I have the following question: I have a Boolean variable in a configuration file. If it is true I want a property in textbox control to be setup according to the value of that variable.
Try the solution above but it does not work. What am I doing wrong?
This is a fragment code:
bool isKeyboardAvtive = true; //read from configuration file
<Style x:Key="StylesTextBox" TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=isKeyboardActive}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="k:TouchScreenKeyboard.TouchScreenKeyboard" Value="True"></Setter>
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=isKyboardActive}" Value="False">
<Setter Property="k:TouchScreenKeyboard.TouchScreenKeyboard" Value="False"></Setter>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
<TextBox Style="{StaticResource StylesTextBox}" Margin="0,5" x:Name="txtUserName" Height="40" Width="150" />
IsKeyboardActive needs to be a public property of the DataContext for the binding to work. Also, you don't need a trigger there, just a binding :
k:TouchScreenKeyboard.TouchScreenKeyboard="{Binding IsKeyBoardActive}"
If you use the standard VS-generated settings, you can also bind to the settings directly :
xmlns:prop="clr-namespace:YourApplication.Properties"
...
k:TouchScreenKeyboard.TouchScreenKeyboard="{Binding IsKeyBoardActive, Source={x:Static prop:Settings.Default}}"
Or even better, using this markup extension :
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:YourApplication"
...
k:TouchScreenKeyboard.TouchScreenKeyboard="{local:SettingBinding IsKeyBoardActive}"
Related
i have the following code snippet:
<ContentControl Height="16">
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="ContentControl">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding ElementName=txtDistanceH, Path=(Validation.HasError)}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{Binding ElementName=txtDistanceH, Path=(Validation.Errors)[0]}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentControl.Style>
</ContentControl>
Now i want to put the style in a separate file instead of inline. However i would like to be able to specify which element it should get the Validation.Errors from, so i can use a single template for several different controls.
Is there any way to tell the template where it should get the Validation.Errors from, OTHER than binding to an element by name?
I tried setting the ContentControls DataContext to the element txtDistanceH, but then i just get a binding error saying that the property cannot be found on the root-element.
thanks for taking the time to answer my question. I've tried it and it works!
However i do have a comment and another related question.
The code i have now is:
<!-- Set content of contentcontrol to the ValidationError of a control stored in Tag, if there is one -->
<Style x:Key="ShowValidationError" TargetType="ContentControl">
<Style.Resources>
<x:Static x:Key="EmptyString" Member="System:String.Empty" />
</Style.Resources>
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{StaticResource EmptyString}" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=Tag.(Validation.HasError)}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=Tag.(Validation.Errors).CurrentItem}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
(Validation.Errors).CurrentItem is better than (Validation.Errors)[0], because the latter gives an out of range exception in the debug window when the error is resolved, see This Link for more information. The empty string ensures the control has the same size when its empty as when it has an error.
However even though it compiles and works, i still get some errors during design time. The code responsible is (Validation.HasError) and (Validation.Errors), respectively, in the above snippet.
Property 'Errors' is not attachable to elements of type 'Object'.
The property 'HasError' was not found in type 'Validation'.
Is there any way to fix / suppress these errors?
Bind the Tag property of the ContentControl to the target element using the element name binding and then update the style to use relative source self bindings to the tag to get at the validation errors.
Somewhere in Resources:
<Style x:Key=“ValidationStyle” TargetType="ContentControl">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=Tag.(Validation.HasError)}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=Tag.(Validation.Errors)[0]}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
And use it thusly:
<ContentControl Style=“{StaticResource ValidationStyle}” Tag=“{Binding ElementName=txtDistanceH}” />
I am trying to switch the content of a contentpresenter based on a datatrigger.I want to display a usercontrol in the contentpresenter.content, if i have a value set or else i need to display an error message.But the binding on my datatrigger fails stating that the property is not found.I cant get the datacontext to inherit for the datatrigger checking.I can make it work by using the commented out code.But i am confused why it doesn't work the normal way.
<ContentPresenter.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentPresenter}">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="{Binding UC}"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<!--<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding DataContext.HasValue,RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ContentPresenter}}}" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="No preview"/>
</DataTrigger>-->
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding HasValue}" Value="false">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="No value"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentPresenter.Style>
</ContentPresenter>
If you want to use triggers to display UserControl, you should use ContentControl not ContentPresenter.
I prefer to use ContentPresenter for CustomControls and When I am using the UserControl for views of Custom Data Types in my system and Allow to give dynamic behavior.
Example: To switch templates for ContentPresenter you need to set ContentTemplateSelector like this
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding MyContent}"
ContentTemplate="{Binding MyContentTemplate}"
ContentTemplateSelector="{Binding MyContentTemplateSelector}"/>
MyContent, MyContentTemplate & MyContentTemplateSelector are Dependency Properties and can be binded wherever you are using its instance.
READ :
Usage of ContentPresenter
What is the difference between ContentControl and ContentPresenter
The binding mentioned in the question won't work as
ContentPresenter’s DataContext is automatically set to the value of
its Content property, while ContentControl’s DataContext is not.
Bindings are resolved relatively to the value of the DataContext property. If you declare a binding on the ContentPresenter, the moment its content is set, the binding would be re-evaluated.
ContentControl.Content Property can be changed on any trigger based on your requirement. If you want to use it to change on PropertyChanged Event of a property of ViewModel, DataTrigger can be used by binding it with a DataTemplate with UserControl instance in it or using static resource of that UserControl.
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentControl}">
<Setter Value="{StaticResource UnSelectedDataTemplate}" Property="ContentTemplate" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=IsSelected}" Value="True">
<Setter Value="{StaticResource SelectedDataTemplate}" Property="ContentTemplate" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentContro.Style>
</ContentControl>
READ How to use triggers for content template, more details here
Difference in DataTemplate and StaticResource scope is DataTemplate creates a new instance of the template every time its applied.
Whereas, StaticResource is using the same instance of UserControl again (Static Instance).
You can also use EventTriggers to change content base don Control Events like MouseOver etc.
Alternate approach
Very similar to the above with slight difference. Defining as a data template in resources. Triggering for the content change is essentially identical.
...in <x.Resources /> tag:
<DataTemplate x:Key="DesignerTemplate" DataType="{x:Type vm:SolutionViewModel}">
<vw:SolutionDesignerView />
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:SolutionViewModel}">
<ContentControl Content="{Binding }">
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ContentControl}">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsLoaded}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource DesignerTemplate}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentControl.Style>
</ContentControl>
</DataTemplate>
...then:
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Solution}" />
I usually use trigger Like this...
<UserControl>
<UserControl.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="normalTemplate" >
<!-Fav UserControl->
</DataTemplate >
<DataTemplate x:Key="overWriteTempalte">
<!-Fav UserControl-> </DataTemplate>
</UserControl.Resources>
<ContentPresenter x:Name="ContentField"
Content="{Binding}"
ContentTemplate="{StaticResource ResourceKey=normalTemplate}" />
<UserControl.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=MyProperty}" Value="True">
<Setter TargetName="ContentField" Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource ResourceKey=overWriteTempalte}" />
</DataTrigger>
</UserControl.Triggers>
</UserControl>
If Bindings are a problem Use Snoop to Detect binding errors
let's say we have simple data class:
public class Ex {
public string Prop1 {...} // notify property
public string Prop2 {...} // notify property
}
and an ObservableCollection of objects of this class. I want to have this collection displayed in a ListView with seperated DataTemplated which is distinguished by Ex.Prop2 (if it is null or empty then template01 is used, otherwise template02). This property can be changed in runtime so simple "trick" with ListView.ItemTemplateSelector does not work :(
How to achieve this functionality? Is it possible to achieve it any other way than listening to NotifyPropertyChanged on each object of the collection and than changing manually the template?
Thanks for your help.
Below piece of code which I already have:
<ListView x:Name="lstTerms"
ItemsSource="{Binding Game.Words}"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
Grid.IsSharedSizeScope="True">
<ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style>
<Setter Property="Control.Padding" Value="0" />
</Style>
</ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<!-- checks if element is null or its Prop2 is null or empty. If so, uses NullTemplate -->
<ListView.ItemTemplateSelector>
<local:MySelectTemplate
NormalTemplate="{StaticResource NormalItemTemplate}"
NullTemplate="{StaticResource NullItemTemplate}" />
</ListView.ItemTemplateSelector>
</ListView>
Instead of using a TemplateSelector, you can have a single DataTemplate containing two Grids, which switch visibility dependent on the property values.
Here is an example:
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid>
<Grid Background="LightBlue" Name="normalGrid">
<Grid.Style>
<Style>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=Prop1}" Value="{x:Null}">
<Setter Property="Grid.Visibility" Value="Hidden"></Setter>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</Grid.Style>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Prop1}"></TextBlock>
</Grid>
<Grid Background="Green" Name="nullGrid">
<Grid.Style>
<Style>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding ElementName=normalGrid, Path=Visibility}" Value="Visible">
<Setter Property="Grid.Visibility" Value="Hidden"></Setter>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</Grid.Style>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Prop2}"></TextBlock>
</Grid>
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
Obviously you could replace the TextBlock elements with UserControls representing your two DataTemplates.
If you want, you can also remove the need for the bulky Styles by binding Grid.Visibility to a property (named, for example, IsVisible) on your ViewModel and using a VisibilityConverter.
I usually just use a ContentControl which changes its ContentTemplate based on a DataTrigger. DataTriggers respond to the value getting changed, while DataTemplateSelectors do not
<Style x:Key="SomeStyleKey" TargetType="{x:Type ContentControl}">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource DefaultTemplate}" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Prop2}" Value="{x:Null}">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource NullTemplate}" />
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Prop2}" Value="">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate" Value="{StaticResource NullTemplate}" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
...
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ContentControl Style="{StaticResource SomeStyleKey}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
You could also use a Converter that returns String.IsNullOrEmpty(value) if you wanted a single DataTrigger
I'm looking to a way to bind a Button Text or IsEnabled property for example to the IsChecked property in an ItemsControl
Here is my simplified source code :
<StackPanel>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Tasks}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Margin="10,0,10,0" Text="{Binding Name}"/>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding InProgress}"/>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding Done}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
<Button/>
</StackPanel>
I would like (for example) if all the "Done" CheckBoxes are Checked, to set Button Text to some value or to enable it. I thought doing this with Data Binding in Xaml using DataTriggers but I don't know how to do it.
Ca anyone give me a full xaml solution ?
New Answer
Sorry, I misunderstood the question. I would expose another property from your DataContext that simply returns true/false if all the items in the collection are checked or not, and base your Button's Text/IsEnabled off that property using a DataTrigger
<Style TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding IsAllChecked}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
Old Answer
DataTriggers simply take a binding, and check if the result is equal to some value.
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Done}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
If you need to test more than one condition, you need a MultiDataTrigger
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="False" />
<Style.Triggers>
<MultiDataTrigger>
<MultiDataTrigger.Conditions>
<Condition Binding="{Binding Path=InProgress}" Value="True" />
<Condition Binding="{Binding Path=Done}" Value="True" />
</MultiDataTrigger.Conditions>
<Setter Property="IsEnabled" Value="True" />
</MultiDataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
Note that the default value of setter is part of the style. This is important because if you set the default value on the <TextBox> then it has a higher priority than triggered values, so triggered values are unable to change the current value.
You can change this line...
<Button/>
To this
<Button Content={Binding ButtonContent}/>
And set the 'ButtonContent' property in your ViewModel whenever your 'Done' check box gets checked.
Usually, the best way to do that is to synthesize the state you want to apply to your button into a property of your ViewModel.
The WPFy way in that case is for your ViewModel to expose a command that implements the action of your button.
The command in turns can react to changes in your data to signal if it is available or not, and thus will automaticaally disable/enable your button. An added bonus is that you can easily implement a menu for example, that will be properly enabled/disabled at no cost once you have your command.
It's been a long time since I had any chance to touch WPF, so I do not have any really useful links at hand, but if I were you I would learn about commands in WPF, they are a very important part of the MVVM architecture.
I have the next code in my view:
<Style x:Key="documentFileNameStyle">
<Setter Property="TextBlock.Foreground" Value="Gray"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Path=Untitled}" Value="True">
<Setter Property="TextBlock.FontStyle" Value="Italic"/>
<Setter Property="TextBlock.Text" Value="no file name"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
<DataTemplate x:Key="documentTemplate">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=FileName}" Style="{StaticResource documentFileNameStyle}"/>
</DataTemplate>
But setting TextBlock.Text to a string didn't work. TextBlock.FontStyle changes to Italic, so whole trigger works properly. What is wrong?
Local assignment of Properties has a higher precedence than setting the values in triggers.
Also you are using Binding (Path=FileName) to set the Text-Property of the TextBlock. So changing the Text in Triggers doesn´t effect the Property.
As you are using Binding. I would change the Property "FileName" to return "no file name" if the Property "Untitled" is "true".