I have a WPF window with a few buttons and a tabcontrol having a tab for each 'document' the user is working on. The tabcontrol uses a DataTemplate to render the data in ItemSource of the tabcontrol.
The question: If one of the buttons is clicked, the command should be executed on the control rendering the document in the active tab, but I've no idea what I should set CommandTarget to. I tried {Binding ElementName=nameOfControlInDataTemplate} but that obviously doesn't work.
I tried to make my problem a bit more abstract with the following code (no ItemSource and Document objects, but the idea is still the same).
<Button Command="ApplicationCommands.Save" CommandTarget="{Binding ElementName=nestedControl}">Save</Button>
<TabControl x:Name="tabControl">
<TabControl.Items>
<TabItem Header="Header1">Item 1</TabItem>
<TabItem Header="Header2">Item 2</TabItem>
<TabItem Header="Header3">Item 3</TabItem>
</TabControl.Items>
<TabControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<CommandTest:NestedControl Name="nestedControl"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ContentTemplate>
</TabControl>
I tested the code by replacing the complete tabcontrol with only one single NestedControl, and then the command button just works.
To be complete, here is the code of NestedControl:
<UserControl x:Class="CommandTest.NestedControl"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<Grid>
<Label x:Name="label" Content="Not saved"/>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
And code behind:
public partial class NestedControl : UserControl {
public NestedControl() {
CommandBindings.Add(new CommandBinding(ApplicationCommands.Save, CommandBinding_Executed));
InitializeComponent();
}
private void CommandBinding_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e) {
label.Content = "Saved";
}
}
I don't know exactly how CommandTarget works, but binding to the active tab in a TabControl is done with something like this:
"{Binding ElementName=tabControl,Path=SelectedItem}"
(SelectedItem is the current active tab)
EDIT:
More information about CommandTarget can be found here: Setting Command Target in XAML
EDIT 2:
Deleted my initial answer since it was not an answer to the question.
Related
I have a DataTemplate containing multiple controls. One of the controls is a button that needs to access the other controls in the datatemplate
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<ComboBox x:Name="optionsCombo" >
<ComboBoxItem Content="Option1" />
<ComboBoxItem Content="Option2" />
<ComboBoxItem Content="Option3" />
</ComboBox>
<Button Name="DoSomethingButton" Margin="10" Click="DoSomethingButton_Click">Do Something</Button>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
In the code behind for the button click event, if I attempt to access the ComboBox by name like this:
private void DoSomethingButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
ComboBoxItem myItem = (ComboBoxItem)optionsCombo.SelectedItem;
}
I get an error: "The name 'optionsCombo' does not exist in the current context"
So, how do I access the other controls in the DataTemplate from the button click event?
You can't access it like that, because there's no code generation for DataTemplates, i.e. the optionsCombo ComboBox does not really exist in the compilation time, hence the error. To manipulate it in the code behind, you need to use VisualTreeHelper, it's well described over the net. Just get the parent Panel of the sender, then find your ComboBox by name, and then cast it to it's proper type. There you have it!
I would like to set up a datagrid so that whenever an item is added to its itemssource the datagrid scrolls down to show the last item.
The datagrid is inside a datatemplate, so i cannot set the X:name property and access it directly from the codebehind.
What I have in mind is to use a datagrid event that fires when a row is added and has the grid scroll itself.
Here's some psuedo code that outlines how I have things set up:
UI.XAML exerpt
<TabControl ItemsSource="{Binding Parents}" x:Name="ProductsTab">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Key}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<TabControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<DataGrid Margin="5" ItemsSource="{Binding Value.Children}">
<DataGrid.Columns>
<Column Column definitions removed for your sanity/>
</DataGrid.Columns>
</DataGrid>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ContentTemplate>
</TabControl>
UI.XAML.CS exerpt
public class UI
{
//Thanks to Dr. WPF for the ObservableDictionary class
public ObservableDictionary<string, Parent> Parents {get; set;}
}
Parent.CS
public class parent
{
public ObservableCollection<Child> Children {get; set;}
}
The datagrids are not editable.
In case you're wondering, I have read the post "How to autoscroll on WPF datagrid" the code in that post would work for me if I could find an event that fires whenever an item is added to the datagrid itemssource.
Any Ideas?
Combine the autoscrolling idea with the idea from this question or this MSDN thread: instead of listening to your grid's event to detect row additions, listen to the events from the ItemsSource.
Edit: Since you don't like that suggestion, you could try hooking LoadingRow, but I strongly suspect this will require EnableRowVirtualization = false in order to work (I haven't tried it). If your collection gets large, turning off row virutalization opens up the possibility of a serious performance hit.
you can access the DataGrid, even if it is in a DataTemplate, by doing a 'search' in the visual tree : VisualTreeHelper.GetChildCount // VisualTreeHelper.GetChild , then test again the type until you find your grid. And you might seek with same kind of methods the ScrollBar, and then you can hook an event handler and use a code-behind logic.
I am trying to find out how to set correctly multiple DataContexts in XAML page. I have a basic collection that I create in code behind and set ItemSource Binding og AutoCompleteBox to it. At the same time, I have another datacontext to set labelsDataSource inside the grid. If I set this datacontext, the AutoCompleteBox’s itemsSource binding is lost. AutoCompleteBox is inside that grid. I do assign DataContext directly to the objetc this way:
MyAutoCompleteBox.DataContext = this;
I am wondering if there is a better way to do it?
Thank you in advance for the help!
Setting AutoComplete Box:
<sdk:AutoCompleteBox x:Name="MyAutoCompleteBox" IsTextCompletionEnabled="True" ItemsSource="{Binding Items}" />
Code Behind:
public IList<string> Items
{
get;
private set;
}
public Basic_ChildWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
Items = new List<string>();
Items.Add(#"One");
Items.Add(#"Two");
Items.Add(#"Three");
DataContext = this;
}
Another datacontext in the same XAML page, AutoCompleteBox is inside that grid:
<Grid x:Name="grdBasic_ChildWindow_Right" Style="{StaticResource GridStyle}" DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource LabelsDataSource}}">
I'm not sure I understand your question--what is "labelsDataSource"?
However, if what you have posted is all the code and there is nothing more to it, simply remove the datacontext/binding from the grid. The grid does not need a datacontext set (it is simply a visual container--not data-related).
So change this:
<Grid x:Name="grdBasic_ChildWindow_Right" Style="{StaticResource GridStyle}" DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource LabelsDataSource}}">
To this:
<Grid x:Name="grdBasic_ChildWindow_Right" Style="{StaticResource GridStyle}">
After selecting ListBox item programmatically it is needed to press down\up key two times to move the selection. Any suggestions?
View:
<ListBox Name="lbActions" Canvas.Left="10" Canvas.Top="10"
Width="260" Height="180">
<ListBoxItem Name="Open" IsSelected="true" Content="Open"></ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem Name="Enter" Content="Enter"></ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem Name="Print" Content="Print"></ListBoxItem>
</ListBox>
Code:
public View()
{
lbActions.Focus();
lbActions.SelectedIndex = 0; //not helps
((ListBoxItem) lbActions.SelectedItem).Focus(); //not helps either
}
Don't set the focus to the ListBox... set the focus to the selected ListBoxItem. This will solve the "two keyboard strokes required" problem:
if (lbActions.SelectedItem != null)
((ListBoxItem)lbActions.SelectedItem).Focus();
else
lbActions.Focus();
If your ListBox contains something else than ListBoxItems, you can use lbActions.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromIndex(lbActions.SelectedIndex) to get the automatically generated ListBoxItem.
If you want this to happen during window initialization, you need to put the code in the Loaded event rather than into the constructor. Example (XAML):
<Window ... Loaded="Window_Loaded">
...
</Window>
Code (based on the example in your question):
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
lbActions.Focus();
lbActions.SelectedIndex = 0;
((ListBoxItem)lbActions.SelectedItem).Focus();
}
You can do this easily in XAML too. Please note that this will set logical focus only.
For example:
<Grid FocusManager.FocusedElement="{Binding ElementName=itemlist, Path=SelectedItem}">
<ListBox x:Name="itemlist" SelectedIndex="1">
<ListBox.Items>
<ListBoxItem>One</ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem>Two</ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem>Three</ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem>Four</ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem>Five</ListBoxItem>
<ListBoxItem>Six</ListBoxItem>
</ListBox.Items>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
Seems that there are two levels of Focus for ListBox control: ListBox itself and ListBoxItem. Like Heinzi said, directly set Focus for the ListBoxItem will avoid the case that you have to click twice on direction key in order to go through all ListBoxItems.
I found out this after several hours work, now it works perfect on my APP.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to change the layout of a databound treeview from this:
To this:
And of course selection must works properly:
Do you have any ideas about how to do that. I've been trying to change the template but I can't find out a way to have this behavior. Maybe a component already exists...
Thanks for your help !
This is difficult. It seems to need a HierarchicalDataTemplate, but because the behavior you want requires multiple ItemsControls, it is not going to work as expected. I don't think there is a way to create a TreeView template in XAML that will do this. Your best bet is to create a custom items control of some sort. You will probably need to do the items binding in code, rather than in XAML, because without the HierarchicalDataTemplate the XAML has no way of understanding nested relationships.
That being said, if you are guaranteed to only have 2 levels of nesting (as in your example), you could do this easily with the following mark-up:
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="ItemTemplate">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<ListBox Name="Level1" Width="150" Height="150"
ItemsSource="{Binding Collection}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource ItemTemplate}"/>
<ListBox Name="Level2" Width="150" Height="150"
ItemsSource="{Binding ElementName=Level1, Path=SelectedValue.Children}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource ItemTemplate}"/>
<ListBox Name="Level3" Width="150" Height="150"
ItemsSource="{Binding ElementName=Level2, Path=SelectedValue.Children}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource ItemTemplate}"/>
</StackPanel>
Where Collection is your root items collection and there is a property on each item called Children containing the child collection.
But I think what you are asking for is an items control that can support any number of nested levels, not just 2. So in that case, I would do this in code-behind. The binding will be the same- that is, at each level, the ListBox should be bound to the parent level's items. But you will obviously need to iterate and create one ListBox for each nested level.
I finally find a way out, but like you say Charlie, it involves creating ListBox:
I create a new CustomControl which inherits Control (I couldn’t use neither Selector or TreeView because I wouldn’t have been able to manage the SelectedItem property from the derived class)
In the template of this CustomControl is an ItemsControl. This ItemsControl has its ItemTemplate property set to a DataTemplate containing a ListBox.
The CustomControl has a Depth property of type int. This property indicates the number of ListBox that should be generated.
The CustomControl automatically databound ListBoxes together: each ListBox’s ItemsSource property is databound to the SelectedItem’s children property of the previous ListBox in the visual tree.
The CustomControl has a SelectedItem property and a SelectionChanged event (like Selector-derived class).
I added an IsReallySelected attached property to the ListBoxItem which are generated. This enables to databing an IsSelected property of the ViewModel class behind the control with the IsSelected of the ListBoxItem. I had to create an attached property because its value is true when the ListBoxItem is selected AND the parent ListBox has IsSelectionActive set to true.
I blogged about this solution (with source code) on my blog.
Its too bad I didn't notice this question before you went to all that work. It is easy to restyle a TreeView to appear this way: The only code required is a single very simple attached property, "VisibleWhenCurrentOf".
The way to do it is to:
Style TreeViewItem to include a ListBox in its ControlTemplate outside the ItemsPresenter.
Control the visibility of the TreeViewItem template using "VisibleWhenCurrentOf", so that a given item is only visible inside the ItemsPresenter if it is the current item within the ListBox.
Restyling details
Here is the XAML for the relevant templates:
<ControlTemplate TargetType="TreeView">
<DockPanel>
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{TemplateBinding ItemsSource}"
IsSyncrhonizedWithCurrentItem="true"
Style="{DynamicResource BoxesTreeViewBoxStyle}"
ItemTemplate="{Binding HeaderTemplate}"
ItemTemplateSelector="{Binding HeaderTemplateSelector}" />
<ItemsPresenter />
</DockPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="TreeViewItem">
<DockPanel
local:VisibilityHelper.VisibleWhenCurrentOf="{Binding ItemsSource, RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor,HeaderedItemsControl,2}">
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{TemplateBinding ItemsSource}"
IsSyncrhonizedWithCurrentItem="true"
Style="{DynamicResource BoxesTreeViewBoxStyle}"
ItemTemplate="{Binding HeaderTemplate}"
ItemTemplateSelector="{Binding HeaderTemplateSelector}" />
<ItemsPresenter />
</DockPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
These two templates are identical except for the conditional visibilty. The way this works is that the "+" in front of the tree item becomes a ListBox, and all items except the one selected in the ListBox are hidden.
Your BoxesTreeViewBoxStyle should set a margin around the ListBox so they will space correctly. You can actually simplify this further by putting the ListBox property values in the style, but I find it more convenient to set them in the ControlTemplate so I can restyle the ListBox without having to remember these settings.
Attached property
Here is the code for the VisibleWhenCurrentOf attached property:
public class VisibilityHelper : DependencyObject
{
// VisibleWhenCurrentOf
public static object GetVisibleWhenCurrentOf(DependencyObject obj) { return (object)obj.GetValue(VisibleWhenCurrentOfProperty); }
public static void SetVisibleWhenCurrentOf(DependencyObject obj, object value) { obj.SetValue(VisibleWhenCurrentOfProperty, value); }
public static readonly DependencyProperty VisibleWhenCurrentOfProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("VisibleWhenCurrentOf", typeof(object), typeof(VisibilityHelper), new UIPropertyMetadata
{
PropertyChangedCallback = (sender, e) =>
{
var element = sender as FrameworkElement;
if(e.OldValue!=null)
{
var oldView = e.OldValue as ICollectionView ?? CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(e.OldValue);
oldView.CurrentChanged -= UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf;
if(e.NewValue==null) element.DataContextChanged -= UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf;
}
if(e.NewValue!=null)
{
var newView = e.NewValue as ICollectionView ?? CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(e.OldValue);
newView.CurrentChanged += UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf;
if(e.OldValue==null) element.DataContextChanged += UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf;
}
UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(sender);
}
});
static void UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(object sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) { UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(sender); }
static void UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(object sender, EventArgs e) { UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(sender); }
static void UpdateVisibilityBasedOnCurrentOf(object sender)
{
var element = sender as FrameworkElement;
var source = GetVisibleWhenCurrentOf(element);
var view = source==null ? null : source as ICollectionView ?? CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(source);
var visible = view==null || view.CurrentItem == element.DataContext;
element.Visibility = visible ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed;
}
}
There is nothing complex here: Any time DataContext or the view's Current changes, visibilty is recomputed. The PropertyChangedCallback simply sets event handlers to detect these conditions and the UpdateVisibiltyBasedOnCurrentOf handler recomputes visibility.
Advantages of this solution
Since this solution is a real TreeView:
You get all the selection handling functionality for free.
It works with any number of tree levels.
You can use all the features of HierarchicalDataTemplate, including HeaderTemplate and HeaderTemplateSelector
You can use different ItemsSource bindings at each level rather than every collection requiring a "Children" proerty
It is a lot less code than a custom control