I am in the design stage of an application that must be both a standalone app & a web application (To save the costs of building 2 near identical applications twice). Basically I have opted to go for a silverlight OOTB application that will be installed on the standalone machines and they will write to a collection of files in the sandbox and occasionally talk to the server version. The same application (with a little configuration) will also operate on the webserver and store its data in a database.
I am however more of a WPF developer so I would like to cover some concerns I have before I go too far down this path...these are:
I hear you can pass a file out for the user to 'Save As' in their browser when using SL normally. Is there similar functionality with OOTB? Because I want to be able to save some of the local files to locations other than the sandbox (With user permission)?
Is is possible to configure OOTB to allow access to the filesystem outside of the sandbox?
Is there a way to programatically determine whether a silverlight application is running in OOTB mode (So I know what mode the application should be running in)?
Are there any major flaws in my ideas so far that would prevent this from being a possibility?
Silverlight 4 will provide support for out of browser trusted applications, which have more privileges that a normal sandboxed application but still not as much as a regular desktop application. Regarding file access, a trusted application will be able to access to some predefined folders such as MyDocuments, MyMusic, MyPictures, MyVideos, but not the entire filesystem. See here for details: http://mtaulty.com/CommunityServer/blogs/mike_taultys_blog/archive/2009/11/18/silverlight-4-rough-notes-trusted-applications.aspx
As for how to know whether you are running out of browser or not, use Application.Current.RunningOffline.
Finally, I recommend you to take a look at PRISM. Among other things, it eases the task of sharing code between WPF and Silverlight, so you could consider developing a dual SL+WPF application.
Related
Shortly I ve Windows Server 2012 R2, AEM Forms(6.2), SQLServer(2014) and Workbench(6.2) in same server. At first when i install and configure all of them, i can check out or in my applications from Workbench succesfully. However After my software team executes some scripts at Database, we can not check in/out from workbench. The worst thing when i click check out, workbench gives any error. any log. on event log or server application. It gives nothing and don't do my transaction. I saw at forums some people have same issue but nobody writes solution.
Please if any one knows the solution, share with us. What's wrong with my workbench? what to do fix this issue?
The query that your software team ran turns off security on every single LiveCycle service and makes them run as the system user. This includes the services used by Workbench and is very bad. Some of the services rely on knowing who is logged in to operate correctly. In particular, how can LiveCycle know who has checked in/out a resource if the service always runs as system?
Your best bet is to restore the LiveCycle database - or at least the tb_sc_service_configuration table to be where it was before you ran the script.
If you need to remove security on individual services, you should do it through the admin console, but only do it for your processes. Never do it for systems services unless the Adobe documentation says it is OK.
As JeremyP pointed out, modifying the Adobe database directly is a bad idea. The database should be treated as a black box that is only manipulated by Adobe code (either by doing things in the Adobe tools or making calls to Adobe APIs).
You can either make security changes manually through the adminui (as he indicates, which is the most common way of doing it) or programatically using the Adobe client APIs. See the following links for sample code that uses the APIs:
Removing Security - http://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/10.0/ProgramLC/WS624e3cba99b79e12e69a9941333732bac8-7f35.html
Setting the runAs user - http://help.adobe.com/en_US/livecycle/10.0/ProgramLC/WS624e3cba99b79e12e69a9941333732bac8-7f38.html
My company, 4Point, offers AEM Forms consulting services. We have an in-house Apache Ant library that wraps the code above to automate this (and other) common tasks that are typically required when deploying (and redeploying) AEM Forms solutions. It can be included as part of a consulting engagement.
Just an R&D question. We need to develop an application that can be run in a browser that has the capability of performing some system checks to gather support information to be emailed to us. These checks will include basic system information, but also will need to scan the filesystem and pull out version information about various DLLS, executables, and .NET assemblies that might be installed. The idea being that we can direct a client to a page and have the application gather the relevant information needed for support, and potentially even populate some database fields. We need it to have as small a footprint as possible.
I've worked with ActiveX before, and know it is capable of these things, but particularly on modern systems security is a nightmare to get around, with a lot of people blocking ActiveX altogether. Is Silverlight easier to deliver to clients? Does it have a lighter footprint? Is it even capable of doing these things?
Silveright has access to isolated storage, but I don't think it can do what you are looking for (I may be wrong). As for footprint, if I remember correctly, the runtime is reasonably small, and the .xap packages are limited to 4Mb.
Silverlight out-of-browser has access to the file system. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd550721(v=vs.95).aspx#special_features_for_outofbrowser_applications
If you intend to run your app in the browser, you will still have to configure the trust as if it where oob. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg192793(v=vs.95).aspx
However, iTunes has a neat way of doing something somewhat related. It has a custom protocol (itms://) that allows the browser to invoke a client side program (iTunes). Then you can embed html in a webpage that passes parameters as command line arguments to that app. The website also knows if the iTunes is installed by a cookie. We this in mind, you might be able to encourage your users to install some small app that setups the custom protocol on install. You could pass command-line parameters to it from the web, and the app will push information from the client back to the server.
To create a real-time experience, you could use sockets + more javascript to update the page with the info you just got off the machine.
HTH,
Silverlight runs in a pretty restricted silo and can't do a lot of low level things - such as checking the file system. So I would say it does not fit your use case, unfortunately.
I just heard that a company I do work for may be bringing in the Pyxis Mobile application development system. When I google it most of what I find is from the company's web site and that is not very informative from a geek perspective. Can any one shed some light on what sort of programming environment it is and what programing language is involved (please let there be a text based language). Any additional information would be great.
Note: the company/product changed their name to Verivo in January.
Full Disclosure - I work as an engineer at Pyxis Mobile. However, I have been in the mobile space for 7+ years and have evaluated several approaches to mobile so hopefully this is helpful.
Pyxis Mobile provides a set of tools and components to build cross platform mobile applications. Let me outline them first.
1. Application Studio - All application development, backend integration, user provisioning and application maintenance/debugging is done w/in this tool. Application Studio (for now) is a Windows based desktop app.
2. Application Clients - Pyxis Mobile provides native client runtimes for iPhone, iPad, BlackBerry, and Android devices. These runtimes get branded for the customer through a build service and are primed to point to a specific Application Server URL.
3. Application Server - Pyxis Mobile App Server runs on the .NET stack (on IIS). All client communication is proxied via this server. This server is able to connect to varied of backend systems (via the Plugin Framework listed below) and respond to the client in a mobile optimized manner. This server needs a SQL Server (2005 or newer) for configuration access, session management, logging and more.
4. Plugin Framework - The Plugin Framework is a backend component that provides system specific pre-built access to several of the enterprise and cloud based systems (Oracle, Siebel, SAP, Salesforce.com, social feeds, REST/SOAP web services, etc.) and also offers an API layer in .NET and Python (using IronPython) to allow even further customization. A plugin is essentially comprised of one or more DLLs or a Python file. These assets are then dynamically loaded to normalize communication between Pyxis Mobile and the customers' backend systems.
5. Push Services - This provides a cross-platform push layer that can poll a backend system for change and alert a mobile device via BlackBerry Push, Apple Push Notification Services (APNS) or Android's Cloud to Deice Messaging (C2DM).
6. OverWatch Analytics - This is an optional (but included) component to track users/devices and provide integrated analytics on what the users are using and what kind of devices and locales makes up your users.
The application itself is "coded" via configuration that is build in App Studio. Pyxis Mobile abstracts away from the code so that you can work at a higher level without having to worry about the wide array of device variances (GPS, touch screens, camera, accelerometer, push, screen resolution, etc.). You can drag fields onto a from, connect screens via menus or buttons, set up caching rules and more in this graphical utility. This configuration (essentially think of an XML like document) is interpreted by the native client layer to produce a rich application. There is also a scripting layer in Lua that allows to really customize behavior via code.
The real value of Pyxis Mobile comes up when you have change to make. The clients check for new configuration at app startup or if the server forces the client to get new configuration. This gives you great agility. Lets say once your application is deployed you want start using the swipe gesture to go next/prev through a set of records. This change on other platforms would mean writing some platform specific code to trap and interpret the swipe to perform a navigation (you couldn't trap a swipe on a non-touch screen). However, in Pyxis Mobile this is a simple configuration change that can be quickly deployed to the App Server and the clients automatically download and use the new configuration. No compilation, no redeployment or re-download for the end users.
I could keep going, but hope this provides some level of guidance.
Beware of Pyxis Mobile. While many of the things they say do work, there are some serious platform issues (as a geek) which I've experienced.
1) No version control system process. The Application studio can basically only be developed on by one person at a time or you risk having your changes overwritten by a fellow developer. The "principle of last save" is very much in play.
2) No unit test coverage. This isn't the biggest issue for a lot of people, but it's a concern for anyone who wants to work in the Enterprise world.
3) The middleware server gets you some value, but it's also a PITA to work with. There is no concept of "client side storage" unless you consider the middleware server the client side. If your phone goes out of coverage, your app won't work. Again, this might not be an issue for you.
4) The application has no true scripting language to work with. The middleware server allows you to intercept requests and responses and modify what you're doing there, but it's not the most elegant solution considering that a native application can have something as simple as "if this then X else Y." This can be accomplished with Pyxis, but the whole process is convoluted and more complicated than one would think it needs to be.
5) Lack of documentation. There's some training guides and the GUI is easy enough to get around for simple apps; however, when you need to do something with guts, you're left relying on Pyxis professional services. There's really no developer community to pose questions to.
I have more complaints, but they are more opinion oriented than Q/A oriented.
I just got note about the most recent comments. I don't want to turn this into a thread of back and forth, but did want to throw a couple of quick notes.
Regarding the points on version control and documentation/developer community - no big contest there. We are definitely working on these shortcommings. We have some basic pieces in place, but we have big plans to focus on this.
Regarding unit testing - we provide a very open interface to our middleware and backend components and they can be very easily unit tested with a bit of instrumentation. We run a ton of unit and integration tests internally. However, mobile unit testing is extremely difficult to get right. We'll investigate this further.
Regarding #4 around middleware and offline capabilities - things are a lot different now. With version 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 our products have increasing become more capabale offline and now features a secure local database if necessary. I can provide more details as necessary, but you can certainly login and operate the app even if you are out of coverage for weeks at a time!
Regarding #5, we've had a scripting engine for over 2 years. Its Lua based and its actually quite powerful and fast. It was BlackBerry only till the most recent release. Given Apple's change of stance on allowing scripting we now allow scripting on BlackBerry, iPad, iPhone and Android as well now!
#RockMeetHardplace - feel free to reach out to me directly and I'll be happy to give you more detailed live demos of our latest platform. I am at - arunSPAMNOTatpyxismobiledotcom (drop the "SPAMNOT" and replace the at and dot). I happen to be the Director of Software and interested in knowing more about the issues you had.
I would like to know if there is any way to launch a local application with silverlight. I'm having some security problems doing this with a user control embedded in IE 8, so I would like to convert this into silverlight app. This little issue is stopping me to go forward with silverlight, so if any suggestion, I would appreciate to hear it.
Thanks in advance..
Carlos.
This will be, theoretically possible, using COM interop with Silverlight OOB in SL4, but you will still have the same security issues, and in addition, add some deployment issues.
In order to do this directly from within IE, you'll need to make an add-in that gets installed with proper security permissions. Any "automatic" model for this would violate the standard IE security policies, so there is no direct means of getting from browser->local system.
this would totally invalidate Silverlight security model. So, good luck with that. Pretty sure you can not do it. This is what officially is known as a "Bad Thing."
Things I learned from Jurassic Park: Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do something.
It is absolutely possible to get "Out of Browser" support using Silverlight 4. But what you need to do in order to access applications on the "Host" machine is the certify the SL4 application as being trusted.
This will involve getting a certificate for it. This could be obtained from CA (or similar for Internet applications) OR you could generate your own certificate for Intranet use and have the users simply install it or have it installed via another automated sys admin style process.
The bottom line is that when the SL4 application is running OOB AND it is trusted, it can access anything on the host machine; to a point.
Even though you can have file access and so forth, you still cannot call the application directly. That is unless it's installed as a COM object.
So what you will need to do is invoke the application using the "script" host COM object. You create a reference to the Script host and then simply pass in the command (and parameters if you like) that would invoke the application.
Hey presto, you broke the wall :-)
It should be noted that the use will still only be able to run the applications on their machine that they are currently allowed to. So you won't be able to invoke Admin tools on a user with limited control.
See here for details
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd550721(VS.95).aspx
It seems to me that you ought to post a question about the developement of the user control you already have. Ultimately no matter what technology you use you will need to get the user to opt-in manually. Silverlight when hosted by a browser is designed to live in nice and secure sandbox that it can't get out of. It isn't the answer to your problem in this case.
Your Silverlight application should be a trusted application because it runs on a browser.
If you want to launch an application in your local machine use the below code:
AutomationFactory.CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run(FilePath);
Use the namespace System.Runtime.InteropServices.Automation
I've done some cursory reading on Silverlight and data access. From what I can tell, I'll need a web service to hook up a Silverlight application to a database while it's running in browser. Is this true when it goes OOB? Or is there another method that should be used then?
Some background:
We have a .Net 2.0 Winforms application. We're trying to convert the functionality to a web app of some sort without rewriting the business logic. Our internal web developers all write in ColdFusion, so Adobe Air seemed to be a natural fit. However, we've found out that the only way to consume a .Net dll in Air is to write an EXE that makes function calls. (Perhaps something like a WCF service on the local machine.) Since that's the case, I thought I'd see how the data access was in Silverlight OOB, because we will have customers with limited-to-no internet connectivity and will need to be able to access an offline DB.
As far as I know, whether it runs in or out of browser it will need a web service or other means to hit a database. You cannot do it through the Silverlight application because of the sandbox security model used.
In 4.0 there is the added use of COM so you may be able to use that to your advantage.
Otherwise you would just be using a file stored in IsolatedStorage to persist data to, like an XML file for example. Maybe this is what you are looking for though?