I am trying to do authentication using serviceClient (SAS Token) instead of using accesskey. Following is my kamelet.yaml file config,
from:
uri: "quartz:azure-storage-blob-stream"
parameters:
cron: "{{cron}}"
steps:
- to:
uri: "azure-storage-blob:{{accountName}}/{{containerName}}"
parameters:
operation: "listBlobs"
serviceClient: "#registerBlobClient"
Whiled deploying application I am getting below error,
Caused by: org.apache.camel.PropertyBindingException: Error binding property (serviceClient=registerBlobClient-3) with name: serviceClient on bean: azure-storage-blob://*****/?operation=listBlobs&serviceClient=%23registerBlobClient with value: registerBlobClient
Related
List SCOPES = Arrays.asList("https://graph.microsoft.com/.default");
final ClientSecretCredential credential = new ClientSecretCredentialBuilder()
.clientId(applicationId)
.clientSecret(secret)
.tenantId(tenantId)
.build();
final TokenCredentialAuthProvider authProvider_new = new TokenCredentialAuthProvider(SCOPES, credential);
GraphServiceClient graphClient = GraphServiceClient
.builder()
.authenticationProvider(authProvider)
.buildClient();
graphClient.users().buildRequest().get();
With
compile group: 'com.microsoft.azure', name: 'azure-spring-boot', version: '2.3.5'
compile group: 'com.google.guava', name: 'guava', version: '28.2-jre'
compile group: 'com.azure', name: 'azure-identity', version: '1.2.5'
compile group: 'com.microsoft.graph', name: 'microsoft-graph', version: '3.5.0'
I've added all the necessary permissions to the application, and it's been consented in Active Directory, but same response.
It works using this code, after I sign in with a user account:
final DeviceCodeCredential credential1 = new DeviceCodeCredentialBuilder()
.clientId(applicationId)
.challengeConsumer(challenge -> System.out.println(challenge.getMessage()))
.build();
But I want to use ClientSecretCredential and use the client secret, not create a challenge.
Update: The error message I get is
SEVERE: Throwable detail: com.microsoft.graph.http.GraphServiceException: Error code: Authorization_RequestDenied
Error message: Insufficient privileges to complete the operation.
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users
SdkVersion : graph-java/v3.5.0
403 : Forbidden
Here's a link of the permissions the app has in API Permissions
I also have the following permissions to Azure Rights Management Services in case it helps
Application.Read.All, Content.DelegatedReader, Content.SuperUser
Based on your granted permission you missed the User.ReadWrite and User.ReadWrite.All Please add that permission .
For more details refer this document:
I try to follow exactly [this tutorial] (https://cloud.google.com/community/tutorials/exposing-aspnet-webapi-using-dotnetcore-with-cloud-endpoints ), but I get the following error at trying gcloud endpoints services deploy openapi.yaml :
ERROR: (gcloud.endpoints.services.deploy) Unable to parse Open API, or Google Service Configuration specification from [SampleSolution]
The body of openapi.yaml :
openapi: 3.0.1
info:
title: Notes API
version: v1
host: [google cloud project ID].appspot.com
paths:
/WeatherForecast:
get:
tags:
- WeatherForecast
responses:
'200':
description: Success
content:
text/plain:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/WeatherForecast'
application/json:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/WeatherForecast'
text/json:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/WeatherForecast'
components:
schemas:
WeatherForecast:
type: object
properties:
date:
type: string
format: date-time
temperatureC:
type: integer
format: int32
temperatureF:
type: integer
format: int32
readOnly: true
summary:
type: string
nullable: true
additionalProperties: false
I only see two things there:
openapi: 3.0.1. This should be swagger: "2.0" accordint ot the Basic structure of an OpenAPI document
host: [google cloud project ID].appspot.com. This should contain the proper project Id.
UPDATE
After checking the composition of your file and the Endpoints openAPI Docs:
OpenAPI feature limitations:
Currently, Cloud Endpoints accepts only version 2 of the OpenAPI Specification.
The Components Section in the Swagger docs mentions that applies to openAPI3. This is not compatible with point 1.
I suggest to remake your file following The basic structure of an OpenAPI document
Swashbuckle.AspNetCore now supports OpenApi 3, but it also has backwards compatibility with Swagger v2, by setting it up in Configure method (Startup class) with:
app.UseSwagger(c =>
{
c.SerializeAsV2 = true;
});
I have a application.yml file in my application
spring:
profiles:
active: default,dev
app:
properties:
lucene:
indexInfoFile: ${spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.search.default.indexBase}/index.properties
reindex: false
storage:
home: ${user.home}/xxx
basePath: ${app.properties.storage.home}/uploads/
staticFilesPrefix: /files/
appUrl: /app/
spring:
profiles: dev
http:
multipart:
max-file-size: 3MB
max-request-Size: 3MB
Now in my controller, I am trying to get the data from yml file and the code for the same is
$http.get('/resources/application.yml').then(function (response) {
console.log('entire data is ', response.data);
console.log('basePath is ', response.data.basePath);
});
Entire Data is printing perfectly ( the whole yml file is getting printed) but when ever I am trying to print a particular property like basePath, max-file-size etc I am getting "undefined error".
My question is how to get a particular property to be printed on the console.
I would not recommend to access the yml file directly in Angular.
The format is difficult to parse (hence your question) and you sooner or later you may not want to expose all your confguration details.
Instead create a rest controller in spring mapped to something like /config
Let spring inject all the configuration values you need using #Value and return a Map or a simple PoJo with exactly the attributes you need.
Spring will convert this to JSON which you can easily be consumed in Angular.
I successfully setup IdentityServer4 with ASP.NET Core.
As a default config I had this:
IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions options = new IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions()
{
Authority = "http://localhost:5000",
ScopeName = "scope",
ScopeSecret = "ScopeSecret",
AutomaticAuthenticate = true,
AutomaticChallenge = true,
RequireHttpsMetadata = false,
};
Now, using this guide I configured to be read from configuration files and so they can be any numbers in production.
For example if I setup API to be running at http://*:5000 then the client can connect to it via the service IP address like http://192.168.1.100:5000.
Once the client obtains the Bearer token and tries to use it, an Internal Server Error occures with this exception:
Unable to obtain configuration from:
'http://*:5000/.well-known/openid-configuration'.
---> System.IO.IOException: IDX10804: Unable to retrieve document from: 'http://*:5000/.well-known/openid-configuration'.
---> System.UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The hostname could not be parsed.
What is the correct way to configure IdS4 to have dynamic authority?
Update
It seems the problem is with Issuer, any idea on this?
Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityTokenInvalidIssuerException:
IDX10205: Issuer validation failed. Issuer: 'http://192.168.1.100:5000'. Did not match: validationParameters.ValidIssuer: 'http://localhost:5000' or validationParameters.ValidIssuers: 'null'.
at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.Validators.ValidateIssuer(String issuer, SecurityToken securityToken, TokenValidationParameters validationParameters)
By a big surprise, all I needed, was to set a value (almost any value) for IssuerUri:
public IServiceProvider ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
////...
var identiyBuilder = services.AddIdentityServer(options =>
{
options.RequireSsl = false;
options.IssuerUri = "MyCompany";
});
////...
}
Now, by the above config, I can use the service by any IP address.
I didn't find I could just put in MyCompany
But in my log files I had the following:
Bearer was not authenticated. Failure message: IDX10205: Issuer validation failed. Issuer: 'https://crm.example.com'. Did not match: validationParameters.ValidIssuer: 'MyCompany' or validationParameters.ValidIssuers: 'null'.
I don't quite know what 'issuer' means but I was able to just take 'https://crm.example.com' and get things working with this :
options.IssuerUri = "https://crm.example.com";
I am trying to connect second db to my webapplication written in PlayFramework2.
I've configured correctly my app. I've added already second source callec crm.
Here is my console log:
--- (RELOAD) ---
[info] play - datasource [jdbc:mysql://localhost/svp] bound to JNDI as DefaultDS
[info] play - datasource [jdbc:mysql://192.168.0.4/scrm_customer] bound to JNDI as CRM
[info] play - database [default] connected at jdbc:mysql://localhost/svp
[info] play - database [CRM] connected at jdbc:mysql://192.168.0.4/scrm_customer
[info] play - Application started (Dev)
I've added to my persistence.xml following:
<persistence-unit name="CRM" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider>
<non-jta-data-source>CRM</non-jta-data-source>
</persistence-unit>
and my configuration for that:
db.default.jndiName=DefaultDS
db.default.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
db.default.url="jdbc:mysql://localhost/svp"
db.default.user=root
db.CRM.jndiName=CRM
db.CRM.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
db.CRM.url="jdbc:mysql://192.168.0.4/scrm_customer"
db.CRM.user=root
db.default.logStatements=true
jpa.default=defaultPersistenceUnit
But when I am trying to get some data from second db using code as follow:
List<Customer> allCustomers = (List<Customer>) JPA.em("CRM")
.createQuery("FROM Customer", Customer.class)
.getResultList();
I am getting an error:
[error] play - Cannot invoke the action, eventually got an error: java.lang.RuntimeException: No JPA EntityManagerFactory configured for name [CRM]
[error] application -
! #6kd0136e7 - Internal server error, for (GET) [/SupraADMIN/klienci] ->
play.api.Application$$anon$1: Execution exception[[RuntimeException: No JPA EntityManagerFactory configured for name [CRM]]]
at play.api.Application$class.handleError(Application.scala:293) ~[play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
at play.api.DefaultApplication.handleError(Application.scala:399) [play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
at play.core.server.netty.PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$applyOrElse$3.apply(PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler.scala:264) [play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
at play.core.server.netty.PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler$$anonfun$3$$anonfun$applyOrElse$3.apply(PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler.scala:264) [play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:145) [scala-library.jar:na]
at play.core.server.netty.PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler$$anonfun$3.applyOrElse(PlayDefaultUpstreamHandler.scala:264) [play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: No JPA EntityManagerFactory configured for name [CRM]
at play.db.jpa.JPA.em(JPA.java:34) ~[play-java-jpa_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
at models.Customer.getCRMList(Customer.java:124) ~[na:na]
at controllers.admin.CMS.Customers(CMS.java:157) ~[na:na]
at admin.Routes$$anonfun$routes$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$24$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(routes_routing.scala:429) ~[na:na]
at admin.Routes$$anonfun$routes$1$$anonfun$applyOrElse$24$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(routes_routing.scala:429) ~[na:na]
at play.core.Router$HandlerInvoker$$anon$7$$anon$2.invocation(Router.scala:183) ~[play_2.10-2.2.4.jar:2.2.4]
[error] application - REGUEST: GET /SupraADMIN/klienci GENERATED ERROR: #6kd0136e7: Execution exception in /home/korbeldaniel/Aplikacje/Eclipse/SVP/modules/common/app/models/Customer.java:124
What do I miss? I've checked official documentation, but nothing usefull found.
Please help
Annotate your controller method with following annotation:
#Transactional(value = "CRM", readOnly = true)
and within controller method perform:
JPA.em().createQuery("FROM Customer", Customer.class).getResultList();
Or if you dont want to use annotation:
List<Customer> customers = JPA.withTransaction("CRM", true, new Function0<List<Customer>>() {
#Override
public List<Customer> apply() throws Throwable {
return JPA.em().createQuery("FROM Customer", Customer.class).getResultList();
}
});
I would strongly recommend using JPA.withTransactionAsync instead.