I have created SSIS packages to move data from AS400 to SQL Server which are scheduled daily.some of the packages in sql agent are taking longer duration more than 9 hours to complete.IF I run same package in Business intelligence studio manually, it is completing in less than 4 hours.Due to this problem my schedule packages are not competing on time.please help me to sort out this issue. I am unable to understand why there is a difference in task completion duration between manual interaction and schedule jobs.
My environment is windows server 2003 with sql server 2005 with SP3.please help me to sort out this issue.
The best way to get around this problem is to watch the scheduled task by using some debug statements and messages. For example, have some insert statements in the stored procedures the SSIS package is invoking. This way u will get to know what control is taking more time than expected. First try to isolate the control that is making the difference.
Also, you can invoke the package from command prompt using:-
dtexec /f filename.dtsx
This will print out all the messages in the console at each step as well.
Use SSIS logging in the package to log to a database table. Set logging to record start and end of tasks. By running the package in BIDS and comparing it to the logging when it is run on the server you will see which tasks are taking too long. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms138020.aspx for more info on SSIS logging (in sql 2008)
Might it be that the SQL server is less powerful than your client or has more load when you execute the package?
Business intelligence Studio the package is executed on your local client with it's CPU and RAM (I think).
Check what version of DTSEXEC you are using. May be you are using 32-bit version at one place and 64-bit at the other one.
Related
I have googled and read many questions/answers, but only one question has ever sounded exactly the same and it did not have an answer.
The situation:
My group has several SQL Servers that are running SQL Server 2017. They are configured virtually identically.
These servers are build boxes, meaning they pull data from a data ware house, or an extract file, run some ETL processing and then push to a prod box. SSIS packages are deployed on the box where the DB resides.
Just over a month ago (with no updates having occurred), one of these servers started having an issue where all the jobs that ran an SSIS package would "hang" on the step that ran the package. Any other step runs fine. But a job step that runs a package (all jobs do this), will not even start the package. The package shows no indication in the executions that anything has even tried to start it.
If the user executes the deployed package it will run successfully.
The only thing that will "fix" the issue is restarting the agent service.
I created a simple job to run a simple package every 5 mins. It had been running for about a week, the last time it ran was 4/11/2021 at 2:40am, the 2:45 run hung. I could find nothing in the event logs that occurred at that time. The server was rebooted as a normal scheduled process at 3:15 and was online by 3:25 because that is the next time it tried to run and it again just hung. So even a server reboot did not fix the issue.
I am at my wits end, since there is no error (the job hangs and the package does not even start) there is no logging that I can find that is showing any issues, I am at a loss as to what might cause this.
Thanks in advance.
Take a look at the SSISDB catalog database on each/all the servers involved. Has it grown exponentially and needs the history etc. cleared down or settings changed? How big are the transaction logs for those databases etc.?
I've done a migration from SQL 2008 to SQL 2014. Unfortunately, one of the SSIS package which takes only 6 hours to run on 2008 is now taking 8 hours on 2014.
Can somebody told me why this is happening and how can I solve this problem? Is it something to do with setting?
I appreciate any idea/help from you guys. Thanks in advance.
Could be some problems:
Check the operating system is the same data SQL 2008.
Check the memory SQL SERVER:
Right-click: Server properties -> Memory -> Maximum Server Memory
Sometimes the virtual team, lowers the CPU consumption for the benefit of another machine
(If this is a virtual machine).
What about logging?
In 2012, the concept of project deployments was born. In addition to that concept, a centralized SSIS database was created by default when as Integration Services server was installed. Are you deploying the packages to a server to be run? If so, then logging might slow you down. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh231191.aspx especially if the default it set to verbose and/or you're doing your own custom logging ( for each event, two executions happen).
Your SSIS server may be drowning from the default logging in addition to the standard workload of the data movements in the package. Try turning logging down or off. Basic works well for us. While the package is executing, monitor any resources that are running too high. That could give you some hints about potential bottle necks and where else to look.
I'm working with an SSIS package that itself calls multiple SSIS packages and hangs periodically during execution.
This is a once-a-day package that runs every evening and collects new and changed records from our census databases and migrates them into the staging tables of our data warehouse. Each dimension has its own package that we call through this package.
So, the package looks like
Get current change version
Load last change version
Identify changed values
a-z - Move changed records to staging tables (Separate packages)
Save change version for future use
All of those are execute SQL tasks except for the moving records tasks which are twenty some execute package tasks (data move tasks), which are executed somewhat in parallel. (Max four at a time.)
The strange part is that it almost always fails when executed by the SQL agent (using a proxy user) or dtexec, but never fails when I run the package through Visual Studio. I've added logging so that I can see where it stops, but it's inconsistent.
We didn't see any of this while working in our development / training environments, but the volume of data is considerably smaller. I wonder if we're just doing too much at once.
I may - to test - execute the tasks serially through the SQL Server agent to see if it's a problem with a package calling a package , but I'd rather not do this because we have a relatively short time in the evening to do this for seven database servers.
I'm slightly new to SSIS, so any advice would be appreciated.
Justin
I am executing a stored procedure using SQL Server Agent Job in SQL Server 2005.
This job was running fast until yesterday. Since yesterday this job is taking more than 1 hour instead of 2 mins.
I executed the stored procedure in SSMS, it just took less than 1 minute to execute.
I could not figure out why it is taking more than 1 hour when executed as a SQL Server Agent job?
After some time commenting and assuming that the SP performs with the same input parameters and data well when executed in SSMS, I finnaly think I can give a last tip:
Depending on what actions are performed within the SP (e.g. inserting/updating/deleting a lot of data within a loop or cursor), you should set nocount on at the beginning of your code.
set nocount on
If this is not the case or does not help, please add more information, already mentioned in the comments (e.g. all settings of the Job and each Jobstep, what has been logged, what is in the Jobhistory, check SQLerrorlogs, eventlogs,....).
Also take a look at the "SQL Server Logs" maybe you can gather some info here. Also a look into the Application/System eventlo of the Databaseserver is always a good idea.
To get a basic overview you can use the Activitymonitor in SSMS, by selecting the Databaseserver and selecting "Activity monitor" from contextmenu and search for the sql agent.
My last try would be to try to run a sql trace for the agent. In this case you would start a trace and filter e.g. by the user that the SQLAgent Service runs. There are so many options you can set for traces, so I would recommend to google for it, search on MSDN or ask another question here on stackoverflow.
We have a large proc that runs in 88 seconds in SSMS and 30-45 minutes in SQL Server Agent. I added the dbo. prefix on all the table names and now it runs just as fast as SSMS.
I've noticed that SQL Agent jobs ignore the server's MAXDOP setting and run everything with a MAXDOP of 1. If I run a stored procedure in a query windows, it obeys the server settings and uses 4 processes. If I use SQL Agent, any stored procedure I run uses only one process.
I have a similar issue with a script that calls a number of UDFs that I created. The UDF's themselves normally run subsecond under SSMS. Likewise, running the reports I generate with them is bearable under SSMS (30d data in 8s, 365d data in 22s). I've always done NOCOUNT ON with my SQL Agent jobs as they normally generate text files out for pickin up by other processes or Excel and I do not want the extra data at the end, so it was not a solution for me.
In this case, when we run the exact same script under SQL Agent as a job, my times grow exponentially. My 8s script takes 2m30s and my 22s script takes 2h20m. This is the same whether I run it midday with other user activity and jobs or after hours with no user activity, nor jobs or backups running. Our server is idle and at best I get one of the 8 cores being utilized when run. DB is only about 10GB running on SSD with a cached RAID card and 16 of 32GB RAM is free. Since my SQL runs efficiently in SSMS, I am pretty well of the belief that I am hitting a threading limit of some sort. I have researched and tried adjusting MAXDOP just prior to the scripts in the SQL Agent with no luck.
Since this is an activity I want to schedule, it needs to be automated one way or another. I could let these scripts take the hours they need to run as SQL steps in SQL Agent jobs, but I decided to run from command line instead and I get the same performance I see in SSMS.
sqlcmd -S SQLSRVRHost -i "C:\My Script Loc With Spaces.sql" -v MyVar="VarValue" >"C:\MyOutputFile.txt"
So I created a batch script with the SQL jobs run from sqlcmd. Then I run the batch script from a SQL Agent job, so I still have the same management and control in place. My 4 SQL jobs that collectively took over 3 hours to run complete in 1 min and a few seconds from a single batch script executed by SQL Agent.
I hope this helps...
I need to determine if a specific application is running from a SQL Server 2005 job. The issue is that one of our applications we use to send data will hang, causing problems with any subsequent jobs that invokes it. If I can also obtain the CPU time, I can determine if it's likely a hung process.
A list of running applications would be good, but being able to lookup a specific executable name with the CPU time would be fantastic!
Any application launched by a job step will show as being run by the same logon account as the SQL Server Agent. Use a specific service account for the SQL Server Agent that won't be used for any other services. This willallow you to monitor the applications launched from by a job using Task Manager, Performance Monitor, etc.
Try opening the SQL Server Activity Monitor. You can also get some of the information from the stored proc sp_who2.
Have the job run an external script (batch file, KSH script) instead of a TSQL script.
I think the best approach is to run SQL Server Profiler as well as performance monitor and wait for the specified job to run. Then import the perfmon stats into profiler. You can do this from SQL Server profiler by going to File–> Import Performance Data… and point it to your Performance Monitor logs.
You should be able to choose the Process(all) counter to give you a list of all running processes, as well as getting CPU time for the processes. You can then correlate this to the application name and/or hostname from the Profiler logs to see whats going on.
I use the (free) replacement to task manager "Process Explorer" to get a better look at exe's and their dependencies.
Might be worth monitoring your issue with this.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx