #include <library.h> directive finds that header and pastes its contents in the source file being compiled. Then, once the source file is compiled, it is linked to the precompiled object file. That way, the library can be included in a huge number of projects without it needing to be compiled from source each time. The only part that must be recompiled when linking to a library is the ( relatively ) small amount of code in the headers, which essentially makes library functions and variables accessible to the source code.
All this means is that to drastically speed up compilation, your best bet is to take all of the functions out of the 10 .h files, and instead leave only the function prototypes in the headers. Once you have all of the functions in separate .c source files, you can compile them into an object file ( typically -c flag ). Then, whenever you need to compile a new program against the 10 headers you typically use, you can instead include your stripped down version of the headers, and link to the precompiled object. Since only the new code in the .c file has to be compiled, instead of all of the code in the headers, the process should be much faster.
I am studying the C language, and I saw a new extension that I had not seen before.
What do files with the extension like library.h.in mean?
Is it as the simple header with extension ".h"? What's the difference?
These files are usually the input for autoconf which will generate final .h files.
Here's an example from PCRE:
#define PCRE_MAJOR #PCRE_MAJOR#
#define PCRE_MINOR #PCRE_MINOR#
#define PCRE_PRERELEASE #PCRE_PRERELEASE#
#define PCRE_DATE #PCRE_DATE#
Autoconf will replace all variables (#…#) with the respective values and the result will be a .h file.
Typically, a .h.in file is a header template that is filled in to become the actual header by a configure script based on the outcome of several tests for features present on the target platform.
Files ending with .in are typically template files used by a program called configure that generates a new file without the extension after substituting for variable expansions. I.e., if you're looking at a source tree that has files called, e.g. Makefile.in in the tree, then ./configure will generate a usable Makefile that can be used to "make" from source.
I have two sets of header files and .c files in my project i will only ever be including one of these headers but i want the option to quickly swap the header im including. Both header files have some declarations that are exactly the same but the implementations in the .c files are different. Basically what I need is way to tell the compiler to only compile the .c file that is associated with the header im including elsewhere in my program.
You could always specify the .c or .o file that you're going to link against at compile/link time for instance
gcc -o myexe file1.c/file1.o
or
gcc -o myexe file2.c/file2.o
you could even make this a different make directive if you have a makefile if you have the same header file but 2 different implementations. I would recommend just using 1 header file and changing the underlying implementation, no point in having 2 headers with similar declarations.
If both header files are exactly the same then you don't need to maintain two header files. You can keep only one copy. Whichever code includes the header file can include this single header file only.
You can always specify which .c file you want to compile while compiling. In gcc, you can mention the C file to be compiled in the command line. In Visual Studio, you can include the correct C file.
I guess you should maintain only one header file and include that in your code. Introduce a flag to the makefile to link which implementation to be linked. You have not mentioned what are you using to build.
I'm trying to use a non-standard header file (http://ndevilla.free.fr/gnuplot). Its used in lots of codes in various different places on my computer. Currently I have to put the header file and the object file in every folder which its needed with the preprocessor directive:
#include "gnuplot_i.h"
In the file. Is there a way by which I can put the header file in one place so I can reference it like other standard header file. Cheers.
Compile with -I<directory>
E.g.
compile with -I/usr/local/gnuplot/inc.
Also it might be worth your reading up on include paths and the difference between:
#include <include_file.h>
and
#include "include_file.h"
Linking in an object file needs to be done explicitly the same way as a C file, which means (I believe) that you need a full path. However if you archive it into a proper library then you can use -l<library name> and -L<library path> instead. E.g.
gcc -I/usr/local/gnuplot/inc -L/usr/local/gnuplot/lib -lgnuplot -o my_prog my_prog.c
Most compilers have a flag -I that lets you add a directory of your choosing to the search path for include files.