Does anyone know how to get the current value associated with a Binding? I ran into a problem recently where I wanted to get the value associated with a particular cell in the WPFToolKit DataGrid - so I created a function that gets the Path string, splits on '.' and tries uses PropertyDescriptor in a loop, trying to get the bound value. Surely there's a better way :). If anyone can point me in the right direction, I'll love you forever.
Thanks,
Charles
As the given link to the answer is nowadays only available on webarchive I duplicated the answer that was given there:
public static class DataBinder
{
private static readonly DependencyProperty DummyProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"Dummy",
typeof(Object),
typeof(DependencyObject),
new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public static object Eval(object container, string expression)
{
var binding = new Binding(expression) { Source = container };
return binding.Eval();
}
public static object Eval(this Binding binding, DependencyObject dependencyObject = null)
{
dependencyObject = dependencyObject ?? new DependencyObject();
BindingOperations.SetBinding(dependencyObject, DummyProperty, binding);
return dependencyObject.GetValue(DummyProperty);
}
}
Example:
public partial class PropertyPathParserDemo : Window
{
public PropertyPathParserDemo()
{
InitializeComponent();
Foo foo = new Foo() { Bar = new Bar() { Value = "Value" } };
this.Content = DataBinder.Eval(foo, "Bar.Value");
}
public class Foo
{
public Bar Bar
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class Bar
{
public string Value
{
get;
set;
}
}
}
Related
I want to find a way to implement different forms of modals in MVVM WPF application. Like dialogs with returning results, message boxes or modal sub-windows with some controls inside.
Can you give me an advice about an efficient and modern approach for it?
I rarely find much use for anything other than a confirmation request. "Do you really want to delete that?" kind of thing.
Things popping up and asking for extra input just aren't super useful in my experience.
To my mind though, what you're doing is splitting your code. There is code up to showing the dialog. There is then code happens if the user clicks OK or Yes or selects a thingummajig in the dialog.
I split these into separate pieces of code. So there is not necessarilly a need to stop code running. It's in a separate method ( or command ) which is only run if the user hits the right button.
My first approach uses a control which itself has no UI. It exists just to get something encapsulated into the view.
namespace UserInput
{
public class ConfirmationRequestor : Control, ICommandSource
{
public bool? ShowConfirmDialog
{
get
{
return (bool?)GetValue(ShowConfirmDialogProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(ShowConfirmDialogProperty, value);
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ShowConfirmDialogProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ShowConfirmDialog",
typeof(bool?),
typeof(ConfirmationRequestor),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null
, new PropertyChangedCallback(ConfirmDialogChanged)
)
{ BindsTwoWayByDefault = true }
);
private static void ConfirmDialogChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if ((bool?)e.NewValue != true)
{
return;
}
ConfirmationRequestor cr = (ConfirmationRequestor)d;
Window parent = Window.GetWindow(cr) as Window;
MessageBoxResult result = MessageBox.Show(parent, cr.Message, cr.Caption, cr.MsgBoxButton, cr.MsgBoxImage);
if (result == MessageBoxResult.OK || result == MessageBoxResult.Yes)
{
if (cr.Command != null)
{
cr.Command.Execute(cr.CommandParameter);
}
}
cr.SetValue(ShowConfirmDialogProperty, false);
}
public MessageBoxButton MsgBoxButton
{
get { return (MessageBoxButton)GetValue(MsgBoxButtonProperty); }
set { SetValue(MsgBoxButtonProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MsgBoxButtonProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MsgBoxButton",
typeof(MessageBoxButton),
typeof(ConfirmationRequestor),
new PropertyMetadata(MessageBoxButton.OK));
public MessageBoxImage MsgBoxImage
{
get { return (MessageBoxImage)GetValue(MsgBoxImageProperty); }
set { SetValue(MsgBoxImageProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MsgBoxImageProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MsgBoxImage",
typeof(MessageBoxImage),
typeof(ConfirmationRequestor),
new PropertyMetadata(MessageBoxImage.Warning));
public string Caption
{
get { return (string)GetValue(CaptionProperty); }
set { SetValue(CaptionProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CaptionProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Caption",
typeof(string),
typeof(ConfirmationRequestor),
new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
public string Message
{
get { return (string)GetValue(MessageProperty); }
set { SetValue(MessageProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MessageProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Message",
typeof(string),
typeof(ConfirmationRequestor),
new PropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
public ICommand Command
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(CommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Command", typeof(ICommand), typeof(ConfirmationRequestor), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public object CommandParameter
{
get { return (object)GetValue(CommandParameterProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandParameterProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("CommandParameter", typeof(object), typeof(ConfirmationRequestor), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public IInputElement CommandTarget
{
get { return (IInputElement)GetValue(CommandTargetProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandTargetProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandTargetProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("CommandTarget", typeof(IInputElement), typeof(ConfirmationRequestor), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
}
}
I have a viewmodel designed to go with this which is exposed as a property on my window viewmodel. That viewmodel and the control encapsulate the confirmer functionality.
namespace UserInput
{
public class ConfirmationRequestorVM : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string caption;
public string Caption
{
get { return caption; }
set
{
caption = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
private string message;
public string Message
{
get { return message; }
set
{
message = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
private MessageBoxButton msgBoxButton;
public MessageBoxButton MsgBoxButton
{
get { return msgBoxButton; }
set
{
msgBoxButton = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
private MessageBoxImage msgBoxImage;
public MessageBoxImage MsgBoxImage
{
get { return msgBoxImage; }
set
{
msgBoxImage = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged();
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] String propertyName = "")
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
}
}
Usage
In the relevant view
<input:ConfirmationRequestor
ShowConfirmDialog="{Binding ShowConfirmation, Mode=TwoWay}"
MsgBoxImage="{Binding confirmer.MsgBoxImage}"
MsgBoxButton="{Binding confirmer.MsgBoxButton}"
Message="{Binding confirmer.Message}"
Caption="{Binding confirmer.Caption}"
Command="{Binding OkCommand}"
/>
Most of that is fairly self explanatory.
When ShowConfirmation is set to true, that control will show a messagebox.
If the user clicks OK or Yes then the OkCommand will be executed.
Hence if you need deletion confirmation then you show your messagebox and the actual deletion would be in that OkCommand.
If you want more complicated UI then rather than using a messagebox at all you could show a window from similar control.
Let's call this a DialogueController. This could be rather simpler since we can rely on our own UI and bind commands.
This control would have a dependency property for view Type. This being the type of a usercontrol which needs to be shown.
Another bool dependency property and change handler would control showing the type.
When the showdialog bool becomes true.
A method instantiates a window ( or it could be a popup if you prefer ) instantiates a usercontrol of the type specified in our other DP. Sets the window datacontext to our current datacontext.
You could use getwindow to find the parent window and set that to parent of our new (dialogue) window instance.
Thus sharing the parent window viewmodel as datacontext.
Call showdialog on the window. Or you could just call show.
You then have whatever UI you wrote in your usercontrol shown in a window.
It has access to your parent window viewmodel so it can reference any of your data you need.
And... It's Yes or OK button can bind to whatever command you defined in that parent window viewmodel.
You could also do things like select from a list and bind selectedFoo in your parent window viewmodel as well.
If you don't showmodal then when you change shared properties anything bound in your parent window can get those changes.
Like I said though.
I've not really come across much demand for that sort of thing.
There are also some elephants in the not-dialog room.
A pop up referencing it's parent viewmodel.
And
An expander similarly.
And
Just overlaying a panel on top of everything inside your parent window. This is how I have done editing for data in datagrids in a number of apps.
The key thing I found was the realisation:
You can "just" split your code into code before the dialog. Show the dialog. Then the "doing" aspect of any dialog-like-UI can go in a separate command.
OK, it's not exactly a road to damascus moment. But it simplifies things. I like simple. More likely to work.
I have the following code in my sample.
public string MyProperty
{
get { return (string)GetValue(MyPropertyProperty); }
set { SetValue(MyPropertyProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MyPropertyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("MyProperty", typeof(string), typeof(MainWindow), new PropertyMetadata("Hello"));
private TestClass1 test;
private void ButtonBase_OnClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Binding binding = new Binding
{
Path = new PropertyPath("MyProperty"),
Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay,
UpdateSourceTrigger = UpdateSourceTrigger.PropertyChanged
};
test.SetValueBinding(binding);
test.DataContext = this;
Console.WriteLine(test.Value);
}
public class TestClass1 : FrameworkElement
{
public object Value
{
get { return (object)GetValue(ValueProperty); }
set { SetValue(ValueProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Value", typeof(object), typeof(TestClass1), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public void SetValueBinding(Binding binding)
{
this.SetBinding(ValueProperty, binding);
}
}
After binding is set, if i access test.Value, it returns null for the first time. After that,if i access it (from another method) it returns correct value "Hello".
But i do not know first time why binding is not working and null value is returned? any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.
It's not that you can't get the value for the first time. It's that you can't get it so fast. When binding is set at the time the DataContext is NULL, the source is resolved in a deferred way, perhaps later by the UI thread. You ask for value just after the binding is set, too early to get valid results.
You should switch lines in your code to:
test.DataContext = this;
test.SetValueBinding(binding);
This way the binding gets the value immediately from DataContext in the first instruction.
I'm trying to bind an Image down from a Window into a UserControl 'Display' thats inside a UserControl 'DisplayHandler'. Display has a DependancyProperty 'DisplayImage'.
This is Similar to this, but their answers didn't help with my problem.
DisplayHandler also should have the Property 'DisplayImage' and pass down the Binding to Display. But Visual Studio doesn't allow me to register a DependancyProperty with the same name twice. So I tried to not register it twice but only to reuse it:
window
<my:DisplayHandler DisplayImage=
"{Binding ElementName=ImageList, Path=SelectedItem.Image}" />
DisplayHandler
xaml
<my:Display x:Name="display1"/>
cs
public static readonly DependencyProperty DisplayImageProperty =
myHWindowCtrl.DisplayImageProperty.AddOwner(typeof(DisplayHandler));
public HImage DisplayImage {
get { return (HImage)GetValue(DisplayImageProperty); }
set { SetValue(DisplayImageProperty, value); }
}
public HImage DisplayImage /*alternative*/ {
get { return (HImage)display1.GetValue(Display.DisplayImageProperty); }
set { display1.SetValue(Display.DisplayImageProperty, value); }
}
**neither of the 2 properties worked out.*
Display
public HImage DisplayImage {
get { return (HImage)GetValue(DisplayImageProperty); }
set { SetValue(DisplayImageProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty DisplayImageProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("DisplayImage", typeof(HImage), typeof(Display));
I have been thinking a Control goes up the Tree and looks for its Property if its own Value is not defined. ->reference
So it should work somehow...
I made some attempts with Templating and A ContentPresenter because that worked for the ImageList(ImageList also contains the Display), but I couldn't get it to bind the value like for an ListBoxItem.
The AddOwner solution should be working, but you have to add a PropertyChangedCallback that updates the embedded control.
public partial class DisplayHandler : UserControl
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty DisplayImageProperty =
Display.DisplayImageProperty.AddOwner(typeof(DisplayHandler),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(DisplayImagePropertyChanged));
public HImage DisplayImage
{
get { return (Image)GetValue(DisplayImageProperty); }
set { SetValue(DisplayImageProperty, value); }
}
private static void DisplayImagePropertyChanged(
DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var dh = obj as DisplayHandler;
dh.display1.DisplayImage = e.NewValue as HImage;
}
}
I have a simple search text box. This text box acts as a filter. I've now copied/pasted the code for the 5th time and enough is enough. Time for a custom control.
left and right brackets have been replaced with ()
My custom control will be simple. My problem is I want to have a dependencyProperty on this control that is of type List(T).
I created a test project to proof it out and make sure it works. It works well. Ignore List.
Below is the entire class. The problem is that the only thing holding me up is replacing List (Person) with List(T). Something like List where: T is Object
typeof(List(T) where: T is Object) <= Obviously I can't do that but gives an idea what I'm trying to accomplish.
public class SearchTextBox : TextBox
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty SourceProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("FilterSource", typeof(List<Person>), typeof(SearchTextBox), new UIPropertyMetadata(null)); //I WANT THIS TO BE LIST<T>
public List<Person> FilterSource
{
get
{
return (List<Person>)GetValue(SourceProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(SourceProperty, value);
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty FilterPropertyNameProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("FilterPropertyName", typeof(String), typeof(SearchTextBox), new UIPropertyMetadata());
public String FilterPropertyName
{
get
{
return (String)GetValue(FilterPropertyNameProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(FilterPropertyNameProperty, value);
}
}
public SearchTextBox()
{
this.KeyUp += new System.Windows.Input.KeyEventHandler(SearchBox_KeyUp);
}
void SearchBox_KeyUp(object sender, System.Windows.Input.KeyEventArgs e)
{
ICollectionView view = CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(FilterSource);
view.Filter = null;
view.Filter = new Predicate<object>(FilterTheSource);
}
bool FilterTheSource(object obj)
{
if (obj == null) return false;
Type t = obj.GetType();
PropertyInfo pi = t.GetProperty(FilterPropertyName);
//object o = obj.GetType().GetProperty(FilterPropertyName);
String propertyValue = obj.GetType().GetProperty(FilterPropertyName).GetValue(obj, null).ToString().ToLower();
if (propertyValue.Contains(this.Text.ToLower()))
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
No; that's not possible.
Instead, just use the non-generic typeof(IList).
I have a ListView bound to a LINQ to SQL object. When I double click an article in the ListView it opens the article details window and allow the user to change article properties.
So far, it all works fine, but when the user saves and closes the article details, the ListView doesn't reflect the changes made (like the article's description for example). I don't want to implement INotifyPropertyChanged in all my LINQ classes because I use VS2010 to generate my Linq table schema, so it would be a pain to alter auto generated designer code... (and it will certainly override all my changes each time I will make a change to the table's schema)
How can I simply force the ListView to refresh the LINQ binding when the details window is closed?
Thank in advance for your help.
All Linq classes are generated as partial classes - this means you can create your own partial class that matches the Linq class and add any extra functionality required there. Then when it is compiled, it will all work as one class.
A quick and easy solution is to use a DynamicObject decorator to add the change notificcation behaviour without having to change your original classes, or writing a suite of partial class definitions
public class DynamicBindingProxy<T> : DynamicObject, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private static readonly Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string,
PropertyInfo>> properties = new Dictionary<string,
Dictionary<string, PropertyInfo>>();
private readonly T instance;
private readonly string typeName;
public DynamicBindingProxy(T instance)
{
this.instance = instance;
var type = typeof(T);
typeName = type.FullName;
if (!properties.ContainsKey(typeName))
SetProperties(type, typeName);
}
private static void SetProperties(Type type, string typeName)
{
var props = type.GetProperties(
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
var dict = props.ToDictionary(prop => prop.Name);
properties.Add(typeName, dict);
}
public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder,
out object result)
{
if (properties[typeName].ContainsKey(binder.Name))
{
result = properties[typeName][binder.Name]
.GetValue(instance, null);
return true;
}
result = null;
return false;
}
public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder,
object value)
{
if (properties[typeName].ContainsKey(binder.Name))
{
properties[typeName][binder.Name]
.SetValue(instance, value, null);
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(binder.Name));
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
and heres a sample useage:
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
private readonly TestObj tObj;
private DynamicBindingProxy<TestObj> dynObj;
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
tObj = new TestObj() { Name = "test", Amount = 123.45, ID = 44, SomeDate = DateTime.Now };
dynObj = new DynamicBindingProxy<TestObj>(tObj);
DataContext = dynObj;
}
private void UpdateName(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
((dynamic)dynObj).Name = newText.Text;
}
}
full details can be found on a blog post I wrote specifically about this issues
http://www.deanchalk.me.uk/post/WPF-e28093-Easy-INotifyPropertyChanged-Via-DynamicObject-Proxy.aspx