Are there any plugins for visual studio (any version) or any other ide that can show you the standard library function prototypes and their (examples) , return etc for the standard c library... much like the java code helper found in eclipse if I am not mistaken (I am not a java developer but I think I saw something similar to what I described).
note: I know I can use google or msdn but I am asking about other alternatives.
Visual Assist X is by far the best C/C++ improvement for Visual Studio.
Edit in response to userHel's comment:
I'll give it a shot. but how come nobody came up with a free version
Probably because it's really hard to do well. You practically need an entire compiler just to parse C++ sufficiently to give the kinds of features VA-X does. At the other end of the stack, you would also need an almost flawless integration with Visual Studio. Just imagine what's in between...
This is where firstborn selling comes in...
KDevelop4 has good C++ analysis support which is constantly improving, including features which I think were inspired by VAX. I haven't used VAX so I can't comment on feature parity, but it has all the C++ features I need. Of note is the tooltip when holding the mouse over an identifier, which gives type info as well as links to the definition (and declaration if available).
For linux development, the man pages are excellent. I'd like to know of something similar for Windows.
Related
Are there existing algorithm visualization tool for C programs? like visualizing an execution of a C program through animated execution stack.
I recommend ddd for fancy GUI debugging visualizations. It visualizes all the data structures and makes pretty graphs and gives you access to your regular debugger.
Oracle Studio for Linux (former Sun Studio) Performance Analyzer has the timeline feature.
That is exactly an animated stack representation.
Like on this screenshot:
For C++, there are educational program visualizers that you might want to try:
VIP (Visual InterPreter), you should be able to visualize your own code by editing one of the examples on the site. Supports only a C++ subset, though.
The Teaching Machine, can be used as a Java program or an Eclipse plugin.
EDIT: Updated the The Teaching Machine link.
You can try ollydbg with the ollyflow plugin, or have a look at IDA
with its call graphing plugin (there are other plugins along these lines as well).
C Tutor - Visualize C code execution to learn C online
Is a great tool for visualizing the workflow of your C/C++ code - as well as a number of other languages. To my knowledge you cannot enter any command line arguments, but that's the only limitation I can think of. The benefits are that it is free, web based, and very intuitive.
I want to do RAD with C, but the only ones I can find only use C++.
Check out Glade, a UI designer for GTK+.
You may have to define what you expect when you use the term RAD. Technically is is a methodology agnostic of language (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapid_application_development, to understand what I mean).
If you mean "visual development" (which is the context in which it is applied to tools such as Delphi and C++Builder, primarily as marketing buzzwords and because Microsoft had already essentially trademarked "Visual" with respect to development tools), then use of C would require an application framework and tool to support this. There is a reason why such tools are usually implemented with object-oriented languages; it is a much more natural fit for GUI elements. This being the case, a tool vendor would be unlikely to choose C as the basis for such a tool.
Also it may be useful to understand what platform(s) you wish to target.
A judicious bit of Googling threw up a couple of things that may fit your requirements:
Auto-C
MGui
You may use BCX DevSuite Pro. It comes with GUI Designers that produces BCX code. When you compile BCX code, it produces also C code.
Is there a pdf or video or some media that can inform me on how to program Winforms with C++. Obviously C++ is the most common programming language and I already have some prior knowledge. But when I try to find media about programming in C++, the examples are usually Console applications. I want some media that can teach me how to program Winforms in C++.
Here's a tutorial showing how to write Windows Forms applications in C++/CLI.
Just be aware that most samples tend to be in C#. Many people purposely use C# for the forms, C++ for their logic, and use C++/CLI to expose their logic as .NET assemblies (For easy use by C#/VB.NET). This helps, since the design-time experience is much nicer in C# or VB.NET for Windows Forms.
Bad idea, IMHO. Managed C++ is ugly; it was never meant to be a garbage-collected language. Its strength lies elsewhere. I recommend C# instead - similar syntax, highly marketable skill.
Preemtive snarky comment: all C++ is ugly.
Have you looked at the MSDN articles? I'm not saying I recommend this, but they do at least give a start.
As far as Seva Alekseyev's comment that all C++ is ugly: it's like the old comment about democracy being the worst form of government except for all the others. He's right that all C++ is ugly, but fails to mention that all the alternatives are even worse.
Just create a new C++ .NET project and start programming your C++. And additional syntax applies to .NET is managed pointers and .NET classes. Information about them you can find in MSDN, including lots of useful examples.
Well, there are opinions all over the place on this topic. My motto is always to use the right size hammer for the job-- and, in general, C++ is the wrong size hammer for making winforms. I love C++, but I only use it when there is an absolute necessity for speed of operations.
C# (or VB.Net, if you must) has MUCH better support for UI creation than C++, though I have noticed that Visual Studio 2010 offers some much needed enhancements to make developing Winforms easier in .NET 4.0. If you MUST stick with C++, look into obtaining a beta version of Visual Studio 2010. Otherwise, use C# as your UI, data access, file manipulation, general purpose language and C++ if you have to write a custom physics engine to go with it.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
so as per one of my previous questions, I'm brushing up on my C skills.
My question is, what do people use for developing C?
Lots of people use Emacs, and have done so for years, but is it better to learn emacs than just use an IDE such as Geany or KDevelop?
Would also be interested to hear from those still using emacs, and why they use it over other apps?
Please note that I'm only really interested in the free IDEs / editors.
EDIT:
Thanks for posting links which answer some of my questions, but I guess what I'm really wondering about is:
Whether learning to edit using emacs / vim and compiling / debugging using the gcc-toolchain is worth it instead of just using an IDE, and why?
What are peoples reasons for not migrating to an IDE?
Has anyone moved from terminal-centric development to IDE development, and why did they move?
I started off by using IDEs, Microsoft or not. Then, while working on QNX some long time ago, I was forced to do with a text editor + compiler/linker. Now I prefer this simple combination––a syntax highlighting editor + C compiler and linker cli + make––to any IDEs, even if environment allows for them.
The reasons are, for me:
it's everywhere. If you program in C, you do have the compiler, and usually you can get yourself an editor. The first thing I do––I get myself nedit on Linux or Notepad++ on Windows. I would go with vi, but GUI editors provide for a better fonts, and that is important when you look at code all day
you can program remotely, via ssh, when you need to. And it does help a lot sometimes to be able to ssh into the target and do some quick things there
it keeps me close to CLI, preferably UNIX/Linux CLI. So all the commands are on my fingertips, and when I need them I don't have to go read a reference book. And UNIX CLI can do things IDEs often can't––because their developers didn't think you'd need them
most importantly, it is very much like seeing the Matrix in raw code. I operate files, so I'm forced to keep them manageable. I'm finding things in my code manually, which makes me keep it simple and organized. I do Config Management explicitly, so I know when I'm synced and how. I know my Makefiles because I write them, and they only do what I tell them to
(if you wonder if that works in "really big projects"––it does work, and the bigger the project the more performance it gains me)
when people ask me to look at their code, I don't have to learn the IDE they use
I've moved from a terminal text-editor+make environment to Eclipse for most of my projects. Spanning from C and C++, to Java and Python to name few languages I am currently working with.
The reason was simply productivity. I could not afford spending time and effort on keeping all projects "in my head" as other things got more important.
There are benefits of using the "hardcore" approach (terminal) - such as that you have a much thinner layer between yourself and the code which allows you to be a bit more productive when you're all "inside" the project and everything is on the top of your head. But I don't think it is possible to defend that way of working just for it's own sake when your mind is needed elsewhere.
Usually when you work with command line tools you will frequently have to solve a lot of boilerplate problems that will keep you from being productive. You will need to know the tools in detail to fully leverage their potentials. Also maintaining a project will take a lot more effort. Refactoring will lead to updates in make-files, etc.
To summarize: If you only work on one or two projects, preferably full-time without too much distractions, "terminal based coding" can be more productive than a full blown IDE. However, if you need to spend your thinking energy on something more important an IDE is definitely the way to go in order to keep productivity.
Make your choice accordingly.
Emacs is an IDE.
edit: OK, I'll elaborate. What is an IDE?
As a starting point, let's expand the acronym: Integrated Development Environment. To analyze this, I start from the end.
An environment is, generally speaking, the part of the world that surrounds the point of view. In this case, it is what we see on our monitor (perhaps hear from our speakers) and manipulate through our keyboard (and perhaps a mouse).
Development is what we want to do in this environment, its purpose, if you want. We use the environment to develop software. This defines what subparts we need: an editor, an interface to the REPL, resp. the compiler, an interface to the debugger, and access to online documentation (this list may not be exhaustive).
Integrated means that all parts of the environment are somehow under a uniform surface. In an IDE, we can access and use the different subparts with a minimum of switching; we don't have to leave our defined environment. This integration lets the different subparts interact better. For example, the editor can know about what language we write in, and give us symbol autocompletion, jump-to-definition, auto-indentation, syntax highlighting, etc.. It can get information from the compiler, automatically jump to errors, and highlight them. In most, if not all IDEs, the editor is naturally at the heart of the development process.
Emacs does all this, it does it with a wide range of languages and tasks, and it does it with excellence, since it is seamlessly expandable by the user wherever he misses anything.
Counterexample: you could develop using something like Notepad, access documentation through Firefox and XPdf, and steer the compiler and debugger from a shell. This would be a Development Environment, but it would not be integrated.
I have used Eclipse with the CDT plug in quite successfully.
Emacs would be better if it had a text editor in it... :-)
Use Code::Blocks. It has everything you need and a very clean GUI.
Netbeans has great C and C++ support. Some people complain that it's bloated and slow, but I've been using it almost exclusively for personal projects and love it. The code assistance feature is one of the best I've seen.
How come nobody mentions Bloodshed Devc++? Havent used it in a while, but i learnt c/c++ on it. very similar to MS Visual c++.
If you are looking for a free, nice looking, cross-platform editor, try Komodo Edit. It is not as powerful as Komodo IDE, however that isn't free. See feature chart.
Another free, extensible editor is jEdit. Crossplatform as it is 100% pure Java. Not the fastest IDE on earth, but for Java actually very fast, very flexible, not that nice looking though.
Both have very sophisticated code folding, syntax highlighting (for all languages you can think of!) and are very flexible regarding configuring it for you personal needs. jEdit is BTW very easy to extend to add whatever feature you may need there (it has an ultra simple scripting language, that looks like Java, but is actually "scripted").
If you're on Windows then it's a total no-brainer: Get Visual C++ Express.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Any online C compiler that you know which can do the following:
Compile and execute the C programs online
File handling
System functions like exec(), system(), fork()
Or any compiler which does not need installation procedure (I mean that you can just copy paste a folder to run the compiler easily)
Note:Please do not propose Turbo C.I know some online compilers at codepad.org (gcc).
I was using codeide.com but its out of service now I think.
And as asked above online compiler will be a best advice that you can give for me.
My environment is Windows ... Thanks in advance.
Any advices on other Language compilers are also invited
Just install something like tcc. It's seriously not worth messing around with an online compiling site if you're going to be compiling files on any sort of regular basis.
Comeau has an online C/C++ compiler, but it's mainly to evaluate their compiler.
or cygwin
I'd rather recommend to install cygwin, you'll get an unix-like environment, with gcc. Then setting up a Makefile - or even just a shell script - to be able to compile is not a big deal.
You asked for other languages: Here's one for Lisp (not a compiler, but an interpreter)
Online Lisp interpreter in Flash
rextester
Maybe my answer is a bit late, but we have created an online compiler and IDE where you can run and create your files using just a browser.
At the moment we support a few languages (C, C++, ObjC, Java, Pascal, Fortran) and a simple file system, but we will enable many more features for better coding and debugging during the near future.
All the features offered at the moment are completely free and there is no registration needed (you can register though in order to keep your files online).
You can try our service here: www.sourcelair.com
DJGPP Public Access Cross-Compiler (C/C++, DOS32, based on GCC)
yet another online compiler:
http://cmpe150-1.cmpe.boun.edu.tr
It supports sytax highlight, indentation etc. I wrote it as a part of my MS thesis
PS: did not test fork command
We have another compiler for C and C++ here: http://www.codepad.org/
I have nothing for C. For other languages, this is a ruby interpreter. But honestly the best online development environment is the browser itself. Javascript is an advanced language. Combined with technologies like CSS and DHTML and frameworks like jQuery or Prototype you can build graphics applications. It is not hard to find debuggers (like Firebug) also.
Of course you can't interact with the file system. To overcome this you could write a plug-in for a browser (notably Firefox). There are many resources available for this and although it is not as straight forward as pure javascript, it is easier than most people believe.
For Python and Sage, try out http://live.codenode.org. It is also open source under the BSD license, so you can be download and run it from your own computer, more info is here: http://codenode.org
just a sudgestion.
I do not know why you do not want simply to install a compiler. However did you considered the possibility of using a portable one?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_C_Compiler
best,
Ste
One of the better lists for C++ is isocpp Getting Started page. Unfortunately Cameau's seems to be disabled for now. LiveWorkspace has been in maintenance mode for a while and it is not clear when it is coming back, which is unfortunate since it has a simple interface and when it was working allowed you to switch between gcc, clang and intel very easily.
Of the ones that are left Coliru is the most powerful, you have a full command line available and you can save files and therefore uses multiple files in your project.
The isocpp list somehow is missing codepad which although rather primitive along with Coliru allows you to use boost.
Coliru, ideone and codepad all support many other languages as well. The list of languages supported by ideone and codepad is pretty large and is obvious on the main pages with Coliru you don't have a list but besides C and C++ it also supports python, perl and ruby.