I woulld like to localize my WPF application with resource files. It good technics. But I have requirement to give ability to end user to change some localization information (for example some word traslation). It means change information in the resourse files on the fly (in run time). Is it possible ?
This would involve recompiling the resources on the fly; and reloading them will be quite difficult (as DLLs cannot be unloaded without unloading an AppDomain).
In such a configuration, you're better off using the database to store your translations.
Related
I am using VS2008 to publish my application files using ClickOnce. I read somewhere that ClickOnce intelligently does only partial updates; meaning it only downloads files from the network share if the file has changed in subsequent updates. However, this wasn't working for me. So I did some research and stumbled upon this MSDN article - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms404267.aspx. It says that if we build using VS, it doesn't perform the partial updates. Can anyone tell me why this is the case? If so, is there a way to atleast let the referenced dlls to be downloaded only for the first time. I am using Microsoft Practices Enterprise Library and some 3rd party controls (with huge Theme files).
Thanks,
Uniball
Partial updates work fine in ClickOnce even when building in VS. However, if you have a solution made up of a few projects (eg a couple of class library projects and an executable) then any time you rebuild all the projects the timestamp on the assembly files will change, even if the code hasn't. Since ClickOnce really only looks at the timestamps to decide whether a file needs updating, it'll pull down the (unchanged) assemblies as new files when the user updates.
The workaround is to pull any dependent projects out of your executable's solution file and build them separately. That means that any assemblies whose code doesn't change very often will only get pulled down to the client once. If you need to change the assembly, you simply open its solution and make the change, then reopen your executable's solution and rebuild that. The next ClickOnce update will pull down both the exe and the changed assembly.
Hope that's clear enough!
I'm putting together a simple help system for my WPF app using XAML FlowDcouments (just .xaml files, no code-behind). I've simply added them to my project with Build Action = Resource, and I can load and display them as required.
Now, I'm trying to make it a bit more flexible, in that after the installation of the app, I want the user to be able to download additional (or newer versions of the existing) FlowDocument XAML help files. Given this, I'm now wondering where the best place to store these files is. A few questions/ideas:
Can I leave them as resource files, and overwrite or add new files as required? I can't find a example of how to add/edit resources at runtime on SO/Google. Is it even possible?
If not, is there a recommended location to store these files? They should be available to all users, so they can't go into the User's directory - they would have to go in the program directory. Does the program directory have write-access (I remember having issues with that before)?
Any other ideas?
Thanks.
The resource files are embedded into the executable and therefore you cannot change them.
As for a common place to put your downloaded help files, you cannot store them in "Program Files" since you would need admin privileges to write there.
I suggest you put them into SpecialFolder.CommonApplicationData (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.environment.specialfolder(v=vs.80).aspx), which is defined as "The directory that serves as a common repository for application-specific data that is used by all users."
I have a common silverlight project. This project project, among other things, includes constants and static classes.
The silverlight App i have references this common library.
In addition, i have a handful of external modules that are loaded on-demand (via Prism). Each module is its own .Xap file and they too reference the common library.
So now each Xap in my silverlight application has a reference to the Common.dll.
Does this mean the common.dll is loaded every time a xap is loaded, or does it essentially mean only the main App's common.dll is ever loaded?
The ultimate question im getting at is this:
If i make a code change (bug fix) in the common.dll, do i have to release ALL Xap files or just the main App xap?
Thanks.
If you use Assembly Caching in all projects that reference the common dll then you'll just get one copy downloaded as it's own zip file. This way all the different XAP files will reference the same dll. Otherwise common.dll will be included in each XAP file that references.
You'll need to create a common.extmap.xml file for your common.dll which needs to be in the same folder from where the dll is referenced.
By default DLLs are loaded on demand. This means that you can't really guarantee which directory they will load from. This is a common issue among modular applications and one that there isn't a ready prescription for. It depends on requirements, essentially.
Some things you can do:
GAC the Common.dll in the target environment. This will allow you to control the versioning of that DLL centrally.
Release everything every time Common.dll changes (as you mentioned).
We have opted for number 2 (we treat our "Common.dll" as a contract assembly that changes rarely) in order to keep our xcopy deployments intact.
Number 1 might make more sense if you anticipate that code churn on Common.dll will be high or you want to keep your deployment schedules for modules completely autonomous (like if the modules were being developed and deployed by seperate teams with seperate build and source respositories, for example).
Edit: It looks like Silverlight has something to provide an xcopy variant of the GAC approach. ChrisF's answer is probably the way I would go with Silverlight (we do WPF, so that's a bit different). I'll leave this here for posterity.
The home page for DotNetNuke 5.2 is around 252.6KB. It uses 15 JavaScripts and 8 CSS files. The number of resources DotNetNuke uses seems excessive to me. I am looking for best practices creating DotNetNuke skins that limit the JavaScript and CSS resources.
You can use the Unload CSS Skin Object to remove links to some of the CSS files loaded by the framework (like Default.css, portal.css & any module-specific CSS files). You can then move all of those styles into the skin (or portal stylesheet, whichever is your preference), so that there's only one stylesheet that gets loaded.
I don't know of any solutions for combining JavaScript resources or reducing the number of scripts that DNN requires.
From 6.1 onward, the Client Resource Management component is the solution for this. It automatically combines all your files, cleaning them up, removing comments, and minifying if desired.
http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Resources/Wiki/Page/Client-Resource-Management-API.aspx
It takes a little getting used to, but the control is quite nice. You can decide which order they'll go in, you can group the files in bunches if you don't want one big single file - maybe you want certain bunches of scripts together but not all.
One thing to remember is that when you're doing development (as noted by the comment below, which I've since edited this post), you should always use debug=true in the web.config, otherwise if you are using Resource Mgmt and change your source files, you'll constantly need to regenerate the combined files by going into Site Settings, Client Resource Management, and increment the version. It's kind of a protection to keep anything from altering your clients' browser caches without intent (that's the message box that pops up to let you know when you do it). I'm sure if you have a zillion users this might make a difference.
Part of that is just the dynamic nature of DNN - there are some good resources that R2i has published about combining javascript and CSS
One concrete suggestion is to combine all your skin and contianer css in one file and if you have full control of the site to combine the css from the modules you use into that same file.
I know with the addition of the Telerik controls there is some abilities to combine resource files
Another thing that helps is to combine graphics into a single file and use CSS (the sprite technique) to cut down number of files loaded and calls to the sever
Like it was stated above, it's the nature of the beast. Each module will have at least 1 css file included. You can check out PageBlaster from snapsis.com, I believe it will do what you are looking for.
Within a Silverlight library, I need to validate incoming XML against a schema. The schema is composed of 5 interdependent .xsd files; the main file uses "xs:import" to reference all of the others, and there are other references among them.
Assuming that the .xsd files need to be distributed with the library (i.e. not hosted on some well-known external URL), how should I structure my project to include them?
I have found that I can embed them in the library project with build type "Resource" and then load them (individually) using Application.GetResourceStream() and a relative URI with the ";content" flag in it. But if I take this approach, can I validate against the interdependent set of 5 files? What happens when the schema parser tries to resolve the interdependencies?
Or should I embed them with build type "Content" and access the main one with some other sort of URL?
Or???
To summarize: how should I use these 5 .xsd files in my project so that I will be able to validate XML against them?
EDIT: It's not clear whether it's even possible to validate in Silverlight. I spun off a related question.
I cannot say much about Silverlight limitations with respect to validation, but the question itself is more generic - one might want to store .xsd files as resources in a desktop .NET application, for example - so I will answer that part.
You can have full control over resolution of URIs in xs:import by means of XmlSchemaSet.XmlResolver property. Just create your own subclass of XmlResolver, override GetEntity() method, and implement it using GetResourceStream(), or GetManifestResourceStream(), or whichever other way you prefer.