WPF Databinding CheckBox.IsChecked - wpf

How would I bind the IsChecked member of a CheckBox to a member variable in my form?
(I realize I can access it directly, but I am trying to learn about databinding and WPF)
Below is my failed attempt to get this working.
XAML:
<Window x:Class="MyProject.Form1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="Title" Height="386" Width="563" WindowStyle="SingleBorderWindow">
<Grid>
<CheckBox Name="checkBoxShowPending"
TabIndex="2" Margin="0,12,30,0"
Checked="checkBoxShowPending_CheckedChanged"
Height="17" Width="92"
VerticalAlignment="Top" HorizontalAlignment="Right"
Content="Show Pending" IsChecked="{Binding ShowPending}">
</CheckBox>
</Grid>
</Window>
Code:
namespace MyProject
{
public partial class Form1 : Window
{
private ListViewColumnSorter lvwColumnSorter;
public bool? ShowPending
{
get { return this.showPending; }
set { this.showPending = value; }
}
private bool showPending = false;
private void checkBoxShowPending_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//checking showPending.Value here. It's always false
}
}
}

<Window ... Name="MyWindow">
<Grid>
<CheckBox ... IsChecked="{Binding ElementName=MyWindow, Path=ShowPending}"/>
</Grid>
</Window>
Note i added a name to <Window>, and changed the binding in your CheckBox. You will need to implement ShowPending as a DependencyProperty as well if you want it to be able to update when changed.

Addendum to #Will's answer: this is what your DependencyProperty might look like (created using Dr. WPF's snippets):
#region ShowPending
/// <summary>
/// ShowPending Dependency Property
/// </summary>
public static readonly DependencyProperty ShowPendingProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ShowPending", typeof(bool), typeof(MainViewModel),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata((bool)false));
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the ShowPending property. This dependency property
/// indicates ....
/// </summary>
public bool ShowPending
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(ShowPendingProperty); }
set { SetValue(ShowPendingProperty, value); }
}
#endregion

You must make your binding mode as TwoWay :
<Checkbox IsChecked="{Binding Path=ShowPending, Mode=TwoWay}"/>

If you have only one control that you want to bind to a property of your code-behind, then you can specify this as the source in your binding via a RelativeSource like this:
<CheckBox ...
IsChecked="{Binding ShowPending, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}}}">
That could be the end of the answer. But more generally you will have multiple controls and wish to bind them to various properties on your class. In this case it is neater and more convenient to make use of the fact that the DataContext property (which is the default source object for data binding) is inherited down through the control hierarchy, so setting it at the top level will make it available to all the child controls.
There is no default value for DataContext, but there are at least two ways you can set the DataContext property of your Window element to point at itself:
By setting DataContext = this in the code-behind constructor. This is very simple, but some might argue that it's not clear in the XAML where the DataContext is pointing.
By setting the DataContext in XAML using DataBinding
The simplest and, I think, most elegant way to set the DataContext at the Window/UserControl level in XAML is very straight forward; just add DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}" to your Window element. RelativeSource Self just means "bind directly to the object", which in this case is the Window object. The lack of a Path property results in the default Path, which is the source object itself (i.e. the Window).
<Window x:Class="MyProject.Form1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}">
<Grid>
<CheckBox ...
IsChecked="{Binding ShowPending}">
</CheckBox>
</Grid>
</Window>
Once you have done this, the DataContext property for all child controls will be the Window class, so data binding to properties in your code-behind will be natural.
If for some reason you don't want to set the DataContext on the Window, but wish to set it lower down the control hierarchy, then you can do so by using the FindAncestor mechanism. E.g. if you want to set it on the Grid element and all children of the Grid:
<Grid DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}}}">
<CheckBox ...
IsChecked="{Binding ShowPending}">
</CheckBox>
</Grid>
It's probably worth noting at this point that what we have achieved so far is the ability to bind a UI Control to a property of your code-behind class, and for that code-behind property to be kept up-to-date with changes to the UI element. So if the user checks the CheckBox, the ShowPending property will be updated.
But quite often you also want the reverse to be true; a change to the source property should be reflected in a corresponding change to the UI Control. You can see this by adding another CheckBox control to your window, bound to the same ShowPending property. When you click one checkbox, you would probably hope or expect the other Checkbox to be synchronized, but it won't happen. To achieve this your code-behind class should either (a) implement INotifyPropertyChanged, (b) add a ShowPendingChanged event or (c) make ShowPending a Dependency Property. Of the 3, I suggest implementing INotifyPropertryChanged on your code-behind is the most common mechanism.

Related

Understanding dependancy objects

I'm totally lost with dependancy objects and binding. I often get things working without understanding why and how, this question is about knowing what should be happening.
I have a tiny user control with the following XAML
<Grid>
<Image Source="{Binding Icon}"></Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}"></TextBlock>
</Grid>
My code behind has the following
public static readonly DependencyProperty IconProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Icon", typeof(Image), typeof(MenuItem));
public Image Icon
{
get { return (Image)GetValue(IconProperty); }
set { SetValue(IconProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TitleProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Title", typeof(String), typeof(MenuItem));
public string Title
{
get { return (string)GetValue(IconProperty); }
set { SetValue(IconProperty, value); }
}
My MainWindow is empty, other than a reference to this control and to the ResourceDictionary. In the MainWindow code behind, I set the DataContext in the constructor.
<Window x:Class="AppUi.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:loc="clr-namespace:AppUi.Control"
Title="">
//set up to Resource Dictionary - all binding and styling works fine :)
<loc:MenuItem Icon="{Binding MailIcon}" Title="{Binding MailTitle}"></loc:MenuItem>
In the ModelView for the MainWindow, I have the following 2 properties
private Image_mailIcon;
public Image MailIcon{
//inotifyproperty implementation
}
private string _mailTitle;
public string MailTitle{
//inotifyproperty implementation
}
My question is, in the UserControl, how do I do the binding? Since it's a user control within a MainWindow, and the MainWindow already has a datacontext, I think the UserControl will inherit the DataContext from the parent (From what I have read).
So, in my UserControl XAML, should I be binding to the MainWindow's Code Behind properties OR to the ViewModel properties?
In other words, should my UserControl be
<Grid>
<Image Source="{Binding MailIcon}"></Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding MailTitle}"></TextBlock>
</Grid>
OR
<Grid>
<Image Source="{Binding Icon}"></Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}"></TextBlock>
</Grid>
Or, because I'm using a DataContext and the UserControl inherits, do I even need the Dependancy Properties at all?
You normally don't want to overwrite DataContext passed through visual tree so you can use either ElementName or RelativeSource binding inside UserControl to change binding context. The easiest way to achive this is give UserControl some name and use it ElementName binding
<UserControl ... x:Name="myUserControl">
<!-- ... -->
<Grid>
<Image Source="{Binding Icon, ElementName=myUserControl}"/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title, ElementName=myUserControl}"/>
</Grid>
<!-- ... -->
</UserControl>
This way binding is DataContext independent. You can also create UserControl with assumption it will always work with only specific type of DataContext and then you just use Path from that view model type but then DataContext of that UserControl must always be of the view model it's designed for (mostly inherited through visual tree)
<UserControl ...>
<!-- ... -->
<Grid>
<Image Source="{Binding MailIcon}"/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding MailTitle}"/>
</Grid>
<!-- ... -->
</UserControl>
I would also change type of Icon property from Image to ImageSource for example. You already have Image control inside your UserControl and you just want to bind its Source
in the UserControl, how do I do the binding? ... the UserControl will inherit the DataContext from the parent
That is correct, the UserControl will inherit the DataContext from the parent Window. Therefore you can data bind from the UserControl directly to the parent Window.DataContext. Please note that you would bind to whatever object has been set as the DataContext, regardless of whether that was the code behind or a separate view model class.
However, you don't have to data bind to the parent's DataContext object in this situation... you have other options. You could data bind to your own UserControl DependencyPropertys using a RelativeSource Binding like this:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title, RelativeSource={RelativeSource
AncestorType={x:Type YourPrefix:YourUserControl}}}" />
You could also name your UserControl and reference its properties like this:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title, ElementName=YourUserControlName}" />
While this example seems to be more concise, don't overlook the first example, as RelativeSource is a useful and powerful friend to have.
should I be binding to the MainWindow's Code Behind properties OR to the ViewModel properties?
That's your choice... what do you want or need to data bind to? you just need to know that a direct data binding will use the auto set DataContext value, so if you don't want to use that, then you can just specify a different data source for the Binding as shown above.
Finally, regarding the need to use DependencyPropertys... you only need to declare them if you are developing a UserControl that needs to provide data binding abilities.

Bind user control dependency properties in MVVM style Windows Phone app

I'm having some issues with binding some custom controls in a Windows Phone app right now. Usually this is never an issue but apparently my mind can't comprehend this today.
So I'm doing an MVVM style setup which is good. I have my page with a view and also a viewmodel. Now on a WebClient callback I assign the dataContext of my view to the list of models in my ViewModel, nice and simple thus far...now in my view I created a ListBox with a custom control in the datatemplate which is basically a cell in the list. I once again set my user controls dataContext to binding, and binding all the models values to the regular UI elements works no problem.
Here's a sample:
<Grid Grid.Column="0">
<Image Source="{Binding SmallPath}" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
</Grid>
<Grid Grid.Column="1">
<StackPanel Margin="12,0,0,0">
<TextBlock x:Name="MemberId_TextBlock" Text="{Binding MemberId}" FontSize="28"
Margin="0,-8,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneForegroundBrush}"/>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="0,-11,0,0">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding DaysReported}" FontSize="42"
Margin="0,0,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneAccentBrush}"/>
<TextBlock Text="days" FontSize="24"
Margin="3,19,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneSubtleBrush}"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
That's in my user control, and here's the the view where the usercontrol is housed:
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="Transparent">
<ListBox Name="TopSpotter_ListBox" ItemsSource="{Binding}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<!--<TextBlock Text="{Binding MemberId}"/>-->
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl DataContext="{Binding}"/>
<Grid Height="18"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
Now this is good enough but what I want to do in my view is set data from my model like Booleans that determine whether or not I should show certain Grids etc. So if I try to set a dependency property explicitly in my control it fires and will run logic in the Getter/Setters for instance. HOWEVER if I try to set these custom objects from a binding source it won't actually set.
Here's what works:
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl ChampVisibility="True">
This way will trigger the ChampVisibility property and then in the code behind of the user control I can set visibilities.
Here's what fails but I want to work:
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl ChampVisibility="{Binding IsChamp">
In addition I can still set the DataContext to {Binding} and the result will be unchanged.
In this scenario IsChamp is part of my model that I would like to bind to this user control which I guess comes from the dataContext being set on the view from the viewModel. I'm not sure what I can do to get this so the bindings work etc. without having to set custom properties.
Finally, here's my user control:
public partial class TopSpotterItemControl : UserControl
{
public string MemberId
{
get
{
return this.MemberId_TextBlock.Text;
}
set
{
this.MemberId_TextBlock.Text = value;
}
}
public bool ChampVisibility {
set
{
if (value)
{
this.Champ_Grid.Visibility = System.Windows.Visibility.Visible;
}
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MemberNameProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MemberId", typeof(string), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ChampVisibilityProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ChampVisibility", typeof(bool), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public TopSpotterItemControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Bit long winded and I hope I made things on the issue clear. My one major hang up so far, and I'd like to abstract as much control as I can to the user control via dependency properties explicitly set in xaml, rather than setting up binding in its xaml that depend on the knowledge of a model. Thanks!
Your DependencyProperty is badly formed. (I also don't see Champ_Grid defined in your class or XAML, but I assume that is an ommission)
Setting ChampVisibility = true in code works because it is unrelated to the DependencyProperty.
You can tell easily because the default value for your DP is invalid. It will compile, but the instance constructor will through an exception if it is ever invoked.
new PropertyMetadata(null)
bool = null = exception
If you call GetValue(TopSpotterItemControl.ChampVisibilityProperty) from somewhere you can confirm all of the above.
You should make changes to instance fields in the property changed handler and declare the property like the following, it will work:
Note that the property has to change (not just be set) for the event to be raised.
public bool ChampVisibility
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(ChampVisibilityProperty); }
set { SetValue(ChampVisibilityProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ChampVisibilityProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ChampVisibility ", typeof(bool), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(true, (s, e) =>
{
TopSpotterItemControl instance = s as TopSpotterItemControl;
instance.Champ_Grid.Visibility = instance.ChampVisibility ? System.Windows.Visibility.Visible : System.Windows.Visibility.Collapsed;
}));
Incidentally, your MemberId DependencyProperty is also completely wrong and cannot work.
Note:
The Binding on your TextBox works, because it is binding to the DataContext (your model), so it probably shows the right value.
The Dependency property in your UserControl will never be set though.
Use the propdp code-snippet in Visual Studio so you dont have to concern yourself with the complexities of Dependency Property declaration.
Also check this out for more info about Dependency Properties

Silverlight relativebinding ItemTemplate ListboxItem - Listbox

I created programatically a class (I called it ViewGrid) so that I use an instance of it as ItemTemplate for my ListBox control; of course, it's my data template for the listboxitem....
Also, in my ViewGrid class, I got a dependency property called IsChecked and I want to keep it in sync with the ListBoxItem's IsSelected property. I noticed that in SL there no relativesource-findancestor-ancestortype support for binding as in WPF, still, I need to find a way to keep my IsChecked property synchronized with the IsSelected property of the internally generated ListBoxItem for my ListBox control. Can you help?
Here is a ListBox defined in XAML that uses the IsSelected property of each LitBoxItem to show or hide a button when selected. You just need to duplicate that Binding approach for the ListBoxItems you create in code. Either that, or create a UserControl with the appropriate ListBoxItem XAML, and insert instances of those UserControls into your ListBox.
<ListBox>
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid Width="200" Height="120">
<StackPanel Margin="5">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name, Mode=OneWay}" />
<StackPanel Visibility="{Binding IsSelected, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource BoolToVisible}}">
<Button Content="Show Details" Click="OnDetailsClick" Tag="{Binding}" />
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
Good luck,
Jim McCurdy
Face To Face Software and YinYangMoney
UPDATE: I revisited this and found a much better solution. My original one remains below, but the way I actually ended up solving this problem is via using the ViewGrid in a ControlTemplate instead of a DataTemplate. Then you can use the RelativeSource TemplatedParent binding to bind to the IsSelected property of the ListBox. So, add the following to the Resources of the listbox or your page or user control:
<Style TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="ListBoxItem">
<StackPanel>
<ViewGrid IsChecked="{Binding IsSelected, RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Mode=TwoWay}"/>​
<!-- other controls may go here -->
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
ORIGINAL:
So after seven years, you almost certainly don't need an answer to this anymore... however, I recently spent a morning wrestling with this issue and thought I'd give my solution in case any similar unfortunate ends up here.
First off, anyone who's using Silverlight 5 is in luck as AncestorType is apparently now available for RelativeSource, letting you bind directly to the IsSelected property of the ListBoxItem. For those of us stuck with 4 or below, the only real workaround I came up with was "faking" the binding via use of events in the code behind.
To do this, assume you have your YourView XAML with a ListBox named "lbYourListBox" which has its ItemsSource and SelectedItem properties bound to appropriate properties on a YourViewModel class, along with a ViewGrid in its ItemTemplate whose IsChecked property is not bound to anything. Then, in your code behind file, you wire up events as follows:
public YourView()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.Loaded += (sender, e) =>
{
((YourViewModel)this.DataContext).PropertyChanged += vm_PropertyChanged;
UpdateViewGrids();
};
}
// this part propagates changes from the view to the view model
private void viewGrid_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var selectedVM = ((ViewGrid)sender).DataContext as SourceItemType;
((YourViewModel)this.DataContext).SelectedViewGridItem = selectedVM;
}
private void vm_PropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (string.Equals(e.PropertyName, "SelectedViewGridItem"))
{
UpdateViewGrids();
}
}
// this part propagates changes from the view model to the view
private void UpdateViewGrids()
{
var viewGrids = this.lbYourListBox.GetVisualDescendants().OfType<ViewGrid>();
var selectedVM = ((YourViewModel)this.DataContext).SelectedViewGridItem;
foreach (var grid in viewGrids)
{
grid.IsChecked = selectedVM == grid.DataContext;
}
}​
The viewGrid_Checked event handler should be wired up to the Checked event of the view grid in the ItemTemplate. The GetVisualDescendants() method comes from the Silverlight Toolkit.
Important caveats:
The ViewGrid.Checked event should not fire except for the unchecked->checked transition, and no more than one view grid should be able to be selected at once. If those two things aren't true, you'll have to make appropriate edits to ensure this code can't cause an infinite event-driven loop. (Of course, if you don't need two-way binding, you only need one of these event handlers and event ping-pong isn't a concern.)
I wrote this for a user control which had its data context set in XAML, which is why the event handler for the view model's PropertyChanged event is only assigned after the view is loaded. Depending on how and when your view and view model are bound to each other, you may have to assign that earlier/later/differently.
This won't work if the view grids aren't visible, GetVisualDescendants seems to ignore hidden/collapsed controls.

wpf binding from a FindAncestor to Dependency Property of custom control

I've got a custom WPF control with a DependencyProperty MyString
I'm using the control within an ItemsControl on my View and want to fish a value out from the ViewModel.
As the DataContext of the control becomes each Item in the ItemsSource of the ItemsControl I thought I'd just be able to use FindAncestor but it dosnt seem to work ... can anyone see where I'm going wrong please?
Heres the XAML on the View ...
<Grid>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding MyItems}" >
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Name="myStack">
<ImportExceptions:ControlStrip MyString="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type ItemsControl}}, Path=DataContext.MyStringOnViewModel}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
</Grid>
and heres the code behind my custom control where I've set up my dependency property ...
public partial class ControlStrip
{
public ControlStrip()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public string MyString
{
get
{
return GetValue(MyStringProperty).ToString();
}
set
{
SetValue(MyStringProperty, value);
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MyStringProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("MyString", typeof (string), typeof (ControlStrip));
}
The DataContext of the control doesn't change - the DataContext for the ImportExceptions:ControlStrip will be (unless explicitly specified) the next DataContext available as its goes 'up' the visual tree...
I infer from your code that you have set the DataContext of the View to a ViewModel with properties 'MyItems' and 'MyStringOnViewModel' - you should be able to simply bind the MyString property directly to the ViewModel, like
<ImportExceptions:ControlStrip MyString="{Binding Path=MyStringOnViewModel}" />
Your code looks fine. Probably you have made an error in the DataContext reference. In all likeliness the DataContext of the the ItemsControl already is MyStringOnViewModel. So, omit the .MystringOnViewModel after the DataContext in the Path attribute. If not can you give some more code, ore post a simplification of it that mimicks how the DataCon,text(s) is/are set?

Can I apply a ContextMenu to a ContextMenuViewModel using a DataTemplate?

I have a ViewModel (AbstractContextMenu) that represents my context menu (IContextMenu), and I bind a real ContextMenu to it with a DataTemplate:
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:AbstractContextMenu}">
<ContextMenu x:Name="contextMenu"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=(local:IContextMenu.Items)}"
IsEnabled="{Binding Path=(local:IContextMenu.IsEnabled)}"/>
</DataTemplate>
Then I have a dummy ConcreteContextMenu for testing that just inherits from AbstractContextMenu. AbstractContextMenu just implements this interface:
public interface IContextMenu : IExtension
{
IEnumerable<IMenuItem> Items { get; set; }
bool IsEnabled { get; set; }
}
I'm using it as a property of another ViewModel object:
public IContextMenu ContextMenu
{
get
{
return m_ContextMenu;
}
protected set
{
if (m_ContextMenu != value)
{
m_ContextMenu = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged(m_ContextMenuArgs);
}
}
}
private IContextMenu m_ContextMenu = new ConcreteContextMenu();
static readonly PropertyChangedEventArgs m_ContextMenuArgs =
NotifyPropertyChangedHelper.CreateArgs<AbstractSolutionItem>(o => o.ContextMenu);
Then I bind a StackPanel to that ViewModel and bind the ContextMenu property on the StackPanel to the ContextMenu property of the ViewModel:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"
ContextMenu="{Binding Path=(local:AbstractSolutionItem.ContextMenu)}"
ContextMenuOpening="stackPanel_ContextMenuOpening">
<!-- stuff goes in here -->
</StackPanel>
When I run this, the ContextMenuOpening event on the StackPanel is fired, but the ContextMenu is never displayed. I'm not sure if I can even do this (apply a ContextMenu to a ContextMenu ViewModel using a DataTemplate). Anyone know?
What is the type of AbstractSolutionItem.ContextMenu? If it corresponds to the ContextMenu property in your question, then the problem could be that the type is wrong. The ContextMenu property of FrameworkElement is expecting an actual ContextMenu, not an IContextMenu. Try checking the output window while debugging your app - you might get an error message stating that this is the problem.
Instead of using a DataTemplate to define your ContextMenu, just put the contents of the template StackPanel.ContextMenu:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"
ContextMenu="{Binding Path=(local:AbstractSolutionItem.ContextMenu)}"
ContextMenuOpening="stackPanel_ContextMenuOpening">
<StackPanel.ContextMenu DataContext="{Binding Path=(local:AbstractSolutionItem.ContextMenu)}">
<ContextMenu x:Name="contextMenu"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Items}"
IsEnabled="{Binding Path=IsEnabled}"/>
</StackPanel.ContextMenu>
<!-- stuff goes in here -->
</StackPanel>
That should get you most of the way there. However, there is still a problem since the ContextMenu does not know how to create a MenuItem from an IMenuItem. To solve this, create an ItemTemplate for the ContextMenu, which binds members of IMenuItem to `MenuItem.
Could you shed some light on the syntax used in the ItemsSource property in the DataTemplate ? Using parentheses usually means an attached property. And Items does not seem to be an attached property defined by IContextMenu (as an interface cannot define such a property).
The DataTemplate is linked to an object of type AbstractContextMenu which has a property called Items. So, the DataTemplate could simply reference it like this:
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type local:AbstractContextMenu}">
<ContextMenu x:Name="contextMenu"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Items)}"
IsEnabled="{Binding Path=IsEnabled}"/>
</DataTemplate>
If the AbstractSolutionItem class is the VM of the StackPanel, you could bind it like this:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"
ContextMenu="{Binding Path=ContextMenu}"
ContextMenuOpening="stackPanel_ContextMenuOpening">
<!-- stuff goes in here -->
</StackPanel>
Of course, the DataTemplate must be "accessible" from the StackPanel.
Bind the ContextMenu property of your view (StackPanel in this scenario) to the ContextMenu property of your ViewModel and provide a IValueConverter to the binding that will create the ContextMenu object and set the IContextMenu to it's DataContext.

Resources