I have 2 tables in an oracle database, which has the same column-names and types.
For example:
Table1: id, name, comment
Table2: id, name, comment
How can I show all data from both table in one view?
If you want 4 separate columns, simply use aliases, like you would any other select.
create or replace view vw_my_view as
select t1.id t1_id
,t1.comment t1_comment
,t2.id t2_id
,t2.comment t2_comment
from table1 t1
inner join table2 t2 on join condition
where filter conditions
EDIT Of course, your tables will relate to each other in some way, otherwise there is no way for a single row of your view to mean anything. You will therefore have a join condition to join the two tables, such as t1.id = t2.id
If you want them in two columns, use Union
create or replace view vw_my_view as
select id
,comment
from table1
union all -- use ALL unless you want to lose rows
select id
,comment
from table2;
Why two identical tables? Whatever happened to "Don't Repeat Yourself"? Sorry, sounds like a bad design smell to me.
Whatever difference inspired you to create two tables, I'll bet it really could be another attribute to distinguish two groups in one table.
SELECT * FROM TABLE1 UNION SELECT * FROM TABLE2
(or UNION ALL if you want duplicates)
I agree with what duffymo says, but if there is a good reason for it then a UNION will do it for you. e.g.
SELECT id, name, comment FROM Table1
UNION
SELECT id, name, comment FROM Table2
select * from table1
union
select * from table2;
Related
Can you set multiple column names from a SQL table as a macro in SQL to query against?
For example I have multiple columns I am hitting against multiple times, can I use a macro or some type of reference to identify them ONCE to avoid displaying them repetitively and cluttering up the code?
The current code works, I am just looking for a cleaner/streamlined option.
Current Code:
WHERE ('ABC') IN
([CODE1],[CODE2],[CODE3],[CODE4],[CODE5],[CODE6],[CODE7],[CODE8]
,[CODE9],[CODE10],[CODE11],[CODE12],[CODE13],[CODE14],[CODE15]
,[CODE16],[CODE17],[CODE18],[CODE19],[CODE20],[CODE21],[CODE22]
,[CODE23],[CODE24],[CODE25]
AND ('CFS') IN
([CODE1],[CODE2],[CODE3],[CODE4],[CODE5],[CODE6],[CODE7],[CODE8]
,[CODE9],[CODE10],[CODE11],[CODE12],[CODE13],[CODE14],[CODE15]
,[CODE16],[CODE17],[CODE18],[CODE19],[CODE20],[CODE21],[CODE22]
,[CODE23],[CODE24],[CODE25]
ect...(20 more times)
Goal:
WHERE 'ABC' IN (&columnsmentionedabove)
OR 'FGS' in (&columnsmentionedabove)
OR 'g6s' in (&columnsmentionedabove)
etc.....
This is inherited code and just seems very clunky.
Thank you
Numbered columns like this are almost always a sign you should have an additional table. So if your existing table structure is like this:
Table1
Table1ID, OtherFields, Code1, Code2, Code3.... Code25
You really want something more like this:
Table1
Table1ID, OtherFields
Table1Codes
Table1ID, Code
Where each entry in Table1 will have many entries in Table1Codes. Then you write JOIN statements to show the two sets side-by-side when needed.
FROM Table1 t
INNER JOIN Table1Codes tc1 ON tc.Table1ID = t.Table1ID AND tc.Code = 'ABC'
INNER JOIN Table1Codes tc2 ON tc.Table1ID = t.Table1ID AND tc.Code = 'CFS'
Or
FROM Table1 t
INNER JOIN Table1Codes tc1 ON tc.Table1ID = t.Table1ID AND tc.Code IN ('ABC','FGS','g6s')
If you can't change the table's schema, as in often the case, you can UNPIVOT it. For example, assuming CODE1...CODE25 come from MyTable, wrap the UNPIVOT operation inside a CTE:
;WITH
cte AS
(
SELECT upvt.*
FROM MyTable
UNPIVOT (
CodeValue FOR CodeLabel IN ([CODE1], [CODE2], ..., [CODE25])
) upvt
)
SELECT *
FROM cte
WHERE CodeValue IN ('ABC', 'DEF', ...)
The unpivot operation is not free. Make sure you filter as much as possible from MyTable before unpivoting the it.
I have 2 tables which contains 5 unique cities each. I want all 10 cities but i don't want to use UNION. Is there any alternative for UNION.
SELECT DISTINCT CITY FROM TABLE1
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT CITY FROM TABLE2
Here is an alternate way
SELECT DISTINCT CASE WHEN a.city is null then b.city else a.city end
FROM Table1 FULL JOIN Table2b ON 1 = 0
it offers no advantage over UNION - but you might be interested in seeing FULL JOIN, which has its similarities to UNION
You can apply Full Outer join instead of Union
SELECT DISTINCT ISNULL(t.City,t1.City)
FROM dbo.TABLE1 t
FULL OUTER JOIN dbo.TABLE2 t1 ON t.City = t.City;
This query provides you the same result as union
You can insert the data that you want into a temporary table and retrieve it from there. That will avoid the need for a UNION.
SELECT DISTINCT CITY
INTO #City
FROM TABLE1
INSERT INTO #City
SELECT DISTINCT CITY
FROM TABLE2
SELECT DISTINCT City
FROM #City
If the first table is sure to contains all the records of the second table, then one can check if the id could be found inside a subquery with an OR clause.
I'm using an ORM framework which doesn't support the UNION operator (Apache OJB) and, with the above assumption, this strategy has proven to be faster than with the use of FULL OUTER JOIN.
For instance if the table STUDENT contains all the students of a province/state with a field for their current main school and another table, STUDENT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL, contains information for those students attending a second school part time, I can get the union of all students attending a particular school either full time or part time this way :
SELECT STD_ID FROM STUDENT
WHERE
STD_SCHOOL='the_school'
OR
STD_ID IN (SELECT STD_ID FROM STUDENT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL WHERE STD_SCHOOL='the_school')
Again, I want to emphasize that this is NOT the equivalent of a UNION but can be useful in some situations.
Suppose you have a table Table1 with columns
UserId, Item1, Item2, Item3, Item4, Item5, Item6, Item7, Item8, Item9, Item10
and you have another table Table2 with
UserId, ItemId, Name
. The values in Table1 is the ItemId from Table2. I have a need to display
UserId, ItemId, Name
where Item1 is 1st and Item10 is last and you have 10 rows. In other words, Item1 is 1st row and Item10 is last row. If there's any way to avoid CASE WHEN that would be great. I may have more columns in the future and would hate to hardcode the 10 columns.
I think you want a reverse pivot in this case. You don't use CASE, like you would in a normal pivot, but instead UNION ALL, like this:
select Table1.UserId, Table2.ItemId, Table2.Name
from Table1 inner join Table2 on Table1.Item1 = Table2.ItemId
UNION ALL
select Table1.UserId, Table2.ItemId, Table2.Name
from Table1 inner join Table2 on Table1.Item2 = Table2.ItemId
UNION ALL
...
select Table1.UserId, Table2.ItemId, Table2.Name
from Table1 inner join Table2 on Table1.Item10 = Table2.ItemId
If you have more items, you should also be able to write a snippet that generates the repeating UNION ALL syntax so you don't have to type it all by hand.
Given you can bypass doing it entirely with SQL, I would highly recommend using e.g. R or Python to process transactions in a ML useable way. The tidyr package with the gather function does exactly what you want to do.
Another way is to crosstabulate. It´s absolutely fine deriving a solution with the SQL standard, but a lot of problems can be much easier done within R or Python.
A table1 with just 3 columns
userid, itemid, sequence
would be more conducive for your purposes. You would be required to convert your AzureML output from the single line
Uid1, itm1,itm2,itm3,...,itm10
into 10 lines like
Uid1, itm1, 1
Uid1, itm2, 2
Uid1, itm3, 3
...
Uid1, itm10,10
Assuming you get the above output line as a (temporary) table output from AzureML with name tbla you could use the follwing UNION ALL construct (as suggested by Spencer Simpson):
INSERT INTO table1 (userid, itemid, sequence)
SELECT uid, itm1, 1 FROM tbla UNION ALL
SELECT uid, itm2, 2 FROM tbla UNION ALL
SELECT uid, itm3, 3 FROM tbla UNION ALL
SELECT uid, itm4, 4 FROM tbla UNION ALL
...
SELECT uid, itm10, 10 FROM tbla
To store the information into table1 which will be the only table you will have to deal with. No JOINs will be required anymore.
Note: I am not quite sure what your column name relates to. Is it the name of an item or the name of a user?
In both cases there should be a second table table2 that takes care of the correspondence between name and userid/itemid like
itm/usr name
This table will then be join-ed into any query that requires displaying the name column too.
What I did to work around this was to use Python (or R) and use the melt function.
There is also a pivot_table function in the dataframe.
So, you can have your columns be converted to rows. Then join those rows on the other table.
Reshaping and Pivot Tables
I have two tables in SQL Server which have two similar columns.
table1 (
partID, PartName, ....
)
table2 (
sekId, Part2Name, ....
)
I need to populate one combobox in vb.net with the cummulated values of PartName and Part2Name so that the list can appear like being sourced from one single column, because the user might require from either. The combobox must be one that's how the design has it. Is there an SQL statement to sort me out?
U get all valuel like this:
SELECT PartName FROM table1
UNION
SELECT PartName From table2
Using the UNION T-SQL statement will join the two tables togheter
SELECT partID as IDNumber, PartName as Name FROM table1
UNION
SELECT sekID as IDNumber, Part2Name as Name From table2
ORDER BY Name
and sort the union using the renamed column
I have two tables, each with some columns that are the same. However, each table also contains data that is unique. (Similar data includes a row name).
What I need to do is tack on the data from table two to it's matching row in table one (matching the name column).
Is there any way to do this?
I need stuff from table two to go into table 1 where the names match:
The following query should return all matching rows with columns from both tables. Note that any unique rows (that only exist in table one or two) will be excluded.
SELECT
one.matchingColum,
one.oddColum,
two.evenColumn
FROM one
JOIN two on one.matchingColumn = two.matchingColumn
If the data types are the same, then you can do a union
SELECT *
FROM table1
UNION
SELECT *
FROM table2
If the datatypes are not the same and you have a field that you can JOIN on, then you can do a JOIN
SELECT *
FROM table1 t1
LEFT JOIN table2 t2
ON t1.id = t2.id