We are in process of completing the migration of Oracle to SQL Server 2005 (schema, data and programming objects). We have about 1220 stored procedures to be tested. What would be the best way to test them? Is there any automation possible here?
We are thinking of writing a small window tool which would take the stored procedure name and list of parameters, would call the Oracle and SQL Server database and then compare the table table outputs. Although this eases the pain to some extent, it still does not eliminate human intervention and would not test every possible flow for the stored procedures, unless the parameters specified changes the proc flow.
I guess, what i am trying to say is what can we do further to ease the pain!
All and any suggestion/help would be appreciated!!
Thanks,
Atul
The only thing that counts here is the working of the application. So my advice would be to run you application and test you scenarios on both databases containing the same data and see if the results are the same in both cases. When you find errors you will need to zoom into the problems and try to reproduce the problems using simple lower level calls, outside of the application.
I hope this helps,
Ronald
Related
I am a developer and performance tester but not a DBA. My team is working on a performance testing tool that is specific to our software. One of the features we want it to have is the ability to generate a database report immediately after the test. Our software is database agnostic. For Oracle, I can easily create a snapshot id before and after the test and programmatically create an AWR report for those snapshots, write to a file and save with other artifacts we gather. Works great.
For SQL Server, however, there is no AWR equivalent (that I know of). I know the MDW as part of the SSMS has a UI for getting things like top 10 slow SQL and things like that. But, I have not yet found a way to programmatically create and extract a SQL performance report (preferably similar to Oracle's AWR) for SQL Server.
I am even willing to create the report myself if I can find a way to extract the raw data.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated because searching online is not getting me anywhere.
P.S. I'm trying to do this in Java, by the way, but will accept help in any language. Thanks again!
Good news! In SQL Server 2016, you can use Query Store. This is like your flight recorder blackbox.. finding long running queries and waits. Capture baseline built in to SQL Server. You can compare before and after hardware changes and/or upgrades on queries. Maybe this similar to Oracle AWR.
Only available SQL Server 2016 and up.
We have Oracle databases for different environment such as Development, System Integration Test, User Acceptance Test and Production. We want to make sure the DB objects such as tables, index, stored procedure etc. are synchronized after each deployment, so we are carrying out some evaluation on DB comparison tools.
But as our budget is really tight, we may eventually need to find a solution that is free.
We don't need to know which line of s.p. is different from the other. We just need to know what table / column / stored. proc. is missing,
Does Oracle come with some tools that help us perform this task? Can we write some scripts that can help us find out the difference between Oracle databases?
You can use comparision tool comparedb from ems which i have used in previous project.
There are other ways like script and a tool TOAD which can also be used. Additional info.
https://community.oracle.com/thread/361526
I am developing a data driven website and quite a lot of programming logic resides in database stored procedures and database functions. I found myself changing the stored proc/functions quite a lot in order to fix bugs or add new functionality. The data (tables) have remained mostly untouched.
The issue I am having is keeping track of versions of stored proc/functions. Currently I am incrementing version of whole database when I do a set of changes. As data is huge (10 Gb) I get issues having to run development version and release versions of databases in parallel.
I wish to put all the stored procs and functions in one database and keep data in one database, so that I can better manage the changes.
I am sure others would have encountered similar suggest and request suggestions on how to best handle this situation.
I would also recommend using source control keyword expansion in your stored procedures ($Version:$)
That way you can eyeball, grep, search syscomments, etc to see what version you have on your deployed database.
You can version just the schema dumps. In combination with source control keword expansion (as suggested by Rawheiser), you just take a look at what version you have in the database, generate a diff and apply it.
Also, there are several excellent tools to compare databases and their schemas, generate DDL scripts etc.: SQL Workbench, Power Architect, DDLUtils and Redgate SQL Compare, to name a few. SQL Compare is likely to work best with SQL Server, although all the others are FOSS and provide a higher ROI (in terms of time spent learning and what you can do with them) as they are platoform and RDBMS independent.
Finally, I have to say...I understand that the immediate results you get with logic in the DB are tempting, but if you've gone beyond more than a couple of procedures in the database, you're setting your self up for quite a lot of pain, sifting through what easily turns into spaghetti code and locking your application to a single database vendor. You might have your reasons, but I've been there and didn't like it very much. Logic can live very nicely in a different layer.
For source control you have several options:
Use a Visual Studio Database project.
Use SQL Server 2005's built-in support for source control
Use a third part tool such as SQL Compare
IMO Option 1. is preferable.
I am looking to insert and update records in a database using functions and logic that are not available in SQL Server or any other RDBMS for that matter. After Googling around a bit this morning, I have come across the concept of Extended Stored Procedures. As far as I can tell, I should be able to compile my desired functionality into a dll, make a stored proc utilizing that dll to do the inserting/updating.
However, most of the articles and examples I have come across are somewhat dated (~2000). Are extended stored procedures still an acceptable practice? I am far from an expert in this area, so any other suggestions or comments would be greatly appreciated.
If you're using SQL Server 2005 or later, SQL CLR is the area to look at. You can call .NET code from within SQL Server.
This article on MSDN is a good place to start.
Are extended stored procedures still
an acceptable practice?
No, they are officialy deprecated and will be dicontinued in a future release. See Deprecated Database Engine Features in SQL Server 2008 , in the Features Not Supported in a Future Version of SQL Server table:
Extended stored procedure programming: Use CLR Integration instead.
I usually recommend against using CLR procedures, in most cases you can refactor the problem you are facing, into something that Transact Sql can handle.
Of most concern is the procedural approach that often accompanies the use of CLR procedures, when a relation database performs best when performing set based operations.
So the first question I always ask, is there anyway to refactor the problem into a set based operation.
If not, then I ask why would you want to execute the code inside of the database server, instead of in an application layer? Think about the performance impact you might have by placing the logic inside the database. (This might not be an issue if your db server has plenty of extra processing time).
If you do go head with CLR procedures, I think they are best applied to intensive calculations and complex logic.
I have a SQL Server stored procedure which has been in use for years. This stored procedure calls lots of other procedures. I would like to extract each inside procedure one at a time and implement its business logic to a .NET Class project.
In order to do that, I have to call .NET assembly from parent stored procedure and the returned result will be used by parent procedure. Since SQL Server 2005 and higher has CLR integration, so I think, executing .NET assembly inside stored procedure [or any Database objects] should not be a big deal, can you please point me some references where i can find examples or article to implement it?
Thank you very much for your help .
I really feel that this would be an inappropriate use of SQL CLR. The purpose of CLR integration is to support complex data types and operations that are normally very hard to do in pure SQL (such as sequences, regular expressions, hierarchy, geospatial, etc.) Not to implement a domain model in your database.
Domain models and business logic are separate from relational/data models. They should be in a proper business tier of some sort. Don't hack them into a database using the CLR.
(Note: I use SQLCLR a fair bit. I am not railing on CLR integration. I just don't think that this question reflects a wise design decision.)
MSDN
Building my First SQL Server 2005 CLR
An Intro to CLR Integration in SQL Server 2005
For loads more ;)
I think you should use SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS). As far as I understand, it solves this case, to orchestrate the procedure calls and gives you much more too..
I'm not too sure if moving this decision outside the db layer is a good decision.
Hope it helps..