Executing SqlScript at the remote DB causes an error:
Failed to connect to SQL database. (-2147467259 myDB1)
The SqlScript is the following:
<sql:SqlString
Id='UpdateSomething1'
SqlDb='myDB1'
ExecuteOnInstall='yes'
User='SQLUser'
ContinueOnError='no'
ExecuteOnReinstall='no'
ExecuteOnUninstall='no'
Sequence='26'
SQL='[SqlString]'/>
where the Db is:
<sql:SqlDatabase
Id='myDB1'
Database='myDB1'
Server='[DATABASE_SERVER]'
CreateOnInstall='yes'
DropOnInstall='no'
DropOnUninstall='no'
ContinueOnError='no'/>
and the user is:
<util:User
Id="SQLUser"
Name="myUserName1"
Password="password1"/>
The problem does not occur with the local DB.
We extracted more specific error message from the IP traffic (the actual error that the remote MSSQL server throws):
Can not open database "myDb1"
requested by the login. The login
failed. {remote machine name} Login
failed for user {user name}
Thank you for any help and information.
Max
I would need more information to be sure but here are some general observations I've had over the years.
In MSI, you typically run deferred custom actions with no impersonation so that they run as Administrator to support managed/elevated installs where the invoking user doesn't have admin either because they really don't or because UAC hasn't elevated their process.
In InstallShield, and I'm sure WiX is similar, this typically causes a problem for remote database connections. If you have a dialog in the UI sequence to test the connection it will succeed ( when expected to ) because the interactive user has permissions to that database/instance. And if installing locally it will succeed because SYSTEM (typically) has permissions the database/instance. But when installing to a remote instance it will frequently fail because SYSTEM can't authenticate against SQL on the remote machine. Your mileage will improve if using sql authentication ( e.g. SA ).
Personally I have some practices that I follow. If I'm creating a single tier system, I restrict the database to (local). If I'm creating a 2 tier system, I create two installers: one for my database layer which I restrict to (local) and one for my application layer which I then reuse the sqllogin dialog to verify connectivity and write the values out to a web.config or app.config. This allows me to loosely couple the layers and service them independently of each other.
I hope this helps to understand the types of issues that can be encountered. I don't know your exact problem without seeing your environement.
The WiX custom actions are just using standard OLEDB commands to connect to the remote server. If the credentials work locally but not remotely then I'd start by ensuring the credentials are correct. There isn't anything different in the WiX custom actions between local and remote servers.
Looking at your database element I would say that you have not added the User attribute to the sql:SqlDatabase so it is creating the database impersonating the current user.
Try:
<sql:SqlDatabase
Id='myDB1'
Database='myDB1'
Server='[DATABASE_SERVER]'
User='SQLUser'
CreateOnInstall='yes'
DropOnInstall='no'
DropOnUninstall='no'
ContinueOnError='no' />
Related
What I am trying to do:
We have a Task Scheduler that kicks off an EXE, which in the course of its runtime, will connect to SQL Server.
So that would be:
taskServer.myDomain triggers the Task Scheduler action
taskServer.myDomain exe runs locally
taskServer.myDomain initiates a connection to sqlServer.myDomain
The scheduled task is associated with a service account (svc_user) that is set to run with highest privilege, run whether the user is logged in or not, and store credentials for access to non-local resources.
The actual behavior
What we are seeing is the Task Scheduler is indeed running as svc_user. It triggers the EXE as expected, and the EXE is also running as svc_user. When the EXE initiates a connection to SQL Server, it errors on authentication.
Looking at the Event Viewer we can see the failure trying to initialize the connection to SQL
Exception Info: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPoolIdentity, System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionString, System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCredential, System.Object, System.String, System.Security.SecureString, Boolean, System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionString, System.Data.SqlClient.SessionData, System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool, System.String, Boolean, System.Data.SqlClient.SqlAuthenticationProviderManager)
And then looking at the SQL Server logs we can see the root of the issue
Logon,Unknown,Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON'. Reason: Could not find a login matching the name provided.
The connection initialized by the EXE to SQL Server is trying to authenticate as ANONYMOUS LOGON.
What I have tried
Background
This issue popped up when our IT team started deploying a GPO lockdown in our environments. So in order to get to this point, we first had to add some GPO exceptions to allow the svc_user to:
log on locally
log on as batch job
Progress?
This is where we started being able to capture the ANONYMOUS LOGON error in SQL Server. From there we tried a handful of other GPO exceptions including
Allow Credential Save
Enable computer and user accounts to be trusted for delegation
The actual issue?
So it would appear that this is a double hop delegation issue. Which eventually led me here and then via the answer, here and here.
So I tried adding GPO policies to allow delegating fresh credentials using the WSMAN/* protocol + wildcard.
Two issues with this:
the Fresh credentials refer to prompted credentials while the EXE is running as a service during off-hours and inheriting the credentials from the TaskScheduler
the WSMAN protocol appears to be used for remote PowerShell sessions (via the original question in the serverfault post) and not SQL Service connections.
So, I added the protocol MSSQLSvc/* to the enabled delegation and tried all permutations of Fresh, Saved and Default delegation. (This was all done in Local Computer Policy -> Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> system -> Credentials Delegation)
Where it gets weird
We have another server, otherServer.myDomain, which we setup with the same TaskSchedule. It is setup with the same GPO memberships, but seems to be able to successfully connect to SQL Server. AFAIK, the servers are identical as far as setup and configuration.
The Present
I have done a bit more digging into anywhere I could think that might offer clues as to how I can feed the credentials through or where they might be falling through. Including watching the traffic between the taskServer and the sqlServer as well as otherServer and sqlServer.
I was able to see NTLM challenges coming from the sqlServer to the taskServer/otherServer.
In the case of taskServer, the NTLM response only has a workstationString=taskServer
On otherServer, the NTLM response has workstationString=otherServer, domainString=myDomain, and userString=svc_user.
Question
What is the disconnect between hop 1 (task scheduler to EXE) and hop 2 (EXE to SQL on sqlServer)? And why does this behavior not match between taskServer and otherServer?
So I finally have an update/solution for this post.
The crux of the issue was a missing SPN. The short answer:
Add an SPN for sqlServer associated with the service account SQL services are running as (not the svc_user)
example: SetSPN -S MSSQLSvc/sqlServer.myDomain myDomain\svc_sql_user
Add another SPN like above but w/ the sql service port
example: SetSPN -S MSSQLSvc/sqlServer.myDomain:1433 myDomain\svc_sql_user
Set the SQL service user account to allow delegation like so
I Created SQL Server Database in Azure which is serverless and tried to access it using my SQL Server Management Studio in my local but I couldn't get it work.
It always gives me this message:
I tried to whitelist also my IP in Azure but still I get the same result.
Is there a possible way to make it connect?
Is the database currently online or paused?
I'll repeat the text from #David Browne's link:
If a serverless database is paused, then the first login will resume the database and return an error stating that the database is unavailable with error code 40613. Once the database is resumed, the login must be retried to establish connectivity. Database clients with connection retry logic should not need to be modified.
So;
Assuming the database is paused, this is normal operation
Please read docs
You need to retry after the database starts OR manually pre-start it using the Powershell provided in the link below
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-serverless#connectivity
And yes, you also need to whitelist your IP address as you have already done.
Obviously this flavour of SQL is unsuitable for some types of applications - there is more information in the link - I suggest you read the whole thing.
I'm working on logs. I want to reproduce a log in which the application fails to connect to the server.
Currently the commands I'm using are
db2 force applications all
This closes all the connections and then one by one I deactivate each database using
db2 deactivate db "database_name"
What happens is that it temporary blocks the connections and after a minute my application is able to create the connection again, due to which I am not able to regenerate the log. Any Ideas how can I do this?
What you are looking for is QUIESCE.
By default users can connect to a database. It becomes active and internal in-memory data structures are initialized. When the last connection closes, the database becomes inactive. Activating a database puts and leaves them initialized and "ready to use".
Quiescing the database puts them into an administrative state. Regular users cannot connect. You can quiesce a single database or the entire instance. See the docs for some options to manage access to quiesced instances. The following forces all users off the current database and keeps them away:
db2 quiesce db immediate
If you want to produce a connection error for an app, there are other options. Have you ever tried to connect to a non-estisting port, Db2 not listening on it? Or revoke connect privilege for that user trying to connect.
There are several testing strategies that can be used, they involve disrupting the network connection between client and server:
Alter the IP routing table on the client to route the DB2 server address to a non-existent subnet
Use the connection via a proxy software that can be turned off, there is a special proxy ToxiProxy, which was designed for the purpose of testing network disruptions
Pull the Ethernet cable from the client machine, observe then plug it back in (I've done this)
This has the advantage of not disabling the DB2 server for other testing in progress.
My windows service is using integrated authentication and running under Local System account and got the below exception.
The target principal name is incorrect. Cannot generate SSPI context.
The SQL Server Service is running under domain admin user e.g. "domain\administrator". If I change the SQL Server Service to run under Local System account then it fixes the above error.
Can anyone explain why it's happening like this? We have an InstallShield wizard which installs our application on client side i don't know how we can handle this behavior through the wizard. Also changing the user for SQL Server Service is not realistic as well because the client may not allow it.
Note: Once when my windows service works fine and I revert the SQL Server run under the admin account my service runs fine. I guess there are some permissions are set to the local system account.
Before it, I ran the Kerberos which generated the following script to run and fixed the issue. After this it was not required to change the user for SQL Server Service.
SetSPN -d "MSSQLSvc/FQDN" "domain\machine$"
SetSPN -s "MSSQLSvc/FQDN" "domain\administrator"
Please explain why it's happening and what is the best way to handle the situation?
When running under the Local System account, sql-server registers an spn for every service it controls automatcially up to active-directory, and attempts to unregister them when the service shuts down. The Local System account has the ability to communicate over the network as the computer account and thus can indicate to Active Directory as to when to make changes about itself and the SPN SQL Service wants to register. When you change the SQL Server account over to an AD domain user account, the Local System account immediately loses it's ability to control this; therefore you must manually delete the existing SPNs previously registered for that SQL service by Local System before registering new SPNs. You should now notice why its nice that the SQL server script helpfully calls for a deletion of the old SPN followed by the registration of a new one in order to prevent issues. When this isn't done properly - you'll get an authentication error when the kerberos clients obtain a ticket for the old invalid SPN - because it was never deleted and any Kerberos-aware service will always reject a ticket for a wrong SPN. After you make SPN changes, always be sure to restart the SQL Server service and right after that if you’re testing with a user have that user log out and log back in. This answers your main question here.
Please see this Microsoft document for further reading on the subject: Register a Service Principal Name for Kerberos Connections. There's also a very good youtube video on this exact problem, that's where I learned about it and how to resolve it. Ignore "SSRS" in the title, I've watched the entirety and the guidance applies to any and all services by SQL which have SPNs.
You had a secondary question at the very end of your question regarding what is the best way to handle the situation. If you're talking about solving it programmatically that would be very difficult to answer as all environments are different in some way and you will come across SQL instances running in all sorts of different security contexts. In an online forum like this you would probably get different answers from different people. If this were your only question, I think it would get closed by the moderators for "being primarily opinion-based" and likely to attract spam answers. I would suggest you incorporate some kind of guidance about the problem in some form of a Readme file that you should package with the InstallShield wizard.
Side note: I think you should add the kerberos tag to this question - as SPNs are relevant to Kerberos only - and not to any other authentication protocol.
I am using msdeploy (version 2) to transfer a database from machine A to machine B.
On in the database on machine A there are some users that do not exist on machine B, thus the transfer (partially) fails with the message:
Error Code: ERROR_SQL_EXECUTION_FAILURE
More Information: An error occurred during execution of the database script.
The error occurred between the following lines of the script: "3" and "5".
The verbose log might have more information about the error.
The command started with the following: "CREATE USER [someDomain\someUser] FOR LOGIN [someDomain"
Windows NT user or group 'someDomain\someUser' not found.
Check the name again. http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=178587
The database seems to be transfered, except for the user creation. Does anyone know what state the database is in after this failure?
Is there any way I can transfer the database without the users (or better without specific users) using msdeploy?
Web Deploy uses SMO (SQL Management Objects) to script out and apply the scripts for SQL databases, and exposes most of the SMO settings with the dbfullsql provider (so, most of these options: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sqlserver.management.smo.transfer_properties.aspx). If you want to skip the users due to this kind of login-not-exists or user-not-found error, you should be able to do this by adding the scripting option: copyAllUsers=false to the source of the sync. For example:
msdeploy.exe -verb:sync -source:dbfullsql="Data Source=.\SQLExpress;Initial Catalog=MySourceDb;User Id=localUser;Password=LocalPass",copyAllUsers=false -dest:dbfullsql="Data Source=RemoteSQLServer;Initial Catalog=MyDestDb;User Id=remoteUser;Password=RemotePass"
Incidentally, I am surprised you note the db appears to have been sync'd - I would expect this is not actually the case. If you have the permissions for it, Web Deploy will create the database if it did not already exist when it initially tries to make the connection, but your failure occurred very early in the script execution, and I believe Web Deploy dbfullsql syncs are transacted by default (the db creation is separate from the script execution and is not transacted). Thus the db may exist where it did not pre-sync, but I wouldn't expect the data to be present in it.