My form in the html DOM is a checkbox to click (there can be more than one). The problem occurs in the description string when ever I use an apostrophe, since my list object is single-quote deliniated. This is one of the checkboxes in the form:
<input type="checkbox" id="cbx" name="cbx" value="{'getPic': 'url', 'picsrc': 'http://lh3.ggpht.com/_ZB3cttqooN0/SVmJPfusGWI/AAAAAAAADvA/GuIRgh6eMOI/Grand%20Canyon%201213_121508214.JPG', 'pos': None, 'description': 'Here's what it REALLY looks like at 5:30am! Bring your headlight!'}">
The javascript that reads the values of the checked checkboxes and pushes them into an array (list):
var pylist = [];
for (i=0; i<document.picList.cbx.length; i++) {
if (document.picList.cbx[i].checked) {
pylist.push( document.picList.cbx[i].value );
}
}
var getstr = JSON.stringify(pylist);
The problem is always that getstr at this point has chopped off everthing after the single quote in the description property.
I've tried different ways of escaping it to little avail.
The problem is that the value of the checkbox already is a JSON string. One solution would be to call JSON.parse() on the value:
var pylist = [];
for (i=0; i<document.picList.cbx.length; i++) {
if (document.picList.cbx[i].checked) {
pylist.push( JSON.parse( document.picList.cbx[i].value) );
}
}
var getstr = JSON.stringify(pylist);
I've run into the same issue - we stick json in a hidden field so we don't have to query the server on every page. We replace apostrophes with a "code" before putting into the html - we added a javascript function that replaces the code with an apostrophe.
Really hacky, but it works really well. Of course, we have one place in the code that gets json from the server and one place where javascript needs to parse it - if you find you're repeating the methods throughout your code, your mileage will vary.
Related
I have an input field that is supposed to contain numbers.
It is bound to an object property.
I want input entered as 4,5 to automatically get converted to 4.5 in both model and view.
HTML:
<input data-ng-model="productContent(product.Id).Org" value="{{productContent(product.Id).Org | replaceComma}}" />
Control:
$scope.productContent = function (prodId) {
var content = $.grep($scope.productsContent, function (el) { return el.ProdId === prodId });
return content[0];}
Filter:
app.filter('replaceComma', function () {
return function (val) {
return (typeof val) == "string" ? val.toString().trim().replace(",", ".") : val
};
});
Result:
When I enter a number, at first the model (productContent) retrieves the correct object. Then the filter code is called and returns a correctly converted string. I would expect both the model and view to be updated to the filtered value, but both are updated with the unfiltered value. What am I doing wrong?
I have faced the same problem in the past but instead of creating my own filter, I took a different path and found something ready to use instead.
angular-input-masks by assisrafael one of my favourite angular extensions for this purpose:
https://github.com/assisrafael/angular-input-masks
Examples:
http://assisrafael.github.io/angular-input-masks/
Since the author has written the documentation, I don't want to get extensive on it and be outdated in the future. As a quick reference, look for ui-number-mask.
Maybe this is not a direct answer to your question, since it's not replacing commas with periods, but making you type the decimals instead.
On a side note, you can suppress the thousands separators with ui-hide-group-sep
I hope that's helpful, otherwise leave a comment and I'll be happy to continue to assist you!
-Helvio
Here're video examples of what's happening:
Without sanitizing,
https://i.lithi.io/6GLS.mp4
With Sanitizing
https://i.lithi.io/TVIu.mp4
When clicked, this is supposed to make the text above, render the full text.
To do this, I have created a function
$scope.loadMore = function($event)
{
var element = $($event.currentTarget);
//console.log(element.data('text'));
var text = $scope.toHtml(element.data('text'));//$compile(element.data('text'));
//$sce.trustAsHtml(element.data('text'))
console.log(text);
if (element.parent().find('#text_data').length) {
element.parent().find('#text_data').html(text);
} else {
/*element.parent().find('#text_data').html(
element.data('text').length > 100 ?
element.data('text').substring(0, 100)
:
element.data('text')
);*/
}
}
I'm calling this function with ng-click. Basically it gets the parent, and then selects the element with the text inside.
The button has a Data Attribution with the full length text (not limited to 100 chars).
When I sanitize it inputs blank text? Whereas if I don't sanitize, it inputs the text.
I don't know if it's the right way to actually do it, but I just replaced the
tag with \n in my PHP, now it doesn't render them. Since YouTube doesn't support other HTML, it should be fine.
This is because your HTML is encoded. You have to decode it like this before displaying.
//angular hack to html decode
let decoded = angular.element('<div />').html(data).text()
$scope.decodedData = $sce.trustAsHtml(decoded);
There is nothing like $scope.toHtml(data)
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/codeandcloud/54mzkjqe/
This is sort of a three part question. I have a JSON file. A few of the values in the JSON file are arrays. Keeping that in mind:
1) On any given page, I'd only want one set of values coming out of the JSON file. For example (as you'll see in code below) my JSON file is a list of attorneys. On any given bio page, I'd obviously only want one attorney's information. I'm currently, successfully, doing this by pulling back the entire JSON and then using ng-show. But this is causing some other issues that I'll explain in later points, so I'm wondering if there's something to put in the app.factory itself to only bring back the one set in the first place.
2) As mentioned, some of the values are arrays. This comes into play two ways in this situation. One of the ways is that there is an array of quotes about the attorney that I'll need to drop into a JS array so that my JS function can loop through them. Currently, I'm hardcoding the quotes for the one test attorney but I'm really trying to figure out how to make this dynamic. This is one reason I'm trying to figure out how to bring back only one attorney's information so I can then, somehow, say his quotes go into this array.
3) Another array value is a list of his specialty areas. I have another, hardcoded, JS object, associating the short terms with the display names. I realized though, that this has two issues.
a) The JS renders after the Angular, so I can't reference that JS in the Angular code
b) I have no way , anyway, to display the JS dynamically inside the Angular code.
My solution to that aspect was to create a second JSON file holding the area hash but besides being a little cumbersome, I'm also not sure how to dynamically display just the ones I want. e.g: If my attorney only specializes in securities and litigation, how would I tell the code to only display {{areas.securities}} and {{areas.litigation}}? So,I'm open to thoughts there as well.
Here is the current, relevant code. If you need more, just ask.
Thanks.
attorneys.json (irrelevant lines removed)
{"attorneys":
[
{
"id":1,
"name":"Bob Smith",
"quotes":
[
{
"id": 1,
"quote": "Wonderful guy!",
"person": "Dovie"
},
{
"id": 2,
"quote": "If ye be wanting a haggis like no other, Bob be yer man!",
"person": "Angus McLoed"
},
{
"id": 3,
"quote": "Wotta Hottie!",
"person": "Bob's wife"
}
],
"areas": ["altdispute", "litigation", "securities"],
}
]
}
...and the relevant current JS object that I'm not sure what to do with:
var practiceareas = {
altdispute: "Alternative Dispute Resolution",
businesscorp: "Businesses & Corporations",
estateplanning: "Estate Planning",
futures: "Futures & Derivatives",
litigation: "Litigation",
productliability: "Product Liability",
realestate: "Real Estate",
securities: "Securities"
}
script.js (relevant function)
var idno = 0;
/* This is what I want replaced by the Angular pull */
var quotelist = ["\"Wonderful guy!\"<br/>-Dovie", "\"If ye be wanting a haggis like no other, Bob be yer man!\"<br/>-Angus McLoed", "\"Hubba, Hubba! What a hottie!\"<br/>-Bob's wife"];
$("#bio_quotes").html(quotelist[0]);
function quoteflip(id, total){
var src1 = quotelist[idno];
$("#bio_quotes").fadeOut(500, function(){
$("#bio_quotes").html(src1).fadeIn(500);
});
idno = (id + 1) % total;
window.setTimeout(function(){quoteflip(idno, quotelist.length);}, 5000);
}
window.setTimeout(function(){quoteflip(idno, quotelist.length);}, 500);
By the way, as far as the quotes, I'm even happy to turn the JSON into a more condensed version by removing the id and consolidating the quote and author - making it an array of strings instead of mini-objects - if that makes it easier. In fact, it might be easier as far as the function anyway.
Can definitely filter things out at the service / factory using Array.filter. If you want to filter it server side, you have to have the code at server side that will do that.
Not sure what your backend store is but definitely doable.
Again, you can do this pretty easily with Array.map which let you pull specific values into a new Array. If you just want the name and quotes' quote and person name, you can definitely do this using Array .filter and .map and bind the new array to your viewmodel / scope.
Hmm.. again, I'd disagree, this look like the same issue with JavaScript array manipulation. You can definitely as part of the transformation in point 1 and 2, include this so it will transfer area to the long practice area names. The easiest way to show the relevant practice area is to map it to the long name during the transformation in the service layer.
//get matching attorney from the store by id
var matches = data.attorneys.filter(function(a) {
return a.id === id;
});
//If match found,
if (matches.length === 1) {
var result = matches[0];
//map the long name for practicing area
//use the matching attorney's area name as key
//and overwrite the result areas with the map
result.areas = result.areas.map(function(a) {
return practiceareas[a];
});
return result;
}
See this solution: http://embed.plnkr.co/xBPju7/preview
As for the fade in and fade out, I'll let you figure it out...
I'm trying display some data loaded from a datastore and it's not reflecting changes on the UI. I created an example to show a general idea of what I'm trying to achieve.
http://plnkr.co/edit/MBHo88
Here is the link to angularjs example where they show when on click then dropdowns are clear out. If you replace the expression with one of the colors of the list dropdowns are well selected. Does this type of selection only work on user events?
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:select
Help is appreciated!!!
Actually the problem is that ngSelect compares objects using simple comparition operator ('=='), so two objects with same fields and values are considered as different objects.
So you better use strings and numbers as values ('select' parameter in expression of ngSelect directive).
Here is kind of solution for your plunker.
Aslo there are some discussion about this topic on GitHub:
https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/1302
https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/1032
Also as I headred there is some work in progress about adding custom comparor/hashing for ngSelect to be able to use ngSelect more easier on objects.
One mistake in the initialization of your controller. You have to refer to the objects in your palette, since these are watched on the view:
$scope.selectedColors.push({col: $scope.palette[2]});
$scope.selectedColors.push({col: $scope.palette[1]});
Same with your result:
$scope.result = { color: $scope.obj.codes[2] };
Then you need to watch the result. In the below example, select 1 receives the value from the initiating select, the second receives the value below in the palette. I don't know if that's what you wanted, but you can easily change it:
$scope.$watch('result', function(value) {
if(value) {
var index = value.color.code -1;
$scope.selectedColors[0] = {col: $scope.palette[index] };
$scope.selectedColors[1] = {col: $scope.palette[Math.max(index-1, 0)] };
}
}, true);
See plunkr.
Ok, I think I figured this out but thanks to #ValentynShybanov and #asgoth.
According to angularjs example ngModel is initialized with one of the objects from the array utilized in the dropdown population. So having an array as:
$scope.locations = [{ state: 'FL', city: 'Tampa'}, {state: 'FL', city: 'Sarasota'} ....];
And the dropdown is defined as:
<select ng-options="l.state group by l.city for l in locations" ng-model="city" required></select>
Then $scope.city is initialized as:
$scope.city = $scope.locations[0];
So far so good, right?!!!.. But I have multiple locations therefore multiple dropdowns. Also users can add/remove more. Like creating a table dynamically. And also, I needed to load data from the datastore.
Although I was building and assigning a similar value (e.g: Values from data store --> State = FL, City = Tampa; Therefore --> { state : 'FL', city : 'Tampa' }), angularjs wasn't able to match the value. I tried diff ways, like just assigning { city : 'Tampa' } or 'Tampa' or and or and or...
So what I did.. and I know is sort of nasty but works so far.. is to write a lookup function to return the value from $scope.locations. Thus I have:
$scope.lookupLocation = function(state, city){
for(var k = 0; k < $scope.locations.length; k++){
if($scope.locations[k].state == state && $scope.locations[k].city == city)
return $scope.locations[k];
}
return $scope.locations[0]; //-- default value if none matched
}
so, when I load the data from the datastore (data in json format) I call the lookupLocation function like:
$scope.city = $scope.lookupLocation(results[indexFromSomeLoop].location.state, results[indexFromSomeLoop].location.city);
And that preselects my values when loading data. This is what worked for me.
Thanks
I'm working with ASP.NET MVC 3, and wondering how to return the contents of a file, as an array to a jtable in a view. Each line of the array contains a comma separated list. (The contents of the file came from either a .csv file or excel spreadsheet)
The first column contains the field headers, and the number of field headers in the file can vary, so I guess you could say the contents of the jtable would be dynamic?
I've written jtables with explicitly named fields, but that's when I know how many fields to expect. In this case, it could be anywhere from 1 to 11 fields, and since the field names are in the first line of the array, i'm not quite sure how to setup the jtable to recognize them as column headers for the jtable.
For starters, here's a couple of examples of an array I would expect to bind to the table.
array[0] = "phone,first,last";
array[1] = "1111111111,firstname,lastname";
OR
array[0] = "first,last,email";
array[1] = "firstname,lastname,emailaddress#email.com";
For the first example, I would not need to display the 'email' field, and for the second I don't need the phone field. The actual contents would probably contain many lines, which is why I want to bind it to jtable with paging enabled.
In my controller method, I have the contents of the file as a string array, one line with comma separated fields per array item. Where do I go from there is the question.
Thanks for any help,
Carrie
Actually, I've solved my first problem by using the Expando object, to create a list of dynamic objects . . . problem now is that jtable seems to need to bind to the results returned from a post. The json object i now have has already been returned, so I don't need to do a post to get it. So, the question now is, is it possible to bind a json result to a jtable without making jtable do the post?
Again, thanks.
Working on a similar question; I am returning json and need to bind to jtable. Here is the code from within my ajax call. The only jtable method I found is the addRecord.
Hope this helps and I will edit as I improve and get this fully functional. Yeh, I know that I should only include well formed answers but since you have had no help, we can start with this and let it be a work in progress.
if (data.Result == "OK") {
for (var i = 0; i < data.Records.length; i++) {
$("#SearchResultsAddContact").jtable('addRecord', {
record: {
FirstName: data.Records[i].FirstName,
LastName: data.Records[i].LastName,
NumGroups: data.Records[i].NumGroups,
NumPhones: data.Records[i].NumPhones,
NumTexts: data.Records[i].NumTexts,
NumTags: data.Records[i].NumTags,
NumTDDs: data.Records[i].NumTDDs,
NumEmails: data.Records[i].NumEmails
}
});
}
$("#SearchResultsAddContact").jtable('load');
Make sure that you edit your jquery.jtable.js file as follows: (lines 1297-1308)
addRecord: function (options) {
var self = this;
options = $.extend({
**clientOnly: true,**
animationsEnabled: self.options.animationsEnabled,
url: self.options.actions.createAction,
success: function () { },
error: function () { }
}, options);
Change the clientOnly: to true