Does anyone know if DotFuscator Community Edition is acceptable to Google Play Store? I'm asking because it's been futile for me. No matter what I do when loading to Play Store, it tells me that I should consider obfuscating. It seems to work locally fine. I can see the files it produces, and it provides relevant obfuscation. What's up with Google? I have tried both, manually entering the statements in Project file and the UI method as well. When using the UI mode I manually copied the obfuscated assemblies in the bin/release folder before archiving the bundle to no avail.
Related
We have a situation with word addins where we try to load our taskpane and use cefglue implementation to show web page. We use cefglue for the same. We just discovered that one of the vendor addins also loads chromium but an older version. Unfortunately our addin shows a message that it cant load chromium due to hash difference.
Now is it possible that 2 COM addins can load different version of chromium? The vendor change looks unlikely and I could see they don't use cefglue or cefsharp but have their own implementation. Has anyone in this situation before? We are thinking of moving our code base to use same version as theirs but again when they upgrade, we have to upgrade and we will have a window where this fails due to incompatible version. thanks
It seems there is no easy answer to this problem as word / excel can load only one libcef dll in memory. The redgate apphost could be a possible solution and I added a link to cefsharp remoting repo which I am still trying to make work but has some readymade code and could be a good starting point for someone trying to do the same thing. Best of luck and thanks #amaitland for pointers.
I'm using DesktopAppConverter to convert my WPF application into a windows store compatible app. Right now I'm able to get the AppX built but the problem is to do with my application assets.
At the moment, DesktopAppConverter is taking my existing Icon (which looks great in WPF) and using it to somehow create all the different Assets at different resolutions for the UWP app. The icons it creates are coming out looking terrible, really blocky and clearly upscaled.
The way I'm looking at it is that there's 2 options.
1 - I specify a really large Icon file in my WPF app that might somehow end up being scaled better inside DesktopAppConverter. The problem here is that with a large resolution Ico file, I end up with a crazy large file (Ico's don't compress very well from what I understand).
2 - I specify a folder of correctly scaled assets (created using UWP Tile Generator) when building through DesktopAppConverter. This is what I'd like to do. I don't really want to be tweaking my Assets every time.
The 3rd choice is the one I'm heading towards, but don't really want to do. It involves building with AppX, then replacing the assets, then using MakeAppX, then re-signing with the SignTool. All of that seems really unnecessary, so I'm hoping someone from MSFT can let me know I'm missing something fundamental.
Thanks.
The easiest way to handle the visual assets for your app package is to use the package manifest editor in Visual Studio 2017.
To use it for your converted app, create an empty UWP project and add the output of the conversion (incl. your appx manifest) in this project. Now you can use the editor to manage the visual assets, build your packages for store submission and much more.
Here is a document that describes the process:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/porting/desktop-to-uwp-packaging-dot-net
Thanks,
Stefan Wick - Windows Developer Platform
I am part of a team of .NET developers and we're trying to use the DNN platform as a way to have a website template so that we will not have to spend weeks or months building core functionality, such as authentication, permissions, navigation, etc. However, I'm very confused as to how the platform works as well as how it's installed. I'v spent many hours researching online at http://www.dnnsoftware.com/ as well as other sites, which only added to my confusion. Here are some specific questions which are still unanswered:
Do we install the source code or not? http://www.dnnsoftware.com/wiki/how-to-install-the-source-package-of-dotnetnuke says that it's not recommended to install source code. On the other hand, http://www.dnnsoftware.com/wiki/packages says that we should use the source code if we are developers (which we are).
If we don't use source code, how do we write code which will be used to add functionality, style, or business logic to our site? Where exactly do we put this code?
I keep on seeing the term "module" being thrown around. What in the world is a module?? Is it a separate .csproj file? Is it a .cs file saved as part of the website? If so, how would we incorporate it without the source code?
Like any other application, we need to be able to maintain full control of builds and deployments. With this, we can see history of what we did, roll back changes if necessary, etc. Currently, for our other projects, we build with TeamCity and deploy with OctopusDeploy. Where does that fit into working with DNN without source? I also know that DNN is set up as a web site project not a web application project (see here http://www.dnnsoftware.com/forums/threadid/338902/scope/posts/threadpage/1) and web site projects is a technology not really being maintained by the newer versions of Visual Studio, and may be harder to deploy as well. Assuming I DON'T want to convert (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/webdev/archive/2009/10/29/converting-a-web-site-project-to-a-web-application-project.aspx), how would I build/deploy the web site project?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/webdev/archive/2009/10/29/converting-a-web-site-project-to-a-web-application-project.aspx seems to state that it's not recommended to remove dependencies from DNN and replace them with other ones. If that's really true, it makes the whole platform seem very fragile and makes me wonder if I'm using the wrong tool altogether. Was DNN really meant for developers or not? (And if not, what was then intended use?)
Start here->
http://www.christoc.com/Tutorials/All-Tutorials/aid/1
1) Don't touch the DNN source, trust me, it isn't worth the headache
2) You add functionality, override style, etc, through the use of Extension (modules and skins)
3) A separate CSProj (check out my templates http://www.christoc.com/Tutorials/All-Tutorials/aid/2
4) You will deploy by taking the ZIP file from each extension and either uploading through the host/extension page, or taking the ZIp file and putting it into /install/module/ in the root of your deployment target, then have a process call /install/install.aspx?mode=installresources
5) DNN is for sure meant for developers, but it is a framework, build on the framework, don't go in and start jacking the framework itself.
I would start by getting a DNN site running on your local. This is fairly straight forward for any .NET developer.
A module is an extension for the DNN framework that you can essentially (once correctly installed) drop on a DNN page (referred to as tab). All your business logic will go in your own modules and the code for these modules will be the only things that you will have to source control. Do not make core changes to DNN as they will be blown away if you ever upgrade.
You do not need to use Christoc's module template if your module will only need to be deployed once. I find that it brings in a lot of unnecessary components and references that you probably will not need. Create your module's using webUserControls that inherit from DotNetNuke.Entities.Modules.PortalModuleBase. Drop the .ascx file in its own folder under DNN's DesktopModules folder and all required .dll's in DNN's bin folder. In DNN, go to Host>Extensions and create a new extention. To the extension add a module control and add your ascx files as controls (leave your default view's key blank). Other views should have unique keys and you can navigate to them in DNN using EditUrl("KeyName").
Drop your module on a DNN page and go from there.
This is of course an over simplification but it should get you going. There are many tutorials online that I advise you watch to learn the basics like Globals.NavigateUrl() to navigate between tabs and how DNN is put together. This forum topic might assist you http://www.dnnsoftware.com/answers/dnn-7-module-development-step-by-step-tutorial
I work on a team building Silverlight apps (version 4). We use SVN and all work on separate parts of the code, and regularly update the project with latest code. The Silverlight app runs from an ASP.NET web app. We are having very frustrating issues when updating our code. It seems like old versions of the XAP are being cached.
Example: Francisco changes the wording of a popup dialog, and commits his changes. A very simple change, what could possibly go wrong? I get the latest code. I see the new code in my IDE (VS2010), and run it. When I view that dialog, it does not have the new wording, even though I can see the new wording in my files. I put a breakpoint on the code right where the change is, but when I run the app, the breakpoint is disabled!
I try Clean build of the Silverlight and the Web host. I kill my local ASP.NET development server. I run the app - same thing! I delete the xap from ClientBin. No good.
Each of us on the team are experiencing this issue. Now we occasionally solve it, but are never sure what exactly fixed things, which is not satisfactory.
There must be some setting or something that we are missing. You would think that deleting the ClientBin xap file would solve it, as the new XAP must come from compiling the Silverlight app, right?
If you've seen this problem before and have a real solution, please let me know. (The solution of "format your hard drive and re-install everything" will NOT be accepted!)
Thank you,
Daniel Wiliams
I recommend that you use IE for Silverlight development. See also this answer.
The problem with using Firefox for development is that Firefox runs plugins in a separate process (plugin-container.exe). When launching the debugger, VS doesn't know that Silverlight won't be running from the process it launched, so it doesn't attach to the correct process. The breakpoints in Silverlight code appear not to work because the VS debugger hasn't attached to any process running the Silverlight code.
I believe it's possible to disable the use of the plugin-container.exe process (see, for example, LIMPET235's post here), but that won't fix the apparent caching you're also experiencing.
I used to use Firefox for Silverlight development, but I found that things worked much more smoothly when I switched to using IE.
First of all, could you please check is your .xap file also included into source control?
it should not be included..., no need IMHO.
Most likely your xap file is set to read only.
go to that file location and make ClientBin folder not read only if is.
I've seen this before the XAP file is cached. Try emptying your browsers cache and then putting a query string on the XAP. So your XAP reference would look something like Foo.xap?1234
couple things to check.
Make sure your silverlight project's output path is correct.
Make sure your silverlight application has been added to your web app project.
Enable silverlight debugging in your web app project.
Set the silverlight project as a dependency in your web application's settings
The solution of "format your hard drive and re-install everything" will NOT be accepted!
Format your hard drive and install Linux (:
More to the point, configure the Silverlight Applications tab in the SomeSilverlightApp.Web project to copy the xap file from the SomeSilverlightApp project to the ClientBin folder which shows there by default.
The ClientBin folder is also part of the SomeSilverlightApp.Web project in my case and the xap properties are set to CopyToOutputDirectory: Always so that it also gets deployed.
This is probably not the right solution but it works here and I have not time to try to investigate this weird logic.
I've been facing a deployment problem.I've built a WPF application with visual studio 2008 and created an installer(msi) which works fine.But then it's pain to add automatic update to it. i've seen this article at windowsclient.net but it seems to be pretty old but could have been the perfect thing for me.Then i looked at the .Net Application updater block v2.0 which uses enterprise library june 2005 and for some reason it's not installing on my machine.
I thought i will need to use a more recent Enterprise library so i installed and compiled Enterprise 4.1(october 2008) but nothing better happened.To i decided to give a try to CLickonce deployment.After struggling with it, it was almost perfect.I realized that when i was testing the updates provided by the clickonce on my machine which is XP i didn't notice the need of having sqlite dll in the GAC. surely it was already there.I noticed it when i moved to vista that there is a problem.After checking the net i know it's impossible to add a dll to the Global Assembly Cache.
Now i'm stuck, i think i've hit a wall.Can any one share some of his experience? I'm willing to try the updater block if i can get help.
Thanks for reading this!!
(Won't fit in a comment)
Here's something helpful -- you can deploy the SQLCE dll's locally, instead of installing as a prerequisite, which makes it easier to deploy. Check out this article.
This is another useful article: how to keep your data safe from ClickOnce updates.
This will make more sense if you check out this thread. I have a post in this thread that has two links in it. One points to the ClickOnce way of handling database deployment, the other to a thread that is essentially the same as the blog article above.
First, you can't use that updater block. It was for .NET 1.1. It was marked obsolete when ClickOnce deployment was added in .NET 2.0.
You probably don't need to install that dll in the GAC. In many cases, you can just include it in the deployment, and it will find the local reference and use it. It just depends on the dll. So here's what I recommend you try:
Add the dll to your project. Set the 'build action' to 'none'. Set 'copy to local directory' as 'do not copy'.
Delete the reference in your project to that dll, and re-add it. But instead of picking it from the GAC, browse to the one you just added to your project and select it. On the reference properties, set 'copy local' to 'true'.
Now when you run it, it will access the local copy instead of looking for one in the GAC.
Like I said, this works great in some cases. It works for SQLCE and DirectX, but not for something like Infragistics. Some assemblies really do have to be installed in the GAC. The only way you will know is if you try it.
If you DO end up having to put it in the GAC, you can create an MSI to do that and deploy it as a prerequisite to the ClickOnce application. So you can still use ClickOnce for your main app.