Allocating memory to a passed-in pointer argument - c

What is the solution to the following problem:
I have a null pointer which I pass to another function (a central place for doing all allocation and some actions on the allocated memory), which should do the actual allocation on that pointer. This is what I have tried:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void xf(int *p) {
p = malloc(sizeof (int));
printf("xf: %p\n", p);
*p = 123;
}
int *pf() {
int *p = NULL;
xf(p);
printf("pf: %p\n", p);
return p;
}
int main()
{
int *a = pf();
printf("===%p %p===\n", NULL, a);
printf("%d\n", *a);
return 0;
}
but returned pointer of pf() is still the null pointer and not the in xf allocated memory address. The above prints something like:
xf: 0x56392c0122a0
pf: (nil)
===(nil) (nil)===
Segmentation fault
Any suggestions?

you are changing the pointer so do this
void xf(int **p) {
*p = malloc(sizeof (int));
printf("xf: %p\n", *p);
**p = 123;
}
and
int *p = NULL;
xf(&p);

Related

Pointer is "passed by value"?

After calling f() on ptr, I expect it to point to a single byte with value of A.
But instead ptr is copied by value and it is only available in the f function(?)
What am I doing wrong?
void f(char* ptr) {
ptr = (char*) malloc(1);
*ptr = 'A';
}
int main() {
char* ptr;
f(ptr);
printf("%c\n", *ptr); // Segmentation fault, But it should be 'A'
// free(ptr);
}
Thanks!
Yes, it's passed by value. If you want the changes you make to the pointer to be visible at the call site, you need to pass a pointer to the pointer.
Example:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void f(char **ptr) { // pointer to the pointer
*ptr = malloc(1);
if(*ptr) // precaution if malloc should fail
**ptr = 'A';
}
int main(void) {
char *ptr;
f(&ptr); // take the address of `ptr`
if(ptr) // precaution again
printf("%c\n", *ptr); // now fine
free(ptr); // without this, you have a memory leak
}
Or, f() could simply return the pointer.
Form the habit of testing return values.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
char *f(void) {
char *ptr = malloc(1);
if( ptr != NULL )
*ptr = 'A';
return ptr;
}
int main() {
char *ptr = f();
if( ptr != NULL )
printf( "%c\n", *ptr );
free( ptr );
}
You might even be able to save some code if you write main() like this:
int main() {
char *ptr;
if( ( ptr = f() ) != NULL )
printf( "%c\n", *ptr ), free( ptr ), ptr = NULL;
/* more code that will see ptr as NULL */
}
And, that leads to this (being inefficient but valid):
int main() {
for( char *ptr = f(); ptr; free( ptr ), ptr = NULL )
printf( "%c\n", *ptr );
}
You are passing the pointer ptr to the function f() by value.
This essentially means that the pointer variable you passed to f() will be copied locally inside f().
Any changes made to the local copy will only affect the local copy and not the original variable you passed to f().
When a variable is passed by value, it's copy can be referenced by whatever the function argument is called.
In your case, the pointer you pass to f() has been copied inside f() and the local copy can be referenced by ptr, since that is the argument name in:
void f(char *ptr)
Now you know how pass by value works you may now understand why your code is erroneous.
In the code:
void f(char* ptr) {
ptr = (char*) malloc(1);
*ptr = 'A';
}
You modify a local copy of what you passed into f() called ptr. And since it is local, it has something called automatic storage duration.
Automatic storage duration essentially means that after the function ends, all local variables will cease to exist and the memory they occupy will be freed. This means your code actually causes a memory leak because the pointer to the memory you allocated is lost.
Solution:
In order to achieve what you want and to modify the pointer called ptr declared in main() you must pass the address of the pointer you want to modify.
This would look like this:
void f(char **ptr)
{
*ptr = malloc(sizeof(char));
if (*ptr == NULL)
{
fprintf(stderr, "malloc fail");
return;
}
**ptr = 'A';
}
int main()
{
char *ptr;
f(&ptr);
printf("%c\n", *ptr);
return 0;
}
Output:
A
Function parameters are its local variables. Changing a local variable has no effect on the argument expression.
You can imagine the function definition and its call the following way
int main() {
char* ptr;
f(ptr);
printf("%c\n", *ptr); // Segmentation fault, But it should be 'A'
// free(ptr);
}
void f( /*char* p */ ) {
char *p = ptr;
p = (char*) malloc(1);
*p = 'A';
}
That is the function parameter p (I renamed it to distinguish the parameter and argument in the function call) is initialized by the value of the argument expression and within the function the local variable p that occupies its own extent of memory is changed.
To change the original pointer you need to pass it to the function by reference. In C passing by reference means passing an object indirectly through a pointer to it. Thus dereferencing the pointer you get a direct access to the original object.
So the function in your program should be defined the following way
void f(char **ptr) {
*ptr = (char*) malloc(1);
**ptr = 'A';
}
and called like
f( &ptr );
you are passing a address of ptr so this will be copied to the funktion f(),
a smiple solution can be: you make the f(...) return a char* and used in the main: ptr = f(ptr);
Alternatively, you can allocate the memory for ptr where you declare it:
void f(char* ptr) {
*ptr = 'A';
}
int main() {
char* ptr = malloc(1);
f(ptr);
printf("%c\n", *ptr); // Segmentation fault, But it should be 'A'
free(ptr);
}

free(): double free detected in tcache 2 after realloc [duplicate]

If I've declared a pointer p as int *p; in main module, I can change the address contained by p by assigning p = &a; where a is another integer variable already declared.
I now want to change the address by using a function as:
void change_adrs(int*q)
{
int *newad;
q = newad;
}
If I call this function from main module
int main()
{
int *p;
int a = 0;
p = &a; // this changes the address contained by pointer p
printf("The address is %u\n", p);
change_adrs(p);
printf("The address is %u\n", p); // but this doesn't change the address
return 0;
}
the address content is unchanged. What's wrong with using a function for same task?
In C, functions arguments are passed by value. Thus a copy is made of your argument and the change is made to that copy, not the actual pointer object that you are expecting to see modified. You will need to change your function to accept a pointer-to-pointer argument and make the change to the dereferenced argument if you want to do this.
For example
void foo(int** p) {
*p = NULL; /* set pointer to null */
}
void foo2(int* p) {
p = NULL; /* makes copy of p and copy is set to null*/
}
int main() {
int* k;
foo2(k); /* k unchanged */
foo(&k); /* NOW k == NULL */
}
If you have the luxury of using C++ an alternative way would be to change the function to accept a reference to a pointer.
In C, variables are passed by value - a copy of the pointer is passed to the function. Use another pointer to the pointer instead:
void change(int **p, int *someOtherAddress)
{
*p = someOtherAddress;
}
int a = 1, b = 2;
int *p = &a;
printf("*p = %d\n", *p);
change(&p, &b);
printf("*p = %d\n", *p);
This prints
*p = 1
*p = 2
If you want to alter the content of a variable in a function in C, pointer is a kinda variable as well, you have to pass it by pointer or indirect reference by using always & address and * dereference operators. I mean * operator is always used and preceded when changing the value of a variable.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void changeIntVal(int *x) {
*x = 5;
}
void changePointerAddr(int **q) {
int *newad;
*q = newad;
}
void changePPAddr(int ***q) {
int **dummy;
*q = dummy;
}
int main() {
int *p;
int **pp;
int *tempForPP;
int a = 0;
printf("\n The address pointing by p -> %p, pp -> %p, value of a -> %d ", p, pp, a);
p = &a;
pp = &tempForPP;
printf("\n The address pointing by p -> %p, pp -> %p, value of a -> %d ", p, pp, a);
changeIntVal(&a); // ----
// |---
changePointerAddr(&p); // ---- |----> parts of what I mean
// |---
changePPAddr(&pp); // ----
printf("\n The address pointing by p -> %p, pp -> %p, value of a -> %d ", p, pp, a);
return 0;
}
For a primitive data type such as an int, the double pointers are not necessary. You can write directly into the address where the int is stored, treating its address as a pointer in the function being called. This is unlike a char array ("string") where the size of what is pointed to is variable and you must therefore use another level of indirection when changing it from within a called function. Try this:
void foo(int *oldVal)
{
int newVal = 99; // or whatever you want
*oldVal = newVal;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int someVal = 0;
foo(&someVal); // we send its address to foo()
printf("someVal is now %d.\n", someVal);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
This won't change the actual value of p because the q in function is local to that and change in that function will not reflect in main so pass the address of p instead of passing p by value
Use this syntax below
void change_adrs(int **q)
{
int * otheraddess;
*q = otheraddress;
}
and call like this change_adrs(&p);
Or, you have other way around:
change the return type of function and catch the returned address.
int* change_adrs(int *q)
{
int * otheraddess;
q = otheraddress;
return q;
}
int main()
{
p = change_adrs(p);
return 0;
}

How can I allocate memory for array inside a function

I am trying to receive a number from the user.
And create an array with that number, but, inside a function.
Here are my few attempts, I get into run time errors.
Help is very much appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int* Init(int* p, int num);
int main() {
int *p;
int num, i;
puts("Enter num of grades:");
scanf("%d", &num);
Init(&p, num);
//for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
//{
// scanf("%d", &p[i]);
//}
free(p);
}
int* Init(int* p, int num)
{
int *pp;
p = (int *)malloc(num*sizeof(int));
if (!pp)
{
printf("Cannot allocate memory\n");
return;
}
p = pp;
free(pp);
}
You have done well upto the point you understood you need to pass a pointer to pointer. But your function signature doesn't take an int **. Either you pass a pointer to pointer and store the allocated memory in it:
void Init(int **pp, int num)
{
int *p;
p = malloc(num*sizeof(int));
if (!p)
{
printf("Cannot allocate memory\n");
}
*pp = p;
}
And check if the Init() returns a proper pointer:
Init(&p, num);
if(p == NULL) {
/*Memory allocation failed */
}
Or allocate memory and return the pointer:
int* Init(int num)
{
int *p;
p = malloc(num*sizeof(int));
if (!p)
{
printf("Cannot allocate memory\n");
}
return p;
}
and from main() call as:
int * p = Init(num);
if(p == NULL) {
/*Memory allocation failed */
}
Change the prototype of Init() accordingly.
In any case, you must not free() the pointer in Init(). That just de-allocates memory immediately and you'll be left with a dangling pointer.
And you need to free() in the main() after you are done with it.
int *pp;
p = (int *)malloc(num*sizeof(int));
if (!pp) /* pp is used uninitialized at this point */
int *p;
int num, i;
puts("Enter num of grades:");
scanf("%d", &num);
Init(&p, num);
free(p); /* p is used uninitialized at this point */
If you want to allocate space for a pointer to int inside another function, you need to pass a pointer to pointer:
...
Init(&p, num);
...
int Init(int **pp, int num)
{
*pp = malloc(num * sizeof(int));
...
First you need to fix the prototype of your function. It should be
int* Init(int** p, int num);
Then fix the function definition
int* Init(int** p, int num)
{
//int *pp; // You don not need this variable
*p = malloc(num*sizeof(int)); // Allocate memory
if (!*p)
{
printf("Cannot allocate memory\n");
return NULL; // Return a NULL pointer
}
return *p;
}
Some typos in your code,
p = (int *)malloc(num * sizeof(int));
should be
pp = (int *)...
Your free(pp); is what is causing it to not work chiefly, you do not want to call that or the memory you allocated will not be saved. Also the memory of pp is essentially "lost" at the end of the function call as method parameter to Init p is a value copy not exact reference to main's version of p, thus when Init returns, the changes to p are 'lost'.
simply do: p = Init(); and in init return pp;
Exp:
This line p = pp, sets variable p to point to the memory allocated by pp, thus a free of pp is a free to p as well.
I am not sure if returning an address to memory is always considered good practice, as you have to ensure it is freed, but for your program it would work.
It's very important to know that your function doesn't modify your pointer (*p),The **p is lost And *p doesn't have a valid and known memory address in the Main function.
To allocate the memory safely I suggest these two functions.
void init(int **p,int number){
*p = malloc(number*sizeof(int));
}
If you want that your function returns the pointer allocated you can do this:
int* init(int number){
int* p = malloc(number*sizeof(int));
return p;
}

C free(): invalid pointer allocated in other function

I'm new in StackOverflow. I'm learning C pointer now.
This is my code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int alloc(int* p){
p = (int*) malloc (sizeof(int));
if(!p){
puts("fail\n");
return 0;
}
*p = 4;
printf("%d\n",*p);
return 1;
}
int main(){
int* pointer;
if(!alloc(pointer)){
return -1;
}else{
printf("%d\n",*pointer);
}
free(pointer);
return 0;
}
I compile with: gcc -o main main.c
error: free(): invalid pointer: 0xb77ac000 ***
what's wrong with my code?
Arguments in C are always passed by value. So, when you call alloc(pointer), you just pass in whatever garbage value pointer contains. Inside the function, the assignment p = (int*)... only modifies the local variable/argument p. Instead, you need to pass the address of pointer into alloc, like so:
int alloc(int **p) {
*p = malloc(sizeof(int)); // side note - notice the lack of a cast
...
**p = 4; // <---- notice the double indirection here
printf("%d\n", **p); // <---- same here
return 1;
}
In main, you would call alloc like this:
if (!(alloc(&pointer))) {
....
Then, your code will work.
Everything in C is pass-by-value. This means that functions always operate on their own local copy of what you pass in to the function. Usually pointers are a good way to mimic a pass-by-reference scheme because a pointer and a copy of that pointer both contain the same memory address. In other words, a pointer and its copy both point to the same space.
In your code the issue is that the function alloc gets its own local copy of the pointer you're passing in. So when you do p = (int*) malloc (sizeof(int)); you're changing the value of p to be a new memory address, but the value of pointer in main remains unchanged.
You can get around this by passing a pointer-to-a-pointer, or by returning the new value of p.
You have two major problems in your code.
First, the alloc function creates a pointer via malloc, but never frees it, nor does it return the pointer to the calling function. This guarantees the memory the pointer addresses can never be freed up via the free command, and you now have memory leaks.
Second, the variable, int* pointer in main, is not being modified as you would think. In C, function arguments are "passed by value". You have two ways to address this problem:
Pass a pointer to the variable you want to modify (in your case, a pointer to a pointer to an int)
Have the function return the pointer to the function that called it.
Here are two implementations of my recommendations:
Approach 1
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int alloc(int** p);
int alloc(int** p) {
if (!p) {
printf("Invalid argument\n");
return (-1);
}
if ((*p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
printf("Memory allocation error\n");
return (-1);
}
**p = 123;
printf("p:%p - *p:%p - **p:%d\n", p, *p, **p);
return 0;
}
int main(){
int* pointer;
if(alloc(&pointer) != 0){
printf("Error calling function\n");
}else{
printf("&pointer:%p- pointer:%p- *pointer:%d\n", &pointer, pointer, *pointer);
}
free(pointer);
return 0;
}
Sample Run for Approach 1
p:0xbfbea07c - *p:0x8656008 - **p:123
&pointer:0xbfbea07cointer - pointer:0x8656008ointer - *pointer:123
Approach 2
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int* alloc(void) {
int* p;
if ((p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
printf("Memory allocation error\n");
return (NULL);
}
*p = 123;
printf("p:%p - *p:%d\n", p, *p);
return p;
}
int main(){
int* pointer = alloc();
if(pointer == NULL) {
printf("Error calling function\n");
}else{
printf("&pointer:%p- pointer:%p- *pointer:%d\n", &pointer, pointer, *pointer);
}
free(pointer);
pointer = NULL;
return 0;
}
Sample Run for Approach 2
p:0x858e008 - *p:123
&pointer:0xbf9bb1ac- pointer:0x858e008- *pointer:123
You are passing the pointer by value into your alloc function. Although that function takes a pointer to an int, that pointer itself cannot be modified by the function. If you make alloc accept **p, set *p = ..., and pass in &pointer from main, it should work.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int alloc(int** p){
*p = (int*) malloc (sizeof(int));
if(!*p){
puts("fail\n");
return 0;
}
**p = 4;
printf("%d\n",**p);
return 1;
}
int main() {
int* pointer;
if(!alloc(&pointer)){
return -1;
} else {
printf("%d\n",*pointer);
}
free(pointer);
return 0;
}
If you want a function to write to a non-array parameter of type T, you must pass a pointer to that parameter.
void func( T *ptr )
{
*ptr = new_value;
}
void foo ( void )
{
T var;
func( &var ); // writes new value to var
}
If T is a pointer type Q *, it would look like
void func( Q **ptr )
{
*ptr = new_pointer_value;
}
void foo ( void )
{
Q *var;
func( &var ); // writes new pointer value to var
}
If Q is a pointer type R *, you would get
void func( R ***ptr )
{
*ptr = new_pointer_to_pointer_value;
}
void foo ( void )
{
R **var;
func( &var ); // writes new pointer to pointer value to var
}
The pattern is the same in all three cases; you're passing the address of the variable var, so the formal parameter ptr has to have one more level of indirection than the actual parameter var.
One sylistic nit: instead of writing
p = (int *) malloc( sizeof (int) );
use
p = malloc( sizeof *p );
instead.
In C (as of the 1989 standard), you don't need to cast the result of malloc; void pointers can be assigned to other pointer types and vice versa without needing a cast (this is not true in C++, but if you're writing C++, you should be using the new operator instead of malloc anyway). Also, under the 1989 version of the language, using the cast would mask a bug if you forgot to include stdlib.h or otherwise didn't have a declaration for malloc in scope. That hasn't been a problem since the 1999 version, though, so now it's more a matter of readability than anything else.
The type of the expression *p is int, so the result of sizeof *p is the same as the result of sizeof (int). This way, if you ever change the type of p, you don't have to modify the malloc call.
To allocate an array of values, you'd use something like
T *p = malloc( sizeof *p * NUM_ELEMENTS );
or, if you want everything to be zeroed out initially, use
T *p = calloc( sizeof *p, NUM_ELEMENTS );

Why I've allocated a pointer memory in a function, but it's also NULL?

The code confused me.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
void create_int(int *p)
{
p = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
}
int main()
{
int *p = NULL;
create_int(p);
assert(p != NULL); /* failed. why? I've allocated memory for it. */
return 0;
}
You are not passing the pointer value back from the function. Try:
void create_int(int **p) {
*p = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
}
int main() {
int *p = NULL;
create_int(&p);
assert(p != NULL); /* failed. why? I've allocated memory for it. */
return 0;
}
The variable p in the function create_int is a copy of the variable p in main. So any changes made to p in the called function does not get reflected in main.
To make the change get reflected in main you need to either:
Return the changed value:
int* create_int(int *p) {
p = malloc(sizeof(int));
// err checking
return p:
}
...
// in main:
p = create_int(p);
Or pass the address of p as:
void create_int(int **p) {
*p = malloc(sizeof(int));
// err checking
}
...
// in main:
create_int(&p);
You need a pointer to a pointer like this:
void create_int(int **p)
{
*p = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
}
int main()
{
int *p = NULL;
create_int(&p);
assert(p != NULL); /* failed. why? I've allocated memory for it. */
return 0;
}
As folks have pointed out, it's failing since you're not actually changing the pointer that the caller has.
A different way to think about the code might be to notice that it's basically wrapping malloc(), i.e. it's doing a memory allocation but with intelligence added. In that case, why not make it have the same prototype (=call signature) as malloc()? That makes it clearer in the caller's context what's going on, and easier to use:
int * create_int(void)
{
return malloc(sizeof (int));
}
int main(void)
{
int *p = create_int();
assert(p != NULL);
return 0;
}
Also, in C you should never cast the return value of malloc() (see Do I cast the result of malloc?).
You need to send a pointer to a pointer to be able to assign a memory to it via a function
void create_int(int **p)
{
*p = (int*)malloc(sizeof_int));
}
int main()
{
int* p = NULL;
create_int(&p);
assert(p != NULL);
return 0;
}
Your code contains two pointers: one in the create_int function and another one in main. When you call create_int, a copy of the pointer in main is made and used, then eliminated when the create_int function returns.
So, any changes you did to the copy within create_int remain there and are not propagated back to main.
The only way to propagate changes between functions in C (aside from, obviously, returning new values) is to pass a pointer to the changed values. This way, while the pointer being passed will be copied, the value that it points to will be the same, so changes will apply.
Since you're trying to change a pointer, you need a pointer-to-pointer.
void create_int(int **pp)
{
// this changes the pointer that `p` points to.
*pp = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
}
int main()
{
int *p = NULL;
// this sends a pointer to the pointer p in main
create_int(&p);
assert(p != NULL);
return 0;
}

Resources