Based off the answer here I am trying to get Chrome to run headless in my script.
The snippet of code below is inside of a function called login() that logs into our ERP system:
if headless == True:
options = Options()
options.headless = True
#Load webdriver
driver = webdriver.Chrome(options=options, executable_path=r'C:/Users/d.kelly/Desktop/Python/chromedriver_win32/chromedriver.exe')
if headless == False:
driver = webdriver.Chrome('C:/Users/d.kelly/Desktop/Python/chromedriver_win32/chromedriver.exe')
window_before_login = driver.window_handles[0]
### Removed Code Block that fills out login form and clicks 'Login' button ###
# Switch to new window ERP (PLEX) launches and close original blank one no longer needed.
window_before_login = driver.window_handles[0]
window_title = driver.title
driver.switch_to.window(window_before_login)
driver.close()
driver.switch_to.window(driver.window_handles[0])
When I call my function like so:
login(headless=False)
It throws no errors and my entire script executes just fine.
When I call my function like this:
def login(headless=True)
I get the following errors:
DevTools listening on ws://127.0.0.1:57567/devtools/browser/69f9e357-dccf-4e38-8d6b-78030462379a
[0204/072436.206:INFO:CONSOLE(6)] "Error parsing a meta element's content: ';' is not a valid key-value pair separator. Please use ',' instead.", source: https://test.plexonline.com/modules/systemadministration/login/index.aspx? (6)
[0204/072437.699:INFO:CONSOLE(6)] "Error parsing a meta element's content: ';' is not a valid key-value pair separator. Please use ',' instead.", source: https://test.plexonline.com/Modules/SystemAdministration/Login/Index.aspx (6)
[0204/072437.722:INFO:CONSOLE(1)] "Scripts may close only the windows that were opened by it.", source: (1)
[0204/072441.162:INFO:CONSOLE(751)] "Synchronous XMLHttpRequest on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to the end user's experience. For more help, check https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/.", source: https://test.plexonline.com/Modules/scripts/ajax.js (751)
I am using Chrome Version 79.0.3945.130 (Official Build) (64-bit), Selenium 3.141.0, and Python 3.7.4.
Any ideas what I am doing wrong? Thank you!
I am trying to show a static pdf in React app. I have tried a lot of packages:
react-pdf
react-pdf-js
react-pdf-js-infinite
simple-react-pdf
pdfjs-dist
react-pdf-pages
They often say that we can use the URL, or pdf file for the props for the PDF component easily, but I cannot use either.
I had two main errors.
As I want to use myPDF for the props for the component, I write this:
import myPDF from 'path/to/pdf_file';
then, render_some_component pdf:{myPDF}
Here is the error:
ModuleParseError in
Module parse failed: Unexpected token (1:0)
You may need an appropriate loader to handle this file type.
(Source code omitted for this binary file)
(When I comment that line, this kind of error disappears)
I used the file-loader in webpack config, I have tried many different ways but failed.
I use the pdf file directly for the props like this:
render_some_component pdf:{'path/to/pdf_file'}
In the Console:
Warning: Setting up fake worker.
11:23:55.962 pdf.worker.js:349 Warning: Ignoring invalid character "33" in hex string
11:23:55.963 pdf.worker.js:349 Warning: Ignoring invalid character "79" in hex string
...
There are a lot of 'Ignoring invalid character' like that and it always ends with:
localhost/:1 Uncaught (in promise) InvalidPDFException {name: "InvalidPDFException", message: "Invalid PDF structure"}
In the Network, Headers, I see:
Request URL:http://localhost:3000/myPdfFile.pdf
Request Method:GET
Status Code:200 OK
Remote Address:127.0.0.1:3000
but In the Network, Response, I see just the HTML layout.
I think the pdf file is loaded correctly but the package cannot recognize its PDF structure.
Except that two main errors, I had another error related to the Worker used in the packages but I don't know how to fix it:
Uncaught DOMException: Failed to construct 'Worker'
(This is something relates to Chrome as people say Chrome does not allow Worker in the local server)
Any help is highly appreciated as I am stuck in this in 4 days already.
Can you pleas clarify what you main task is?
If I understood it right you want to display a PDF file that already exists in a part of your application? You don't want to create a new PDF with JavaScript.
If you want to just show a PDF have you tried to use iframe?
Something like this:
<iframe
title="file"
style={{ width: '100%', height: '100%' }}
src={downloadURL}
/>
You ca use here also relative paths to the file from the location where your Component is or use full URLs to the file.
I am trying to throw a 403 (Forbidden error) in my controller. When the exception is thrown, I would like to display the associated view. I was under the assumption that if the error is one of the built in exceptions, this would be pretty easy. I throw the exception like this:
throw new ForbiddenException("You do not have permission to view this page.");
I also created a view called "error403.ctp" in the app/view/Errors folder (it already contained 400 and 500). The problem is that when the error is thrown, it displays the error400.ctp view instead. Do I have to create custom exceptions for a built in error? What am I doing wrong.
From http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/development/exceptions.html#exception-renderer
"For all 4xx and 5xx errors the view files error400.ctp and error500.ctp are used respectively."
So you aren't doing anything wrong, that's just the default CakePHP behavior. As to how to change it so that you can have a 403 page separate from the other 4XX errors, see CakePHP 2.0 - How to make custom error pages?
I don't have the exact cake version you are using, so I'll use links to docs of version 2.3, but it should apply to any version 2.x.
If you look at the default ExceptionRenderer construct, you get this from the description
Creates the controller to perform rendering on the error response. If the error is a CakeException it will be converted to either a 400 or a 500 code error depending on the code used to construct the error.
And clear enough, from the code of that function, all errors get mapped to that:
$method = 'error500';
if ($code >= 400 && $code < 500) {
$method = 'error400';
}
You'll have to create a custom Exception Renderer if you want to use other views. Also, keep in mind that when using debug < 1, you'll only get 500 error pages
Captures and handles all unhandled exceptions. Displays helpful framework errors when debug > 1. When debug < 1 a CakeException will render 404 or 500 errors. If an uncaught exception is thrown and it is a type that ExceptionHandler does not know about it will be treated as a 500 error.
I`m trying to create a page that read the metadata of an image and allow user to edit it and save it to the same image.
After searching the internet I have found exiftool as the solution but I can make it work only as a command line not as a library in the page.
I have this code:
eval('$metadata=' . exiftool.exe -php -q $imagePath);
foreach ($metadata[0] as $key => $value) {
if ($metadata[0][$key]!=$_POST[$key]){
if ($_POST[$key]=="") $_POST[$key]=" "; //if metadata is not set, than create an empty metadata
eval('$metadata=' . exiftool.exe "-$key=$_POST[$key]" $imagePath);
}
}
and I`m getting this error:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected 'image' (T_STRING) in E:\xampp\htdocs\imgdata\index.php(30) : eval()'d code on line 1
I tried to replace the ` with other like " and ' but no luck.
What do I miss?
Any better idea on how to do it?
Thanks
I had the same problem, but using Centos OS, and found a solution here:
'command not found' error when using subprocess in apache
Might not work for Windows but worth a look. Basically the answer suggests specifying the full exiftool path rather than simply exiftool.exe.
If that doesn't help then have a look for errors in the Apache Error Log File.
While trying to answer a question in the vicinity 'Unit Testing WPF Bindings' I had the following niggling question..
What's the best way to find if you have WPF Data Binding wiring setup incorrectly (or you just broke something that was wired up correctly) ?
Although the unit-testing approach seems to be like Joel's 'ripping off your arm to remove a splinter'.. I am looking around for easier less Overhead ways to detect this.
Everyone seems to have committed themselves to data binding in a big way with WPF.. and it does have its merits.
In .NET 3.5 it was introduced a new way to specifically output tracing information about specific data bindings.
This is done through the new System.Diagnostics.PresentationTraceSources.TraceLevel attached property that you can apply to any binding or data provider. Here is an example:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication1.Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:diag="clr-namespace:System.Diagnostics;assembly=WindowsBase"
Title="Debug Binding Sample"
Height="300"
Width="300">
<StackPanel>
<TextBox Name="txtInput" />
<Label>
<Label.Content>
<Binding ElementName="txtInput"
Path="Text"
diag:PresentationTraceSources.TraceLevel="High" />
</Label.Content>
</Label>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
This will put trace information for just that particular binding in Visual Studio's Output Window, without any tracing configuration required.
Best I could find...
How can I debug WPF Bindings? by Beatriz Stollnitz
Since everyone can't always keep one eye on the Output Window looking for Binding errors, I loved Option#2. Which is add this to your App.Config
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
<system.diagnostics>
<sources>
<source name="System.Windows.Data" switchName="SourceSwitch" >
<listeners>
<add name="textListener" />
</listeners>
</source>
</sources>
<switches>
<add name="SourceSwitch" value="All" />
</switches>
<sharedListeners>
<add name="textListener"
type="System.Diagnostics.TextWriterTraceListener"
initializeData="GraveOfBindErrors.txt" />
</sharedListeners>
<trace autoflush="true" indentsize="4"></trace>
</system.diagnostics>
</configuration>
Pair that up with a good regex scan script to extract out relevant info, that you can run occasionally on the GraveOfBindErrors.txt in your output folder
System.Windows.Data Error: 35 : BindingExpression path error: 'MyProperty' property not found on 'object' ''MyWindow' (Name='')'. BindingExpression:Path=MyProperty; DataItem='MyWindow' (Name=''); target element is 'TextBox' (Name='txtValue2'); target property is 'Text' (type 'String')
I use the solution presented here to turn binding errors into native Exceptions: http://www.jasonbock.net/jb/Default.aspx?blog=entry.0f221e047de740ee90722b248933a28d
However, a normal scenario in WPF bindings is to throw exceptions in case the user input cannot be converted to the target type (for instance, a TextBox bound to a integer field; the input of a non-numeric string results in a FormatException, the input of number that is too large results in an OverflowException). A similar case is when the Setter of the source property throws an exception.
The WPF way of handling this is via ValidatesOnExceptions=true and ValidationExceptionRule to signal the user the supplied input is not correct (using the exception message).
However, these exception are also send to the output window and thus 'caught' by the BindingListener, resulting in an error...clearly not the behaviour you'd want.
Therefore, I expanded the BindingListener class to NOT throw an Exception in these cases:
private static readonly IList<string> m_MessagesToIgnore =
new List<String>()
{
//Windows.Data.Error 7
//Binding transfer from target to source failed because of an exception
//Normal WPF Scenario, requires ValidatesOnExceptions / ExceptionValidationRule
//To cope with these kind of errors
"ConvertBack cannot convert value",
//Windows.Data.Error 8
//Binding transfer from target to source failed because of an exception
//Normal WPF Scenario, requires ValidatesOnExceptions / ExceptionValidationRule
//To cope with these kind of errors
"Cannot save value from target back to source"
};
Modified lines in public override void WriteLine(string message):
....
if (this.InformationPropertyCount == 0)
{
//Only treat message as an exception if it is not to be ignored
if (!m_MessagesToIgnore.Any(
x => this.Message.StartsWith(x, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase)))
{
PresentationTraceSources.DataBindingSource.Listeners.Remove(this);
throw new BindingException(this.Message,
new BindingExceptionInformation(this.Callstack,
System.DateTime.Parse(this.DateTime),
this.LogicalOperationStack, int.Parse(this.ProcessId),
int.Parse(this.ThreadId), long.Parse(this.Timestamp)));
}
else
{
//Ignore message, reset values
this.IsFirstWrite = true;
this.DetermineInformationPropertyCount();
}
}
}
You can use the trigger debugging feature of WPF Inspector. Just download the tool from codeplex and attach it to your running app. It also shows binding errors on the bottom of the window.
Very useful tool!
Here's a useful technique for debugging/tracing triggers effectively. It allows you to log all trigger actions along with the element being acted upon:
http://www.wpfmentor.com/2009/01/how-to-debug-triggers-using-trigger.html
This was very helpful to us but I wanted to add to those who find this useful that there is a utility that Microsoft provides with the sdk to read this file.
Found here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms732023.aspx
To open a trace file
1.Start Service Trace Viewer by using a command window to navigate to your
WCF installation location (C:\Program
Files\Microsoft
SDKs\Windows\v6.0\Bin), and then type
SvcTraceViewer.exe. (although we found ours in \v7.0\Bin)
Note: The Service Trace Viewer tool
can associate with two file types:
.svclog and .stvproj. You can use two
parameters in command line to register
and unregister the file extensions.
/register: register the association of
file extensions ".svclog" and
".stvproj" with SvcTraceViewer.exe
/unregister: unregister the
association of file extensions
".svclog" and ".stvproj" with
SvcTraceViewer.exe
1.When Service Trace Viewer starts, click File and then point to Open.
Navigate to the location where your
trace files are stored.
2.Double-click the trace file that you want to open.
Note: Press SHIFT while clicking
multiple trace files to select and
open them simultaneously. Service
Trace Viewer merges the content of all
files and presents one view. For
example, you can open trace files of
both client and service. This is
useful when you have enabled message
logging and activity propagation in
configuration. In this way, you can
examine message exchange between
client and service. You can also drag
multiple files into the viewer, or use
the Project tab. See the Managing
Project section for more details.
3.To add additional trace files to the collection that is open, click File
and then point to Add. In the window
that opens, navigate to the location
of the trace files and double-click
the file you want to add.
Also, as for the filtering of the log file, we found these this link extremely helpful:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms751526.aspx
For anyone like me looking for a pure programmatic way of enabling all WPF Tracing at a given Trace Level, here is a piece of code that does it. For reference, it's based on this article: Trace sources in WPF.
It doesn't requires a change in the app.config file, and it does not require to change the registry either.
This is how I use it, in some startup place (App, etc.):
....
#if DEBUG
WpfUtilities.SetTracing();
#endif
....
And here is the utility code (by default it sends all Warning to the Default Trace Listener):
public static void SetTracing()
{
SetTracing(SourceLevels.Warning, null);
}
public static void SetTracing(SourceLevels levels, TraceListener listener)
{
if (listener == null)
{
listener = new DefaultTraceListener();
}
// enable WPF tracing
PresentationTraceSources.Refresh();
// enable all WPF Trace sources (change this if you only want DataBindingSource)
foreach (PropertyInfo pi in typeof(PresentationTraceSources).GetProperties(BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Public))
{
if (typeof(TraceSource).IsAssignableFrom(pi.PropertyType))
{
TraceSource ts = (TraceSource)pi.GetValue(null, null);
ts.Listeners.Add(listener);
ts.Switch.Level = levels;
}
}
}
My suggestion at 2021:
The Best way is to use Benoit Blanchon small library from Nuget
His original post at here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/19610384/6296708
His GitHub link and more info about how to use it + Nuget command: https://github.com/bblanchon/WpfBindingErrors
Its features (until now!):
throw exception on binding errors (+ line number)
If source Variable throw any exceptions, this library will catch it and show it.
Unit Test supports too!
Happy Coding!