When I set the value of IsClosed during runtime, OnIsClosedChanged() is called fine.
However, the Designer sets the value of the property but does not call the OnIsClosedChanged().
public static DependencyProperty IsClosedProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("IsClosed", typeof(bool), typeof(GroupBox), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(false, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender));
public bool IsClosed {
get {
return (bool)this.GetValue(IsClosedProperty);
}
set {
if ((bool)this.GetValue(IsClosedProperty) == value)
return;
this.SetValue(IsClosedProperty, value);
OnIsClosedChanged();
}
}
private void OnIsClosedChanged() {
_rowDefContent.Height = new GridLength((IsClosed ? 0 : 1), GridUnitType.Star);
}
Obviously IsClosed is not modified by the Designer and only IsClosedProperty receives the xaml change.
My question is: How can I run IsClosed after the value has been modified in the Designer. Or at least add some logic to the non-runtime changes.
You would have to register a PropertyChangedCallback with property metadata.
The reason is that dependency properties set in XAML or by bindings or some other source do not invoke the CLR wrapper (the setter method). The reason is explained in the XAML Loading and Dependency Properties article on MSDN:
For implementation reasons, it is computationally less expensive to
identify a property as a dependency property and access the property
system SetValue method to set it, rather than using the property
wrapper and its setter.
...
Because the current WPF implementation of the XAML processor behavior
for property setting bypasses the wrappers entirely, you should not
put any additional logic into the set definitions of the wrapper for
your custom dependency property. If you put such logic in the set
definition, then the logic will not be executed when the property is
set in XAML rather than in code.
Your code should look like this:
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsClosedProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"IsClosed", typeof(bool), typeof(GroupBox),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(false,
FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender,
(o, e) => ((GroupBox)o).OnIsClosedChanged()));
public bool IsClosed
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(IsClosedProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsClosedProperty, value); }
}
private void OnIsClosedChanged()
{
_rowDefContent.Height = new GridLength((IsClosed ? 0 : 1), GridUnitType.Star);
}
Found the answer myself now. ValidateValueCallback comes really close! (as Alex K has pointed out) But it is a static method and I don't get any reference to the instance which has been changed. The key is to use a PropertyChangedCallback in FrameworkPropertyMetadata which is also an argument passed to the Property.Register method.
See:
public static DependencyProperty IsClosedProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("IsClosed", typeof(bool), typeof(GroupBox), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(false, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnIsClosedChangedPCC)));
public bool IsClosed {
get {
return (bool)this.GetValue(IsClosedProperty);
}
set {
this.SetValue(IsClosedProperty, value);
OnIsClosedChanged();
}
}
private static void OnIsClosedChangedPCC(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) {
GroupBox current = (GroupBox)d;
current.IsClosed = current.IsClosed;
}
private void OnIsClosedChanged() {
_rowDefContent.Height = new GridLength((IsClosed ? 0 : 1), GridUnitType.Star);
}
That does now re-set the IsClosedValue which triggers the OnIsClosedChanged to run.
Thank's for your help guys!
I've created a custom control with, amongst others, the following:
public partial class MyButton : UserControl
{
public bool Enabled
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(EnabledProperty); }
set {
SetValue(EnabledProperty, value);
SomeOtherStuff();
}
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty EnabledProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Enabled", typeof(bool), typeof(MyButton), new PropertyMetadata(true));
public static void SetEnabled(DependencyObject obj, bool value)
{
obj.SetValue(EnabledProperty, value);
}
public static bool GetEnabled(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (bool) obj.GetValue(EnabledProperty);
}
}
In my XAML, I (try to) use binding to set the Enabled property:
<MyButton x:Name="myButtom1" Enabled="{Binding CanEnableButton}"/>
I know the bind between my control and the underlying data model is valid and working as I can bind 'IsEnabled' (a native property of the underlying UserControl) and it works as expected. However, my Enabled property is never set via the above binding. I've put breakpoints on my property set/get and they never get hit at all.
I can only imaging I've missed something relating to binding in my custom control. Can anyone see what?
I've tried implementing INotifyPropertyChanged on my control (and calling the PropertyChanged event from my Enabled setter) ... but that didn't fix it.
[ BTW: In case you are wondering "Why?": I can't intercept changes to the IsEnabled state of the base control, so I decided to implement and use my own version of a Enable/disable property (which I called Enabled) - one where I could plug my own code into the property setter ]
First of all drop the SetEnabled and GetEnabled pair, these only make sense for an attached property which is not what you are doing.
Now your main problem is that you are under the false assumption that the get/set members of your propery get called during binding, they don't.
What you need is to pass a call back method in the property meta data, it's here that you intercept changes and take other actions like so:-
public bool IsEnabled
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(IsEnabledProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsEnabledProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsEnabledProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"IsEnabled",
typeof(bool),
typeof(MyButton),
new PropertyMetadata(true, OnIsEnabledPropertyChanged));
private static void OnIsEnabledPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
MyButton source = d as MyButton;
source.SomeOtherStuff();
}
private void SomeOtherStuff()
{
// Your other stuff here
}
With this in place regardless of how the propery is changed the SomeOtherStuff procedure will execute.
I'd suggest using the IsEnabledChanged event which is part of every Control/UserControl.
That would allow you to hook up to the event and do whatever actions you want to take.
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.IsEnabledChanged += new DependencyPropertyChangedEventHandler(MainPage_IsEnabledChanged);
}
void MainPage_IsEnabledChanged(object sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
// Do SomeStuff
}
I have no idea why data binding is not happening for certain objects in my Silverlight 4 application. Here's approximately what my XAML looks like:
<sdk:DataGrid>
<u:Command.ShortcutKeys>
<u:ShortcutKeyCollection>
<u:ShortcutKey Key="Delete" Command="{Binding Path=MyViewModelProperty}"/>
</u:ShortcutKeyCollection>
</u:Command.ShortcutKeys>
</sdk:DataGrid>
The data context is set just fine since other data bindings that I have set on the grid are working just fine. The Command.ShortcutKeys is an attached DependencyProperty that is declared as follows:
public static readonly DependencyProperty ShortcutKeysProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"ShortcutKeys", typeof(ShortcutKeyCollection),
typeof(Command), new PropertyMetadata(onShortcutKeysChanged));
private static void onShortcutKeysChanged(
DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
var shortcuts = args.NewValue as ShortcutKeyCollection;
if (obj is UIElement && shortcuts != null)
{
var element = obj as UIElement;
shortcuts.ForEach(
sk => element.KeyUp += (s, e) => sk.Command.Execute(null));
}
}
public static ShortcutKeyCollection GetShortcutKeys(
DependencyObject obj)
{
return (ShortcutKeyCollection)obj.GetValue(ShortcutKeysProperty);
}
public static void SetShortcutKeys(
DependencyObject obj, ShortcutKeyCollection keys)
{
obj.SetValue(ShortcutKeysProperty, keys);
}
I know this attached property is working just fine since the event handlers are firing. However, the Command property of the ShortcutKey objects are not getting data bound. Here's the definition of ShortcutKey:
public class ShortcutKey : DependencyObject
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty KeyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"Key", typeof(Key), typeof(ShortcutKey), null);
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"Command", typeof(ICommand), typeof(ShortcutKey), null);
public Key Key
{
get { return (Key)GetValue(KeyProperty); }
set { SetValue(KeyProperty, value); }
}
public ICommand Command
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(CommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandProperty, value); }
}
}
public class ShortcutKeyCollection : ObservableCollection<ShortcutKey> { }
The property that is getting bound to has its value set in the constructor of my view model, and its type is ICommand. So why isn't my Command property getting data bound? Also, have you found an effective way to debug data binding issues in Silverlight?
Edit:
At least one thing that was wrong was that ShortcutKey derived from DependencyObject instead of FrameworkElement, which is apparently the only root class that binding can be applied to. However, even after that change, the binding continued to not work properly.
You need to specify the Source of the Binding, since the DataContext is not inherited by members of the ObservableCollection.
edit:
Try setting the ShortcutKey.DataContext in onShortcutKeysChanged:
private static void onShortcutKeysChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
var shortcuts = args.NewValue as ShortcutKeyCollection;
if (obj is FrameworkElement && shortcuts != null)
{
var element = obj as FrameworkElement;
ForEach(ShortcutKey sk in shortcuts)
{
sk.DataContext = element.DataContext;
element.KeyUp += (s, e) => sk.Command.Execute(null));
}
}
}
It looks like unless an object is inserted into the visual tree, no DataContext inheritance takes place, and thus no data binding works. I couldn't find a way to get the container's data context to be passed to the ShortcutKey objects, so as a workaround, I set up the binding in the code behind.
Hopefully someone else has a different answer that will show me how I won't have to resort to setting up this data binding in the code.
I want to write a ViewModel that always knows the current state of some read-only dependency properties from the View.
Specifically, my GUI contains a FlowDocumentPageViewer, which displays one page at a time from a FlowDocument. FlowDocumentPageViewer exposes two read-only dependency properties called CanGoToPreviousPage and CanGoToNextPage. I want my ViewModel to always know the values of these two View properties.
I figured I could do this with a OneWayToSource databinding:
<FlowDocumentPageViewer
CanGoToNextPage="{Binding NextPageAvailable, Mode=OneWayToSource}" ...>
If this was allowed, it would be perfect: whenever the FlowDocumentPageViewer's CanGoToNextPage property changed, the new value would get pushed down into the ViewModel's NextPageAvailable property, which is exactly what I want.
Unfortunately, this doesn't compile: I get an error saying 'CanGoToPreviousPage' property is read-only and cannot be set from markup. Apparently read-only properties don't support any kind of databinding, not even databinding that's read-only with respect to that property.
I could make my ViewModel's properties be DependencyProperties, and make a OneWay binding going the other way, but I'm not crazy about the separation-of-concerns violation (ViewModel would need a reference to the View, which MVVM databinding is supposed to avoid).
FlowDocumentPageViewer doesn't expose a CanGoToNextPageChanged event, and I don't know of any good way to get change notifications from a DependencyProperty, short of creating another DependencyProperty to bind it to, which seems like overkill here.
How can I keep my ViewModel informed of changes to the view's read-only properties?
Yes, I've done this in the past with the ActualWidth and ActualHeight properties, both of which are read-only. I created an attached behavior that has ObservedWidth and ObservedHeight attached properties. It also has an Observe property that is used to do the initial hook-up. Usage looks like this:
<UserControl ...
SizeObserver.Observe="True"
SizeObserver.ObservedWidth="{Binding Width, Mode=OneWayToSource}"
SizeObserver.ObservedHeight="{Binding Height, Mode=OneWayToSource}"
So the view model has Width and Height properties that are always in sync with the ObservedWidth and ObservedHeight attached properties. The Observe property simply attaches to the SizeChanged event of the FrameworkElement. In the handle, it updates its ObservedWidth and ObservedHeight properties. Ergo, the Width and Height of the view model is always in sync with the ActualWidth and ActualHeight of the UserControl.
Perhaps not the perfect solution (I agree - read-only DPs should support OneWayToSource bindings), but it works and it upholds the MVVM pattern. Obviously, the ObservedWidth and ObservedHeight DPs are not read-only.
UPDATE: here's code that implements the functionality described above:
public static class SizeObserver
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObserveProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"Observe",
typeof(bool),
typeof(SizeObserver),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(OnObserveChanged));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObservedWidthProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"ObservedWidth",
typeof(double),
typeof(SizeObserver));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObservedHeightProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"ObservedHeight",
typeof(double),
typeof(SizeObserver));
public static bool GetObserve(FrameworkElement frameworkElement)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
return (bool)frameworkElement.GetValue(ObserveProperty);
}
public static void SetObserve(FrameworkElement frameworkElement, bool observe)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
frameworkElement.SetValue(ObserveProperty, observe);
}
public static double GetObservedWidth(FrameworkElement frameworkElement)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
return (double)frameworkElement.GetValue(ObservedWidthProperty);
}
public static void SetObservedWidth(FrameworkElement frameworkElement, double observedWidth)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
frameworkElement.SetValue(ObservedWidthProperty, observedWidth);
}
public static double GetObservedHeight(FrameworkElement frameworkElement)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
return (double)frameworkElement.GetValue(ObservedHeightProperty);
}
public static void SetObservedHeight(FrameworkElement frameworkElement, double observedHeight)
{
frameworkElement.AssertNotNull("frameworkElement");
frameworkElement.SetValue(ObservedHeightProperty, observedHeight);
}
private static void OnObserveChanged(DependencyObject dependencyObject, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var frameworkElement = (FrameworkElement)dependencyObject;
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
{
frameworkElement.SizeChanged += OnFrameworkElementSizeChanged;
UpdateObservedSizesForFrameworkElement(frameworkElement);
}
else
{
frameworkElement.SizeChanged -= OnFrameworkElementSizeChanged;
}
}
private static void OnFrameworkElementSizeChanged(object sender, SizeChangedEventArgs e)
{
UpdateObservedSizesForFrameworkElement((FrameworkElement)sender);
}
private static void UpdateObservedSizesForFrameworkElement(FrameworkElement frameworkElement)
{
// WPF 4.0 onwards
frameworkElement.SetCurrentValue(ObservedWidthProperty, frameworkElement.ActualWidth);
frameworkElement.SetCurrentValue(ObservedHeightProperty, frameworkElement.ActualHeight);
// WPF 3.5 and prior
////SetObservedWidth(frameworkElement, frameworkElement.ActualWidth);
////SetObservedHeight(frameworkElement, frameworkElement.ActualHeight);
}
}
I use a universal solution which works not only with ActualWidth and ActualHeight, but also with any data you can bind to at least in reading mode.
The markup looks like this, provided ViewportWidth and ViewportHeight are properties of the view model
<Canvas>
<u:DataPiping.DataPipes>
<u:DataPipeCollection>
<u:DataPipe Source="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type Canvas}}, Path=ActualWidth}"
Target="{Binding Path=ViewportWidth, Mode=OneWayToSource}"/>
<u:DataPipe Source="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type Canvas}}, Path=ActualHeight}"
Target="{Binding Path=ViewportHeight, Mode=OneWayToSource}"/>
</u:DataPipeCollection>
</u:DataPiping.DataPipes>
<Canvas>
Here is the source code for the custom elements
public class DataPiping
{
#region DataPipes (Attached DependencyProperty)
public static readonly DependencyProperty DataPipesProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("DataPipes",
typeof(DataPipeCollection),
typeof(DataPiping),
new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public static void SetDataPipes(DependencyObject o, DataPipeCollection value)
{
o.SetValue(DataPipesProperty, value);
}
public static DataPipeCollection GetDataPipes(DependencyObject o)
{
return (DataPipeCollection)o.GetValue(DataPipesProperty);
}
#endregion
}
public class DataPipeCollection : FreezableCollection<DataPipe>
{
}
public class DataPipe : Freezable
{
#region Source (DependencyProperty)
public object Source
{
get { return (object)GetValue(SourceProperty); }
set { SetValue(SourceProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty SourceProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Source", typeof(object), typeof(DataPipe),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnSourceChanged)));
private static void OnSourceChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
((DataPipe)d).OnSourceChanged(e);
}
protected virtual void OnSourceChanged(DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
Target = e.NewValue;
}
#endregion
#region Target (DependencyProperty)
public object Target
{
get { return (object)GetValue(TargetProperty); }
set { SetValue(TargetProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TargetProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Target", typeof(object), typeof(DataPipe),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null));
#endregion
protected override Freezable CreateInstanceCore()
{
return new DataPipe();
}
}
If anyone else is interested, I coded up an approximation of Kent's solution here:
class SizeObserver
{
#region " Observe "
public static bool GetObserve(FrameworkElement elem)
{
return (bool)elem.GetValue(ObserveProperty);
}
public static void SetObserve(
FrameworkElement elem, bool value)
{
elem.SetValue(ObserveProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObserveProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Observe", typeof(bool), typeof(SizeObserver),
new UIPropertyMetadata(false, OnObserveChanged));
static void OnObserveChanged(
DependencyObject depObj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
FrameworkElement elem = depObj as FrameworkElement;
if (elem == null)
return;
if (e.NewValue is bool == false)
return;
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
elem.SizeChanged += OnSizeChanged;
else
elem.SizeChanged -= OnSizeChanged;
}
static void OnSizeChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (!Object.ReferenceEquals(sender, e.OriginalSource))
return;
FrameworkElement elem = e.OriginalSource as FrameworkElement;
if (elem != null)
{
SetObservedWidth(elem, elem.ActualWidth);
SetObservedHeight(elem, elem.ActualHeight);
}
}
#endregion
#region " ObservedWidth "
public static double GetObservedWidth(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (double)obj.GetValue(ObservedWidthProperty);
}
public static void SetObservedWidth(DependencyObject obj, double value)
{
obj.SetValue(ObservedWidthProperty, value);
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for ObservedWidth. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObservedWidthProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("ObservedWidth", typeof(double), typeof(SizeObserver), new UIPropertyMetadata(0.0));
#endregion
#region " ObservedHeight "
public static double GetObservedHeight(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (double)obj.GetValue(ObservedHeightProperty);
}
public static void SetObservedHeight(DependencyObject obj, double value)
{
obj.SetValue(ObservedHeightProperty, value);
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for ObservedHeight. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty ObservedHeightProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("ObservedHeight", typeof(double), typeof(SizeObserver), new UIPropertyMetadata(0.0));
#endregion
}
Feel free to use it in your apps. It works well. (Thanks Kent!)
Here is another solution to this "bug" which I blogged about here:
OneWayToSource Binding for ReadOnly Dependency Property
It works by using two Dependency Properties, Listener and Mirror. Listener is bound OneWay to the TargetProperty and in the PropertyChangedCallback it updates the Mirror property which is bound OneWayToSource to whatever was specified in the Binding. I call it PushBinding and it can be set on any read-only Dependency Property like this
<TextBlock Name="myTextBlock"
Background="LightBlue">
<pb:PushBindingManager.PushBindings>
<pb:PushBinding TargetProperty="ActualHeight" Path="Height"/>
<pb:PushBinding TargetProperty="ActualWidth" Path="Width"/>
</pb:PushBindingManager.PushBindings>
</TextBlock>
Download Demo Project Here.
It contains source code and short sample usage.
One last note, since .NET 4.0 we are even further away from built-in-support for this, since a OneWayToSource Binding reads the value back from the Source after it has updated it
I like Dmitry Tashkinov's solution!
However it crashed my VS in design mode. That's why I added a line to OnSourceChanged method:
private static void OnSourceChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (!((bool)DesignerProperties.IsInDesignModeProperty.GetMetadata(typeof(DependencyObject)).DefaultValue))
((DataPipe)d).OnSourceChanged(e);
}
I think it can be done a bit simpler:
xaml:
behavior:ReadOnlyPropertyToModelBindingBehavior.ReadOnlyDependencyProperty="{Binding ActualWidth, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"
behavior:ReadOnlyPropertyToModelBindingBehavior.ModelProperty="{Binding MyViewModelProperty}"
cs:
public class ReadOnlyPropertyToModelBindingBehavior
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty ReadOnlyDependencyPropertyProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"ReadOnlyDependencyProperty",
typeof(object),
typeof(ReadOnlyPropertyToModelBindingBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(OnReadOnlyDependencyPropertyPropertyChanged));
public static void SetReadOnlyDependencyProperty(DependencyObject element, object value)
{
element.SetValue(ReadOnlyDependencyPropertyProperty, value);
}
public static object GetReadOnlyDependencyProperty(DependencyObject element)
{
return element.GetValue(ReadOnlyDependencyPropertyProperty);
}
private static void OnReadOnlyDependencyPropertyPropertyChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
SetModelProperty(obj, e.NewValue);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ModelPropertyProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"ModelProperty",
typeof(object),
typeof(ReadOnlyPropertyToModelBindingBehavior),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault));
public static void SetModelProperty(DependencyObject element, object value)
{
element.SetValue(ModelPropertyProperty, value);
}
public static object GetModelProperty(DependencyObject element)
{
return element.GetValue(ModelPropertyProperty);
}
}
How do I expose the ActualWidth property of one of the components of my user control to users?
I have found plenty of examples of how to expose a normal property by creating a new dependency property and binding, but none on how to expose a read-only property like ActualWidth.
What you need is a ReadOnly dependency property. The first thing you need to do is to tap into the change notification of the ActualWidthProperty dependency on the control that you need to expose. You can do that by using the DependencyPropertyDescriptor like this:
// Need to tap into change notification of the FrameworkElement.ActualWidthProperty
Public MyUserControl()
{
DependencyPropertyDescriptor descriptor = DependencyPropertyDescriptor.FromProperty
(FrameworkElement.ActualWidthProperty, typeof(FrameworkElement));
descriptor.AddValueChanged(this.MyElement, new EventHandler
OnActualWidthChanged);
}
// Dependency Property Declaration
private static DependencyPropertyKey ElementActualWidthPropertyKey =
DependencyProperty.RegisterReadOnly("ElementActualWidth", typeof(double),
new PropertyMetadata());
public static DependencyProperty ElementActualWidthProperty =
ElementActualWidthPropertyKey.DependencyProperty;
public double ElementActualWidth
{
get{return (double)GetValue(ElementActualWidthProperty); }
}
private void SetActualWidth(double value)
{
SetValue(ElementActualWidthPropertyKey, value);
}
// Dependency Property Callback
// Called when this.MyElement.ActualWidth is changed
private void OnActualWidthChanged(object sender, Eventargs e)
{
this.SetActualWidth(this.MyElement.ActualWidth);
}
ActualWidth is a public readonly property (coming from FrameworkElement) and is exposed by default. What is the case that you are trying to achieve?