Hey All, I have been working on this problem for a while and the usual google searches are not helping :(
I have a production database in SQL 2000. I want to copy it over the top of a training database to refresh it. I want this to be something that is scheduled to happen once a week to keep the training database up-to-date.
I have a DTS job created for doing this. Within that DTS job I have a single "Copy SQL Server Objects" task. That task is set up to:
Create all copied objects
Drop destination objects first
Copy data
Replace existing data
Copy indexes, triggers, primary and foreign keys
Copy all user tables, views, functions and stored procedures.
When I run this DTS package (in pre-production for testing of course) it gets to 99% done and throws the following error:
Step Error Source: Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42S02)
Step Error Description:[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Invalid object name 'dbo.vwEstAssetStationAddress'.
Step Error code: 800400D0
Step Error Help File:SQLDMO80.hlp
Step Error Help Context ID:1131
My searches on the net didn't provide much help. There are reports of these errors getting hit, but none seem to match my circumstances. One suggestion I found was the the sysdepends table had become corrupted, making the DTS job run its scripts in the wrong order. Howeever, I ran the following script to correct that table and it still throws the same error:
USE master
GO
ALTER DATABASE [DATABASE NAME]
SET SINGLE_USER
GO
USE [DATABASE NAME]
GO
DBCC CHECKTABLE('sysdepends',REPAIR_REBUILD )
GO
USE master
GO
ALTER DATABASE [DATABASE NAME]
SET MULTI_USER
GO
I have also seen that having different object owners can cause this error. But I have confirmed that the objects are all owned by the dbo user in this case.
Any suggestions?
I feel stupid, but am posting the answer I just found for posterity (and so all you helpful fellows can stop stressing on my behalf.
Even though I had selected all the user tables, views, stored procedures and user defined functions to copy, I hadn't selected "Include all dependant objects". I had assumed that if you selected two objects to copy, and one was dependant on the other, SQL would always do them in the correct order. Aparrently not. Selecting this little check box made all the difference.
Thanks again to those who helped with suggestions
Somehow the dbo.vwEstAssetStationAddress table is not being found by your DTS package. Unfortunately, the message doesn't say if it was on the source or destination that it couldn't find it.
What are the exact steps, in the order that you have them in your DTS package? I'm assuming that the list of the task items above is not in order. I know this not an answer, but it looks like we are going to need a bit more information to help you further.
Thanks for the response hectorsosajr.
the object aparrently causing the error (dbo.vwEstAssetStationAddress) is a view that references 2 underlying tables. I have tested querying the view, as well as running the SELECT statement that defines it, on both the source and destination databases and it works fine.
The database object copy task in DTS doesn't allow you to specify the order it transfers things in. As far as I understand it, it uses the sysdepends table to determine the requisite order of events.
I was trying to avoid doing it via backup / restore. There are some users of the database that are SQL Server accounts (not Active Directory). This becomes a pain in the but if you need to do it from one server to another as you have to drop those users and recreate them.
Sounds like it is trying to create a stored procedure/view based on a view that doesn't yet exist.
Why not just backup and restore the database under a different name? (if it wasn't production, I would say detach, copy and re-attach). You can do all that under the control of T-SQL.
See if this link helps you find your dependency issue.
I've run another test to try and isolate this. I removed the mentioned view from the destination database totally, then ran the DTS again. It failed with the same error. However, the view that aparrently is an invalid object name was recreated successfully. It seems that the error is coming from something trying to reference that view, but it doesn't actually stop the script when it hits that error.
Cade - I will check out that link. I will also try and establish what is referencing the view and breaking.
Related
I'm using Visual Studio 15.8.5 with Sql Server Data Tools 15.1.
I've created an SQL Server database project and imported the schema of an already existing database. I've made several minor changes to a few tables of the database and published the updates to the development database without any problems.
After adding a few SQL scripts to the project, all of them with:
Build Action = None
publish fails, despite no changes have been made in any of the database objects of the project.
This is the part of the auto-generated publish script that causes the problem:
/*
The table [lut].[KAE] is being dropped and re-created since all
non-computed columns within the table have been redefined.
*/
IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from [lut].[KAE])
RAISERROR (N'Rows were detected. The schema update is terminating
because data loss might occur.', 16, 127) WITH NOWAIT
GO
Table [lut].[KAE] has not been changed, though. One of the scripts is redefining its schema but this should make no difference since this is a 'No Build' script.
What am I possibly doing wrong here?
Edit:
I've done a schema comparison as #MadBert advised. I originally used my actual database as source and my sql server visual studio project as target. No differences were found.
I then switched source and target databases and compared again. The following 'difference' was detected.
As you can see this is not an actual difference, it looks like a Visual Studio bug in schema comparison. Any ideas on how I could circumvent this behavior?
It turned out that a refactor log file was the culprit.
I tried to publish to an empty database, as #Ogglas wisely advised. I noticed that during publish I was getting the following message:
The following operation was generated from a refactoring log file
8e659d92-10bb-4ce9-xxxx-xxxxxxxxx Rename [lut].[KAE].[xxxxx] to
$$$$$$$$$ Caution: Changing any part of an object name could
break scripts and stored procedures.
I then noticed that my SQL Server Database project contained a .refactorlog file
It seems that this log file was generated after I changed the offending table schema. The schema of the table was later reverted to its original state but the log file remained.
I deleted this log file and after that publish finally succeeded!
Had a similar problem when a SQL Server Database project was set to the wrong Target platform. Edit this in project properties to match the target server. Initiate a schema compare again by right clicking on the project and select Schema Compare....
Also check if Ignore whitespace is marked in Schema Compare Options. If you still have a difference one way or another try pasting the text in Notepad++ with Show All Characters on and see if you can spot a difference.
If you still can't find any difference, try creating a new database from the project and use SSMS GUI to compare. Does the table have the same Lock Escalation settings etc?
In my SSDT Project, why could I be getting this error?
"the select permission was denied on the object __refactorlog?"
There is a refactorlog item in the Project.
I select to generate a publish script from inside VS.
Edit: the target is a production server, so I don't have permissions to create tables or select data there, I just have to create the deployment script, and there is no table __refactorlog anyway..
You need greater permissions than you currently have on that server in order to generate a publish script. I verified that there is a call "SELECT OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.__RefactorLog')" in the code handling refactor operations that checks if the table exists. It's likely that the code is failing at that point as you don't have the permissions to even ask to select the object. You can check this yourself by running that query against the database and seeing if you get an error.
Suggestions for determining the permissions you need:
Try right-clicking on the database and choosing "Create New Project". If you can't extract the database definition to a project then it's a clear sign that you don't have View Definition privileges on the database
If that's not the case, then the issue is that you need read permissions on the __refactorlog table and don't have it. The solution would be to get access to that table, or else you'd have to verify none of the refactorings are needed and delete the refactorlog from the project (not recommended as generally you want to preserver refactorings to avoid possible data loss and other issues).
Here is how I handle this, even though it is a poor substitute and is not useful for automating database publishing. I write the publish script, then do a global search and replace, changing "dbo" to a schema that I can access. That works for me, because I have removed all the options that attempt to script objects I do not control, and the dbo schema is completely out of my hands, same as you.
I am not proud of this, and I wish that I had the option of controlling where that table could reside, but at least the Visual Studio features of refactoring are completely supported.
I backed up my database table's and entire schema into .sql script using Visual Studio's Database Publishing Wizard.
I then tried to re-create those tables on another PC, not before re-creating the database itself, with the same exact name and everything (using a script that I created via SSMS's Script Database as).
I then open that tables .sql file using SSMS and execute it.
SSMS reports:
Command(s) completed successfully
But examining Object Explorer reveals that no tables were created.
Why is this happening?
What have I missed?
I've just been having the exact same problem symptoms also using Visual Studio's Database Publishing Wizard, - but with a slightly different cause / fix.
Even though SQL Server Management Studio says it is connected to the correct database (in the drop down in the ribbon, and in the status bar of the window), it wasn't actually connected to anything.
To identify and fix either:
SELECT DB_NAME() AS DataBaseName
If you get
master
(or any other unexpected database name) as the result, then you are connected to the wrong database and should select the correct DB from the dropdown. This was the cause of your problem.
If you get
Command(s) completed successfully
then somehow you aren't connected at all - this happened to me.
To fix, click the "change connection" button to disconnect and reconnect.
Check whether you have selected database. Most of the times we execute query in Master db by mistake.
-- Mark as answered if this answer really answered your question
Check if you are running "Execute" or jut Parsing the code. It was a late night, I was tired, and kept running a query to create a table, successfully, but no new table. The next day with a clear mind i noticed that i was not actually running the query, i was parsing it.
I've got a project where I'm attempting to use SQLite via System.Data.SQLite. In my attempts to keep the database under version-control, I went ahead and created a Database Project in my VS2008. Sounds fine, right?
I created my first table create script and tried to run it using right-click->Run on the script and I get this error message:
This operation is not supported for the provider or data source you are using.
Does anyone know if there's an automatic way to use scripts that are part of database project against SQLite databases referenced by the databases, using the provider supplied by the System.Data.SQLite install?
I've tried every variation I can think of in an attempt to get the script to run using the default Run or Run On... commands. Here's the script in it's most verbose and probably incorrect form:
USE Characters
GO
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE type = 'U' AND name = 'Skills')
BEGIN
DROP Table Skills
END
GO
CREATE TABLE Skills
(
SkillID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
SkillName TEXT,
Description TEXT
)
GO
Please note, this is my first attempt at using a Database, and also the first time I've ever touched SQLite. In my attempts to get it to run, I've stripped any and everything out except for the CREATE TABLE command.
UPDATE: Ok, so as Robert Harvey points out below, this looks like an SQL Server stored procedure. I went into the Server Explorer and used my connection (from the Database project) to get do what he suggested regarding creating a table. I can generate SQL from to create the table and it comes out like thus:
CREATE TABLE [Skills] (
[SkillID] integer PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
[SkillName] text NOT NULL,
[Description] text NOT NULL
);
I can easily copy this and add it to the project (or add it to another project that handles the rest of my data-access), but is there anyway to automate this on build? I suppose, since SQLite is a single-file in this case that I could also keep the built database under version-control as well.
Thoughts? Best practices for this instance?
UPDATE: I'm thinking that, since I plan on using Fluent NHibernate, I may just use it's auto-persistence model to keep my database up-to-snuff and effectively in source control. Thoughts? Pitfalls? I think I'll have to keep initial population inserts in source-control separately, but it should work.
I built my database using an SQLite SQL script and then fed that into the sqlite3.exe console program like this.
c:\sqlite3.exe mydatabase.db < FileContainingSQLiteSQLCommands
John
Well, your script looks like a SQL Server stored procedure. SQLite most likely doesn't support this, because
It doesn't support stored procedures, and
It doesn't understand SQL Server T-SQL
SQL is actually a pseudo-standard. It differs between vendors and sometimes even between different versions of a product within the same vendor.
That said, I don't see any reason why you can't run any (SQLite compatible) SQL statement against the SQLite database by opening up connection and command objects, just like you would with SQL Server.
Since, however, you are new to databases and SQLite, here is how you should start. I assume you already have SQLite installed
Create a new Windows Application in Visual Studio 2008. The database application will be of no use to you.
Open the Server Explorer by pulling down the View menu and selecting Server Explorer.
Create a new connection by right-clicking on the Data Connections node in Server Explorer and clicking on Add New Connection...
Click the Change button
Select the SQLite provider
Give your database a file name.
Click OK.
A new Data Connection should appear in the Server Explorer. You can create your first table by right-clicking on the Tables node and selecting Add New Table.
I HAVE to be missing something really simple here!
I have a database in my development environment called Project.
I have a database in my test environment called Project_UAT.
I've created an SSIS package that successfully copied my database from Project to Project_UAT. I'm pretty sure this eliminates most permission and configuration issues.
Now, I want to re-create the package and this time allow it to overwrite the destination, which is Project_UAT. This is simply because from time to time I want to click a button in the Microsoft SQL Management Studio that pushes the new database schema, data, users, and everything, out to my testing environment. I WANT to overwrite the data.
So I create the package just like I did before, but this time I specify the already-existing database name as the "Destination database" and I select the radio button called "Drop any database on the destination server with the same name, then continue with the database transfer, overwriting existing database files."
I click Next, and what does it tell me?
"Database name already exists at destination"
Well, I KNOW! I just told you I want to overwrite it!
How do I make this work?
Not sure if I am missing the point but why do you not use a task to drop/delete the existing database prior to your deployment step?
Perhaps you could qualify the SSIS Component Tasks you are using within your SSIS package.
Cheers, John
You can add an Execute SQL Task into the Control Flow to drop the database. Just set the SQLStatement property to
DROP DATABASE Project_UAT
After this step is executed the new copy of the Project_UAT database won't have to overwrite the old one.
I had this problem because I deleted the database before hand. The database is not in the destination folder, but SQL Server 2008 still thinks it is there. Refresh didn't work. And SQL Server wouldn't honor the selection of "Drop any database on the destination server..." It just complained that the database already existed.
Guys this is a common sense solution. A lot of complexity for nothing.
Backup the destination database you want to copy to and delete the destination database.
Open the copy database wizard and follow the steps.
Use the detach and attach method.
When you get to the configure destination database use the option if destination database exists select drop database on destination server with same name.
Now it will continue to the next screen.
But this only works if you delete the destination database first before starting the wizard.
I may have missed something but this worked for me.