I have a 3rd party control which among other things performs loading of some data. I want my viewmodel to keep track of this load operation and adjust its own state accordingly.
If it were up to me, I'd do the data loading far away from the view, but it is not. So, I seem to be in the situation where my viewmodel depends on my view. How do I best handle this? I feel rather dirty making the view publish events to the viewmodel but I don't see any other reasonable way to get this info into the viewmodel.
A similar situation might crop up with standard controls, too - imagine if your viewmodel depends on the events coming from a MediaElement - how do you properly model this? Do you put the MediaElement into the viewmodel? That doesn't sound right.
If publishing the events to the viewmodel is indeed the most reasonable way, is there some common pattern used for this? How do you do it?
Generally, you would not allow your ViewModel to know details or even the type of your view controls. Having it respond to events is the cleaner way to go. There are a number of libraries that contain behaviors to map control events to ICommands on your ViewModel.
Caliburn is one such library. You can map control events to methods on your ViewModel.
Related
I have two separate views each containing a ScrollViewer. I want to slave one to the other in terms of scrolling. (Views are being injected using PRISM)
I can do this trivially if they are in the same view. However I seem to be stuck doing it between isolated views. (The views are isolated for a good reason... well I think!)
What I think I want to do is echo the ScrollViewer 'ScrollChangedEvent' to the ViewModel layer then use some linking service to pass a message to the 2nd ViewModel.
However I'm struggling to work out how to drive the 2nd ScrollViewer from the ViewModel without violating MVVM.
Sure I'm missing something obvious so a shove in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
There are several ways to go about this. One would be, as you suggested, to transfer the scroll change to the view model. From there you can use a loose pub/sub mechanism (such as Prism's Event Aggregator) or a shared object that is available to both view models to transmit the event from one view model to the other.
My recommendation would be to use Prism.
When the second view model receives the event, it can publish it to the view using another event the view can directly consume, or through a property (using an attached property you can bind to that calls ScrollViewer.ScrollToVerticalOffset)
Sometimes a Domain Model object with a business logic (DDD) when calling a method an event is fired.
In my situation, a viewmodel (for a given view) encapsulates the domain object and needs to register and react on those domain events (i must use events because that same domain object can be managed by many loosely coupled views along with their viewmodels).
I also need to unregister to those events when that particular context is hidden.
I can handle this register/unregister/dispose in parallel with show/hide/dispose of that view using databinding, programmatically or whatever if the scenario keeps simple enough...
The problem comes when visualization logic comes with DataTemplates.
How can I know when that datatemplate becomes hidden so that I can unregister my events? is it there a better way with wpf to handle this, instead of adding more events?
What is the best practice to handle this scenario in a good MVVM approach?
edit: ok, the problem is structural. sometimes choices made inside the project has forced us to work in an atypical manner... in a good mvvm approach this problem should not happen
I'd be careful in making the ViewModel dependent on the View for making things right.
So what I would do is provide a property (Show? Visible? Open?) on the ViewModel that has a TwoWay binding with the View so the ViewModel can monitor the property.
I have a silverlight bing map application. I am using the MVVM pattern with PRISM.
The bing map has a "BoundingRectangle" property that is not available in XAML, but it is available via code behind. Of course this does me no good since I need the data in my viewmodel which doesn't have access to the View's code behind (nor do I want to add it, since I'd really like to try to not use the view's code behind if possible).
Normally, you would do a two way bind to a viewmodel property. The Bing map will surface BoundingRectangle for layers, but not for the base map (that I can find).
I'm not looking for a hack here, just wondering what the best practices or convention for getting data out of a view to a viewmodel that isn't "bindable".
Thanks!
Databinding in Silverlight is just a framework feature that automatically synchronizes data between your view and your view model (if you are following the MVVM pattern). However, there is nothing wrong with doing this yourself!
The two main advantages of the MVVM pattern (other than the usual separation of concerns that most UI patterns provide) are:
It aids unit testing, the View Model can be exercised from your unit test code without a view present.
It helps the developer / designer workflow, reducing the files shared between the designer and developer.
In my experience, having a small amount of code-behind that 'assists' the binding framework does no hard at all!
You can use techniques such as attached behaviours to wrap this code up, but often this just results in a cosmetic improvement.
CraigF,
you can use Mediator pattern, if you use Galasoft Light toolkit then use messenger to send message from view to your viewmodel. Viewmodel register to that message and if recive one set your property in viewmodel and do some logic..
i know some Mvvm Frameworks that introduced in this thread
please describe or give me link for that what are them useful for?
not information about MVVM about MVVM Framework.
thanks :)
i want to know :
What Is MVVM Framework?
I think your question is not really precise. As far as I understand, you ask for the features of each framework?!
You can find detailed information here and here. However, at least one of these links has already been given in the thread you mentioned...
EDIT:
Basically, an MVVM framework is a collection of classes which are commonly used in applications utilising the MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) pattern. This may include messaging systems to communicate between independent parts of a software, dependency injection techniques, base classes for ViewModels, project/class templates, validation mechanisms, commonly used commands, techniques for displaying dialog boxes, and so on...
To completely understand such a framework, you will have to understand the MVVM pattern first. Because only then (or even only after you did your first MVVM project) you will have an understanding of the problems and/or challenges of this pattern.
To use Mvvm framework just simply follow below steps:
You have a model and a view-model with the same name.
View-models are not supposed to be wrappers around models. The job of a view-model is to broker requests for external services such as the loading and saving of data. The data itself, as well as validation and most of the business logic, should be in the models.
I can’t emphasize this enough. Whenever you create a view-model that wraps a model by delegation you introduce a huge hole in your API. Specially, anything with a direct reference to the model can change a property in such a way that the view-model and thus the UI are never notified. Likewise, any changes to calculated fields in the model won’t be propagated back to the view-model.
You have a view and a view-model with the same name.
Ideally view-models are agnostic to the screens they are used by. This is especially true in a WPF application where multiple windows may be sharing the same instance of a view-model.
For smaller applications such you may only need a single view-model for the whole application. For larger applications you may need one for the main functionality and one for each secondary aspect such as configuration management.
You have no code behind.
In absolute terms code behind is neither a good nor a bad thing. It is merely a place to put logic that is specific to a single view or control. So when I see a view with no code-behind at all I immediately check for the following mistakes:
Does the view-model touch specific controls by name?
Is the view-model being given access to controls via a command parameter?
Is EventToCommand or another leaky behavior being used in place of simple event handler?
EventToCommand from MVVM Light is especially bad because it will prevent controls from being garbage collected after they are removed from the screen.
View-models are listening to property changed notifications
If a model has a longer life-span then the view-model that listens to its events then you probably have a memory leak. Unlike views which have an unloaded event, view-models don’t have a good story for life-cycle management. So if they attach an event to a model that may out-last them then the view-model will be leaked.
I am trying to get into MVVM and away from the code behind approach in Silverlight, and I want to know the best practices around how to invoke view logic.
I have a very basic page where I have bound a listbox to a collection of domain objects, this is all using MVVM, so when I recieve my data back from the services, I want to fire off an animation and view changes on the screen.
Where/How is the best way to doing this? Silverlight (version 3, BTW) doesnt have triggers does it? I have seen blogs where people seem to be using them, but i think they must be rolling their own? Not sure... anyways, any thoughts ideas here is greatly appreciated
First of all, I think code behind is just fine as long as it only works with the view, i.e. it is concerned only with UI concerns. Don't struggle for no-code-behind when the easier way out is just as correct.
Secondly, of course sometime you need some sort of disconnected communication between your view and view-model (for example, getting multiple selected items from your view into your view-model). For these purposes you could use an aggregator like MVVMLight's Messenger, which is both simple and expresses the concept nicely. You can send a message from the view-model and have the view listen for it; also you can send messages from your view (when some events occur) and broadcast them.
MVVMLight also includes some utility classes which make it easy to bind events directly to Commands in your view-model, so that's the easier option in most cases I think.